Tensions in transparent urban AI

designing a smart electric vehicle charge point

Journal Article (2022)
Author(s)

Kars Alfrink (TU Delft - Internet of Things)

A.I. Keller (TU Delft - Codesigning Social Change)

N Doom (TU Delft - Ethics & Philosophy of Technology)

G.W. Kortuem (TU Delft - Internet of Things)

Internet of Things
Copyright
© 2022 Kars Alfrink, A.I. Keller, N. Doorn, G.W. Kortuem
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01436-9
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2022
Language
English
Copyright
© 2022 Kars Alfrink, A.I. Keller, N. Doorn, G.W. Kortuem
Internet of Things
Issue number
3
Volume number
38
Pages (from-to)
1049-1065
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The increasing use of artificial intelligence (AI) by public actors has led to a push for more transparency. Previous research has conceptualized AI transparency as knowledge that empowers citizens and experts to make informed choices about the use and governance of AI. Conversely, in this paper, we critically examine if transparency-as-knowledge is an appropriate concept for a public realm where private interests intersect with democratic concerns. We conduct a practice-based design research study in which we prototype and evaluate a transparent smart electric vehicle charge point, and investigate experts’ and citizens’ understanding of AI transparency. We find that citizens experience transparency as burdensome; experts hope transparency ensures acceptance, while citizens are mostly indifferent to AI; and with absent means of control, citizens question transparency’s relevance. The tensions we identify suggest transparency cannot be reduced to a product feature, but should be seen as a mediator of debate between experts and citizens.