Because building materials are intended to provide durable and safe structures, they are subject to strict regulations designed to ensure that they do not pose a hazard during their use. But they must also not be harmful to humans or the environment at the end of their life cycle, regardless of whether they are reused, recycled, or disposed of in a landfill. The requirements that building materials/products must meet vary around the world, but all countries have at least some minimum requirements, whether through regulations, mandatory standards, certification procedures, and/or monitoring at construction sites. In Europe, regulations and standards are based on what is known as the “materials-based” approach, meaning that standards define not only the technical requirements, but also the materials from which products are made. Other parts of the world use the so-called “performance-based approach”, meaning that products must have a certain performance regardless of the materials from which they are made. The “materials-based” approach could present some obstacles or barriers for alkali activated products when it comes to providing the documentation needed to bring such products to the market, as there are no EN standards for alkali-activated products so far. The aim of this chapter is to provide information on the legislation for building materials in general but with a focus on alkali activated materials (AAM) around the world and to provide guidance on how to approach the subject.

Numerical models are helpful vehicles for understanding and describing the engineering properties of construction materials. With the rapid development of both computational capabilities and theoretical insights into chemical reactions, there have been increasing research activities around the globe and raising demands for computational methods that describe different characteristics of alkali-activated materials. In this Chapter, we summarized the collective efforts performed on modelling and simulation of alkali-activated materials in the past two decades and highlighted the most relevant results and advances in the aspects of atomistic simulation, thermodynamic modelling, kinetics modelling, microstructure simulation, and multi-scale modelling. It can be concluded that pioneering work on modelling and simulation of alkali-activated materials has been conducted with fruitful results. However, there are still deficiency gaps and challenges in modelling and simulation of alkali-activated materials, especially in comparison with PC-based materials.

Among the various examples of sustainable construction materials explored in scientific literature, alkali-activated materials excel as one of the most mature and reliable solutions for large scale applications. It consists on the combination of an alkaline source in liquid or solid state, and a partially-to-fully amorphous solid precursor. The combination of these components leads to the obtainment of a hardened material which resembles Portland-cement based products. The performance and durability of these alternative binders is highly dependent on their components and production methods, and multiple laboratorial- and industrial-scale examples have shown their capability of outperforming conventional building materials. Practical challenges with variations in chemistry and mineralogy of raw materials, and the global utilization of prescriptive standards for structural building materials, hinder a wider utilization of these binders, and the efforts of the scientific and applied industry communities in overcoming these barriers is detailed throughout this report. This chapter provides an overview of alkali-activated binders, summarizing the main characteristics of their components, their reaction mechanisms, their challenges, and the expected advances of the technology with respect to one-part binders.

Alkali-activated materials (AAMs) are a class of potentially eco-friendly construction materials that can contribute to reduce the environmental impact of the construction sector by offering an alternative to Portland cement (PC). With the rapid development of both computational capabilities and theoretical insights into alkali-activation reaction processes, there has been a surge in research activities worldwide, leading to a growing demand for computational methods that can describe different characteristics of AAMs. This review summarizes the collective efforts made in the past two decades on this topic, and highlights the most relevant results and advances in the aspects of atomistic simulation, thermodynamic modeling, microstructure/−based simulation, and multi-scale modeling. The gaps and challenges in current numerical research on AAMs are pointed out and discussed in comparison with PC-based materials. This review aims to provide a critical overview of the state-of-the-art in modeling and simulating AAMs, while also outlining potential avenues for future development.

This paper provides a critical review on autogenous shrinkage of alkali-activated slag (AAS). It is reported that AAS paste, mortar, and concrete generally show larger autogenous shrinkage than Portland cement (PC) counterparts. Self-desiccation is the main driving force of the autogenous shrinkage of hardened AAS, but other mechanisms also play roles, particularly at early age. Existing models developed for PC do not give satisfactory estimations of the autogenous shrinkage of AAS, unless the pronounced viscoelasticity of AAS is considered. The susceptibility of AAS concrete to extensive cracking is not necessarily high due to the effects of stress relaxation, but local creep can exacerbate the development of microcracks. Various strategies have been proposed to mitigate the autogenous shrinkage of AAS, but many exhibit side effects, e.g., strength reduction. Existing testing methods for autogenous shrinkage of PC seem applicable to AAS, but the starting time and test duration need to be reconsidered.

The production of cement and concrete contributes significantly to global greenhouse gas emissions. Alkali‐activated concretes (AACs) are a family of existing alternative construction materials that could reduce the current environmental impact of Portland cement (PC) production and utilisation. Successful applications of AACs can be found in Europe and the former USSR since the 1950s and more recently in Australia, China and North America, proving their potential as construction materials. However, their utilisation is limited presently by the lack of normative and construction guidelines. Raw materials’ non‐uniform global availability and variable intrinsic properties, coupled with the lack of specific testing methods, raise questions regarding reproducibility and reliability. The mechanical and chemical behaviour of AACs has been investigated extensively over the past decades, strengthening its potential as a sustainable substitute for traditional PC‐based concrete. Although a wide amount of studies demonstrated that AACs could meet and even exceed the performance requirements provided by European design standards, a classification of these broad spectra of materials, as well as new analytical models linking the chemistry of the system components to the mechanical behaviour of the material, still need further development. This report gives an overview of the potential of alkali‐activated systems technology, focusing on the limitations and challenges still hindering their standardisation and wider application in the construction field.

Many standardised durability testing methods have been developed for Portland cement-based concretes, but require validation to determine whether they are also applicable to alkali-activated materials. To address this question, RILEM TC 247-DTA ‘Durability Testing of Alkali-Activated Materials’ carried out round robin testing of carbonation and chloride penetration test methods, applied to five different alkali-activated concretes based on fly ash, blast furnace slag or metakaolin. The methods appeared overall to demonstrate an intrinsic precision comparable to their precision when applied to conventional concretes. The ranking of test outcomes for pairs of concretes of similar binder chemistry was satisfactory, but rankings were not always reliable when comparing alkali-activated concretes based on different precursors. Accelerated carbonation testing gave similar results for fly ash-based and blast furnace slag-based alkali-activated concretes, whereas natural carbonation testing did not. Carbonation of concrete specimens was observed to have occurred already during curing, which has implications for extrapolation of carbonation testing results to longer service life periods. Accelerated chloride penetration testing according to NT BUILD 443 ranked the tested concretes consistently, while this was not the case for the rapid chloride migration test. Both of these chloride penetration testing methods exhibited comparatively low precision when applied to blast furnace slag-based concretes which are more resistant to chloride ingress than the other materials tested.