S. Unsiwilai
Please Note
9 records found
1
Challenges in Smartphone-Based Crowdsensing for Railway Condition Monitoring
Insights into Variability and Track Quality Assessment
Modern smartphones, widely available and equipped with multiple sensors, offer the potential for railway infrastructure condition monitoring through mobile crowdsensing without disrupting operational railway services. This paper investigates key factors influencing the use of smartphone accelerometers for railway track quality assessment and highlights the associated challenges. Differences in accelerometer characteristics across three budget smartphones, including variations in sampling frequencies and dynamic sensitivity, are analyzed. A case study conducted on in-service passenger trains examines the effects of operational conditions, specifically vehicle speed and smartphone placement within the car body, on the frequency content and magnitude of recorded signals. Additionally, this study compares smartphone measurement results with a conventional track quality index derived from track geometry measured by specialized vehicles. Promising correlations are observed between the standard deviation of the smartphone vertical acceleration signals and the longitudinal level-based track quality index, demonstrating the potential of smartphones to assess track quality and detect local anomalies. However, variations caused by vehicle speed and smartphone placement pose challenges for standardizing track quality assessments. These findings highlight the potential of mobile crowdsensing for railway infrastructure monitoring while emphasizing the need for strategies to address variability in operational conditions and device characteristics.
Transition zones in railway tracks often degrade faster than other locations, yet traditional health assessments rely on infrequent track geometry measurements, limiting early detection of dynamic changes. This research presents an approach for more frequent evaluation of transition zone health by integrating data sources from multiple monitoring technologies: track geometry, interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), and axle box acceleration (ABA). Missing InSAR data are addressed through spatio-temporal interpolation, and track longitudinal levels are predicted using a hybrid neural model that includes a hybrid convolutional neural network (CNN) with gated recurrent units (GRU) network and a hybrid CNN with a long short-term memory (LSTM) network. The models fuse historical and interpolated data from InSAR and ABA, enabling higher-frequency insights. A novel key performance index (KPI) based on predicted longitudinal levels is proposed to quantify track condition. The framework is validated on a transition zone at a railway bridge between Dordrecht and Lage Zwaluwe in the Netherlands. Results show that the hybrid model outperforms standalone methods and offers a good balance between accuracy and computational efficiency. The proposed approach enables earlier detection of irregularities, supporting prescriptive maintenance decisions.
Detection of Rail Surface Defects based on Axle Box Acceleration Measurements
A Measurement Campaign in Sweden
The conventional vertical track quality index (TQI) based on the standard deviation of longitudinal levels yields standardized railway track condition assessment. Nevertheless, its capability to identify problems is limited, particularly in the ballast and substructure layers when abrupt changes affect train-track interaction. Previous research shows that dynamic responses from moving trains via axle box acceleration (ABA) measurements can quantify abrupt changes in the vertical dynamic responses. Thus, this paper proposes a framework to design an enhanced vertical TQI, called EnVTQI, by integrating track longitudinal levels and dynamic responses from ABA measurements. First, measured ABA signals are processed to mitigate the influence of variation in measurement speed. Then, substructure and ballast-related features are extracted, including scale average wavelet power (SAWP) in the ranges 0.04 m-1 to 0.33 m-1 (substructure) and 1.25 m-1 to 2.50 m-1 (ballast). This enables identifying track conditions at different track layers. Finally, EnVTQI is determined by weight averaging between the conventional vertical TQI and the ABA features from moving trains. The performance of EnVTQI is evaluated based on 48 segments of a 200-m track on a Dutch railway line. The results indicate that EnVTQI helps to distinguish track segments that cause poor train-track interaction, which the conventional TQI does not indicate. EnVTQI can supplement the conventional TQI, improving the effectiveness of track maintenance decision-making.
Various measurement technologies, such as visual inspections, geometry profile measurements, and other measurement techniques, have been used for the detection of rail defects. While these methods provide insights, they often lack the capability for early-stage defect detection. Thus, most of these technologies are suitable for reactive maintenance since they detect defects when they reach a certain severity level. Axle box acceleration (ABA) technology provides a solution capable of frequent monitoring, mounted on trains in operation without dedicated measurement vehicles (see figure 71-1). Its basic principle is to use a train as a moving load that excites the infrastructure and to detect defects by evaluating the time-frequency characteristics of the dynamic response measured by accelerometers installed on axle boxes of the train. ABA systems have shown promise in detecting defects in the early stages. However, its widespread application and need for robustness require further validation and development. This work presents the results of detecting and monitoring rail surface defects using ABA technology. ...
Various measurement technologies, such as visual inspections, geometry profile measurements, and other measurement techniques, have been used for the detection of rail defects. While these methods provide insights, they often lack the capability for early-stage defect detection. Thus, most of these technologies are suitable for reactive maintenance since they detect defects when they reach a certain severity level. Axle box acceleration (ABA) technology provides a solution capable of frequent monitoring, mounted on trains in operation without dedicated measurement vehicles (see figure 71-1). Its basic principle is to use a train as a moving load that excites the infrastructure and to detect defects by evaluating the time-frequency characteristics of the dynamic response measured by accelerometers installed on axle boxes of the train. ABA systems have shown promise in detecting defects in the early stages. However, its widespread application and need for robustness require further validation and development. This work presents the results of detecting and monitoring rail surface defects using ABA technology.
Vertical dynamic measurements of a railway transition zone
A case study in Sweden
This study presents a measuring framework for railway transition zones using a case study on the Swedish line between Boden and Murjek. The final goal is to better understand the vertical dynamics of transition zones using hammer tests, falling weight measurements, and axle box acceleration (ABA) measurements. Frequency response functions (FRFs) from hammer tests indicate two track resonances, for which the FRF magnitudes on the plain track are at least 30% lower than those at the abutment. The falling weight measurements indicate that the track on the bridge has a much higher deflection than the track on the embankment. Two features from ABA signals, the dominant spatial frequency and the scale average wavelet power, show variation along the transition zone. These variations indicate differences in track conditions per location. Finally, the ABA features in the range of 1.05–2.86 m−1 are found to be related to the track resonance in the range of 30–60 Hz. The findings in this paper provide additional support for physically interpreting train-borne measurements for monitoring transition zones.
Condition monitoring of railway transition zones using acceleration measurements on multiple axle boxes
Case studies in the Netherlands, Sweden, and Norway