The contribution of aviation NOx emissions to climate change

Are we ignoring methodological flaws?

Review (2019)
Author(s)

Volker Grewe (TU Delft - Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

S. Matthes (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Katrin Dahlmann (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR))

Research Group
Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects
Copyright
© 2019 V. Grewe, Sigrun Matthes, K. Dahlmann
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5dd7
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2019
Language
English
Copyright
© 2019 V. Grewe, Sigrun Matthes, K. Dahlmann
Research Group
Aircraft Noise and Climate Effects
Issue number
12
Volume number
14
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The contribution of aviation to anthropogenic climate change results from CO2 and non-CO2 emissions. The latter emissions comprise of nitrogen oxides, water vapour, and aerosols as well as contrail and contrailcirrus effects. A series of updates can be noted in recent studies related to the effects of NOx-emissions; the inclusion of two physical processes and an updated radiation calculation (see below). However, in our opinion, two further published methodological shortcomings have not been fully considered which leads to a considerable underestimation of the contribution of aviation’s NOx emissions to climate change. First, methane response calculations implicitly assume steady-state instead of an adequate transient development. Second, most studies determine ozone changes are caused by switching off or reducing aviation NOx emissions, instead of calculating aviation contributions to the ozone. Such methodological simplifications largely underestimate the contribution of the aviation NOx emissions to climate change by a factor of 6 to 7 and can thereby be considered as flaws. Note that the contribution of an emission to climate change (=‘status report’) and the contribution of a change in emissions to climate change (=‘mitigation option’) require different calculation methods [1, 2]. While for calculating the contribution of emissions to atmospheric compositions (and hence climate change), to which we are referring here, a clear recommendation was made (e.g. [1]), the methodological approach for evaluating mitigation measures might still be ambiguous, but should certainly not ignore the results of contribution calculations [3].