Shared automated vehicles (SAVs) have the potential to transform travel by enabling users to engage in non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs), enhancing productivity and travel satisfaction. To explore this potential, we conducted a field experiment using a Wizard-of-Oz simulator-on-wheels replicating SAV services in urban areas. The study examined how engagement in work and leisure NDRTs influenced attitudes, preferences, and associated values of travel time (VoTTs) for SAVs versus conventional transport modes (public transport (PT), cars, and bicycles). A total of 104 participants completed two test rides while engaging in work and leisure activities, with engagement levels captured via video recordings. Results showed that travel costs for SAVs were perceived as less negative than those of PT and cars, and that participants preferring work over leisure in SAVs developed a more positive perception of travel time in them post-test. In contrast, full concentration on NDRTs during test rides increased the disutility of travel time of the car alternative. Pre-test results indicated that SAVs had the highest VoTTs compared to cars and PT. However, after the rides, VoTTs for SAVs decreased when used for work-related activities, underscoring their advantage for productivity-focused travel. For cars, the ability to fully concentrate on NDRTs increased VoTTs, reflecting heightened expectations of comfort and productivity. These findings highlight SAVs’ potential to enhance travel productivity, but also show how experience with NDRTs reshapes conventional modes perceptions. Finally, the experiment demonstrated the relevance of the Wizard-of-Oz approach for simulating realistic SAV experiences, with 74% of participants believing the setup was genuine.

Electric buses (EBs) play a crucial role in achieving global greenhouse gas emission targets. However, efficiently operating an electric bus fleet (EBF) requires a comprehensive approach that considers both mobility and energy systems, particularly when implementing opportunity charging strategies. Existing literature and many real-life implementations often focus on only one of these systems, oversimplifying the other, which can lead to inefficiencies, operational challenges, or even unfeasible implementations. To fill this gap, we propose a framework to assess the impact of bus opportunity charging strategies on the power grid by integrating a traffic simulation model (SUMO) and a power grid simulation model (Gaia). SUMO evaluates the energy consumption and charging needs of the EBs, while Gaia assesses the impact of the transformer load in the distribution grid. The integrated method is applied to Rotterdam’s bus line 36 to demonstrate the practicality of this approach. Results indicate that designing an electric bus route with opportunity charging is feasible only when both mobility and energy systems are carefully coordinated.

Teleoperated driving complements automated driving and acts as transitional technology towards full automation. An economic advantage of teleoperated driving in logistics operations lies in managing fleets with fewer teleoperators compared to vehicles with in-vehicle drivers. This alleviates growing truck driver shortage problems in the logistics industry and save costs. However, a trade-off exists between the teleoperator-to-vehicle (TO/V) ratio and the service level of teleoperation. This study designs a simulation framework to explore this trade-off generating multiple performance indicators as proxies for teleoperation service level. By applying the framework, we identify factors influencing the trade-off and optimal TO/V ratios under different scenarios. Our case study on road freight tours in the Netherlands reveals that for any operational settings, a TO/V ratio below one can manage all freight truck tours without delay, while one represents the current situation. The minimum TO/V ratio for zero-delay operations is never above 0.6, implying a minimum of 40% teleoperation labor cost saving. For operations where a small delay is allowed, TO/V ratios as low as 0.4 are shown to be feasible, which indicates potential savings of up to 60%. This confirms great promise for a positive business case for the teleoperated driving as a service.

Urban Air Mobility (UAM) systems offer a three-dimensional transportation alternative by using low-altitude airspace, with the potential to reduce travel times and improve access to mobility in regions underserved by current transportation systems. To support efficient design and operation of UAM systems, we develop an integrated optimization framework in response to three interrelated challenges: (i) land use, aeronautical feasibility, community acceptance and other factors that restrict the number of potential locations for vertiports, (ii) bidirectional demand–supply interaction that needs to be considered, as the level of service influences demand for UAM and operators adjust the level of service in response to demand, and (iii) strong interactions between strategic decisions on the distribution of ground infrastructure, tactical decisions on eVTOL fleet size and operational decisions on dispatching and repositioning. Analyzing the decisions in isolation can lead to poor estimates of the overall system performance. The framework consists of (1) a knock-off criteria analysis model for the identification of a realistic set of candidate locations for vertiports, (2) integer programming models in which strategic, tactical and operational decision levels are modeled, and (3) pre-processing techniques to generate near-optimal solutions for real-world instances. By applying the framework in a large-scale real-world setting in the Île-de-France region, we demonstrate complex interactions between strategic, tactical, and operational decision levels and customer demand, revealing various trade-offs between operator profit and traveler generalized travel costs.

Shared electric vehicles (SEVs) have emerged as a promising solution for promoting sustainable urban mobility. However, ensuring the efficient operation and effective battery management of SEV systems remains a complex challenge. To address this issue, this paper introduces an integrated optimization framework for SEV systems that jointly considers Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G), Battery-to-Grid (B2G), plug-in charging, and battery swapping. The proposed approach is built on a space-time-energy network model that simultaneously optimizes battery charging and discharging scheduling together with SEV operations, such as relocations and battery swapping. The objective is to maximize profit while addressing operational constraints and the complexities of energy management within SEV systems. Given the substantial complexity of large-problem scales, the paper introduces a column generation-based heuristic algorithm. Additionally, a rolling horizon approach is employed to enable real-time decision-making under dynamic operational conditions. Extensive experiments are conducted to evaluate the effects of key parameters, such as the rolling horizon settings, charging rates, fleet sizes, and the number of stocked batteries. The effectiveness of various energy management strategies is also assessed, ranging from plug-in charging alone to its combinations with battery swapping, V2G, and B2G. Numerical results show that under low carsharing rental demand scenarios, plug-in charging alone is a cost-effective option. Moreover, battery swapping is found to be particularly effective as an auxiliary recharging method when the SEV fleet is limited, charging rates are low, or carsharing demand is high. Overall, this study provides theoretical foundations for the integration of vehicle operations and energy management in shared electric mobility systems.

Shared automated electric vehicles (SAEVs) have the potential to transform regional transportation, particularly in low-density areas where accessibility and resource optimization are challenging. However, their integrated economic impact on operators, users, environment, and society have been little explored. This paper presents a cost-benefit analysis methodology, incorporating a flow-based integer programming model, to assess the viability of SAEV services in a regional interurban context. The case study is based on mobility data from the Aveiro and Coimbra regions (Portugal). We evaluate the replacement of all motorized intermunicipal trips with various SAEV configurations, including automated cars (with and without pooling), automated minibuses, and a mixed fleet (cars and minibuses). Results indicate that SAEV providers can achieve profitability with fares ranging from €0.08 to €0.36 per kilometer. Even at these rates, SAEV services generate economic benefits for users, particularly pooled car-based services, as private car expenses dominate current mobility costs. Additionally, all SAEV configurations contribute to cost reductions related to air pollution, noise, global warming potential, and road accidents, with pooled services offering the greatest savings. A series of SAEV transition scenarios using a fleet of pooled cars also demonstrated benefits for all stakeholders, albeit lower than those from fully replacing motorized trips. A second sensitivity analysis confirms that reducing vehicle acquisition costs is key to lowering fares and increasing user savings. This paper represents one of the first evaluations of large-scale SAEV services for intermunicipal trips with significant distances between urban centers, contributing insights into smart and sustainable transportation solutions for such contexts.

This paper proposes a decision-making framework for a multiple-period planning of electric vehicle (EV) charging station development. In this proposed framework, transportation planners seek to implement a phased provision of electric charging stations as well as repurposing gas stations at selected locations. The developed framework is presented as a bi-level optimization problem that determines the optimal electric charging network design while capturing the practical constraints and travelers’ decisions. The upper level minimizes overall vehicle CO emissions by selecting optimal charging stations and their capacities, while the lower-level models travelers’ choices of vehicle class (EV or conventional) and travel routes. A genetic algorithm is developed to solve this problem. The results of the numerical experiments describe the sensitive nature of EV market penetration rates in the urban traffic stream and overall vehicle CO emissions to EV charging station availability and capacity. The findings can assist transportation agencies in designing effective EV charging infrastructure by identifying optimal locations and capacities, as well as in creating policies to encourage EV use over time. This study supports broader efforts to reduce air pollution and promote sustainable transportation by promoting EV adoption in the long term.

New mobility concepts such as Mobility as a Service (MaaS) are emerging as potential solutions to move people more sustainably in an increasingly urbanized world. Planning for this multi-modal mobility requires a whole system approach (STEEP - social, technical, economic, environmental, and political) to evaluate alternative future scenarios and address varied stakeholder concerns. A strategic planning tool was selected that can model alternative scenarios for how urban mobility systems may evolve over time. A sustainable mobility scorecard was defined, comprised of individual metrics generated from the tool's output. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) was selected and applied to generate stakeholder weightings from an online survey of U.S. transportation planning professionals. Those weightings were applied to the scorecard to demonstrate their influence on alternative planning outcomes. Results include the scorecard metrics assessed with the greatest relative importance to sustainability; increases in no car ownership, increases in the transit/walk/bike mode share especially in lower income populations, maintaining the average peak traffic speed (actual/posted), and reducing cars per capita. The resulting weighted scorecard, part of a strategic assessment methodology for mobility sustainability (SAMMS), is then used to evaluate four future planning scenarios with contrasting trends (socio-demographics, travel behavior, employment, land use, transport supply) for the greatest overall sustainable mobility outcome.

The rapid growth of the online food delivery industry has led to a significant increase in the number of delivery riders navigating urban streets, predominantly using bikes and e-bikes. This growth has been accompanied by a concerning rise in crashes involving these riders, posing a critical challenge for city authorities and policymakers. Promoting safer riding behavior, such as choosing safer routes while delivering food, can potentially reduce crash risks. With this motivation, this paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies that encourage riders to choose safer routes and estimate the value riders place on reducing the risk of road crashes. The paper presents a stated preference experiment conducted with food delivery riders in Amsterdam and Copenhagen to assess two targeted strategies: ’safety information’ and ’monetary incentives’, designed to encourage riders toward selecting safer routes. The results from the route choice model show that presenting information about safety against crashes on different routes and offering monetary incentives can effectively motivate riders to choose safer routes, even if these are longer. The trade-offs riders make between safer and shorter routes were quantified by calculating the Value of Risk Reduction (VRR) and Willingness to Accept (WTA) indicators, which offer valuable insights into riders’ safety preferences. These indicators highlight how much riders value risk reduction and the compensation required to choose safer routes. Furthermore, the findings reveal that factors related to riders’ working arrangements and socio-demographic profiles significantly influence their route choice decisions. The paper concludes with a discussion about the practical challenges associated with implementing the strategies to enhance rider safety and proposing potential solutions that can be useful for food delivery platforms and policymakers.

The growing demand for parcel delivery contributes to traffic congestion, high emissions, and rising costs of freight logistics, particularly in urban areas. To address these issues, new and sustainable last-mile delivery methods must be implemented. However, estimating the impact of different logistics systems is complex, as it depends heavily on consumer adoption of these new delivery methods. This paper presents a simulation model that captures and explores the interconnections between multiple last-mile delivery methods and corresponding consumer preferences. Two key factors affecting consumer preferences are simulated: (1) consumers’ response to the performance and availability of delivery methods, and (2) the sharing of knowledge through word of mouth and familiarisation. System dynamics is applied at the aggregate level to simulate the evolution of consumer preferences for last-mile delivery across multiple methods. At the disaggregate level, an agent-based model simulates the operational performance of these delivery methods, which in turn influences consumer preferences in the system dynamics model. This integrated approach allows for the observation of the evolving interaction between urban logistics supply and demand, providing key performance indicators on consumer preferences and the delivery method operations at consecutive time points. The developed simulation model is applied to a case study in the Rotterdam-The Hague region, a highly urbanised region in The Netherlands. Results show that consumer preferences strongly depend on the carriers’ ability to fulfil the demand. The dynamic interaction between supply and demand creates a reinforcing feedback loop, where the adaptability of carriers is crucial for the long-term success of a delivery method. Additionally, the spatial results reveal that there are zonal differences in the performance of the delivery methods. Further findings indicate that, while total vehicle kilometres and CO₂ emissions will rise due to increasing parcel demand in all scenarios, the average number of van kilometres and CO₂ emissions per parcel will decrease as demand grows.

Amidst the pressing need for sustainable transportation, Shared Automated Electric Vehicles (SAEVs) emerge as an increasingly explored solution with the potential to revolutionize mobility. Yet, understanding the environmental impacts of operating this mobility solution at different scales remains sparse. This study addresses this by integrating Agent-Based Modelling (ABM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to assess the environmental impacts of SAEVs at municipal, subregional and regional scales. ABM simulates travellers’ behaviour and SAEVs deployment strategies, yielding dynamic patterns along a typical day, while LCA provides a structured framework for assessing the life cycle environmental impacts. This process involves creating an ABM that reflects a representative mobility scenario, and a modified ABM scenario where private car and bus trips are replaced with SAEV services. The analysis extends the different scales, providing both short-term and long-term perspectives on LCA impacts. Findings revealed significant reductions in global warming potential (up to 91%), but challenges include increased operational intensity, human toxicity (up to 240%), and mineral resource scarcity (up to 229%). Vehicle kilometres travelled, and fleet replacement needs are key factors influencing long-term environmental impacts. Larger-scale implementation yields greater environmental benefits compared to smaller-scale deployment.

Offering shared mobility options at transit stops can potentially increase the service area of a stop and consequently, possible detours in transit lines can be eliminated to decrease in-vehicle travel times for through-passengers and reduce operational costs. However, current research mostly focusses on shared mobility options and expected behaviour only, whilst not looking at this integrated transit network design problem. Additionally, most focus of current studies is on the integration of shared mobility in urban areas and/or around train stations, leaving a gap on suburban areas and transit lines with lower demand. In order to answer our research question “what the effects are of increased route directness for low-demand transit lines in conjunction with offering shared mobility at transit stops”, we developed a mesoscopic model extension for the aggregated four-step transport model to model changes in travel behaviour as a result of straightened transit lines and the simultaneous integration of shared modes. Discrete choice models are used to accurately model first and last mile preferences of people, based on the access and egress distance, demographics and available (shared) modes. Finally, the probability of passengers cancelling their complete trip as a result of increased first and last mile distances is also explored. This model framework was applied to nine case studies in the Netherlands. The synthesis of the case studies resulted in key factors contributing to a promising redesign of the transit network. The main factor is that through-passengers should significantly outnumber local passengers, by at least 75%-25%. Additionally, the increase in access and egress times should not be significantly larger than in-vehicle time savings of through-passengers. Moreover, it is found that the mode share of micromobility in the first and last mile is approximately 15% across the different cases, whereby the highest usage can be seen for people under the age of 25 and for distances greater than 1 km. Finally, it is concluded that the additional costs of shared mobility are on average only 10% of the savings in operational costs.

As a two-sided digital platform, ride-sourcing has disruptively penetrated the mobility market. Ride-sourcing companies provide door-to-door transport services by connecting passengers with independent service suppliers labelled as “driver-partners”. Once a passenger submits a ride request, the platform attempts to match the request with a nearby available driver. Drivers have the freedom to accept or decline ride requests. The consequences of this decision, which is made at the operation level, have remained largely unknown in the literature. Using agent-based simulation modelling on the realistic case study of the city of Amsterdam, the Netherlands, we study the impacts of drivers’ ride acceptance behaviour, estimated from unique empirical data, on the ride-sourcing system where the platform applies regular and surge pricing strategies, and riders may revoke their requests and reject the received offers. Furthermore, we delve into the implications of various supply–demand intensities, a centralised fleet (i.e., mandatory acceptance on each ride request) versus a decentralised fleet (i.e., ride acceptance decision by each driver), ride acceptance rates, and surge pricing settings. We find that the ride acceptance decision of ride-sourcing drivers has far-reaching consequences for system performance in terms of passengers’ waiting time, driver's revenue, operating costs, and profit, all of which are highly dependent on the ratio between demand and supply. As the system undergoes a transition from undersupplied (i.e., real-time demand locally exceeds available drivers) to balanced and then oversupplied state (i.e., more available drivers than real-time demand), ride acceptance decisions result in higher income inequality. A high acceptance rate among drivers may lead to more rides, but it does not necessarily increase their profit. Surge pricing is found to be asymmetrically in favour of all the parties despite adverse effects on the demand side due to higher trip fare. This study offers insights into both the aggregated and disaggregated levels of ride-sourcing system operations and outlines a series of transport policy and practice implications in cities that offer such ride-sourcing systems.

Integrating renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, challenges grid stability due to their intermittent nature. Vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology provides a promising solution by utilizing electric vehicles (EVs) as decentralized energy storage systems, enabling the storage of surplus energy during low demand and its release during peak demand. The effectiveness of V2G depends critically on car usage patterns. Data from the Netherlands Mobility Panel (MPN) of 2022, comprising travel diaries from 2,505 households, was analyzed to explore this. A methodology was developed to create car usage profiles based on parking durations and locations, distinguishing weekday and weekend patterns. The analysis shows that vehicles are predominantly parked at home, with weekday profiles reflecting work-related parking and weekend profiles highlighting increased leisure activity. Households with shared cars showed higher driving activity and shorter parking durations than households with a 1:1 car-to-license ratio or surplus vehicles. Six distinct car usage clusters were identified for weekdays and four for weekends.