A closed-form shear resistance model for regions of prestressed beams without flexural cracks

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Marco Roosen (Rijkswaterstaat, TU Delft - Concrete Structures)

Y. Yang (TU Delft - Concrete Structures)

C van der Veen (TU Delft - Concrete Structures)

Dick G. Schaafsma (Rijkswaterstaat)

MAN Hendriks (Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), TU Delft - Concrete Structures)

Research Group
Concrete Structures
Copyright
© 2022 M.A. Roosen, Y. Yang, C. van der Veen, Dick G. Schaafsma, M.A.N. Hendriks
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202100695
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 M.A. Roosen, Y. Yang, C. van der Veen, Dick G. Schaafsma, M.A.N. Hendriks
Research Group
Concrete Structures
Issue number
3
Volume number
23
Pages (from-to)
1304-1315
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

When the shear resistance of prestressed beams with stirrups is determined with the current Eurocode, no distinction is made between regions with and without flexural cracks. This while it may be expected that a region without flexural cracks will have a higher shear resistance. This is due to the lower longitudinal strains and the narrow crack widths, resulting in a higher contribution of aggregate interlock. Also, the Eurocode does not take into account that in regions without flexural cracks, a significant part of the shear force is transferred through the uncracked flanges. This article proposes therefore a shear resistance model, based on Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT), that does consider the low longitudinal strains and shear transfer through the uncracked flanges. From a comparison it was found that the proposed model can determine shear resistance as accurately as the most comprehensive level III approach of the Model Code 2010. However, the proposed model was found to be much easier to use in engineering practice as no iterations are necessary.