In recent years, the research interest in bidirectional charging of electric vehicles has increased significantly, driven by improved accessibility to charging and payment information as well as the increasing emphasis on integrating variable renewable energy sources more effectively into the grid. Integrating bidirectional charging with the grid/building/home can also reduce grid congestion. Despite this, broader implementation of this technology has not yet been achieved. In this context, this article comprehensively surveys direct current (DC) off-board vehicle to grid/building/home chargers and analyses the gaps which prevent the technologies’ wide implementation. These gaps are analysed by considering areas such as the development direction of bidirectional charging technology, battery cost and its degradation, V2G applicable standards, grid codes and charging protocols, deployment of V2G chargers (off-board versus on-board/wireless), market feasibility of V2G services, and the cost of bidirectional off-board chargers. The first survey of twenty-five commercial bidirectional chargers is presented and investigated in relation to the above-mentioned areas. Four key (technical, regulatory, financial, and behavioural) barriers are identified and discussed for the wide implementation of vehicle to grid/building/home charging.

The massive deployment of PV systems in residential buildings is causing voltage challenges in low-voltage distribution networks. Worldwide, DSOs started requesting users to curtail power when this is injected back into the grid. Although many commercially available inverters can perform curtailment, the degradation effects of curtailment still have to be investigated. This paper estimated how power curtailment affects the reliability of a boost converter working below MPPT voltages. Using the mission profile method, we determined the conduction and switching losses on the converter switch as the critical component, based on its temperature and current profiles. The results suggest that curtailing the power requires the operation point to move towards lower PV voltages, leading to deeper thermal cycles, therefore reducing the expected lifetime of the converter by up to 80 % for power injection into the grid below 1.5 kW. From the operational perspective, this might require premature replacements compared to operating under MPP conditions, affecting the revenue forecast before the enforcement of curtailment. For power injection above 1.5 kW, the LCoE does not change compared to the case without considering the degradation. However, near zero-injection conditions, the difference in LCoE between considering and not considering replacements increases exponentially up to 135 %.