Maintaining laminar flow on large swept surfaces of subsonic transport aircraft, i.e. the wings and the stabilisers, is currently posing a considerable challenge for aerodynamic design. Improving the efficiency of aircraft by delaying or removing the laminar-to-turbulent transition process over the wing and tail parts can substantially reduce contaminant emissions. The dominant flow instability causing laminar-turbulent transition of swept-wing flow is the so-called crossflow instability (CFI). Ongoing research at TU Delft has shown potential to delay transition by use of passive mechanisms. As such, a framework has been designed to numerically compute crossflow development and transition to turbulence on swept wings. Through the use of experimental data acquired in wind-tunnel measurements at TU Delft, the CFI development and transition process on swept wings has been modelled numerically by means of Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS). Based on a DNS laminar flow field generated from the pressure distribution along the model surface, a numerical primary CFI mode in good agreement with the experiment was obtained through Non-linear Parabolized Stability Equations (NPSE). Following this steady flow field analysis, the simulation was made unsteady by the implementation of numerical free-stream turbulence. This novel method resulted in unprecedented modelling of the receptivity mechanisms of transition in three-dimensional crossflow cases, overcoming ad-hoc treatments. Both experimental and numerical flow fields indicated a Type-I dominant secondary CFI (i.e. K-H type of response in the laterally inclined shear layer of the stationary crossflow vortex), which consequently carries the formation of near-wall hairpins and ultimately turbulence. Crossflow vortex frequency content also agrees well in the low-frequency band (450Hz ≤ 𝑓 ≤ 3000Hz), whilst the numerical high-frequency content (3500Hz ≤ 𝑓 ≤ 9000𝐻𝑧) does show a distinct delay in amplitude growth throughout the majority of the transition region. Contradicting the promising qualitative analysis of the free-stream turbulence methodology, this discrepancy in the frequency spectrum indicates the major shortcoming in the numerical setup, which was shown to be biased towards introducing more low-frequency disturbances at the inflow boundary.