The separation of functions has been criticized as deteriorating the quality of urban
life. After World War II many industrial estates have been developed where industry
could develop without disturbing housing and its environment. Over the past decades
these areas have become en
...
The separation of functions has been criticized as deteriorating the quality of urban
life. After World War II many industrial estates have been developed where industry
could develop without disturbing housing and its environment. Over the past decades
these areas have become enclosed by the city and a shift from industry to business can
be noticed. Now, compact-city policies stimulate municipalities to look for different
functions for inner-city business parks. Nevertheless, some of the industrial
enterprises are still present, causing nuisance for adjacent city parts and forming
obstacles for redevelopment. Local governments are looking for strategies and
instruments to redevelop these sites. One of the options is introducing housing on
obsolete inner-city business parks that have a lack of occupancy at a time that there
are still industrial functions left behind that do not have a positive contribution to
housing conditions. Projecting housing programmes on these sites are meant to make
them come to life again, but introducing housing on business parks may also lead to
environmental problems, such as noise, danger of activities and traffic. Based on the
case studies of Binckhorst and Plaspoelpolder (The Hague region) and Buiksloterham
(Amsterdam), this paper explores and reviews the compact-city policy and focuses on
strategies used by municipalities for the redevelopment of inner-city business parks.