Climate change has devastating effects on society, increasing the risk of natural disasters and associated health issues. These effects are caused by the greenhouse gases emitted by humans. Aligned with the Paris Agreement, the Dutch government aims to achieve a 100% reduction in emissions by 2050, striving for climate neutrality. Climate justice, an emerging theoretical concept, recognizes the unevenly distributed burdens and benefits of carbon emissions and calls for effective mitigation strategies. One of the most polluting sectors is the energy sector, which still heavily relies on fossil fuels. To achieve climate neutrality, a transition to sustainable forms of energy is necessary. Energy justice, a theoretical framework advocating for equitable energy distribution, representative energy decision-making, and a balanced cost-benefit distribution among citizens, has gained traction in recent academic literature. In the Netherlands, the energy transition is governed at regional and local levels through regional energy strategies. However, understanding of local and regional governance in this context is somewhat limited. This research combines the concepts of regional governance and the energy justice framework and applies them to the Rotterdam-The Hague energy region. The research objectives of this thesis are to comprehend regional energy decision-making, identify stakeholders experiencing energy injustices, examine how these injustices are currently addressed, and propose potential improvements. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach involving interviews and media analysis, the research reveals instances of energy injustices experienced by citizens in this region, including energy poverty. While the regional and local governments are presently unaware of this framework, they acknowledge the importance of a just energy transition and are actively developing strategies to mitigate these injustices. Policy recommendations encompass various levels: providing structural financial support to local governments at the national level, promoting knowledge exchange and cross-border collaboration at the regional level, and enhancing citizen participation, ownership in energy projects, and insulation programs at the local level. In conclusion, this thesis offers valuable insights into local and regional energy transition governance, focusing on energy justice, energy poverty, and citizen participation.

This thesis delves into the intricate challenges facing The Netherlands as it aims to fulfil its ambitious CO2 emission reduction goals by means of the Regional Energy Strategy (RES) framework. A significant issue highlighted is the emergence of an unintended wealth gap and energy poverty affecting over 600,000 people, which restricts their involvement in the energy transition process. These concerns point to the necessity of comprehensive research to ensure marginalized groups’ active involvement in the energy transition. The core objective of this study is to scrutinize the impact of governance and decision-making practices in the Regional Energy Strategy of Rotterdam The Hague (RES-RDH) on energy justice principles. It seeks to define and understand the concepts of ’local ownership’ and ’equitable participation' within the RES-RDH context. By exploring ways to incorporate energy justice principles into decision-making processes, this research aims to create a comprehensive reference tool to guide the region’s energy transition towards fairness and equity. The investigation employs a literature review, policy document analysis, and interviews to address the main research question and its four sub-questions. The sub-questions focus on defining equitable participation and local ownership in the RES-RDH context, understanding the influence of institutional governance on these aspects, identifying specific challenges in organizing equitable participation, and exploring how energy justice principles can enhance decision-making processes. The findings collectively answer the main research question and contribute to the final reference tool’s development. The theoretical framework incorporates elements of energy justice and public decision-making, enabling a thorough exploration of the equitability and inclusivity of RES- RDH’s decision-making processes. It examines equitable participation, local ownership, and energy justice principles through theoretical lenses, emphasizing the importance of engaging diverse stakeholders, ensuring local community involvement, and balancing power dynamics...