B.D. Rukanova
Please Note
78 records found
1
Cross-Border e-Commerce Customs Risk Management
Exploring the Potential of Linking Digital Product Passport Data, X-Ray Scanned Images, and AI
Digital Product Passport and Administrative Burden Reduction
Potential for Streamlining Cross-legislative and Cross-jurisdiction Compliance
Legislative changes that concern both customs and market surveillance authorities are under way. Concerning customs, the ambitious EU Customs Reform was approved on 26 March 2026 by EU Member States and the European Parliament (EU, 2026). The three pillars to the Customs Reform are (1) Smart data-driven approach to customs checks, which will include the establishment of an EU Customs Authority and an EU Customs Data Hub, (2) a strong partnership with businesses, and (3) a modern approach to e-commerce. At the same time, new legislative changes under the Product Act will also affect the way of working of the EU market surveillance authorities. Addressing the issue of authorities in monitoring the steep increase of cross-border e-commerce flows needs to be seen in view of these recent developments.
In the meantime, in 2025, the European Commission published a communication on A Comprehensive EU Toolbox for Safe and Sustainable E-commerce (COM, 2025a), where digital tools, including Digital Product Passports are seen as a potential part of the solution. In the European Union, Digital Product Passports (DPP) were initially seen only as an instrument to foster ecodesign and circularity and to improve market surveillance. The latter has acquired new importance also to solve e-commerce compliance challenges and the DPP concept is increasingly also seen as a tool to address wider concerns including administrative burden reduction. The upcoming EU Product Act (Q3 2026) of the is anticipated to further strengthen this role of DPPs. The Digital Product Passports are still under development and while they are considered as an element for the solution to address cross-border e-commerce monitoring challenges, what role they can play in this context needs to be further understood.... ...
Legislative changes that concern both customs and market surveillance authorities are under way. Concerning customs, the ambitious EU Customs Reform was approved on 26 March 2026 by EU Member States and the European Parliament (EU, 2026). The three pillars to the Customs Reform are (1) Smart data-driven approach to customs checks, which will include the establishment of an EU Customs Authority and an EU Customs Data Hub, (2) a strong partnership with businesses, and (3) a modern approach to e-commerce. At the same time, new legislative changes under the Product Act will also affect the way of working of the EU market surveillance authorities. Addressing the issue of authorities in monitoring the steep increase of cross-border e-commerce flows needs to be seen in view of these recent developments.
In the meantime, in 2025, the European Commission published a communication on A Comprehensive EU Toolbox for Safe and Sustainable E-commerce (COM, 2025a), where digital tools, including Digital Product Passports are seen as a potential part of the solution. In the European Union, Digital Product Passports (DPP) were initially seen only as an instrument to foster ecodesign and circularity and to improve market surveillance. The latter has acquired new importance also to solve e-commerce compliance challenges and the DPP concept is increasingly also seen as a tool to address wider concerns including administrative burden reduction. The upcoming EU Product Act (Q3 2026) of the is anticipated to further strengthen this role of DPPs. The Digital Product Passports are still under development and while they are considered as an element for the solution to address cross-border e-commerce monitoring challenges, what role they can play in this context needs to be further understood....
The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is one example of a regulation that requires extreme levels of transparency and timelines of implementation are approaching fast. Many businesses are facing this regulation with big concerns of what to do and how to be compliant, looking for quick solutions to meet the regulatory deadlines. At the same time, we see relevant developments such as Digital Product Passports (DPP) and related pilots driven by other regulations (e.g. the Ecodesign for Sustainable Product Regulation (ESPR)), with different timelines, which may bring pieces of the puzzle needed to address challenges related to the European Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) but potentially also others. A big question then remains: how to be compliant in the short run to meet the requirements of EUDR, while keeping an eye on the future to avoid investing in silo solutions for every new legislation.
In this paper we will not give a specific solution and answer, as the solutions and answers will depend on the specific company’s situation and how companies decide to act. However, what we will do is provide an overview of some current developments, reports, and pilots related to Digital Product Passports. While these developments related to DPP may be very well known for people working in that area, for many parties that have not yet been affected by legislative developments that require DPP but already need to comply with legislations such as EUDR and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) this overview may be informative and insightful. It is this audience that this paper aims to reach. We hope that by providing insights into the DPP developments to parties not yet affected and aware of these developments but affected by other legislations, this will allow them to take a broader perspective and rethink their strategies, taking a broader view and a long-term perspective. ...
The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) is one example of a regulation that requires extreme levels of transparency and timelines of implementation are approaching fast. Many businesses are facing this regulation with big concerns of what to do and how to be compliant, looking for quick solutions to meet the regulatory deadlines. At the same time, we see relevant developments such as Digital Product Passports (DPP) and related pilots driven by other regulations (e.g. the Ecodesign for Sustainable Product Regulation (ESPR)), with different timelines, which may bring pieces of the puzzle needed to address challenges related to the European Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) but potentially also others. A big question then remains: how to be compliant in the short run to meet the requirements of EUDR, while keeping an eye on the future to avoid investing in silo solutions for every new legislation.
In this paper we will not give a specific solution and answer, as the solutions and answers will depend on the specific company’s situation and how companies decide to act. However, what we will do is provide an overview of some current developments, reports, and pilots related to Digital Product Passports. While these developments related to DPP may be very well known for people working in that area, for many parties that have not yet been affected by legislative developments that require DPP but already need to comply with legislations such as EUDR and Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) this overview may be informative and insightful. It is this audience that this paper aims to reach. We hope that by providing insights into the DPP developments to parties not yet affected and aware of these developments but affected by other legislations, this will allow them to take a broader perspective and rethink their strategies, taking a broader view and a long-term perspective.
Ein „Real-Life“-Pilot des Batterieproduktpasses für Traktionsbatterien
Real-life Pilot of the Battery Product Passport for Electric Vehicle Batteries
Die in der EU eingeführte Batterieverordnung verpflichtet Wirtschaftsakteure, die Batterien auf dem EU-Markt anbieten, zur Bereitstellung eines digitalen Batteriepasses [1]. Dies betrifft zwangsläufig auch den Automobilsektor und damit europäische und ausländische Unternehmen, die Elektrofahrzeuge (Battery Electric Vehicles, BEVs) auf dem EU-Markt anbieten. Eine Herausforderung für die betroffenen Unternehmen besteht darin, dass die Informationen im Batteriepass eine breite Palette von Datenpunkten abdecken müssen – darunter statische Daten über die Batterie, ihren Hersteller, Materialzusammensetzung, Recyclinganteil sowie dynamische Daten wie den Ladezustand. Behörden und andere Parteien wie sogenannte Second-Use Manufacturers müssen auf diese Informationen zugreifen und sie für die Überwachung der Einhaltung von Vorschriften sowie zur Förderung der Kreislaufwirtschaft nutzen können.
Während sich andere Batteriepassprojekte hauptsächlich mit dem Verständnis der durch die Batterieverordnung geforderten Datenattribute oder der Lösung technischer IT-Herausforderungen beschäftigten, arbeitet das hier vorgestellte Projekt an einem realen Anwendungsfall mit Beteiligung von Unternehmen und Behörden. Dabei wurde ein Batteriezellpass in ein Fahrzeug implementiert, das nach der Produktion in Korea nach Europa importiert wurde. Das Pilotprojekt konzentrierte sich auf die Gewinnung von Erkenntnissen unter Berücksichtigung technischer und organisatorischer Aspekte. Es stellt den weltweit ersten Realversuch mit einem Batteriepass im Zusammenwirken von Industrie und Behörden dar. ...
Die in der EU eingeführte Batterieverordnung verpflichtet Wirtschaftsakteure, die Batterien auf dem EU-Markt anbieten, zur Bereitstellung eines digitalen Batteriepasses [1]. Dies betrifft zwangsläufig auch den Automobilsektor und damit europäische und ausländische Unternehmen, die Elektrofahrzeuge (Battery Electric Vehicles, BEVs) auf dem EU-Markt anbieten. Eine Herausforderung für die betroffenen Unternehmen besteht darin, dass die Informationen im Batteriepass eine breite Palette von Datenpunkten abdecken müssen – darunter statische Daten über die Batterie, ihren Hersteller, Materialzusammensetzung, Recyclinganteil sowie dynamische Daten wie den Ladezustand. Behörden und andere Parteien wie sogenannte Second-Use Manufacturers müssen auf diese Informationen zugreifen und sie für die Überwachung der Einhaltung von Vorschriften sowie zur Förderung der Kreislaufwirtschaft nutzen können.
Während sich andere Batteriepassprojekte hauptsächlich mit dem Verständnis der durch die Batterieverordnung geforderten Datenattribute oder der Lösung technischer IT-Herausforderungen beschäftigten, arbeitet das hier vorgestellte Projekt an einem realen Anwendungsfall mit Beteiligung von Unternehmen und Behörden. Dabei wurde ein Batteriezellpass in ein Fahrzeug implementiert, das nach der Produktion in Korea nach Europa importiert wurde. Das Pilotprojekt konzentrierte sich auf die Gewinnung von Erkenntnissen unter Berücksichtigung technischer und organisatorischer Aspekte. Es stellt den weltweit ersten Realversuch mit einem Batteriepass im Zusammenwirken von Industrie und Behörden dar.
Digital Product Passports
Opportunities for Cross-Border eCommerce Risk Management
Pre-print paper to be presented at the EGOV2025 – IFIP EGOV-CeDEM-EPART’25, August 31 – September 4, 2025, Krems, Austria and is to appear in the the CEUR-WS Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2025. ...
Pre-print paper to be presented at the EGOV2025 – IFIP EGOV-CeDEM-EPART’25, August 31 – September 4, 2025, Krems, Austria and is to appear in the the CEUR-WS Proceedings of Ongoing Research, Practitioners, Posters, Workshops, and Projects of the International Conference EGOV-CeDEM-ePart 2025.
The Future of Circular Economy Monitoring
Conceptualizing Data, Information and IT Tools for Effective Policymaking
As interest in circular economy governance grows, effective policymaking requires the creation and continuous monitoring of circular policies. In response, governments worldwide are seeking data and developing indicators to monitor and report progress within their jurisdictions. In recent years, this has led to a proliferation of monitoring frameworks at national, regional, and city levels. Nevertheless, existing research has yet to sufficiently address what types of information are essential for effective CE policymaking, how policymakers and enforcement agencies can access relevant data sources, and how information systems can support policymaking processes. This participatory workshop presents ongoing research on a conceptual framework that identifies key data attributes, information types, and digital infrastructures needed for CE policymaking. It aims to bring together researchers and policymakers working in open data, sustainability, smart cities, and evidence-based governance to discuss challenges, share best practices and build capacity through dialogue with fellow researchers and policymakers.
Digital Product Passports
Opportunities for Cross-Border eCommerce Risk Management
Cross-border eCommerce flows from non-EU countries with direct product delivery to consumers in the European Union have been rapidly growing. Whereas monitoring eCommerce flows for aspects such as Value- Added Tax (VAT), and safety and security already is a high priority, the increasing volumes bring new concerns. Such concerns include how to ensure that the products are sustainably produced and how to ensure a level playing field with products that are produced in the EU or imported via other modes of transport that are subject to more thorough checks at the border. These challenges have become new priorities in EU policy documents. Currently, authorities receive limited information related to eCommerce goods (particularly the low-value consignments that are exempted from duties), which hampers their risk assessment. Recently, Digital Product Passports (DPPs) have been introduced in legislation as a tool to inform consumers, recyclers, and market surveillance authorities about the material and manufacturing aspects of products. These DPPs promise to contain rich data that can be used to enhance both the monitoring and the customs risk assessment of cross-border eCommerce flows. To assess the exact potential and added value of DPPs, we analyze international eCommerce flows in the context of the EU-funded project PARSEC. We identify potential areas where DPPs can be relevant for eCommerce monitoring and risk assessment and present follow-up research directions on this topic.
Data-driven Policymaking and Monitoring for the Circular Economy
Conceptualization of Data Sources and Information
The EU Green Deal and the ensuing policies and regulations to stimulate the transition toward a circular economy pose challenges to policymakers and authorities. Taking planetary boundaries into account is a nascent topic on all regulatory levels, and data-driven policymaking and its implementation require the collection and access to new types of data in all policy-making phases, from agenda-setting to policy formulation, implementation, and evaluation. Extant studies into data-driven policymaking have not yet addressed which information types are needed and how policymakers and enforcement agencies can gain access to data sources, whereas the urgency to prepare for this is high. We use the lens of the policy cycles to assess the required data. In three typical cases, we explore the data sources at different policy levels of monitoring to develop a conceptual framework of data attributes to inform policymakers. We position that the extant data used in the policy phases for the transition to the circular economy are different from the familiar data that public administrations use in their respective domains. Our conceptual framework provides an initial overview of new types of data and potential shared use among the policy phases to support policymakers and enforcement agencies to timely prepare for access to the relevant data and data sources. We recommend the creation of data ecosystems for public administrations, the adoption of new capabilities for CE literacy, exploring the added value of Digital Product Passports, and AI-based tools and mechanisms to handle large volumes of data to structure messy data.
Multi-Party Computation as a Data Sharing Solution for Compliance Monitoring
An Exploratory Study in the Domain of Battery Circularity
Monitoring the circular economy (CE) transition requires data sharing and collaboration between public and private actors. However, businesses are reluctant to share data with authorities for monitoring purposes due to fear of losing control over sensitive data. The emerging technology Multi-Party Computation (MPC), which enables collaborative data analysis while maintaining data control, could address barriers in business-to-government (B2G) data sharing and collaboration. This ongoing research aims to explore the potential of MPC in facilitating B2G data sharing and collaboration for CE monitoring under the conditions of inter-organizational trust and data control. Drawing on a B2G data sharing framework, our initial findings suggest that MPC can benefit authorities in accessing sensitive business data, while businesses can benefit from controlling shared data for compliance reporting. As MPC can be deployed in various architectures, the next research steps are to examine links between variants of MPC architectures and different data-sharing solutions.
Digital government and the circular economy transition
An analytical framework and a research agenda
Despite the increasing global policy focus on CE, research on the role of digital government in initiating, implementing, and consolidating a transition towards a circular economy is surprisingly scarce and fragmented, and a systematic effort in digital government research is yet to emerge.
To tackle this issue, this article sets out to answer the research question: what is the role of digital government in the transition towards a circular economy? Driven by this research question, we conduct a review on 88 empirical studies in the Information Systems (IS) and digital government fields and discuss existing research foci and gaps in relation to the types of digital technologies used, the types of stakeholders involved, the stages of the product life cycle, and the type of resources that governments draw on to advance the circular economy transition. In addition, we identify two types of transition styles, based on an analysis of the types of roles taken by the government in two cases of transition towards a circular economy.
Based on these findings, we provide two contributions to establishing a new line of research in digital government and the circular economy: an analytical framework, including a static view, a longitudinal view, and a transition style view of the role of digital government in the circular economy transition; and a research agenda that builds on our framework, to guide future research on the role of digital government in the circular economy transition. ...
Despite the increasing global policy focus on CE, research on the role of digital government in initiating, implementing, and consolidating a transition towards a circular economy is surprisingly scarce and fragmented, and a systematic effort in digital government research is yet to emerge.
To tackle this issue, this article sets out to answer the research question: what is the role of digital government in the transition towards a circular economy? Driven by this research question, we conduct a review on 88 empirical studies in the Information Systems (IS) and digital government fields and discuss existing research foci and gaps in relation to the types of digital technologies used, the types of stakeholders involved, the stages of the product life cycle, and the type of resources that governments draw on to advance the circular economy transition. In addition, we identify two types of transition styles, based on an analysis of the types of roles taken by the government in two cases of transition towards a circular economy.
Based on these findings, we provide two contributions to establishing a new line of research in digital government and the circular economy: an analytical framework, including a static view, a longitudinal view, and a transition style view of the role of digital government in the circular economy transition; and a research agenda that builds on our framework, to guide future research on the role of digital government in the circular economy transition.
Green Customs
How Customs Administrations Can Promote Sustainability
In this paper we present a high-level framework for business and government requirements analysis of detection technology, taking emerging policy developments related to circular economy monitoring into account. The framework was developed in the context of the PARSEC research project on postal and parcel eCommerce flows.
Border Crossing and Circular Economy Monitoring in a Global Context
Challenges and Opportunities
Circular economy (CE) and sustainability are high on the political agenda of governments nationally and internationally. We see different regulatory developments where governments aim to put stricter rules and requirements towards businesses to ensure the transition toward a more circular and sustainable future. The use of digital infrastructures, including transparency systems and digital product passports is starting to play a vital role in supporting governments in their CE monitoring efforts. Yet there are challenges to be overcome. Many government procedures are set up in laying out very detailed requirements about what one government agency can do in a singular phase of the circular process (e.g., customs performing specific checks at the border) or a single Member State (e.g., organizing Extended Producer Responsibility in a specific country). While these efforts are valuable building stones towards CE monitoring, they are fragmented, and blank spots in CE monitoring occur when borders are crossed, and another country needs to take over the CE monitoring tasks. As for circularity, even if many efforts are spent by a single government agency or a single country, all these efforts may be in vain if the proper CE monitoring of the next step is not secured. While earlier research identified this problem, there is still limited understanding of the problem itself and directions to address it systematically. In this paper, following up on earlier research and with insights gained from an EU project on CE monitoring, we shed further light on the problem. More specifically we conceptualize CE monitoring by putting the CE flows at the center and exploring deficiencies for governments and businesses to safeguard the monitoring of CE flows. We examine two routes that can be followed to ensure continued CE monitoring when borders are crossed, namely the government route, as well as the business route (enabled by traceability systems and in-control mechanisms of businesses). We discuss the need for a global governance layer that can facilitate both routes and propose further directions to advance CE monitoring by taking a global perspective.
Digital Infrastructures for Compliance Monitoring of Circular Economy
Requirements for Interoperable Data Spaces
Government Accessing Business Data for Compliance Monitoring of Circular Economy
DATAPIPE White paper