Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustic Performance of a Propeller Propulsion System with Swirl-Recovery Vanes

Journal Article (2018)
Author(s)

T. Sinnige (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

Tom Stokkermans (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

Daniele Ragni (TU Delft - Wind Energy)

G. Eitelberg (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

LLM Veldhuis (TU Delft - Flight Performance and Propulsion)

Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion
Copyright
© 2018 T. Sinnige, T.C.A. Stokkermans, D. Ragni, G. Eitelberg, L.L.M. Veldhuis
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B36877
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2018
Language
English
Copyright
© 2018 T. Sinnige, T.C.A. Stokkermans, D. Ragni, G. Eitelberg, L.L.M. Veldhuis
Research Group
Flight Performance and Propulsion
Issue number
6
Volume number
34
Pages (from-to)
1376-1390
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Swirl-recovery vanes (SRVs) enhance propulsive efficiency by converting the rotational kinetic energy in a propeller slipstream into additional thrust. This paper discusses the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic impact of the installation of a set of SRVs downstream of a single-rotating propeller. Experiments were carried out in a large low-speed wind tunnel, while simulations were performed by solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations. Favorable comparisons between the experimental and numerical slipstream data validated the simulations, which predicted a maximum propulsive-efficiency increase of 0.7% with the current design of the SRVs. This can be improved further by optimizing the SRVs' pitch distribution. The upstream effect of the SRVs on the time-averaged propeller performance was negligible. Yet, small but systematic unsteady propeller loads were measured with a peak-to-peak amplitude of at most 2% of the time-averaged loading, occurring at a frequency corresponding to the five SRV passages during one revolution. The downstream interaction was one order of magnitude stronger, with unsteady loading on the SRVs with a peak-to-peak amplitude of about 20% of the time-averaged load. The interaction mechanisms caused an increase of the tonal noise levels of 3 to 7 dB, with the noise penalty decreasing with increasing propeller thrust setting.

Files

1.b36877.pdf
(pdf | 2.34 Mb)
- Embargo expired in 27-02-2019
License info not available