Aggregated residential multi-carrier energy storage as voltage control provider in low-voltage distribution networks

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

J.J. Alpizar Castillo (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

L.M. Ramirez Elizondo (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

A.M. van Voorden (Stedin Group, TU Delft - Electrical Sustainable Energy)

P. Bauer (TU Delft - DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage)

Research Group
DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.117507
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
DC systems, Energy conversion & Storage
Volume number
132
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The inclusion of PV and heat pumps in residential low-voltage distribution systems is a fundamental component of the energy transition. Nevertheless, adoptions below 40% can already cause voltage conditions incompliant with the standard EN50160 during winter. Aggregated storage systems have been proposed as a solution; however, the literature generally assumes full observability and controllability of the assets, which is unrealistic in many cases. This paper evaluates the potential of aggregated single- and multi-carrier storage systems to maintain voltage stability in low voltage networks, considering separated controllers for the prosumer and the aggregator. We used a real 301-node residential distribution network in the Netherlands as case study. Our results demonstrate that aggregated multi-carrier energy storage can ensure the voltage conditions established in the standard EN50160 for energy transition adoptions up to 80%, while aggregated single-carrier storage can reach 60% and centralized storage only 40%. We concluded that aggregation of storage assets increases the utilization of the existing grid infrastructure, reducing reinforcement costs for the DSOs. However, the energy storage assets’ high investment costs lead to unattractive conditions for single- and multi-carrier storage, compared to a case with only PV and heat pumps. Considering the current market conditions, using storage for voltage support would require economic compensations. These findings provide DSOs valuable insight on alternative solutions to grid reinforcement and centralized storage to address the challenges of the energy transition.