G.H.W. Schoups
Please Note
15 records found
1
Long-term hydrological response and physical transport dynamics in response to climatic variability
Insights from the Neckar basin
The research analysed the ground data available in Rio Las Vacas to verify and validate its quality. This study uses precipitation gauges, ERA5, and CHIRPS to assess the most suitable input for modelling rainfall-runoff in the Rio Las Vacas catchment. The catchment's hydrology was analysed and a conceptual model of the catchment was proposed. Using the wflow model, the hydrological response was modelled using the three rainfall products and the effect of uncertainty and spatially distributed rainfall was assessed.
The result shows that the Rio Las Vacas catchment suffers from a shortage of hydrometeorological information which is also of spurious quality. Only three rain gauges were available, and their analysis revealed high error variance and independence between stations. Hydrological characterisation analysis revealed significant human-induced changes. A calibrated wflow model effectively simulated the catchment’s hydrological response, demonstrating that global parameterisation was sufficient as a starting point for the model in this region. The soil water parameters are one of the most significant parameters in generating runoff for the model. The impact of spatially distributed precipitation is prominent in the model. This is one of the reasons for ERA5 to perform poorly in simulating the streamflow in the catchment. Based on the quantitative validation, the best modelling results came from using rain gauge data interpolated with the IDW method, followed by CHIRPS. However, the qualitative assessment shows CHIRPS is more reliable among the datasets.
In conclusion, this study shows the difficulties of modelling a data-scarce basin in the mountainous region. However, extensive data verification and validation, in combination with hydrological characterisation, helps to improve the model result. It also shows the precipitation inputs were crucial for a distributed model. The use of precipitation input with finer resolution could improve the model significantly. The study shows that the spatio-temporal distribution of the precipitation did not only affect the streamflow at the measurement point, but also the spatio-temporal runoff generated in the basin at pixel level. This could propagate to the water quality or plastic transport study. Among the datasets tested, CHIRPS emerged as the most reliable and suitable for hydrological modelling in this basin, both quantitatively and qualitatively. ...
The research analysed the ground data available in Rio Las Vacas to verify and validate its quality. This study uses precipitation gauges, ERA5, and CHIRPS to assess the most suitable input for modelling rainfall-runoff in the Rio Las Vacas catchment. The catchment's hydrology was analysed and a conceptual model of the catchment was proposed. Using the wflow model, the hydrological response was modelled using the three rainfall products and the effect of uncertainty and spatially distributed rainfall was assessed.
The result shows that the Rio Las Vacas catchment suffers from a shortage of hydrometeorological information which is also of spurious quality. Only three rain gauges were available, and their analysis revealed high error variance and independence between stations. Hydrological characterisation analysis revealed significant human-induced changes. A calibrated wflow model effectively simulated the catchment’s hydrological response, demonstrating that global parameterisation was sufficient as a starting point for the model in this region. The soil water parameters are one of the most significant parameters in generating runoff for the model. The impact of spatially distributed precipitation is prominent in the model. This is one of the reasons for ERA5 to perform poorly in simulating the streamflow in the catchment. Based on the quantitative validation, the best modelling results came from using rain gauge data interpolated with the IDW method, followed by CHIRPS. However, the qualitative assessment shows CHIRPS is more reliable among the datasets.
In conclusion, this study shows the difficulties of modelling a data-scarce basin in the mountainous region. However, extensive data verification and validation, in combination with hydrological characterisation, helps to improve the model result. It also shows the precipitation inputs were crucial for a distributed model. The use of precipitation input with finer resolution could improve the model significantly. The study shows that the spatio-temporal distribution of the precipitation did not only affect the streamflow at the measurement point, but also the spatio-temporal runoff generated in the basin at pixel level. This could propagate to the water quality or plastic transport study. Among the datasets tested, CHIRPS emerged as the most reliable and suitable for hydrological modelling in this basin, both quantitatively and qualitatively.
The assessment of flood mitigation measures applied in Cartagena de Indias
A case study approach about investigating types of flood mitigation measures in Cartagena de Indias
The study consists of four parts:
1. Identifying the main causes of floods using a data analysis;
2. Quantifying these findings with a numerical D-Hydro model;
3. Investigating suitable kind of mitigation measures and quantifying the impact of the best feasible mitigation options;
4. Evaluating the investigated mitigation options based on several criteria with the help of a multicriteria analysis.
Parts 1 and 2 focus on understanding the system. Parts 3 and 4 of the study focus on finding the best option to reduce floods.
The data analysis allows the development of a system description identifying the main causes of flooding. The analysis reveals that the limited capacity of the drainage system, high topographic variations, and extreme rainfall are the main causes of flooding in Cartagena. Extreme rainfall flows quickly from steep upstream areas to milder slope lower-lying areas, particularly those at the edge of the Ciénaga de la Virgen. It is hypothesised that downstream water level plays a role in the accumulation of runoff water, thereby influencing the frequency and intensity of floods in the neighbourhoods at the southern edge of the Ciénaga de la Virgen, especially with a relative sea level increase of approximately half a meter factored in. This hypothesis is checked by quantifying the impact of different scenarios with a numerical model.
A numerical D-Hydro model is used to quantify the impact of different meteorological conditions and downstream water levels on floods. The model’s simulation results show that rainfall intensity is a more dominant factor in flood generation than downstream water levels. Even with a return period of two years, rainfall causes significant flooding of almost 25% in the study area. The model also indicates an increasing influence of tidal conditions due to relative sea level rise. Still, the increased influence is mainly visible in the borders of the Ciénaga de la Virgen with minimal residential impact. These conclusions highlight the need for mitigation efforts to focus primarily on improving the areas influenced by the rainfall, especially for short return period rainfall events.
Various flood mitigation measures are considered for the southern border of the Ciénaga de la Virgen to reduce floods caused by the dominant intense rainfall. Wetland creation and evaporation measures are ruled out due to the dominant influence of rainfall-induced floods and the inability to prevent floods caused by extreme rainfall events respectively. After investigating the scale required, considering feasibility, the three types of measures that are converted into mitigation options are:
• Mitigation Option 1: Increasing channel dimensions,
• Mitigation Option 2: Increasing infiltration,
• Mitigation Option 3: Constructing retention areas.
These mitigation options are assessed for their impact on reducing flooded areas and flood levels. The three mitigation options are evaluated to recommend the best-preferred mitigation design. This evaluation employs a Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA)... ...
The study consists of four parts:
1. Identifying the main causes of floods using a data analysis;
2. Quantifying these findings with a numerical D-Hydro model;
3. Investigating suitable kind of mitigation measures and quantifying the impact of the best feasible mitigation options;
4. Evaluating the investigated mitigation options based on several criteria with the help of a multicriteria analysis.
Parts 1 and 2 focus on understanding the system. Parts 3 and 4 of the study focus on finding the best option to reduce floods.
The data analysis allows the development of a system description identifying the main causes of flooding. The analysis reveals that the limited capacity of the drainage system, high topographic variations, and extreme rainfall are the main causes of flooding in Cartagena. Extreme rainfall flows quickly from steep upstream areas to milder slope lower-lying areas, particularly those at the edge of the Ciénaga de la Virgen. It is hypothesised that downstream water level plays a role in the accumulation of runoff water, thereby influencing the frequency and intensity of floods in the neighbourhoods at the southern edge of the Ciénaga de la Virgen, especially with a relative sea level increase of approximately half a meter factored in. This hypothesis is checked by quantifying the impact of different scenarios with a numerical model.
A numerical D-Hydro model is used to quantify the impact of different meteorological conditions and downstream water levels on floods. The model’s simulation results show that rainfall intensity is a more dominant factor in flood generation than downstream water levels. Even with a return period of two years, rainfall causes significant flooding of almost 25% in the study area. The model also indicates an increasing influence of tidal conditions due to relative sea level rise. Still, the increased influence is mainly visible in the borders of the Ciénaga de la Virgen with minimal residential impact. These conclusions highlight the need for mitigation efforts to focus primarily on improving the areas influenced by the rainfall, especially for short return period rainfall events.
Various flood mitigation measures are considered for the southern border of the Ciénaga de la Virgen to reduce floods caused by the dominant intense rainfall. Wetland creation and evaporation measures are ruled out due to the dominant influence of rainfall-induced floods and the inability to prevent floods caused by extreme rainfall events respectively. After investigating the scale required, considering feasibility, the three types of measures that are converted into mitigation options are:
• Mitigation Option 1: Increasing channel dimensions,
• Mitigation Option 2: Increasing infiltration,
• Mitigation Option 3: Constructing retention areas.
These mitigation options are assessed for their impact on reducing flooded areas and flood levels. The three mitigation options are evaluated to recommend the best-preferred mitigation design. This evaluation employs a Multi-Criteria Analysis (MCA)...
The River Rotte Fish Migration Project
A bayesian Network approach for fish habitat suitability
The aim of this thesis is to develop an ecological model for fish habitat suitability in the river Rotte basin in the Netherlands that can be used in policy development for ecological restoration. The model serves as a decision support system to explain differences in fish population and evaluate the impact of management actions to modify fish habitat suitability. The river Rotte suits perfectly for this case study, because recently a fish passage has been realised between the Rotte and Nieuwe Maas to facilitate fish migration and expand living conditions. Furthermore, the river Rotte is a designated WFD water body, but the current status of the river varies between "poor" and "moderate" due to an unbalance between plant-loving and benthivorous fish species.
The model developed in this thesis is a Bayesian Belief Network model that predicts habitat factors for food preference and preference for habitat structure. The model is based on machine learning with a set of cases from monitoring data and predicts the probability distribution for fish habitat suitability for plant-loving and benthivorous fish species. The model has been applied to assess the impact of local conditions on fish habitat differentiation and to evaluate the impact of management actions on fish habitat suitability. The research shows that the Bayesian Belief Network model is very useable for policy making and facilitates the participation of various stakeholders. However, the current version of the model shows inadequate prediction accuracy and relies heavily on sampling data. This can be improved by expanding the scope of the model to include other water bodies in the Netherlands and by using metamodels for specific model variables.
Overall, the Bayesian Belief Network model is functional and usable for policy making, but further improvements are needed to enhance its prediction accuracy. This can be achieved through expanding the model's scope, evaluating its performance, and including more habitat factors in the model structure.
...
The aim of this thesis is to develop an ecological model for fish habitat suitability in the river Rotte basin in the Netherlands that can be used in policy development for ecological restoration. The model serves as a decision support system to explain differences in fish population and evaluate the impact of management actions to modify fish habitat suitability. The river Rotte suits perfectly for this case study, because recently a fish passage has been realised between the Rotte and Nieuwe Maas to facilitate fish migration and expand living conditions. Furthermore, the river Rotte is a designated WFD water body, but the current status of the river varies between "poor" and "moderate" due to an unbalance between plant-loving and benthivorous fish species.
The model developed in this thesis is a Bayesian Belief Network model that predicts habitat factors for food preference and preference for habitat structure. The model is based on machine learning with a set of cases from monitoring data and predicts the probability distribution for fish habitat suitability for plant-loving and benthivorous fish species. The model has been applied to assess the impact of local conditions on fish habitat differentiation and to evaluate the impact of management actions on fish habitat suitability. The research shows that the Bayesian Belief Network model is very useable for policy making and facilitates the participation of various stakeholders. However, the current version of the model shows inadequate prediction accuracy and relies heavily on sampling data. This can be improved by expanding the scope of the model to include other water bodies in the Netherlands and by using metamodels for specific model variables.
Overall, the Bayesian Belief Network model is functional and usable for policy making, but further improvements are needed to enhance its prediction accuracy. This can be achieved through expanding the model's scope, evaluating its performance, and including more habitat factors in the model structure.
Therefore, the use of dataset ensembles as opposed to dataset pairs is recommended in further applications of the data fusion methodology. Additional applications may focus on applying the methodology across a wider range of river basins, using a wider range of ensemble datasets (including different GRACE solutions), as well as comparison of different data error models. ...
Therefore, the use of dataset ensembles as opposed to dataset pairs is recommended in further applications of the data fusion methodology. Additional applications may focus on applying the methodology across a wider range of river basins, using a wider range of ensemble datasets (including different GRACE solutions), as well as comparison of different data error models.
1. How large are water balance data errors and to what extent can they be reduced?
2. How large are water balance model errors and to what extent can they be reduced?
3. To what extent does quantifying and reducing data and model errors eliminate trade-offs in fitting multiple datasets?
The strategy is constructed based on an error estimation and water balance data fusion method and the original and the advanced version of the Water Partition and Balance model (Wapaba), then tested in the Smoky Hill River catchment. When using unprocessed data, the water balance is not closed for the basin. The discharge simulation has the fitting precision index the Box-Cox transformed root mean squared error (TRMSE) in the range of 0.70 - 1.43 for different datasets and in calibration and validation period. Indexes of discharge fitting σma$ exceed 1.66. After closing the water balance with the mean time series of all fluxes, TRMSE decreases to 0.55. Considering data uncertainties, TRMSE is further declined to 0.29 and σ drops to 0.46. After that, the model structure is also improved. When using the modified model to calibrate on only ETa and TWSA for calibration (TRMSE for discharge = 0.87), the performance is similar to that of using the original Wapaba on all fluxes (TRMSE for discharge = 0.86). The fitting precision index σ for TWSA also decreases.
The research demonstrates the effectiveness of the data fusion method in correcting satellite time series and sheds light on the potential of application of this strategy in the ungauged area through the comparison of different calibration cases. After modification, the strategy is able to reproduce the flow regime, without using in-situ data, to the same degree as all three hydrological components (discharge, actual evapotranspiration and water storage) are used for calibration.
...
1. How large are water balance data errors and to what extent can they be reduced?
2. How large are water balance model errors and to what extent can they be reduced?
3. To what extent does quantifying and reducing data and model errors eliminate trade-offs in fitting multiple datasets?
The strategy is constructed based on an error estimation and water balance data fusion method and the original and the advanced version of the Water Partition and Balance model (Wapaba), then tested in the Smoky Hill River catchment. When using unprocessed data, the water balance is not closed for the basin. The discharge simulation has the fitting precision index the Box-Cox transformed root mean squared error (TRMSE) in the range of 0.70 - 1.43 for different datasets and in calibration and validation period. Indexes of discharge fitting σma$ exceed 1.66. After closing the water balance with the mean time series of all fluxes, TRMSE decreases to 0.55. Considering data uncertainties, TRMSE is further declined to 0.29 and σ drops to 0.46. After that, the model structure is also improved. When using the modified model to calibrate on only ETa and TWSA for calibration (TRMSE for discharge = 0.87), the performance is similar to that of using the original Wapaba on all fluxes (TRMSE for discharge = 0.86). The fitting precision index σ for TWSA also decreases.
The research demonstrates the effectiveness of the data fusion method in correcting satellite time series and sheds light on the potential of application of this strategy in the ungauged area through the comparison of different calibration cases. After modification, the strategy is able to reproduce the flow regime, without using in-situ data, to the same degree as all three hydrological components (discharge, actual evapotranspiration and water storage) are used for calibration.
Gaussian Process Regression Models for Predicting Water Retention Curves
Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Modelling Uncertainty in Hydraulic Curves
Genetic Programming in Hydrology
Using genetic programming in conceptual modelling
MnO4 – Fe(III) dosing to rapid sand filters for removing arsenic from drinking water to <1 µg/l
A case study in Katwijk (Dunea)
The aim of the research was to asses whether data assimilation can reduce the uncertainty on the water level predictions in a Delfland polder. The polder is modelled with a conceptual rainfall-runoff model in Sobek RR, while the data assimilation is implemented as an ensemble Kalman filter in OpenDA.
In order to manipulate the states in Sobek RR for data assimilation, the model was extended by a black-box wrapper that was newly created in Java for this research.
To asses the theoretical applicability of data assimilation in a polder area, four twin experiments were carried out, which differed only in the model components to which noise was applied. The four set-ups included the use of a rainfall multiplier, additive noise on the model states, additive noise on the groundwater state and a single multiplier for all states. The results were compared visually and objectively through the probabilistic Nash Sutcliffe, a model efficiency coefficient.
All set ups for the twin experiment generated good results for the assimilated water level, mimicking the observed water levels closely with probabilistic Nash Sutcliffe values ranging between 0.92 to 0.97. However, only the set up with the rainfall multiplier exhibited good score measures for the hidden states, with an average of 0.6, showing a significant improvement over the case without assimilation. The other twin experiments failed to represent the hidden states, with average score measures below zero.
The data assimilation set-up with the rainfall multiplier was then applied using water level observations from Tedingerbroek polder. The pump pattern and magnitude of water levels of the modelled and observed water level differed significantly. The influence of the different model components on the modelled water level was assessed, from which was concluded that these could not account for the difference in modelled and observed values. Possible explanations are due to a non-representative measurement point in the polder or additional unknown water fluxes coming into the polder.
Recommended further research should focus on creating a larger observation network; implementing multiple water level observation locations, collecting pump discharges and taking measurements of the storage in greenhouse basins. The last could give a method to validate the assimilation of the hidden states, whereas the pump discharges should be used as additional observation in the data assimilation.
...
The aim of the research was to asses whether data assimilation can reduce the uncertainty on the water level predictions in a Delfland polder. The polder is modelled with a conceptual rainfall-runoff model in Sobek RR, while the data assimilation is implemented as an ensemble Kalman filter in OpenDA.
In order to manipulate the states in Sobek RR for data assimilation, the model was extended by a black-box wrapper that was newly created in Java for this research.
To asses the theoretical applicability of data assimilation in a polder area, four twin experiments were carried out, which differed only in the model components to which noise was applied. The four set-ups included the use of a rainfall multiplier, additive noise on the model states, additive noise on the groundwater state and a single multiplier for all states. The results were compared visually and objectively through the probabilistic Nash Sutcliffe, a model efficiency coefficient.
All set ups for the twin experiment generated good results for the assimilated water level, mimicking the observed water levels closely with probabilistic Nash Sutcliffe values ranging between 0.92 to 0.97. However, only the set up with the rainfall multiplier exhibited good score measures for the hidden states, with an average of 0.6, showing a significant improvement over the case without assimilation. The other twin experiments failed to represent the hidden states, with average score measures below zero.
The data assimilation set-up with the rainfall multiplier was then applied using water level observations from Tedingerbroek polder. The pump pattern and magnitude of water levels of the modelled and observed water level differed significantly. The influence of the different model components on the modelled water level was assessed, from which was concluded that these could not account for the difference in modelled and observed values. Possible explanations are due to a non-representative measurement point in the polder or additional unknown water fluxes coming into the polder.
Recommended further research should focus on creating a larger observation network; implementing multiple water level observation locations, collecting pump discharges and taking measurements of the storage in greenhouse basins. The last could give a method to validate the assimilation of the hidden states, whereas the pump discharges should be used as additional observation in the data assimilation.