R. Ktori
Please Note
9 records found
1
As water research and industry shift towards resource recovery plants, comprehensive assessment methods are needed to capture environmental trade-offs. Existing life cycle assessments (LCA) on desalination often neglect key methodological challenges in multi-product zero-liquid-discharge (ZLD) systems, risking misleading conclusions. This study applies LCA to conventional desalination and with three resource recovery scenarios (integrated desalination and brine treatment) in Cyprus: Sc1) maximum water recovery using waste heat (WH), Sc2) integrated desalination plant with brine treatment using WH, Sc3) electricity-based desalination with chemicals recovery, to assess how key methodological decisions influence the results and decisions. Five impact categories were analysed: climate change, human toxicity, marine ecotoxicity, water depletion, and fossil depletion. Without product substitution, multi-product ZLD systems show higher absolute impacts than SWRO due to increased energy and chemical demands. However, when credits for recovered salts and chemicals are considered, Scenarios 2 and 3 achieve large net reductions compared to conventional production, highlighting the sustainability potential of resource recovery. Results proved highly sensitive to methodological choices: functional unit selection (increase up to 59 %), allocation methods (variation from 54 % to 90 %), while excluding WH altered impacts by up to 89 %, emphasizing the need for transparent reporting to support robust decision-making in desalination design. Sensitivity analysis showed that integrating renewable energy could cut climate change and fossil depletion impacts by up to 99 %, though with trade-offs in marine ecotoxicity and water depletion. Rather than proposing new methods, this work provides critical guidance on applying standardized LCA options to complex systems, offering directly relevant insights for practitioners and policy-makers in sustainable desalination design.
While desalination with resource recovery offers an alternative source of water, salts, and chemicals, its sustainability depends on local conditions and necessitates a holistic evaluation. Assessing these systems is particularly complex when water, a primary good, is among the recovered products. This research aims to refine assessment methodologies and explore trade-offs in integrated desalination and brine treatment. It adopts an exploratory, mixed-methods approach, beginning with a systematic literature review and the development of a sustainability assessment framework that prioritizes stakeholder participation.
In Chapter 2, the current sustainability assessment frameworks in desalination, water treatment, and resource recovery were reviewed and analysed. The literature review identified critical shortcomings in current sustainability assessments for seawater desalination and brine treatment systems. These assessments notably neglect social aspects and stakeholder involvement. To address these deficiencies, we proposed a new Sustainability Assessment (SA) framework that integrates participatory multi-criteria analysis and value-sensitive design into the decision-making process.
An open-source software tool in Python was developed in Chapter 3 to simulate the desalination and mineral recovery processes, providing data that will inform later assessments. The outputs from this software directly support the analyses presented in Chapters 4–7, illustrating its integral role in this thesis and its potential for broader applicability.
The value-sensitive design (VSD) approach was applied in Chapter 4 to design and evaluate integrated seawater desalination and brine treatment, ensuring that technical scenarios align with societal values. Four configurations were assessed for trade-offs between resource recovery, energy consumption, and environmental impact. While maximizing water and salt recovery improves resource security, it increases energy use and CO₂ emissions. The study highlights the need for region-specific solutions and demonstrates how VSD fosters stakeholder dialogue, supporting sustainable and socially acceptable designs. These scenarios serve as the basis for analysis in subsequent chapters.
In Chapter 5, the economic performance of desalination systems focused on resource recovery was assessed using the levelized cost indicator. Allocation factors were used to fairly distribute costs and income from recovered products. A comparison of traditional Non-allocation and novel cost calculation methods revealed that the Non-allocation method overestimates production costs, resulting in inflated product prices. The Economic allocation approach, by redistributing costs to higher-value products, assigns a minimal percentage to water costs, unlike the heavy loading seen with Non-allocation.
Chapter 6 investigates the environmental performance of integrated desalination and brine treatment systems for resource recovery using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The study highlights how key methodological choices—like functional unit and treatment of waste heat—substantially affect results. Overall, resource recovery systems demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional production systems of the same product basket, highlighting the need for integrated practices.
Finally, the effect of interdependence among decision criteria in the multi-criteria decision-making process for sustainability assessment was evaluated in Chapter 7. By combining the Best-Worst Model and the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory technique, we proposed a novel weighting method that accounts for interdependencies. Applied to desalination and brine treatment, results showed that while numerical impacts are moderate, capturing interdependencies improves conceptual understanding—particularly in single-stakeholder settings.
In Chapter 8, a summary of the main findings of this thesis is provided, along with the limitations of this work and an outlook for future research directions based on these findings.
...
While desalination with resource recovery offers an alternative source of water, salts, and chemicals, its sustainability depends on local conditions and necessitates a holistic evaluation. Assessing these systems is particularly complex when water, a primary good, is among the recovered products. This research aims to refine assessment methodologies and explore trade-offs in integrated desalination and brine treatment. It adopts an exploratory, mixed-methods approach, beginning with a systematic literature review and the development of a sustainability assessment framework that prioritizes stakeholder participation.
In Chapter 2, the current sustainability assessment frameworks in desalination, water treatment, and resource recovery were reviewed and analysed. The literature review identified critical shortcomings in current sustainability assessments for seawater desalination and brine treatment systems. These assessments notably neglect social aspects and stakeholder involvement. To address these deficiencies, we proposed a new Sustainability Assessment (SA) framework that integrates participatory multi-criteria analysis and value-sensitive design into the decision-making process.
An open-source software tool in Python was developed in Chapter 3 to simulate the desalination and mineral recovery processes, providing data that will inform later assessments. The outputs from this software directly support the analyses presented in Chapters 4–7, illustrating its integral role in this thesis and its potential for broader applicability.
The value-sensitive design (VSD) approach was applied in Chapter 4 to design and evaluate integrated seawater desalination and brine treatment, ensuring that technical scenarios align with societal values. Four configurations were assessed for trade-offs between resource recovery, energy consumption, and environmental impact. While maximizing water and salt recovery improves resource security, it increases energy use and CO₂ emissions. The study highlights the need for region-specific solutions and demonstrates how VSD fosters stakeholder dialogue, supporting sustainable and socially acceptable designs. These scenarios serve as the basis for analysis in subsequent chapters.
In Chapter 5, the economic performance of desalination systems focused on resource recovery was assessed using the levelized cost indicator. Allocation factors were used to fairly distribute costs and income from recovered products. A comparison of traditional Non-allocation and novel cost calculation methods revealed that the Non-allocation method overestimates production costs, resulting in inflated product prices. The Economic allocation approach, by redistributing costs to higher-value products, assigns a minimal percentage to water costs, unlike the heavy loading seen with Non-allocation.
Chapter 6 investigates the environmental performance of integrated desalination and brine treatment systems for resource recovery using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). The study highlights how key methodological choices—like functional unit and treatment of waste heat—substantially affect results. Overall, resource recovery systems demonstrated superior performance compared to conventional production systems of the same product basket, highlighting the need for integrated practices.
Finally, the effect of interdependence among decision criteria in the multi-criteria decision-making process for sustainability assessment was evaluated in Chapter 7. By combining the Best-Worst Model and the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory technique, we proposed a novel weighting method that accounts for interdependencies. Applied to desalination and brine treatment, results showed that while numerical impacts are moderate, capturing interdependencies improves conceptual understanding—particularly in single-stakeholder settings.
In Chapter 8, a summary of the main findings of this thesis is provided, along with the limitations of this work and an outlook for future research directions based on these findings.
Sustainability assessment framework for integrated seawater desalination and resource recovery
A participatory approach
Economic evaluation of water and resource recovery plants
A novel perspective on levelized cost
Water treatment facilities are bound to incorporate resource recovery in the near future, necessitating novel economic assessments that capture the full economic potential of these systems. This study evaluates three cost calculation methods—Non-allocation, Economic allocation, and Dual allocation— to improve the accuracy of the Levelized Cost for multi-product desalination and brine treatment plants. The methods were tested across three technical scenarios: Sc1) maximum water recovery, Sc2) integrated desalination with brine treatment for resource recovery and Sc3) electricity-based desalination for chemical recovery. Results reveal that the traditional Non-allocation method tends to overestimate production costs by uniformly applying fixed costs across products, leading to inflated levelized costs. The Economic allocation approach reduces the levelized costs of water and other recovered products by up to 81 %, enhancing competitiveness with conventional production methods. The Dual allocation approach is most effective for recovered salts and chemicals, ensuring fair cost distribution and fostering competitiveness with linear systems. Sc2 is the most economically feasible under both novel approaches due to its balanced mix of high-value products and moderate operational costs. These findings suggest that cost calculation methods should align with plant objectives: Economic allocation for scenarios prioritizing water recovery and Dual allocation for maximizing the value of salts and chemicals. This study provides a foundation for tailored economic assessments and guides plant design and investment decisions.
Pioneering minimum liquid discharge desalination
A pilot study in Lampedusa Island
Minimum Liquid Discharge (MLD) and Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) schemes have been widely proposed in the recent scientific literature not only as a possible solution to brine disposal but also as a non-conventional sustainable source of raw materials. Nevertheless, very few works have pushed the idea towards a real demonstration activity, and this somehow limits the reliability that such schemes have with respect to the real implementation potential at the industrial scale. In this work, for the first time in the literature, an integrated treatment chain for the sustainable production of freshwater and minerals has been demonstrated at a pre-industrial scale, in the island of Lampedusa (Italy). The treatment chain included a Nanofiltration (NF) step to separate monovalent and bivalent ions, followed by a Multi-Effect Distillation (MED) unit, powered by waste heat from a Thermal Power plant, generating high-quality water (<30 μS/cm) and an ultra-concentrated brine. The latter was treated in Evaporation Ponds (EPs) to generate high purity NaCl (>99 %). On the other side, the NF retentate was treated to selectively recover magnesium and calcium hydroxides (Mg(OH)2 purity up to 98 %) in a novel Multiple Feed-Plug Flow Reactor (MF-PFR). The resulting brine fed an ElectroDialysis with Bipolar Membranes unit (EDBM), generating in-situ alkaline and acidic solutions: chemicals needed for internal usage in the plant. All units were successfully tested, reaching satisfactory performance indicators. Furthermore, the stability of each unit during the daily operational run was assessed and successfully achieved, demonstrating not only the technical feasibility of the proposed demo plant, but also the feasibility of MLD as a sustainable alternative for minerals recovery.
Thermal seawater desalination for irrigation purposes in a water-stressed region
Emerging value tensions in full-scale implementation
Water scarcity in arid regions has driven the spread of desalination. These systems contribute to water access but come at an intensive energy cost, and lead to brine discharge and associated environmental impacts. This work aims to investigate emerging societal issues and tensions when developing and implementing a thermal desalination system to produce irrigation water in the South of Spain. This has been done in a demonstration system for solar desalination able to recover water and salts from desalination brine. For this purpose, a context-sensitive design exercise has been implemented. First, tensions between social values expressed by diverse stakeholders have been identified. Then, a set of technical scenarios for the full-scale implementation of the system were designed and evaluated, comparing them to conventional membrane desalination. The analysis indicates high economic and energy costs to avoid the environmental impacts of increasing water production.
This work explores resource recovery coupled to seawater desalination in small islands. As small islands depend on seawater desalination for water access, they make an excellent ground for exploring the trade-offs associated to resource recovery, like potential economic gains, energy use, and environmental impacts. Here, we investigated these tensions in the context of Lampedusa, in Italy. We then developed and evaluated scenarios for the recovery of additional water, Mg, and other resources from brines, to identify if and how resource recovery is an interesting approach for the island vis-à-vis these tensions. We have found that the potential to increase water production with water recovery from brine is an interesting alternative for small islands, especially when harnessing waste heat. However, while some technologies offer possibilities for recovering additional resources, in places like small islands the potential benefits from additional recovery do not seem to justify the costs to the local system.
European policy encourages the adoption of sustainable systems that promote the efficient use and recovery of minerals and chemicals. In this respect, desalination brines do contain a dramatic amount of valuable minerals and can be valorized through appropriate treatments rather than releasing them into the environment. This paper proposes an innovative brine recovery system for obtaining high purity chemicals through the integration of Eutectic Freeze Crystallization (EFC) and Electrodialysis with Bipolar Membrane (EDBM) technologies. Two separate laboratory-scale experimental campaigns were carried out to validate the potential integration of the two processes. Mirabilite (Na2SO4∙10H2O) has been recovered with a purity of 99.9% using the EFC, and a feed rich in NaCl with low impurities has been further processed in an EDBM unit. EDBM tests with feed solutions simulating EFC effluents have shown that it is possible to produce acidic and basic solutions with high purity (>99%), despite the presence of impurities in the feed. Interestingly, the low EDBM specific consumptions of 0.9–1.1 kWh kg−1NaOH at 100 A m−2 and 1.3–1.6 kWh kg−1NaOH at 300 A m−2 were comparable with and without impurities. In the context of the circular economy strategy promoted by the EU-H2020 Water Mining project, the current study demonstrates that this integrated system effectively minimizes waste, promoting sustainability while providing a potential economic return.