Grappling with Diversity in Research Through Design

Conference Paper (2020)
Author(s)

Boudewijn Boon (TU Delft - Form and Experience)

S.E. Baha (TU Delft - DesIgning Value in Ecosystems)

A. Singh (TU Delft - QRD/Kouwenhoven Lab)

Frithjof E. Wegener (TU Delft - Responsible Marketing and Consumer Behavior)

MC Rozendaal (TU Delft - Human Information Communication Design)

Pieter Jan Stappers (TU Delft - Codesigning Social Change)

Research Group
Form and Experience
Copyright
© 2020 Boudewijn Boon, S.E. Baha, A. Singh, F.E. Wegener, M.C. Rozendaal, P.J. Stappers
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2020.362
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2020
Language
English
Copyright
© 2020 Boudewijn Boon, S.E. Baha, A. Singh, F.E. Wegener, M.C. Rozendaal, P.J. Stappers
Research Group
Form and Experience
Pages (from-to)
139-151
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Since its introduction, Research through Design (RtD) has taken on a wide variety of forms. Currently, there is a lack of clarity about what connects and separates different RtD approaches. Several attempts have been made to clarify these matters, often in the form of a top-down categorization. Here we start on a different path, one that is open for different points of view and grounded in the ongoing concerns and needs of RtD practitioners. Over a two-month period, we engaged a local research community in weekly discussions about RtD in their work. Thoughts and questions were posted on a dedicated wall-space, maintained, and clustered over the weeks. As a result, we identified 11 themes that indicate concerns among participants about RtD. We suggest the themes can help in articulating different RtD ‘styles’ and ‘genres’, and believe this should be a collaborative and bottom-up effort that crosses disciplinary and institutional boundaries.