L. Willemet
info
Please Note
<p>This page displays the records of the person named above and is not linked to a unique person identifier. This record may need to be merged to a profile.</p>
2 records found
1
Our remarkable sense of touch provides us the feedback that is crucial for successfully manipulating a wide range of objects.
The unconscious synergy between touch and the precision grip is particularly astonishing.
During precision manipulation, humans constantly control their grip force to maintain a safety margin of approximately 25 percent above the minimum force required to prevent held objects from slipping.
The ability to accurately control this safety margin heavily relies on tactile feedback founded on sensed deformations of our fingertips.
Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using this feedback, humans even manage to maintain this safety margin independently of the weight or friction of a lifted object, and when the weight of a held object is perturbed.
However, it is still unknown whether the sense of touch can help us to maintain this safety margin when the friction of a statically held object is perturbed.
As previous methods could not deliver these friction perturbations, we demonstrated the viability of a new friction perturbation method that we employed to fill this knowledge gap.
Here we show that humans in fact do not adapt their grip force in response to an abrupt increase of friction, but do increase their grip force in response to an abrupt decrease of friction.
The asymmetry of these grip adaptations is consistent with current hypotheses on the limitations of our sense of friction.
Our results support the existence of the hypothesized inability of our sense of touch to directly sense an increase of friction.
These findings can help to enhance the haptic interaction between humans and machines, and may inspire the design of an artificial sense of touch that can greatly improve the manipulation dexterity of robotic grippers. ...
The unconscious synergy between touch and the precision grip is particularly astonishing.
During precision manipulation, humans constantly control their grip force to maintain a safety margin of approximately 25 percent above the minimum force required to prevent held objects from slipping.
The ability to accurately control this safety margin heavily relies on tactile feedback founded on sensed deformations of our fingertips.
Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using this feedback, humans even manage to maintain this safety margin independently of the weight or friction of a lifted object, and when the weight of a held object is perturbed.
However, it is still unknown whether the sense of touch can help us to maintain this safety margin when the friction of a statically held object is perturbed.
As previous methods could not deliver these friction perturbations, we demonstrated the viability of a new friction perturbation method that we employed to fill this knowledge gap.
Here we show that humans in fact do not adapt their grip force in response to an abrupt increase of friction, but do increase their grip force in response to an abrupt decrease of friction.
The asymmetry of these grip adaptations is consistent with current hypotheses on the limitations of our sense of friction.
Our results support the existence of the hypothesized inability of our sense of touch to directly sense an increase of friction.
These findings can help to enhance the haptic interaction between humans and machines, and may inspire the design of an artificial sense of touch that can greatly improve the manipulation dexterity of robotic grippers. ...
Our remarkable sense of touch provides us the feedback that is crucial for successfully manipulating a wide range of objects.
The unconscious synergy between touch and the precision grip is particularly astonishing.
During precision manipulation, humans constantly control their grip force to maintain a safety margin of approximately 25 percent above the minimum force required to prevent held objects from slipping.
The ability to accurately control this safety margin heavily relies on tactile feedback founded on sensed deformations of our fingertips.
Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using this feedback, humans even manage to maintain this safety margin independently of the weight or friction of a lifted object, and when the weight of a held object is perturbed.
However, it is still unknown whether the sense of touch can help us to maintain this safety margin when the friction of a statically held object is perturbed.
As previous methods could not deliver these friction perturbations, we demonstrated the viability of a new friction perturbation method that we employed to fill this knowledge gap.
Here we show that humans in fact do not adapt their grip force in response to an abrupt increase of friction, but do increase their grip force in response to an abrupt decrease of friction.
The asymmetry of these grip adaptations is consistent with current hypotheses on the limitations of our sense of friction.
Our results support the existence of the hypothesized inability of our sense of touch to directly sense an increase of friction.
These findings can help to enhance the haptic interaction between humans and machines, and may inspire the design of an artificial sense of touch that can greatly improve the manipulation dexterity of robotic grippers.
The unconscious synergy between touch and the precision grip is particularly astonishing.
During precision manipulation, humans constantly control their grip force to maintain a safety margin of approximately 25 percent above the minimum force required to prevent held objects from slipping.
The ability to accurately control this safety margin heavily relies on tactile feedback founded on sensed deformations of our fingertips.
Previous studies have demonstrated that, by using this feedback, humans even manage to maintain this safety margin independently of the weight or friction of a lifted object, and when the weight of a held object is perturbed.
However, it is still unknown whether the sense of touch can help us to maintain this safety margin when the friction of a statically held object is perturbed.
As previous methods could not deliver these friction perturbations, we demonstrated the viability of a new friction perturbation method that we employed to fill this knowledge gap.
Here we show that humans in fact do not adapt their grip force in response to an abrupt increase of friction, but do increase their grip force in response to an abrupt decrease of friction.
The asymmetry of these grip adaptations is consistent with current hypotheses on the limitations of our sense of friction.
Our results support the existence of the hypothesized inability of our sense of touch to directly sense an increase of friction.
These findings can help to enhance the haptic interaction between humans and machines, and may inspire the design of an artificial sense of touch that can greatly improve the manipulation dexterity of robotic grippers.
Master thesis
(2022)
-
C.A. Langens, M. Wiertlewski, L. Willemet, M. Plooij, J. Kober, E. van der Kruk
Manipulating soft and fragile objects is a challenging task in robotic grasping. The key challenge for robotic grasping is to exert enough grip force to prevent slipping while being gentle enough to prevent damage to an object. Existing grippers used for processes like automatic harvesting of fruits, either apply excessive grip force leading to object damage or react to slip resulting in object release from the gripper. The aim of this study is to develop a grip force controller that uses tactile feedback to maintain a constant frictional safety margin over the minimum required grip force, called Safety Margin Control. Tactile sensors can provide information on friction, which is used to predict slip. An optical tactile sensor is modeled and used in simulations where Safety Margin Control regulates the grip force during interaction with various virtual objects. The deformation of the sensor’s soft viscoelastic membrane is described by local frictional behavior and used to estimate the safety margin. The desired safety margin is set to 30%, based on comparison to the way humans control grip force in their fingertips. The desired value can be tuned to favor release over damage and vice versa. Safety Margin Control is compared to two baseline controllers: React To Slip and Conservative Control. The performance is evaluated based on maximum pressure and total lateral displacement of the object relative to the sensor. Safety Margin Control results in a pressure decrease of 44% on average compared to Conservative Control, and no significant pressure change was observed compared to React To Slip. The total lateral displacement for Safety Margin Control is 0 mm, as opposed to 1.3 mm for React To Slip. Safety Margin Control provides a way forward for automated harvesting as the pressure exerted on an object can be reduced while no slip occurs.
...
Manipulating soft and fragile objects is a challenging task in robotic grasping. The key challenge for robotic grasping is to exert enough grip force to prevent slipping while being gentle enough to prevent damage to an object. Existing grippers used for processes like automatic harvesting of fruits, either apply excessive grip force leading to object damage or react to slip resulting in object release from the gripper. The aim of this study is to develop a grip force controller that uses tactile feedback to maintain a constant frictional safety margin over the minimum required grip force, called Safety Margin Control. Tactile sensors can provide information on friction, which is used to predict slip. An optical tactile sensor is modeled and used in simulations where Safety Margin Control regulates the grip force during interaction with various virtual objects. The deformation of the sensor’s soft viscoelastic membrane is described by local frictional behavior and used to estimate the safety margin. The desired safety margin is set to 30%, based on comparison to the way humans control grip force in their fingertips. The desired value can be tuned to favor release over damage and vice versa. Safety Margin Control is compared to two baseline controllers: React To Slip and Conservative Control. The performance is evaluated based on maximum pressure and total lateral displacement of the object relative to the sensor. Safety Margin Control results in a pressure decrease of 44% on average compared to Conservative Control, and no significant pressure change was observed compared to React To Slip. The total lateral displacement for Safety Margin Control is 0 mm, as opposed to 1.3 mm for React To Slip. Safety Margin Control provides a way forward for automated harvesting as the pressure exerted on an object can be reduced while no slip occurs.