M.K. Mehta
Please Note
6 records found
1
The energy transition towards carbon neutrality requires a rapid electrification of all energy sectors by 2050. In the EU-27, the REPowerEU strategy, initiated in March 2022, is pursuing this target even more ambitiously. However, in order to achieve the aforementioned goals, the increasing demand for green hydrogen will cause an increase of the renewable energy needs as early as 2030. In this way, offshore wind can be a solid supplier of the renewable energy for green hydrogen production. However, since nearly 80% of the worldwide wind energy potential is situated in deep waters, floating offshore wind turbines (FOWT) can be used to cover those energy needs. In addition, the literature review showed that when green hydrogen production via FOWT is considered, the most economically and energy efficient layout is the in situ topology, where hydrogen is locally produced on the FOWT. Although FOWT and green hydrogen production via FOWT have been lately examined in literature, a literature gap was found. More specifically, no attention was given on the performance change of a turbine when it is adapted from a bottom fixed (BF) application to a FOWT. Also, the effect of the in situ hydrogen plant to the FOWT performance was not considered. Thus, the aim of this project is to highlight if FOWT for in situ hydrogen production should be aerodynamically redesigned to improve their performance or to tackle possible energy losses. In this direction, several sub-questions should be answered, including the selection of turbine, floater type and site to be investigated, the effect of the floater design on the FOWT performance, the performance change of a turbine due to its adaptation as FOWT and the effect of the added mass of the hydrogen plant on the FOWT performance. Lastly, in case of a proven FOWT performance deterioration, solutions should be provided so as to regain performance. Aligned with the previous goals, the IEA 15MW reference wind turbine on top on the UMaine Volturn US-S semi-submersible floater is simulated in OpenFAST under steady and turbulent wind fields, according to wind & wave conditions of a typical US East Coast site. In addition, the in situ hydrogen plant is incorporated in the model using a simplified approach. The results suggest that in the whole partial load region, the FOWT experiences power losses due to the static floater pitch angle, which reduces the inflow wind speed seen by the rotor. However, between 9 and 12 m/s, a peak shaving routine is incorporated in the FOWT controller, which results in early power shedding and contributes, together with the static floater pitch, to considerable power losses. Furthermore, the simulations conducted using the OpenFAST FOWT model, which incorporated the hydrogen plant, suggest that it has a negligible effect on the FOWT performance and can be omitted from the model. Finally, the comparison of the FOWT and of the BF turbine under turbulence, highlights the fact that the FOWT exhibits a spanwise aerodynamic torque reduction and a spanwise airfoil aerodynamic inefficiency in terms of angle of attack, that can be solved via an aerodynamic redesign. As a result, a variety of blade twist angle and airfoil chord length profiles are developed, tested and evaluated using the FOWT annual energy production (AEP) as an indicator. The results point out that all solutions result in a slight FOWT AEP gain, compared to the original FOWT design, at the expense of increased rotor loading, which effectively increases the static floater pitch. Thus, the aerodynamic redesign approach requires a more cautious approach. ...
The energy transition towards carbon neutrality requires a rapid electrification of all energy sectors by 2050. In the EU-27, the REPowerEU strategy, initiated in March 2022, is pursuing this target even more ambitiously. However, in order to achieve the aforementioned goals, the increasing demand for green hydrogen will cause an increase of the renewable energy needs as early as 2030. In this way, offshore wind can be a solid supplier of the renewable energy for green hydrogen production. However, since nearly 80% of the worldwide wind energy potential is situated in deep waters, floating offshore wind turbines (FOWT) can be used to cover those energy needs. In addition, the literature review showed that when green hydrogen production via FOWT is considered, the most economically and energy efficient layout is the in situ topology, where hydrogen is locally produced on the FOWT. Although FOWT and green hydrogen production via FOWT have been lately examined in literature, a literature gap was found. More specifically, no attention was given on the performance change of a turbine when it is adapted from a bottom fixed (BF) application to a FOWT. Also, the effect of the in situ hydrogen plant to the FOWT performance was not considered. Thus, the aim of this project is to highlight if FOWT for in situ hydrogen production should be aerodynamically redesigned to improve their performance or to tackle possible energy losses. In this direction, several sub-questions should be answered, including the selection of turbine, floater type and site to be investigated, the effect of the floater design on the FOWT performance, the performance change of a turbine due to its adaptation as FOWT and the effect of the added mass of the hydrogen plant on the FOWT performance. Lastly, in case of a proven FOWT performance deterioration, solutions should be provided so as to regain performance. Aligned with the previous goals, the IEA 15MW reference wind turbine on top on the UMaine Volturn US-S semi-submersible floater is simulated in OpenFAST under steady and turbulent wind fields, according to wind & wave conditions of a typical US East Coast site. In addition, the in situ hydrogen plant is incorporated in the model using a simplified approach. The results suggest that in the whole partial load region, the FOWT experiences power losses due to the static floater pitch angle, which reduces the inflow wind speed seen by the rotor. However, between 9 and 12 m/s, a peak shaving routine is incorporated in the FOWT controller, which results in early power shedding and contributes, together with the static floater pitch, to considerable power losses. Furthermore, the simulations conducted using the OpenFAST FOWT model, which incorporated the hydrogen plant, suggest that it has a negligible effect on the FOWT performance and can be omitted from the model. Finally, the comparison of the FOWT and of the BF turbine under turbulence, highlights the fact that the FOWT exhibits a spanwise aerodynamic torque reduction and a spanwise airfoil aerodynamic inefficiency in terms of angle of attack, that can be solved via an aerodynamic redesign. As a result, a variety of blade twist angle and airfoil chord length profiles are developed, tested and evaluated using the FOWT annual energy production (AEP) as an indicator. The results point out that all solutions result in a slight FOWT AEP gain, compared to the original FOWT design, at the expense of increased rotor loading, which effectively increases the static floater pitch. Thus, the aerodynamic redesign approach requires a more cautious approach.
Due to dependence on threshold values that vary across the literature and the limitations associated with calculating thresholds as a percentage of installed capacity, it was demonstrated that binary ramp definitions are not ideal and result in under-reporting. On the other hand, the wavelet approach extracts ramp events from the generation using statistically determined threshold values. As a result, the problem of under-detection of ramp events is mitigated. The proposed approach of "significant ramps" allows the evaluation of which ramp events are important and which are far less disruptive and may be ignored.
It was demonstrated that anti-correlation between wind and solar resources alone is not adequate to promise a smoother output as it does not provide sufficient information about ramp events. Anti-correlations at shorter time resolutions, such as 15 minutes or an hour, could be preferable. While seasonal anti-correlation may benefit national system adequacy, it does not benefit daily ramping events.
The optimal wind-PV capacity size for decreasing the total number of ramps was such that wind turbines filled the grid capacity, as solar power would result in extra ramps. It was observed that solar over-planting leads to a significantly increased number of ramp events, whereas wind over-planting results in a minimal change in ramp events. A penalty price was proposed to internalize the severity of ramp events, which could influence the choice between wind and solar over-planting. A solution was presented to mitigate ramp incidents in a hybrid power plant using a battery which was found to be more effective and/or more economical in minimizing ramps compared to over-planting.
The proposed "significant wavelet ramp approach" is shown to be a useful metric for characterizing wind-based hybrid power plant ramp occurrences. For a future in which variable renewable energy sources account for a substantial portion of the energy mix, it is proposed that demand information be considered when defining ramp events. More attention must be paid to power ramp occurrences, either by penalizing ramps or enforcing tougher grid codes. The ramp events must be considered at the sizing and development stage, with the possibility of including a ramp-mitigating battery strategy. A thorough examination of ramp events in hybrid power plants demonstrates the importance of minimizing and managing ramp events for both the system operator and the producer.
...
Due to dependence on threshold values that vary across the literature and the limitations associated with calculating thresholds as a percentage of installed capacity, it was demonstrated that binary ramp definitions are not ideal and result in under-reporting. On the other hand, the wavelet approach extracts ramp events from the generation using statistically determined threshold values. As a result, the problem of under-detection of ramp events is mitigated. The proposed approach of "significant ramps" allows the evaluation of which ramp events are important and which are far less disruptive and may be ignored.
It was demonstrated that anti-correlation between wind and solar resources alone is not adequate to promise a smoother output as it does not provide sufficient information about ramp events. Anti-correlations at shorter time resolutions, such as 15 minutes or an hour, could be preferable. While seasonal anti-correlation may benefit national system adequacy, it does not benefit daily ramping events.
The optimal wind-PV capacity size for decreasing the total number of ramps was such that wind turbines filled the grid capacity, as solar power would result in extra ramps. It was observed that solar over-planting leads to a significantly increased number of ramp events, whereas wind over-planting results in a minimal change in ramp events. A penalty price was proposed to internalize the severity of ramp events, which could influence the choice between wind and solar over-planting. A solution was presented to mitigate ramp incidents in a hybrid power plant using a battery which was found to be more effective and/or more economical in minimizing ramps compared to over-planting.
The proposed "significant wavelet ramp approach" is shown to be a useful metric for characterizing wind-based hybrid power plant ramp occurrences. For a future in which variable renewable energy sources account for a substantial portion of the energy mix, it is proposed that demand information be considered when defining ramp events. More attention must be paid to power ramp occurrences, either by penalizing ramps or enforcing tougher grid codes. The ramp events must be considered at the sizing and development stage, with the possibility of including a ramp-mitigating battery strategy. A thorough examination of ramp events in hybrid power plants demonstrates the importance of minimizing and managing ramp events for both the system operator and the producer.
Techno-economic analysis of offshore platforms for green hydrogen production
Dive into system design and costs
This study explores whether operating storage, collocated with a utility scale wind power plant, can solve these challenges while improving the bottom line for operators. Spot market arbitrage, providing balancing energy through the automatic frequency restoration reserve, and generator imbalance cost reduction are identified as possible strategies for operating storage that can add value whilst also alleviating the identified issues. Furthermore, this study explores if arguments for co locating storage with wind energy to form hybrid wind and storage power plants exist or if the business case for operating storage is independent of being collocated.
It was found that an 8-hour battery performs best when undertaking spot market arbitrage. Still, even with a perfect market forecast and no storage degradation costs, it will need at least a 65% decrease from current Li-ion storage costs to become profitable. The 8-hour battery outperforms the higher power batteries because the low volatility of the spot market doesn’t warrant the higher costs of 1 and 4-hour batteries. Additionally, it was found that providing non-contracted balancing energy to the grid with a 1-hour battery provides a potential 5-fold increase in profitability compared to having no co-located storage. However, the sensitivity analysis to storage degradation costs ultimately makes the case less profitable compared to having no co-located storage. The lower sensitivity to degradation costs of the 8-hour battery cause it to outperform the 1 and 4-hour batteries. Providing contracted balancing energy showed less potential than non-contracted balancing energy before the sensitivity analysis. However, the contracted balancing energy scenario is less sensitive to storage degradation costs. It was found that a 4-hour battery providing contracted balancing energy performed best. However, this strategy was ultimately 20% less profitable compared to not operating co-located storage. Furthermore, the results of the proposed strategies turned out to be independent of the storage being co-located. Therefore, no strong arguments for collocating storage could be made here.
The business case for storage, as put forth in this project, might not exist today. However, strong clues exist that it will in the future. The predicted drop in costs of storage and the increased volatility in electricity markets will provide opportunities for the profitable operation of storage systems. When that time comes WPP operators should also be interested to operate these storage systems to further their goal of competing with traditional fossil-fuel-fired power plants.
...
This study explores whether operating storage, collocated with a utility scale wind power plant, can solve these challenges while improving the bottom line for operators. Spot market arbitrage, providing balancing energy through the automatic frequency restoration reserve, and generator imbalance cost reduction are identified as possible strategies for operating storage that can add value whilst also alleviating the identified issues. Furthermore, this study explores if arguments for co locating storage with wind energy to form hybrid wind and storage power plants exist or if the business case for operating storage is independent of being collocated.
It was found that an 8-hour battery performs best when undertaking spot market arbitrage. Still, even with a perfect market forecast and no storage degradation costs, it will need at least a 65% decrease from current Li-ion storage costs to become profitable. The 8-hour battery outperforms the higher power batteries because the low volatility of the spot market doesn’t warrant the higher costs of 1 and 4-hour batteries. Additionally, it was found that providing non-contracted balancing energy to the grid with a 1-hour battery provides a potential 5-fold increase in profitability compared to having no co-located storage. However, the sensitivity analysis to storage degradation costs ultimately makes the case less profitable compared to having no co-located storage. The lower sensitivity to degradation costs of the 8-hour battery cause it to outperform the 1 and 4-hour batteries. Providing contracted balancing energy showed less potential than non-contracted balancing energy before the sensitivity analysis. However, the contracted balancing energy scenario is less sensitive to storage degradation costs. It was found that a 4-hour battery providing contracted balancing energy performed best. However, this strategy was ultimately 20% less profitable compared to not operating co-located storage. Furthermore, the results of the proposed strategies turned out to be independent of the storage being co-located. Therefore, no strong arguments for collocating storage could be made here.
The business case for storage, as put forth in this project, might not exist today. However, strong clues exist that it will in the future. The predicted drop in costs of storage and the increased volatility in electricity markets will provide opportunities for the profitable operation of storage systems. When that time comes WPP operators should also be interested to operate these storage systems to further their goal of competing with traditional fossil-fuel-fired power plants.