J. Gosseye
Please Note
15 records found
1
Living Archives
Effective inefficiencies that turn space into story
Our home became the inspiration for a new type of architectural research. Not about finding specific solutions or creating perfect plans, but about following fragments, being guided by stories, and learning all the hidden ways through which space accumulates meaning.
But what allows a place so (technically) unsuitable, a vacant, decrepit hospital with all its shortcomings, to function so successfully for this community?
In a building never intended for living, leaking roofs, awkward staircases, and narrow hallways turned out to be “effectively inefficient”: imperfections that unintendedly triggered social interactions. What at first glance loos like architectural obstacles instead brought people closer together, turning friction into connection. These so-called shortcomings became subtle design forces, guiding movements, encounters, and everyday rituals. It suggests that what architects are trained to “correct” or “resolve” can be the very thing that gives space its social intelligence.
Therefore this project doesn’t aim to re-design but to re-read. Here, seemingly inefficient architectural details are not interpreted as “flawed” technical junctions but as successful social ones. Through a non-linear, foldable storybook/map the building’s human and architectural “voices” unfold through scale and interconnect in all directions without a set beginning or end. This way, each fragment stands on its own, but (through folding out) always in relation to the bigger whole. Not as a fixed format or static object but, like the building itself, as a layered and living network of human stories.
Understanding space through social life expands the boundaries of what architectural education considers valuable and opens new ways of seeing, practicing, and representing architecture.
...
Our home became the inspiration for a new type of architectural research. Not about finding specific solutions or creating perfect plans, but about following fragments, being guided by stories, and learning all the hidden ways through which space accumulates meaning.
But what allows a place so (technically) unsuitable, a vacant, decrepit hospital with all its shortcomings, to function so successfully for this community?
In a building never intended for living, leaking roofs, awkward staircases, and narrow hallways turned out to be “effectively inefficient”: imperfections that unintendedly triggered social interactions. What at first glance loos like architectural obstacles instead brought people closer together, turning friction into connection. These so-called shortcomings became subtle design forces, guiding movements, encounters, and everyday rituals. It suggests that what architects are trained to “correct” or “resolve” can be the very thing that gives space its social intelligence.
Therefore this project doesn’t aim to re-design but to re-read. Here, seemingly inefficient architectural details are not interpreted as “flawed” technical junctions but as successful social ones. Through a non-linear, foldable storybook/map the building’s human and architectural “voices” unfold through scale and interconnect in all directions without a set beginning or end. This way, each fragment stands on its own, but (through folding out) always in relation to the bigger whole. Not as a fixed format or static object but, like the building itself, as a layered and living network of human stories.
Understanding space through social life expands the boundaries of what architectural education considers valuable and opens new ways of seeing, practicing, and representing architecture.
Post-Military Landscapes
Future and Transformation of Masaryk Barracks in Pardubice
Anarchisphere
Where the City Meets the Wild
What is public space, and who is it really for?
The Anarchisphere explores how architecture might provoke awareness of invisible systems of control while creating conditions in which power relations are critically dismantled. It asks how people might reclaim the ability to shape their surroundings through self-organisation, mutual aid, and collective action.
Rather than prescribing use or behaviour, the project proposes architecture as an open framework: unfinished, unstable, and open to appropriation. Public space is treated not as neutral ground, but as a contested terrain shaped by power, regulation, and design decisions that often go unquestioned.
Situated along the railway corridor between Rotterdam Centraal and Rotterdam Blaak, the project intervenes in a landscape defined by speed, infrastructure, and surveillance. A rigid triangular grid establishes an imposed order, which is disrupted by a new anarchic axis. Along this axis unfolds a system of mobile units, climbable towers, and wild ecologies. These elements resist a fixed program and invite misuse, transformation, and collective negotiation.
The Anarchisphere is not a singular object, but a lived condition. It is both an actual place and a theoretical understanding of space and its function. It is a desire for more: for freedom, autonomy, and comfort within the public realm. Through exposure, friction, and disruption, the project challenges preconceived notions of publicity and freedom within existing structures of hierarchy and power.
Architecture is turned inside out: a host rather than a master, a provocation rather than a solution. By giving people the means to create, occupy, and redefine space, the project asks what public space could become when authorship is collective and authority is no longer fixed. Ultimately, The Anarchisphere positions architecture not as a tool for control but as a catalyst for awareness, creativity, and freedom within the urban public realm.
...
What is public space, and who is it really for?
The Anarchisphere explores how architecture might provoke awareness of invisible systems of control while creating conditions in which power relations are critically dismantled. It asks how people might reclaim the ability to shape their surroundings through self-organisation, mutual aid, and collective action.
Rather than prescribing use or behaviour, the project proposes architecture as an open framework: unfinished, unstable, and open to appropriation. Public space is treated not as neutral ground, but as a contested terrain shaped by power, regulation, and design decisions that often go unquestioned.
Situated along the railway corridor between Rotterdam Centraal and Rotterdam Blaak, the project intervenes in a landscape defined by speed, infrastructure, and surveillance. A rigid triangular grid establishes an imposed order, which is disrupted by a new anarchic axis. Along this axis unfolds a system of mobile units, climbable towers, and wild ecologies. These elements resist a fixed program and invite misuse, transformation, and collective negotiation.
The Anarchisphere is not a singular object, but a lived condition. It is both an actual place and a theoretical understanding of space and its function. It is a desire for more: for freedom, autonomy, and comfort within the public realm. Through exposure, friction, and disruption, the project challenges preconceived notions of publicity and freedom within existing structures of hierarchy and power.
Architecture is turned inside out: a host rather than a master, a provocation rather than a solution. By giving people the means to create, occupy, and redefine space, the project asks what public space could become when authorship is collective and authority is no longer fixed. Ultimately, The Anarchisphere positions architecture not as a tool for control but as a catalyst for awareness, creativity, and freedom within the urban public realm.
Dutch Housing Commons
Non-speculative housing within and against the housing market
The design of Great Hall of the People
Building "More, Faster, and Better"
SESCeffect
The city should be for everyone
Parks, Squares and Political Events
Difference in accessibility for political events depending on ownership structures
Potsdam between shifting ideologies
Selective deconstruction and reconstruction in two systems
The Qualities of Urban Agriculture to Overcome the Urban Crises
A case study of London during urban poverty, war, and climate crisis in 20th-21st century
The Importance of a Safe Construction in the Fight Against Terrorism
A historical analysis of buildings subjected to terrorist attacks and the changes in structural and safety design
Supermetabolism
The influence of Metabolism on the 20th century Superdutch
DeafSpace and Disability
A research into DeafSpace design and its peculiarities in relation to other architectural adaptations for disabilities