While hyperthermia has been shown to induce a variety of cytotoxic and sensitizing effects on cancer tissues, the thermal dose–effect relationship is still not well quantified, and it is still unclear how it can be optimally combined with other treatment modalities. Additionally, it is speculated that different methods of applying hyperthermia, such as water bath heating or electromagnetic energy, may have an effect on the resulting biological mechanisms involved in cell death or in sensitizing tumor cells to other oncological treatments. In order to further quantify and characterize hyperthermia treatments on a cellular level, in vitro experiments shifted towards the use of 3D cell spheroids. These are in fact considered a more representative model of the cell environment when compared to 2D cell cultures. In order to perform radiofrequency (RF)-induced heating in vitro, we have recently developed a dedicated electromagnetic field applicator. In this study, using this applicator, we designed and validated an experimental setup which can heat 3D cell spheroids in a conical polypropylene vial, thus providing a reliable instrument for investigating hyperthermia effects at the cellular scale.

The combination of interstitial hyperthermia treatment (IHT) with high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR‐BT) can improve clinical outcomes since it highly enhances the efficiency of cell kill, especially when applied simultaneously. Therefore, we have developed the ThermoBrachy applicators. To effectively apply optimal targeted IHT, treatment planning is considered essential. However, treatment planning in IHT is rarely applied as it is regarded as difficult to accurately calculate the deposited energy in the tissue in a short enough time for clinical practice. In this study, we investigated various time‐efficient methods for fast computation of the electromagnetic (EM) energy deposition resulting from the ThermoBrachy applicators. Initially, we investigated the use of an electro‐quasistatic solver. Next, we extended our investigation to the application of geometric simplifications. Furthermore, we investigated the validity of the superpositioning principle, which can enable adaptive treatment plan optimization without the need for continuous recomputation of the EM field. Finally, we evaluated the accuracy of the methods by comparing them to the golden standard Finite‐Difference Time‐Domain calculation method using gamma‐index analysis. The simplifications considerably reduced the computation time needed, improving from >12 h to a few seconds. All investigated methods showed excellent agreement with the golden standard by showing a >99% passing rate with 1%/0.5 mm Dose Difference and Distance‐to‐Agreement criteria. These results allow the proposed electromagnetic simulation method to be used for fast and accurate adaptive treatment planning.

In high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer treatment, interstitial hyperthermia (IHT) is applied to sensitize the tumor to the radiation (RT) dose, aiming at a more efficient treatment. Simultaneous application of HDR-BT and IHT is anticipated to provide maximum radiosensitization of the tumor. With this rationale, the ThermoBrachyTherapy applicators have been designed and developed, enabling simultaneous irradiation and heating. In this research, we present a method to optimize the three-dimensional temperature distribution for simultaneous HDR-BT and IHT based on the resulting equivalent physical dose (EQDphys) of the combined treatment. First, the temperature resulting from each electrode is precomputed. Then, for a given set of electrode settings and a precomputed radiation dose, the EQDphys is calculated based on the temperature-dependent linear-quadratic model. Finally, the optimum set of electrode settings is found through an optimization algorithm. The method is applied on implant geometries and anatomical data of 10 previously irradiated patients, using reported thermoradiobiological parameters and physical doses. We found that an equal equivalent dose coverage of the target can be achieved with a physical RT dose reduction of 20% together with a significantly lower EQDphys to the organs at risk (p-value < 0.001), even in the least favorable scenarios. As a result, simultaneous ThermoBrachy-Therapy could lead to a relevant therapeutic benefit for patients with prostate cancer.

Objective: The addition of hyperthermia in the treatment of intact breast cancer with the aim to improve local response is currently in a research phase. First, optimal hyperthermia devices need to be developed, for which a diverse, anatomically and pathologically accurate set of patient models is necessary. Methods: To investigate the effects of inter-subject variations on hyperthermia treatment plans, we generated a repository of 22 anatomically and pathologically diverse patient models based on MR images of breast cancer patients. Hyperthermia treatment plans were generated for the 22 models using a generic theoretical phased array hyperthermia applicator. Results: Good temperature coverage was achieved in the vast majority of the models, with median values for T ₁₀ = 43.5°C (41.9–43.8°C), T ₅₀ = 42.5°C (41.3–43.3°C), and T ₉₀ = 41.3°C (39.8–42.6°C) under the condition that the maximum temperature increase in the patient is limited to 44°C. Conclusions: For future development of hyperthermia devices and treatment methods, a repository with a sufficiently large number of representative patient models, such as the one provided in this study, should be used to ensure applicability to a wide variety of patients. This repository is therefore made publicly available.

The evaluation of the biological effects of therapeutic hyperthermia in oncology and the precise quantification of thermal dose, when heating is coupled with radiotherapy or chemotherapy, are active fields of research. The reliable measurement of hyperthermia effects on cells and tissues requires a strong control of the delivered power and of the induced temperature rise. To this aim, we have developed a radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic applicator operating at 434 MHz, specifically engineered for in vitro tests on 3D cell cultures. The applicator has been designed with the aid of an extensive modelling analysis, which combines electromagnetic and thermal simulations. The heating performance of the built prototype has been validated by means of temperature measurements carried out on tissue-mimicking phantoms and aimed at monitoring both spatial and temporal temperature variations. The experimental results demonstrate the capability of the RF applicator to produce a well-focused heating, with the possibility of modulating the duration of the heating transient and controlling the temperature rise in a specific target region, by simply tuning the effectively supplied power.