Inverted T precast girders with a cast-in-situ topping layer, recognized as precast composite girders, are commonly used in Dutch bridge construction. Notably, the bridges built before 1974 often lacked sufficient shear reinforcement, raising concerns about their shear capacity under increasing traffic loads. However, how to assess these composite girders under the scope of the second-generation Eurocode remains challenging, as the shear formulations were originally developed for monolithic structural members. Consequently, their direct applicability to precast composite systems, due to the distinctive stress distribution in the web of the composite structural members, lacks theoretical substantiation and experimental validation. This study first presents the three alternative failure criteria equations based on the same theory, and after that, an experimental investigation of the shear behaviour of precast composite girders through two full-scale tests is discussed. The test data is later used to compare the alternative failure criteria.

The shear provision for members without shear reinforcement in the second generation of Eurocode has been changed to a new set of formulas based on the critical shear crack theory (CSCT). The formula is based on a shear failure criterion originally developed for reinforced concrete members without shear reinforcement. To allow its application as a design code type for formula, the original CSCT failure criterion undergoes several modifications, such that it can be used to verify the shear resistance of prestressed members as well. Since the new Eurocode shear provision will be applied to design and assess prestressed concrete members in Europe and many other countries in the world, it is important to extensively validate this model. This paper presents a validation study of three different variations of the CSCT strain-based failure criteria, including the one eventually employed in the second generation Eurocode shear provision, using the ACI-DAfStb shear database. The results are also compared with the current Eurocode shear provisions. The second generation Eurocode shear formula appears to be able to determine the shear resistance more accurately than the current one, even for prestressed concrete members without shear reinforcement while it was not actually developed for this. However, Annex I.8 shear formula may lead to an overestimation of the shear resistance for higher values of the effective span to depth ratio (acs/d).

For structures whose structural safety cannot be demonstrated using the applicable code regulations, a nonlinear finite element analysis (NLFEA) can be used to investigate the structural behavior and maximum load capacity. The Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management uses a dedicated guideline for NLFEA in such an assessment. This guideline lacks validation on multi-span girder bridges with continuous deck slabs. Particularly, the modeling of the concrete-to-concrete interface between girders and slab deserves attention, since the interface shear transfer can significantly affect the structural behavior. In this paper we investigate the impact of different interface constitutive relations, and validate the selected modeling approach on three experimental shear tests of continuous girders. The finite element models accurately describe the failure processes and predict, on average, a 10% lower shear capacity as observed in the tests. In anticipation of future research, this is an indication that the modeling approach is suitable to be used in engineering practice.

Over the last century, over one hundred crack width formulas have been developed to calculate the width and spacing of cracks in reinforced and prestressed concrete elements. It is unclear which formulas are the most accurate. An extensive comparison study is required to determine which formulas accurately describe the crack patterns, consisting of the crack width and spacing. To make such a study possible, this paper proposes categorizing formulas. The categorization of the formulas is based on their applicability, crack pattern representation, and background. The categorization presents an overview of the different assumptions and application areas for describing crack patterns.

When the shear resistance of prestressed beams with stirrups is determined with the current Eurocode, no distinction is made between regions with and without flexural cracks. This while it may be expected that a region without flexural cracks will have a higher shear resistance. This is due to the lower longitudinal strains and the narrow crack widths, resulting in a higher contribution of aggregate interlock. Also, the Eurocode does not take into account that in regions without flexural cracks, a significant part of the shear force is transferred through the uncracked flanges. This article proposes therefore a shear resistance model, based on Modified Compression Field Theory (MCFT), that does consider the low longitudinal strains and shear transfer through the uncracked flanges. From a comparison it was found that the proposed model can determine shear resistance as accurately as the most comprehensive level III approach of the Model Code 2010. However, the proposed model was found to be much easier to use in engineering practice as no iterations are necessary.

Diagonal tension cracking is the governing failure mode for bridge girders with a thin web that are highly prestressed and contain little shear reinforcement. When assessing existing bridge girders using the Eurocode 2 [1], it often turns out that it is not possible to demonstrate sufficient resistance to diagonal tension cracking. This paper evaluates the method to determine the maximum principal tensile stresses as used in the Eurocode 2 [1] and investigates how flexural cracks affect the principle tensile stresses in the regions without flexural cracks. This paper also investigates how the tensile strength of the web is affected by the presence of compressive stresses and by the size of the area subjected to high tensile stresses. Based on the results of these investigations, an improved model is proposed to determine the resistance to diagonal tension cracking.

In the Netherlands, existing bridges are being assessed to investigate whether they are still capable to resist current and future traffic loads. Bridges that are compiled of single span prestressed girders, appear to have insufficient resistance to diagonal tension cracking. This concerns bridges that do not contain sufficient stirrups. Consequently, diagonal tension cracking could result in an abrupt brittle failure. However, the assessments are performed using the Eurocode model and there is doubt about its accuracy. In this research the accuracy of the Eurocode model is determined by comparing predicted resistances with experimentally found resistances. Moreover the stress distribution according to the Eurocode model is compared with the stress distribution of a linear elastic finite element analysis. Based on the comparison, an alternative model is suggested, that predicts the resistance to diagonal tension cracking more accurately.