Z. Wang
Please Note
16 records found
1
Automatic Train Operation (ATO) aims to enhance punctuality, energy efficiency, and reliability by automating driving tasks. Specifically, for mainline railways, an ATO onboard component generates and tracks optimised train trajectories based on time targets or windows at critical network locations, known as timing points, across train routes. These timing points and their associated constraints are specified in the Train Path Envelope (TPE), computed to ensure conflict-free operations. The generation of TPEs relies on dynamic updates of the real-time traffic plan from the Traffic Management System and real-time train statuses (e.g., position and speed). Understanding how TPEs are affected by these updates is essential for effective ATO deployment. To address this, this paper proposes a sensitivity analysis using elementary effects of a TPE generation algorithm, evaluating its response to variations in real-time traffic plans and train status updates. A real-life case study on a Dutch rail corridor with heterogeneous traffic reveals that control timing points can be introduced into the TPE as headways decrease, to homogenise traffic by aligning speed profiles and thus resolving conflicts. Timing point locations remain mostly unchanged, while their associated time windows become more sensitive when placed further along the route. Operational tolerance, which defines the latest conflict-free passing time, becomes more sensitive to headway changes and the distance from the previous stop.
Semi-flexible transit, integrating fixed-route and on-demand services, offers a demand-adaptive and cost-effective alternative for public transit users, particularly in low-demand conditions. Despite the growing interest in this system, existing approaches have failed to develop comprehensive optimization methods for managing demand fluctuations across distinct scenarios, thereby significantly constraining operational adaptability in semi-flexible transit services. To address this research gap, we propose a scenario-based optimization model that jointly determines the fleet size and master routes at the tactical level as well as sub-routes at the operational level. The objective is to minimize travel costs while ensuring service feasibility under varying passenger demand scenarios, accounting for constraints such as travel time, state changes, time windows, and route consistency. Then, an Augmented Lagrangian Relaxation under Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ALR-ADMM) decomposition solution framework is introduced to decouple the proposed integrated problem into three sub-problems, namely master route, sub-route and service planning problems. Numerical experiments on the Sioux-Falls network validate the proposed model and solution approach, achieving a 94.93 % reduction in computation time while maintaining an average optimality difference of 0.57 % compared to the Gurobi optimizer. Sensitivity analysis further examines the effects of vehicle capacity limits, penalty parameters, and demand stop selection, revealing their impact on computational efficiency and operational costs. The applicability of our approach is further assessed through a real-world case study on the West Jordan network, which provides evidence of the ALR-ADMM-based algorithm in terms of both solution quality and computational efficiency. Our findings illustrate the feasibility and potential of the proposed model and algorithm in navigating both the tactical and operational scheme of semi-flexible transit within modern urban transit systems.
Widespread congestion in metro systems often hinders passengers from boarding the first arriving train, making them compelled to adopt an alternative route, some of which involve travelling backwards. While this travel strategy has direct consequences for forecasting passenger flow distribution in congested networks, little is known about the travelling backwards phenomenon and why people adopt this travelling behaviour. The aim of this study is to understand passengers’ perception of time in various segments considering travelling backwards. To achieve this, we develop a route choice model using revealed preference data from smart card records. We find that passengers exhibit a greater aversion to waiting time and onboard time while travelling backwards. Specifically, passengers perceive each minute spent waiting on the turn-back stations’ platform as equivalent to 1.97 min on the origin platform. Similarly, each minute spent onboard the backwards train is perceived as equivalent to 1.24 min on the forwards train. Ignoring this difference in perception would result in the underestimation of the expected social benefits of demand management policies. Finally, we assess the potential benefits of travelling backwards under various passenger flow conditions, offering valuable policy insights regarding whether and how this behaviour should be regulated or promoted.
Automatic Train Operation (ATO) aims to partially or fully automate train driving, enhancing railway capacity, punctuality, and energy efficiency. However, a key challenge arises from the mismatch between discrete event-time decisions at the Traffic Management System (TMS) level, assuming fixed running times, and the continuous speed–distance trajectory optimisation at the ATO level, leading to possible misalignments between planned and executed train movements. To bridge this gap, this paper introduces a novel optimisation-based method that dynamically computes Train Path Envelopes (TPEs) based on multiple driving strategies, defined as time targets or windows over a sequence of timing points, which ATO-equipped trains must comply with to align their movements with traffic management constraints. The method follows a two-stage approach: First, a linear programming model determines conflict-free blocking time ranges across the multiple driving strategies. Second, a structured optimisation process establishes operationally feasible TPEs by determining departure tolerances and configuring intermediate timing points. By integrating a critical-block strategy, the optimised TPEs provide the flexibility needed for ATO while accommodating variations in train driving strategies. The method is validated through experiments and a real-life case study in The Netherlands, demonstrating that optimised timing points at critical track locations improve energy efficiency, enhance punctuality, increase capacity, and provide an approach to align traffic management with ATO.
The COVID-19 pandemic has imposed a dramatic effect on the mobility habits of both passengers and freight in the rail sector. Since the relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions worldwide, rail transport has been revitalised gradually. However, the new normal emerges with unprecedented issues, such as changed travel behaviour, lost profits, and a lack of personnel. In this paper, we determine the arising challenges due to COVID-19 and pandemics in general and subsequently propose several solutions to tackle these challenges in rail transport. These solutions cover multidisciplinary aspects such as passenger demand management, freight demand management, service design, automation, decentralisation and advanced railway technologies. By reviewing the relevant literature on COVID-19, public transport and particularly rail transport, we synthesise and identify promising lines of research that should devote more attention to a more efficient, effective and sustainable rail transport service. This paper provides policymakers, researchers, railway infrastructure managers and undertakings with an overview and an outlook for the impacts of the pandemic crisis and similar situations. It supports decision-making with more evidence and facilitates rail transport to restore its performance and reach its societal goal.
Nowadays it is widely accepted that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is significantly influencing a large number of domains, including railways. In this paper, we present a systematic literature review of the current state-of-the-art of AI in railway transport. In particular, we analysed and discussed papers from a holistic railway perspective, covering sub-domains such as maintenance and inspection, planning and management, safety and security, autonomous driving and control, revenue management, transport policy, and passenger mobility. This review makes an initial step towards shaping the role of AI in future railways and provides a summary of the current focuses of AI research connected to rail transport. We reviewed about 139 scientific papers covering the period from 2010 to December 2020. We found that the major research efforts have been put in AI for rail maintenance and inspection, while very limited or no research has been found on AI for rail transport policy and revenue management. The remaining sub-domains received mild to moderate attention. AI applications are promising and tend to act as a game-changer in tackling multiple railway challenges. However, at the moment, AI research in railways is still mostly at its early stages. Future research can be expected towards developing advanced combined AI applications (e.g. with optimization), using AI in decision making, dealing with uncertainty and tackling newly rising cybersecurity challenges.
Automatic Train Operation (ATO) is well-known in urban railways and gets increasing interest from mainline railways at present to improve capacity and punctuality. A main function of ATO is the train trajectory generation that specifies the speed profile over the given running route considering the timetable and the characteristics of the train and infrastructure. This paper proposes and assesses different possible ATO architecture configurations through allocating the intelligent components on the trackside or onboard. The set of analyzed ATO architecture configurations is based on state-of-the-art architectures proposed in the literature for the related Connected Driver Advisory System (C-DAS). Results of the SWOT analysis highlight that different ATO configurations have diverse advantages or limitations, depending on the type of railway governance and the technological development of the existing railway signaling and communication equipment. In addition, we also use the results to spotlight operational, technological, and business advantages/limitations of the proposed ATO-over-ETCS architecture that is being developed by the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA) and provide a scientific argumentation for it.
Predictions on Public Transport (PT) ridership are beneficial as they allow for sufficient and cost-efficient deployment of vehicles. On an operational level, this relates to short-term predictions with lead times of less than an hour. Where conventional data sources on ridership, such as Automatic Fare Collection (AFC) data, may have longer lag times and contain no travel intentions, in contrast, trip planner data are often available in (near) real-time and are used before traveling. In this paper, we investigate how such data from a trip planner app can be utilized for short-term bus ridership predictions. This is combined with AFC data (in this case smart card data) to construct a ground truth on actual ridership. Using informative variables from the trip planner dataset through correlation analysis, we develop 3 supervised Machine Learning (ML) models, including k-nearest neighbors, random forest, and gradient boosting. The best-performing model relies on random forest regression with trip planner requests. Compared with the baseline model that depends on the weekly trend, it reduces the mean absolute error by approximately half. Moreover, using the same model with and without trip planner data, we prove the usefulness of trip planner data by an improved mean absolute error of 8.9% and 21.7% and an increased coefficient of determination from a 5-fold cross-validation of 7.8% and 18.5% for two case study lines, respectively. Lastly, we show that this model performance is maintained even for the trip planner requests with prediction lead times up to 30 min ahead, and for different periods of the day. We expect our methodology to be useful for PT operators to elevate their daily operations and level of service as well as for trip planner companies to facilitate passenger replanning, in particular during peak hours.