Startle and surprise in helicopter operations

reported prevalence and application of mitigation strategies

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Daan Vlaskamp (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Alexandra Pollitt (King’s College London)

James Blundell (Cranfield University)

A. Landman (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Eric Groen (Cranfield University, TNO)

MM van Paassen (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

O. Stroosma (TU Delft - International Research Institute for Simulation, Motion and Navigation)

M Mulder (TU Delft - Control & Simulation)

Research Group
Control & Simulation
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-025-00811-y
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Control & Simulation
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

Startle and surprise can impair pilot performance and affect flight safety. This study investigates the prevalence of different startle and surprise events among helicopter pilots, its impact on pilot stress and mental effort and the influence of training background. It also looks at currently used startle mitigation strategies and evaluates the usability of a previously proposed “Aviate, Breathe, Check (ABC)” startle management method (Piras et al. 2023). A survey among 234 helicopter pilots revealed that 96% had experienced impactful startle or surprise events during operations. Scenarios such as disorientation, tail rotor incidents, and flight into instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) were considered particularly stressful. Reported levels of stress and mental effort during startle and surprise events did not differ between pilots with higher and lower experience levels or between pilots with a different training background (military or civilian). Only 38% of pilots indicated they were specifically trained to deal with startle and surprise and only 1% were trained to use a breathing technique. Most pilots (90%) expressed openness to implementing the ABC method and expected benefits from using it. Concerns regarding time constraints in critical situations emerged as the primary objection to adopting this technique. Overall, the findings indicate that the introduction of a startle management method tailored for helicopter operations could significantly enhance safety, especially given the higher accident rates compared to fixed-wing operations. Future research should focus on developing effective training protocols that account for the unique challenges of helicopter flying.