C. Werker
Please Note
10 records found
1
Moving Beyond Stasis in Agglomeration Externalities
Exploratory System Dynamics Modelling of Agglomeration Externalities Innovation Performance in Regional Innovation Systems for Research-Informed Decision-Making
actionable insights for innovation development. In this research, I aimed to materialise the mechanics of agglomeration patterns in Regional Innovation Systems to build a dynamic understanding of their effect on innovation performance anchored in the EU regional context. The final aim is to shape research-informed decision-making with the findings of this dynamic study.
To bridge this gap, I created an SD model to simulate agglomeration dynamics in RIS. Modelling agglomeration patterns requires different levels of granularity from traditionally aggregated innovation system modelling. To satisfy this requirement, I drew concepts from a thorough theoretical literature review. I analysed collected theories by making use of Williamson’s Institutional model, informing the exploratory aspect of the SD modelling. To verify the model, boundary adequacy, structure verification, dimensional consistency, parameter verification and extreme value tests were accomplished. To validate model behaviour, a replicative data validation, an expert validation and a parameters sweep were realised. The model was parametrised with Ile-de-France and Bretagne data to simulate
the interactions between different sectors of Jacobs and MAR RIS to inform system behaviour. Finally, a Sobol sensitivity analysis informed influential system variables with a multivariate parameter variation, subsequently reinforced by a scenario test. These tests have been analysed for both MAR and Jacobs regions.
The results of the modelling informed that the MAR model was more robust to uncertainties. It also showed a faster recovery from shocks than Jacobs regions. Additionally, government funding did not play a significant role in regional knowledge development. It therefore appeared more important that regional sectors developed links with nearby industries, whether in MAR or Jacobs regions, to ensure higher flexibility in periods of uncertainty. Decision-making can therefore examine ways to increase industry proximity in Jacobs regions and firm collaboration in MAR regions.
Finally, it highlighted the importance of timing in innovation generation, often overlooked in agglomeration studies.
Beyond the findings, the contribution of this thesis also reflected itself in the modelling, a further conceptual offering to understand the complexity of innovation development. While the data and assumptions are interesting considerations brought by this thesis, the strongpoint stood in the formalisation and pragmatism of field theories through causal relationships in a model. Theoretically, it advanced RIS scholarship by reframing agglomeration as a systemic equilibrium rather than a linear outcome, while methodologically, it demonstrated how conceptual SD can democratise policy design.
The model offered can be further refined, detailed and parametrised in further research to lead to more robust outcomes and more precise data-informed decisions. One key improvement suggested is the inclusion of Agent Based Modelling to form a hybrid-SD-ABM model. Representing variables at the levels of single agents can support higher flexibility and dynamism, which can be advantageous to represent regions with a start-up landscape more
accurately. ...
actionable insights for innovation development. In this research, I aimed to materialise the mechanics of agglomeration patterns in Regional Innovation Systems to build a dynamic understanding of their effect on innovation performance anchored in the EU regional context. The final aim is to shape research-informed decision-making with the findings of this dynamic study.
To bridge this gap, I created an SD model to simulate agglomeration dynamics in RIS. Modelling agglomeration patterns requires different levels of granularity from traditionally aggregated innovation system modelling. To satisfy this requirement, I drew concepts from a thorough theoretical literature review. I analysed collected theories by making use of Williamson’s Institutional model, informing the exploratory aspect of the SD modelling. To verify the model, boundary adequacy, structure verification, dimensional consistency, parameter verification and extreme value tests were accomplished. To validate model behaviour, a replicative data validation, an expert validation and a parameters sweep were realised. The model was parametrised with Ile-de-France and Bretagne data to simulate
the interactions between different sectors of Jacobs and MAR RIS to inform system behaviour. Finally, a Sobol sensitivity analysis informed influential system variables with a multivariate parameter variation, subsequently reinforced by a scenario test. These tests have been analysed for both MAR and Jacobs regions.
The results of the modelling informed that the MAR model was more robust to uncertainties. It also showed a faster recovery from shocks than Jacobs regions. Additionally, government funding did not play a significant role in regional knowledge development. It therefore appeared more important that regional sectors developed links with nearby industries, whether in MAR or Jacobs regions, to ensure higher flexibility in periods of uncertainty. Decision-making can therefore examine ways to increase industry proximity in Jacobs regions and firm collaboration in MAR regions.
Finally, it highlighted the importance of timing in innovation generation, often overlooked in agglomeration studies.
Beyond the findings, the contribution of this thesis also reflected itself in the modelling, a further conceptual offering to understand the complexity of innovation development. While the data and assumptions are interesting considerations brought by this thesis, the strongpoint stood in the formalisation and pragmatism of field theories through causal relationships in a model. Theoretically, it advanced RIS scholarship by reframing agglomeration as a systemic equilibrium rather than a linear outcome, while methodologically, it demonstrated how conceptual SD can democratise policy design.
The model offered can be further refined, detailed and parametrised in further research to lead to more robust outcomes and more precise data-informed decisions. One key improvement suggested is the inclusion of Agent Based Modelling to form a hybrid-SD-ABM model. Representing variables at the levels of single agents can support higher flexibility and dynamism, which can be advantageous to represent regions with a start-up landscape more
accurately.
Industry 4.0 and workplace inclusivity
Assessing the effect of institutions on the implementation and use of robots to employ a diverse workforce
Innovation is a complex multifaceted process influenced by numerous factors, among which formal and informal institutions. Formal institutions are written rules such as laws, standards and obligations, while informal institutions are unwritten rules, such as social and cultural norms, that shape people's perceptions and behaviors. Diversity can be related to social groups holding peculiar norms/beliefs that can conflict with other social norms or regulations. The role of formal and informal institutions in diversity and inclusion initiatives has been largely overlooked in the HRI literature, but existing studies suggest that institutions play a crucial role in enabling/hampering inclusion and diversity through technology.
In this research, I make use of qualitative research and the RRI approach to analyze the complex socio-technical system in which robots are implemented and used in the real-world context of the KLM baggage handling facilities at Amsterdam Airport.
The aim of this study is to build grounded theory through the analysis of the impact that institutions have on the implementation and utilization of robotic technology in the employment of a workforce that is diverse in terms of age, ethnicity, and race.
The research question guiding the research is: “How do formal and informal institutions shape the implementation and use of robots at work aimed at including a diverse workforce?”
This research question aims at tackling two different aspects of deploying robots at work: implementation and utilization.
The focus on implementation pertains to the analysis of the process by which a diverse workforce is included or not in the deployment of robots in the workplace, and the role that institutions play in shaping this process.
The focus on utilization pertains to the analysis of the role that institutions play in shaping the ability and willingness of a diverse workforce to use robots in the workplace.
When it comes to the implementation of robots at work, results show that if there are no formal institutions in place to include a diverse workforce in the implementation process, then informal institutions, such as a willingness to use technology, play a prominent role in determining the likelihood that diverse workforce will be included in the process or not.
In the Dutch context, factors like age or ethnic diversity do not affect the positive perception of robots at work and willingness to use technology, thus these diverse identities do not influence the participation of the diverse workforce in the implementation of robots at work.
When it comes to the utilization of robots, diversity plays both a direct and indirect role.
The direct role is related to formal institutions, for instance standard requirements to operate the robot, that may exclude certain ethnic/race groups with different physical characteristics from using the robot.
An example of physical characteristics that play a role in the Dutch context are the average height and left-handedness.
The indirect effect pertains to the influence of age diversity within the workforce on the formation of informal institutions, such as social norms. Members of the age diverse workforce may hold positions of opinion leadership within the workplace, enabling them to shape the opinions of their colleagues with regard to the use of robots. This, in turn, can influence the utilization of robotic technology by the workforce as a whole.
This study has both strong practical and theoretical implications.
From a practical standpoint, this study provides valuable insights for organizations seeking to employ a diverse workforce through the use of robotics. The findings highlight the importance of carefully considering both the practical and social implications of this approach, including the need to take into account the physical requirements of a diverse workforce and the potential influence of diversity on the formation of social norms within the workplace.
From a research perspective, this study highlights the suitability of the \acs{RRI} approach as a conceptual tool for HRI research to assess the socio-technical systems in robotics is used for diversity and inclusivity purposes.
Future research could focus on analyzing the interactions between formal and informal institutions and other diverse identities, such as gender, in the context of implementing robots in the workplace. The main limitations of this study pertain to the limited number of participants and the lack of generalizability to SMME. These firms have different organizational structures and limited financial and intellectual resources, thus, when employing a diverse workforce, they may face considerably different challenges when implementing robotic technology in the workplace. ...
Innovation is a complex multifaceted process influenced by numerous factors, among which formal and informal institutions. Formal institutions are written rules such as laws, standards and obligations, while informal institutions are unwritten rules, such as social and cultural norms, that shape people's perceptions and behaviors. Diversity can be related to social groups holding peculiar norms/beliefs that can conflict with other social norms or regulations. The role of formal and informal institutions in diversity and inclusion initiatives has been largely overlooked in the HRI literature, but existing studies suggest that institutions play a crucial role in enabling/hampering inclusion and diversity through technology.
In this research, I make use of qualitative research and the RRI approach to analyze the complex socio-technical system in which robots are implemented and used in the real-world context of the KLM baggage handling facilities at Amsterdam Airport.
The aim of this study is to build grounded theory through the analysis of the impact that institutions have on the implementation and utilization of robotic technology in the employment of a workforce that is diverse in terms of age, ethnicity, and race.
The research question guiding the research is: “How do formal and informal institutions shape the implementation and use of robots at work aimed at including a diverse workforce?”
This research question aims at tackling two different aspects of deploying robots at work: implementation and utilization.
The focus on implementation pertains to the analysis of the process by which a diverse workforce is included or not in the deployment of robots in the workplace, and the role that institutions play in shaping this process.
The focus on utilization pertains to the analysis of the role that institutions play in shaping the ability and willingness of a diverse workforce to use robots in the workplace.
When it comes to the implementation of robots at work, results show that if there are no formal institutions in place to include a diverse workforce in the implementation process, then informal institutions, such as a willingness to use technology, play a prominent role in determining the likelihood that diverse workforce will be included in the process or not.
In the Dutch context, factors like age or ethnic diversity do not affect the positive perception of robots at work and willingness to use technology, thus these diverse identities do not influence the participation of the diverse workforce in the implementation of robots at work.
When it comes to the utilization of robots, diversity plays both a direct and indirect role.
The direct role is related to formal institutions, for instance standard requirements to operate the robot, that may exclude certain ethnic/race groups with different physical characteristics from using the robot.
An example of physical characteristics that play a role in the Dutch context are the average height and left-handedness.
The indirect effect pertains to the influence of age diversity within the workforce on the formation of informal institutions, such as social norms. Members of the age diverse workforce may hold positions of opinion leadership within the workplace, enabling them to shape the opinions of their colleagues with regard to the use of robots. This, in turn, can influence the utilization of robotic technology by the workforce as a whole.
This study has both strong practical and theoretical implications.
From a practical standpoint, this study provides valuable insights for organizations seeking to employ a diverse workforce through the use of robotics. The findings highlight the importance of carefully considering both the practical and social implications of this approach, including the need to take into account the physical requirements of a diverse workforce and the potential influence of diversity on the formation of social norms within the workplace.
From a research perspective, this study highlights the suitability of the \acs{RRI} approach as a conceptual tool for HRI research to assess the socio-technical systems in robotics is used for diversity and inclusivity purposes.
Future research could focus on analyzing the interactions between formal and informal institutions and other diverse identities, such as gender, in the context of implementing robots in the workplace. The main limitations of this study pertain to the limited number of participants and the lack of generalizability to SMME. These firms have different organizational structures and limited financial and intellectual resources, thus, when employing a diverse workforce, they may face considerably different challenges when implementing robotic technology in the workplace.
Microfoundations of the Digital Transforming Dynamic Capability
An exploratory multiple case study in the fashion and retail industry to investigate the underlying mechanisms of digital transformation through dynamic capabilities perspective
Reviewing research in dynamic capabilities revealed a framework that allows firms to respond to digital disruption through constant evolution in capabilities. My desk research uncovered the management research community’s ongoing investigation of dynamic capabilities’ underlying mechanisms known as microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Examining these capability sub-dimensions showed that aggregated actions of individuals form routines that evolve into the firm’s capabilities. Developing capabilities of any kind starts from the learning and collaboration of individuals with different skill sets, beliefs, and values that make up the organization.
I approached three legacy firms in the low-tech sector of fashion and retail as a case study that exemplifies the problem of digital transformation. They were chosen based on profiles typical of a digitally-transforming firm, such as investments in digital technologies, the appointment of chief digital/information officers, size, and age. In addition to content, the firm’s headquarter operations reside in the Netherlands, and their digital transformation initiatives occurred in the last five years. I consulted annual reports, financial filings, and company press releases to trace their digital transformation journey and validated through individual interviews from digital actors, people involved in the company’s digitalization.
The empirical observations confirmed that the microfoundations perspective fits the research question due to the digital transformation’s multi-pronged approach. However, I did not observe all sub-dimensions of the dynamic capability in the case study companies. Nevertheless, I found at least one of each factor relating to individuals, processes, and structures. For example, the individual dimension emerged in the study due to the central roles of leadership and the workforce’s digital savviness in the transformation process. Furthermore, digital intensity (processual dimension) is a must in digital transformation since substantial digital technology investments are a core requirement. Their interaction and collaboration across different levels of the organization through proximity help build capabilities for digital transformation. The structural dimension also shows that a centrally organized digital initiative can move slower than a decentralized one.
The framework suggests that dynamic building capabilities are rooted in individuals learning and collaborating. Additionally, proximity and the concepts of multi-dimensional relationships (geography, cognition, social, and organizational) facilitate the learning process. My study also suggests that individuals working at different levels of the organizations build firm-level capabilities, hinting at the multi-level characteristics of capabilities of the firm. The research in microfoundations of capabilities has only recently caught traction. Thus, the elements of my thesis form a foundation for future research.
...
Reviewing research in dynamic capabilities revealed a framework that allows firms to respond to digital disruption through constant evolution in capabilities. My desk research uncovered the management research community’s ongoing investigation of dynamic capabilities’ underlying mechanisms known as microfoundations of dynamic capabilities. Examining these capability sub-dimensions showed that aggregated actions of individuals form routines that evolve into the firm’s capabilities. Developing capabilities of any kind starts from the learning and collaboration of individuals with different skill sets, beliefs, and values that make up the organization.
I approached three legacy firms in the low-tech sector of fashion and retail as a case study that exemplifies the problem of digital transformation. They were chosen based on profiles typical of a digitally-transforming firm, such as investments in digital technologies, the appointment of chief digital/information officers, size, and age. In addition to content, the firm’s headquarter operations reside in the Netherlands, and their digital transformation initiatives occurred in the last five years. I consulted annual reports, financial filings, and company press releases to trace their digital transformation journey and validated through individual interviews from digital actors, people involved in the company’s digitalization.
The empirical observations confirmed that the microfoundations perspective fits the research question due to the digital transformation’s multi-pronged approach. However, I did not observe all sub-dimensions of the dynamic capability in the case study companies. Nevertheless, I found at least one of each factor relating to individuals, processes, and structures. For example, the individual dimension emerged in the study due to the central roles of leadership and the workforce’s digital savviness in the transformation process. Furthermore, digital intensity (processual dimension) is a must in digital transformation since substantial digital technology investments are a core requirement. Their interaction and collaboration across different levels of the organization through proximity help build capabilities for digital transformation. The structural dimension also shows that a centrally organized digital initiative can move slower than a decentralized one.
The framework suggests that dynamic building capabilities are rooted in individuals learning and collaborating. Additionally, proximity and the concepts of multi-dimensional relationships (geography, cognition, social, and organizational) facilitate the learning process. My study also suggests that individuals working at different levels of the organizations build firm-level capabilities, hinting at the multi-level characteristics of capabilities of the firm. The research in microfoundations of capabilities has only recently caught traction. Thus, the elements of my thesis form a foundation for future research.
A Business Model Taxonomy for Data Marketplaces
Data Trade in Various Trading Structures
Digital transformation: Leading the way in the Dutch insurance sector
A multiple-case study within the Dutch insurance sector focused on micro-foundations of growth performance
Firm’s upgrading within the Solar Photovoltaic Energy Value Chain
An exploratory study in Costa Rica