On the annual energy yield of perovskite/silicon tandem modules with different bottom cell technologies and optimized top cell properties for different locations

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

M. Singh (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

J. Finazzo (Student TU Delft)

Youri Blom (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

M. Jayan (Student TU Delft)

Carlos Ruiz Tobon (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

A.W. Weeber (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

M. Zeman (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

Rudi Santbergen (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

O. Isabella (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

Research Group
Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2025009
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
Volume number
16
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

At standard test conditions (STC), the performance of photovoltaic modules is compared using efficiency. As irradiance and module temperature fluctuate over the year and STC efficiency does not assess the performance of the module accurately in real world conditions, the annual energy yield is used instead as performance metric. Perovskite/silicon tandem solar cells are being massively researched and sought after in PV industry for their efficiency well above 34% with further growth perspective. In this work, to evaluate and compare performance of different perovskite/silicon tandem photovoltaic (PV) modules based on different bottom cell technologies, we use a hybrid modelling approach. Such approach, combining experimentally obtained and simulated current-voltage curves, flexibly predicts the annual energy yield of novel tandem PV modules via our PVMD toolbox and enables their optimization in any location. In particular, considering (i) mono- and bi-facial architectures, (ii) 2-terminal and 4-terminal module configurations, and (iii) silicon heterojunction or novel poly-SiOx passivated c-Si solar bottom cells, we compare the annual energy yield of different perovskite/silicon tandem modules and we optimize their performance in different locations with respect to different perovskite thickness and bandgaps