Inefficient management of rail surface defects can increase maintenance costs, safety hazards, service disruptions, and catastrophic failures like rail breaks. To achieve adequate management, having effective technology capable of timely detecting and frequently monitoring rail defects is of utmost importance. The aim is early detection of defects to maintain safety levels and prevent the re-appearance due to residual damages.

Various measurement technologies, such as visual inspections, geometry profile measurements, and other measurement techniques, have been used for the detection of rail defects. While these methods provide insights, they often lack the capability for early-stage defect detection. Thus, most of these technologies are suitable for reactive maintenance since they detect defects when they reach a certain severity level. Axle box acceleration (ABA) technology provides a solution capable of frequent monitoring, mounted on trains in operation without dedicated measurement vehicles (see figure 71-1). Its basic principle is to use a train as a moving load that excites the infrastructure and to detect defects by evaluating the time-frequency characteristics of the dynamic response measured by accelerometers installed on axle boxes of the train. ABA systems have shown promise in detecting defects in the early stages. However, its widespread application and need for robustness require further validation and development. This work presents the results of detecting and monitoring rail surface defects using ABA technology.

This work presents the results of a measurement campaign to demonstrate the effectiveness of the axle box acceleration (ABA) technology for detecting rail defects. The measurements were conducted along the Iron Ore line between Sweden and Norway for the IN2TRACK3 project. This line is mostly single-track with passenger-freight mixed traffic and heavy axle load. Historical data and track information data were not considered in this study. By analyzing data acquired from the accelerometers in vertical and longitudinal directions, rail defects were detected in near real-time using big-data analytics. For our validated sections, 100% of rail defects (including squats) were detected using time-frequency analysis and an outlier detection approach. The methodology also allows for identifying priority locations, e.g., defective welds, joints, transition zones, etc., and its use for prescriptive maintenance recommendations is being explored in the framework of the IAM4RAIL project.