Correction

Realizing the potential of RF-sputtered hydrogenated fluorine-doped indium oxide as an electrode material for ultrathin SiOx/poly-si passivating contacts (ACS Applied Energy Materials (2020) 3:9 (8606-8618) DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.0c01206)

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Can Han (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

Guangtao Yang (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

Paul Procel (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

Luana Mazzarella (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

Yifeng Zhao (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Stephan Eijt (TU Delft - RST/Fundamental Aspects of Materials and Energy)

Henk Schut (TU Delft - RST/Neutron and Photon Methods for Materials)

Miro Zeman (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

Olindo Isabella (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c00519
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Related content
Research Group
Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
Journal title
ACS Applied Energy Materials
Issue number
3
Volume number
4
Pages (from-to)
2961
Downloads counter
155
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The authors inadvertently misreported the order of magnitude of the TCO deposition pressure, for which all “10-3 Pa” should be intended as “Pa”. The following errors appear in the article. P8607. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION, 2.1. “2.50 × 10-3 Pa”, “1.6 × 10-5 Pa”, and “2.20 × 10-3 Pa” should be read as “2.50 Pa”, “1.6 × 10-2 Pa”, and “2.20 Pa”, respectively. These errors do not affect the “RESULTS AND DISCUSSION” or “CONCLUSIONS” of this article.

Files

License info not available