P. Proesmans
Please Note
16 records found
1
Trajectory-Based Operations in Mixed Datalink Equipage Conditions
A Trajectory Management Evolution in Amsterdam ACC
Assessing the feasibility and scalability of short-haul battery-electric aviation in Europe
Coupling ML-based demand forecasting, network modelling and GHG mitigation potential under battery constraints
...
Hydrogen Fuel System Modelling for Conceptual Aircraft Performance Analysis
Coupling the MATLAB Initiator with KBE-Based Geometry Modelling for Automated Integration, Routing, and Sizing
...
Predicting the Maximum Loading in Zeolites for Hydroisomerization Applications
A Machine Learning Approach
A qualitative hazard and accident-pathway assessment (HAZID/HAZOP supported by bow-tie logic) was conducted to identify the main LH2 refuelling hazards and accident path- ways, and to determine how these hazards drive conservative safety-distance requirements. The outcomes were then used to select representative scenarios and define zoning modes for the operational analysis. These modes are translated into operational rules (e.g., stand closures and route restrictions) and implemented in a stochastic discrete-event simulation of a regional airport apron with LH2-specific turnaround processes. Experiments vary penetra- tion rate, stand layouts, refuelling logistics and transfer duration (S1–S5), and LH2/Jet-A1 truck-fleet sizing. Performance is assessed via statistical comparison of departure-delay met- rics.
The safety assessment identifies dispersion-and-ignition outcomes (flash fire and jet fire) as the dominant safety distance drivers for open-apron LH2 releases and motivates practical distance scales that define the zoning modes. In the operational simulation, zoning has lit- tle effect at low LH2 adoption, but delays increase sharply once conservative zones remove neighbouring stand capacity and push the apron into a capacity-limited regime. For smaller zones, performance is driven mainly by refuelling logistics and refueller availability rather than by routing restrictions. Undersized service fleets primarily worsen the tail of very late departures, with the binding constraint shifting between the LH2 and Jet-A1 fleets depend- ing on demand. Overall, safe scale-up requires joint design of zoning rules and refuelling resources to prevent structural apron bottlenecks. ...
A qualitative hazard and accident-pathway assessment (HAZID/HAZOP supported by bow-tie logic) was conducted to identify the main LH2 refuelling hazards and accident path- ways, and to determine how these hazards drive conservative safety-distance requirements. The outcomes were then used to select representative scenarios and define zoning modes for the operational analysis. These modes are translated into operational rules (e.g., stand closures and route restrictions) and implemented in a stochastic discrete-event simulation of a regional airport apron with LH2-specific turnaround processes. Experiments vary penetra- tion rate, stand layouts, refuelling logistics and transfer duration (S1–S5), and LH2/Jet-A1 truck-fleet sizing. Performance is assessed via statistical comparison of departure-delay met- rics.
The safety assessment identifies dispersion-and-ignition outcomes (flash fire and jet fire) as the dominant safety distance drivers for open-apron LH2 releases and motivates practical distance scales that define the zoning modes. In the operational simulation, zoning has lit- tle effect at low LH2 adoption, but delays increase sharply once conservative zones remove neighbouring stand capacity and push the apron into a capacity-limited regime. For smaller zones, performance is driven mainly by refuelling logistics and refueller availability rather than by routing restrictions. Undersized service fleets primarily worsen the tail of very late departures, with the binding constraint shifting between the LH2 and Jet-A1 fleets depend- ing on demand. Overall, safe scale-up requires joint design of zoning rules and refuelling resources to prevent structural apron bottlenecks.
This thesis investigates the impact of implementing a dual-fuel propulsion system using hydrogen and kerosene (or SAF replacement) on the design and performance of a medium-range narrowbody tube-and-wing turbofan aircraft. A parametric conceptual design model is developed using Python and the commercial ParaPy Python package, incorporating preliminary aircraft sizing, hydrogen tank structural and thermal modelling, aerodynamic analysis, engine performance modelling, mission analysis and well-to-wake energy and emission evaluation. Several fuel-use scenarios are evaluated, including full kerosene, full hydrogen, hydrogen-kerosene combinations, and varying fuel splits during cruise, for design ranges of 2500 km and 5000 km.
The results show that introducing dual-fuel capability mainly affects aircraft design through an increase in fuselage length due to hydrogen tank integration, with this effect being more pronounced at 5000 km than at 2500 km range. Across both ranges, increasing hydrogen use reduces total fuel weight, but increases operational empty weight, resulting in only small changes in maximum take-off weight due to these counteracting effects. Dual-fuel operation partially mitigates the fuselage length and passenger capacity penalties observed for full-hydrogen configurations at both ranges. Although tank-to-wake CO2 emissions decrease with increasing hydrogen use, overall equivalent CO2 emissions remain strongly dependent on hydrogen production pathways, with dual-fuel operation offering advantages over full-hydrogen concepts under near-term electricity grid assumptions. Overall, this study demonstrates that dual-fuel aircraft concepts offer a promising intermediate pathway towards aviation decarbonisation, enabling gradual integration of hydrogen while maintaining competitive operational performance. ...
This thesis investigates the impact of implementing a dual-fuel propulsion system using hydrogen and kerosene (or SAF replacement) on the design and performance of a medium-range narrowbody tube-and-wing turbofan aircraft. A parametric conceptual design model is developed using Python and the commercial ParaPy Python package, incorporating preliminary aircraft sizing, hydrogen tank structural and thermal modelling, aerodynamic analysis, engine performance modelling, mission analysis and well-to-wake energy and emission evaluation. Several fuel-use scenarios are evaluated, including full kerosene, full hydrogen, hydrogen-kerosene combinations, and varying fuel splits during cruise, for design ranges of 2500 km and 5000 km.
The results show that introducing dual-fuel capability mainly affects aircraft design through an increase in fuselage length due to hydrogen tank integration, with this effect being more pronounced at 5000 km than at 2500 km range. Across both ranges, increasing hydrogen use reduces total fuel weight, but increases operational empty weight, resulting in only small changes in maximum take-off weight due to these counteracting effects. Dual-fuel operation partially mitigates the fuselage length and passenger capacity penalties observed for full-hydrogen configurations at both ranges. Although tank-to-wake CO2 emissions decrease with increasing hydrogen use, overall equivalent CO2 emissions remain strongly dependent on hydrogen production pathways, with dual-fuel operation offering advantages over full-hydrogen concepts under near-term electricity grid assumptions. Overall, this study demonstrates that dual-fuel aircraft concepts offer a promising intermediate pathway towards aviation decarbonisation, enabling gradual integration of hydrogen while maintaining competitive operational performance.
Toward an End-to-End Pipeline from Requirements to Code
Large Language Model Supported Coding Assistant for Knowlegde Based Engineering Application Development
This research validates that retrieval-augmented approaches offer a practical alternative to retraining models for specialized domains with limited data, such as ParaPy. In these approaches, AI systems dynamically access domain-specific knowledge during operation rather than relying solely on their training. This has significant implications for industries or institutions using proprietary tools where comprehensive model retraining is economically infeasible.
The research implements this approach by developing and evaluating a dual-agent framework for AI-assisted KBE application development that operates within industrial privacy and security constraints. The framework comprises a Developer Agent optimized for code generation and debugging with the ParaPy SDK, and an Educational Agent focused on ParaPy learning support and documentation. Both agents access a knowledge infrastructure that uses semantic search over indexed ParaPy documentation, curated examples, and technical references. Additionally, the Developer Agent employs verification mechanisms that progressively check code at two core levels: syntax correctness (ensuring the code follows programming language rules) and successful execution (confirming the code runs without errors).
User testing revealed how different skill levels benefit from AI assistance. Intermediate users benefited most, showing dramatic improvements in productivity and performance. Novice users achieved substantial productivity gains and reduced framework-specific (ParaPy) errors significantly, with task completion rates approaching expert baseline performance. Expert users, however, experienced slight performance degradation due to reduced code review under time pressure. The framework successfully reduced knowledge barriers for novice and intermediate users, broadening access to specialized engineering tools.
Despite these successes, the framework has persistent limitations in understanding three-dimensional spatial relationships. This is critical for KBE applications where code must define the precise position, orientation, and assembly of physical components. The framework struggles to correctly place components in space or apply proper rotational transformations. This produces code that may be syntactically correct but results in misaligned parts or incorrectly oriented features. These geometric errors require iterative refinement with human guidance, representing a fundamental limitation of the current approach and language model architectures.
While geometric reasoning limitations suggest fundamental boundaries of current AI capabilities, the demonstrated productivity improvements and reduced knowledge requirements establish a foundation for broader AI adoption in knowledge-intensive engineering domains. The framework contributes a validated operational prototype that addresses critical gaps in AI-assisted KBE development: reducing the manual coding bottleneck, lowering knowledge barriers for new users, and providing privacy-compliant deployment options. The framework functions most effectively as a development accelerator requiring expert oversight, supporting human engineers rather than replacing them.
Keywords: Knowledge-Based Engineering, Large Language Models, Code Generation, ParaPy, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, AI-Assisted Development, Aerospace Engineering, Multi-Agent Systems ...
This research validates that retrieval-augmented approaches offer a practical alternative to retraining models for specialized domains with limited data, such as ParaPy. In these approaches, AI systems dynamically access domain-specific knowledge during operation rather than relying solely on their training. This has significant implications for industries or institutions using proprietary tools where comprehensive model retraining is economically infeasible.
The research implements this approach by developing and evaluating a dual-agent framework for AI-assisted KBE application development that operates within industrial privacy and security constraints. The framework comprises a Developer Agent optimized for code generation and debugging with the ParaPy SDK, and an Educational Agent focused on ParaPy learning support and documentation. Both agents access a knowledge infrastructure that uses semantic search over indexed ParaPy documentation, curated examples, and technical references. Additionally, the Developer Agent employs verification mechanisms that progressively check code at two core levels: syntax correctness (ensuring the code follows programming language rules) and successful execution (confirming the code runs without errors).
User testing revealed how different skill levels benefit from AI assistance. Intermediate users benefited most, showing dramatic improvements in productivity and performance. Novice users achieved substantial productivity gains and reduced framework-specific (ParaPy) errors significantly, with task completion rates approaching expert baseline performance. Expert users, however, experienced slight performance degradation due to reduced code review under time pressure. The framework successfully reduced knowledge barriers for novice and intermediate users, broadening access to specialized engineering tools.
Despite these successes, the framework has persistent limitations in understanding three-dimensional spatial relationships. This is critical for KBE applications where code must define the precise position, orientation, and assembly of physical components. The framework struggles to correctly place components in space or apply proper rotational transformations. This produces code that may be syntactically correct but results in misaligned parts or incorrectly oriented features. These geometric errors require iterative refinement with human guidance, representing a fundamental limitation of the current approach and language model architectures.
While geometric reasoning limitations suggest fundamental boundaries of current AI capabilities, the demonstrated productivity improvements and reduced knowledge requirements establish a foundation for broader AI adoption in knowledge-intensive engineering domains. The framework contributes a validated operational prototype that addresses critical gaps in AI-assisted KBE development: reducing the manual coding bottleneck, lowering knowledge barriers for new users, and providing privacy-compliant deployment options. The framework functions most effectively as a development accelerator requiring expert oversight, supporting human engineers rather than replacing them.
Keywords: Knowledge-Based Engineering, Large Language Models, Code Generation, ParaPy, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, AI-Assisted Development, Aerospace Engineering, Multi-Agent Systems