D.C. Duives
Please Note
13 records found
1
is created and the model is then calibrated using extensive data from the case study, structured with an iterative calibration cycle. For the model selection, Crowd:it, MassMotion, Pedestrian Dynamics, Vadere and Viswalk are compared. Vadere and Viswalk are excluded, respectively due to long runtimes and to limited license availability. After the five comparison experiments, the Social Force Model MassMotion is found to be the best suited for this setting due to its computational efficiency, ability to handle stationary agents and realistic pedestrian behaviour. A model is formulated with two experiments: one for the ingress and one for the egress. The model uses a fixed arrival function and a fixed start of egress function. A novel grid cell structure is introduced which divides the stage area into different cells to be able to control the spread of agents over the stage area. Each cell is given a value which consists of two parts: static and dynamic values. The static values are mapped based on the line
of sight, the distance from the stage, the bar adjacency and the remaining ingress effect. The dynamic values are based on the travel time and the density within a grid cell, where the last one is used to limit the inflow into a cell which exceeds its average density. From the calibration, a difference between the ingress and egress mean free flow speed is found. During ingress visitors walk slower compared to egress. Additionally, a decrease in the crowd density between the start of the show and the end of the show is found due
to the crowd spreading out. The model as proposed in this study overestimates the KPIs of the model but is able to show the dynamics of the stage area well, so it can be used for comparing different infrastructural layouts. The model can predict bottlenecks caused by everyone taking the most direct route to their destination, but not other bottlenecks. The calibration has been limited by the available time, but structural problems are identified. Based on the model
it is concluded that better stationary agent behaviour and local dynamic path planning are required to be able to simulate the ingress and egress of stage areas at large scale outdoor music festivals. ...
is created and the model is then calibrated using extensive data from the case study, structured with an iterative calibration cycle. For the model selection, Crowd:it, MassMotion, Pedestrian Dynamics, Vadere and Viswalk are compared. Vadere and Viswalk are excluded, respectively due to long runtimes and to limited license availability. After the five comparison experiments, the Social Force Model MassMotion is found to be the best suited for this setting due to its computational efficiency, ability to handle stationary agents and realistic pedestrian behaviour. A model is formulated with two experiments: one for the ingress and one for the egress. The model uses a fixed arrival function and a fixed start of egress function. A novel grid cell structure is introduced which divides the stage area into different cells to be able to control the spread of agents over the stage area. Each cell is given a value which consists of two parts: static and dynamic values. The static values are mapped based on the line
of sight, the distance from the stage, the bar adjacency and the remaining ingress effect. The dynamic values are based on the travel time and the density within a grid cell, where the last one is used to limit the inflow into a cell which exceeds its average density. From the calibration, a difference between the ingress and egress mean free flow speed is found. During ingress visitors walk slower compared to egress. Additionally, a decrease in the crowd density between the start of the show and the end of the show is found due
to the crowd spreading out. The model as proposed in this study overestimates the KPIs of the model but is able to show the dynamics of the stage area well, so it can be used for comparing different infrastructural layouts. The model can predict bottlenecks caused by everyone taking the most direct route to their destination, but not other bottlenecks. The calibration has been limited by the available time, but structural problems are identified. Based on the model
it is concluded that better stationary agent behaviour and local dynamic path planning are required to be able to simulate the ingress and egress of stage areas at large scale outdoor music festivals.
Measuring Sustainable Accessibility at the Neighbourhood scale
A GIS-based multimodal index approach to measure sustainable access to daily opportunities
Sustainable accessibility is defined in this research as the extent to which people can reach daily opportunities within acceptable travel times by walking, cycling, and multimodal combinations of these active modes with public transport. To operationalize this concept, a Sustainable Accessibility Index (SAI) is developed. This composite index combines the number of reachable opportunities, the reachability of those opportunities within acceptable travel times, and the sufficiency of the reachable opportunities for daily life. The index is calculated from multiple origin points within each neighbourhood and aggregated into a neighbourhood-level sustainable accessibility (SA) score. This makes it possible to calculate an overall neighbourhood SA score, while also being able to decompose this score into underlying layers. These specific layer SA scores could help show whether low accessibility in the neighbourhood is related to longer travel times, too few reachable opportunities, weak access to specific opportunities, or spatial inequalities within a neighbourhood.
The method is applied to nine neighbourhoods in the Netherlands across different degrees of urbanisation. The results show that sustainable accessibility is generally higher in more urbanised neighbourhoods, but accessibility differences are not only explained by urbanisation. Local opportunity distribution, transport network systems, mode-specific travel times, and origin locations within neighbourhoods also influence the SA scores. Additionally, the results show that the multimodal transport combinations of walking and cycling combined with public transport tend to extend access beyond the immediate neighbourhood. However, in highly- and moderate urbanised neighbourhoods, cycling can outperform the multimodal combination. This suggests that public transport adds the most value in neighbourhoods where walking or cycling alone does not provide sufficient access to daily opportunities. Furthermore, the decomposed results show that neighbourhood averages can hide substantial differences in sustainable accessibility within a neighbourhood. Lastly, the sensitivity analysis indicates that the main spatial and modal patterns are generally stable but exact SA scores and interpretations depend on methodological choices such as travel-time thresholds, the way opportunities are counted, and aggregation rules of the SAI.
The main value of the SAI is that it makes sustainable accessibility visible, measurable, and explainable. The resulting index could help transport planners identify what kind of accessibility problem exists and select targeted intervention to improve everyday sustainable accessibility. ...
Sustainable accessibility is defined in this research as the extent to which people can reach daily opportunities within acceptable travel times by walking, cycling, and multimodal combinations of these active modes with public transport. To operationalize this concept, a Sustainable Accessibility Index (SAI) is developed. This composite index combines the number of reachable opportunities, the reachability of those opportunities within acceptable travel times, and the sufficiency of the reachable opportunities for daily life. The index is calculated from multiple origin points within each neighbourhood and aggregated into a neighbourhood-level sustainable accessibility (SA) score. This makes it possible to calculate an overall neighbourhood SA score, while also being able to decompose this score into underlying layers. These specific layer SA scores could help show whether low accessibility in the neighbourhood is related to longer travel times, too few reachable opportunities, weak access to specific opportunities, or spatial inequalities within a neighbourhood.
The method is applied to nine neighbourhoods in the Netherlands across different degrees of urbanisation. The results show that sustainable accessibility is generally higher in more urbanised neighbourhoods, but accessibility differences are not only explained by urbanisation. Local opportunity distribution, transport network systems, mode-specific travel times, and origin locations within neighbourhoods also influence the SA scores. Additionally, the results show that the multimodal transport combinations of walking and cycling combined with public transport tend to extend access beyond the immediate neighbourhood. However, in highly- and moderate urbanised neighbourhoods, cycling can outperform the multimodal combination. This suggests that public transport adds the most value in neighbourhoods where walking or cycling alone does not provide sufficient access to daily opportunities. Furthermore, the decomposed results show that neighbourhood averages can hide substantial differences in sustainable accessibility within a neighbourhood. Lastly, the sensitivity analysis indicates that the main spatial and modal patterns are generally stable but exact SA scores and interpretations depend on methodological choices such as travel-time thresholds, the way opportunities are counted, and aggregation rules of the SAI.
The main value of the SAI is that it makes sustainable accessibility visible, measurable, and explainable. The resulting index could help transport planners identify what kind of accessibility problem exists and select targeted intervention to improve everyday sustainable accessibility.
Journey through Crowds!
Modeling passenger distribution on railway platforms in the Netherlands: a discrete choice approach
A combination of descriptive statistics, spatial analysis, and discrete choice modeling was applied to a high-resolution dataset comprising 142,256 sensor-based observations collected under 49 situational scenarios. The platform was discretized into spatial cells characterized by distance to entrances, information boards, and the track edge, proximity to seating, leaning areas and kiosks, passenger density, lighting conditions, and weather.
Descriptive analyses reveal systematic clustering near entrances and comfort-related facilities, confirming the central role of accessibility and physical support in waiting behavior. Passengers generally avoid track-adjacent areas, while moderate social clustering occurs at intermediate densities. Environmental conditions further influence spatial patterns, with adverse weather and poor lighting reinforcing concentration in sheltered zones.
A multinomial logit model identifies nine statistically significant determinants of waiting location choice. Seating exhibits the strongest positive effect, followed by entrance proximity and leaning facilities, highlighting comfort and accessibility as primary drivers. Safety considerations reduce the attractiveness of areas near the track, although this effect weakens under favorable lighting and weather conditions. Areas near kiosks and information boards are avoided, indicating the disutility associated with congestion and circulation conflicts. The model demonstrates strong predictive performance and reproduces observed passenger distributions with high accuracy.
The findings show that platform waiting behavior reflects structured trade-offs between comfort, safety, accessibility, congestion avoidance, social context, and environmental conditions. Based on these results, design recommendations are proposed, including redistributing seating and leaning facilities, dispersing entrance flows, relocating kiosks and information boards toward circulation corridors, applying adaptive lighting strategies, and maintaining clear safety buffers near the track edge. The study provides a behavioral and empirical foundation for improving comfort, safety, and operational efficiency at Dutch railway stations. ...
A combination of descriptive statistics, spatial analysis, and discrete choice modeling was applied to a high-resolution dataset comprising 142,256 sensor-based observations collected under 49 situational scenarios. The platform was discretized into spatial cells characterized by distance to entrances, information boards, and the track edge, proximity to seating, leaning areas and kiosks, passenger density, lighting conditions, and weather.
Descriptive analyses reveal systematic clustering near entrances and comfort-related facilities, confirming the central role of accessibility and physical support in waiting behavior. Passengers generally avoid track-adjacent areas, while moderate social clustering occurs at intermediate densities. Environmental conditions further influence spatial patterns, with adverse weather and poor lighting reinforcing concentration in sheltered zones.
A multinomial logit model identifies nine statistically significant determinants of waiting location choice. Seating exhibits the strongest positive effect, followed by entrance proximity and leaning facilities, highlighting comfort and accessibility as primary drivers. Safety considerations reduce the attractiveness of areas near the track, although this effect weakens under favorable lighting and weather conditions. Areas near kiosks and information boards are avoided, indicating the disutility associated with congestion and circulation conflicts. The model demonstrates strong predictive performance and reproduces observed passenger distributions with high accuracy.
The findings show that platform waiting behavior reflects structured trade-offs between comfort, safety, accessibility, congestion avoidance, social context, and environmental conditions. Based on these results, design recommendations are proposed, including redistributing seating and leaning facilities, dispersing entrance flows, relocating kiosks and information boards toward circulation corridors, applying adaptive lighting strategies, and maintaining clear safety buffers near the track edge. The study provides a behavioral and empirical foundation for improving comfort, safety, and operational efficiency at Dutch railway stations.
Modal shift strategies from car to public transport via shared bicycle integration
A case study on suburban commuting in South Holland
Results underline the critical role of competitive public transport travel times in fostering shared bicycle adoption. In areas where public transport significantly lags behind cars in travel time, the potential for shared bicycles is diminished. Shared bicycles are most effective for last-mile distances between 500 and 3,000 metres, but availability issues and reliance on private bicycles limit their adoption. Cost measures, including employer subsidies and reduced shared bicycle fees, significantly encourage uptake, while car parking charges predominantly shift commuters to public transport. A combination of free shared bicycles and paid parking achieves a potential modal shift of 10 percentage points, though inclusivity remains essential.
The stated preference model reveals that shared bicycle costs are perceived as three times more negative than travel time, particularly among younger and low-income travellers. Women and lower-educated individuals are more sensitive to public transport travel times, while frequent car users show less aversion to longer car journeys. Furthermore, hybrid systems such as Donkey Republic meet the needs of frequent commuters, while e-bikes provide limited added value in suburban areas due to car dominance over longer distances.
This study concludes that optimising public transport competitiveness, improving shared bicycle availability, and introducing cost incentives are vital for achieving a sustainable modal shift. Recommendations include integrating shared bicycles into public transport cards, reallocating bicycle parking, and enhancing hub locations to strengthen the synergy between shared bicycles and public transport. ...
Results underline the critical role of competitive public transport travel times in fostering shared bicycle adoption. In areas where public transport significantly lags behind cars in travel time, the potential for shared bicycles is diminished. Shared bicycles are most effective for last-mile distances between 500 and 3,000 metres, but availability issues and reliance on private bicycles limit their adoption. Cost measures, including employer subsidies and reduced shared bicycle fees, significantly encourage uptake, while car parking charges predominantly shift commuters to public transport. A combination of free shared bicycles and paid parking achieves a potential modal shift of 10 percentage points, though inclusivity remains essential.
The stated preference model reveals that shared bicycle costs are perceived as three times more negative than travel time, particularly among younger and low-income travellers. Women and lower-educated individuals are more sensitive to public transport travel times, while frequent car users show less aversion to longer car journeys. Furthermore, hybrid systems such as Donkey Republic meet the needs of frequent commuters, while e-bikes provide limited added value in suburban areas due to car dominance over longer distances.
This study concludes that optimising public transport competitiveness, improving shared bicycle availability, and introducing cost incentives are vital for achieving a sustainable modal shift. Recommendations include integrating shared bicycles into public transport cards, reallocating bicycle parking, and enhancing hub locations to strengthen the synergy between shared bicycles and public transport.
Drawing upon data gathered from the CrowdLimits experiments, we start the exploration of how various factors impact the rotation behavior of pedestrians. Our investigation covers crowd density, the fundamental movement scenarios (bidirectional and crossing flows), flow ratio, and the influence of disturbances within the crowd under different scenarios.
Our key findings reveal that all these factors play a role in shaping the frequency of rotations within a crowd. However, the extent and precise conditions under which these factors influence this subject demand further in-depth research and exploration.
In essence, this study addresses the fundamental question: How does shoulder rotation behavior vary concerning macroscopic crowd characteristics, including crowd density, flow ratio, and movement patterns like bidirectional and crossing flows? Through this research, we hope to highlight the complex interplay between these factors and the rotational strategies operated by pedestrians, ultimately enhancing our understanding of crowd dynamics. ...
Drawing upon data gathered from the CrowdLimits experiments, we start the exploration of how various factors impact the rotation behavior of pedestrians. Our investigation covers crowd density, the fundamental movement scenarios (bidirectional and crossing flows), flow ratio, and the influence of disturbances within the crowd under different scenarios.
Our key findings reveal that all these factors play a role in shaping the frequency of rotations within a crowd. However, the extent and precise conditions under which these factors influence this subject demand further in-depth research and exploration.
In essence, this study addresses the fundamental question: How does shoulder rotation behavior vary concerning macroscopic crowd characteristics, including crowd density, flow ratio, and movement patterns like bidirectional and crossing flows? Through this research, we hope to highlight the complex interplay between these factors and the rotational strategies operated by pedestrians, ultimately enhancing our understanding of crowd dynamics.
Therefore the existing model of the PedestrianDynamics - Virus Spread (PeDViS) of Duives et al. (2022) is chosen as the base model to be extended into a model that allows the comparison of the effects of NPIs in an office space.
The NPIs of which the effects are explored in this research are:
• All employees wear a mask while walking
• Increasing the rate of cleaning
• Increasing the ventilation rate from standard rate to the rate advised by government officials
• Allowing only 50 % of the employees to come into the office
• Allowing a maximum number of people in the meeting rooms, equal to 50 % of the capacity of the meeting rooms
A sensitivity analysis has been performed to learn more about the impact of some of the variables related to the meetings held in the office. Both the size and frequency of meetings were found to have some influence on the number of infections.
Next, policy analysis has been performed to learn more about the effectiveness of the NPIs, both individually and combined into policies. This led to conclusions on how large and consistent the effect of each of the NPIs was in reducing the number of infections in office contexts. The results also provided information on under what circumstances NPI could best be implemented and what NPI policies are recommended to be implemented to adhere to different levels of safety. Also, various limitations of this research were identified and recommendations for future work were given for part of them. The most important recommendations for future work are:
• Extending the model to include shared workspaces and the activity of having lunch.
•Testing the impact of more aspects relating to activity scheduling
•Gather data on people’s behaviour when the number of days they can come to the office is limited, to learn more about the inconsistent effect of this NPI.
•Test the impact of the NPIs in a context in which the initial infection risk is low.
...
Therefore the existing model of the PedestrianDynamics - Virus Spread (PeDViS) of Duives et al. (2022) is chosen as the base model to be extended into a model that allows the comparison of the effects of NPIs in an office space.
The NPIs of which the effects are explored in this research are:
• All employees wear a mask while walking
• Increasing the rate of cleaning
• Increasing the ventilation rate from standard rate to the rate advised by government officials
• Allowing only 50 % of the employees to come into the office
• Allowing a maximum number of people in the meeting rooms, equal to 50 % of the capacity of the meeting rooms
A sensitivity analysis has been performed to learn more about the impact of some of the variables related to the meetings held in the office. Both the size and frequency of meetings were found to have some influence on the number of infections.
Next, policy analysis has been performed to learn more about the effectiveness of the NPIs, both individually and combined into policies. This led to conclusions on how large and consistent the effect of each of the NPIs was in reducing the number of infections in office contexts. The results also provided information on under what circumstances NPI could best be implemented and what NPI policies are recommended to be implemented to adhere to different levels of safety. Also, various limitations of this research were identified and recommendations for future work were given for part of them. The most important recommendations for future work are:
• Extending the model to include shared workspaces and the activity of having lunch.
•Testing the impact of more aspects relating to activity scheduling
•Gather data on people’s behaviour when the number of days they can come to the office is limited, to learn more about the inconsistent effect of this NPI.
•Test the impact of the NPIs in a context in which the initial infection risk is low.
The research question was answered through a mixed-methods approach including literature research and expert interviews. A case study was used to apply and validate the MCDM model. VGS were found to offer a range of supporting, regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem services. The performance of VGS in delivering these services was mainly determined by the plants, substrate and support system. In general, living walls have a higher performance than green façades, among which modular living walls perform best. However, context-specific valuation was considered key. Evaluating VGS on the interaction effects between the main system components and the ecosystem services is an effective approach for developing a MCDM model that enhances decision-making and creates support base for implementation. A context-specific impact assessment can be achieved by weighing the relevance of the ecosystem services. Further research that compares the impact of distinct types of VGS is needed to further develop and validate the model, specifically with regard to grey water treatment, education, and wellbeing. ...
The research question was answered through a mixed-methods approach including literature research and expert interviews. A case study was used to apply and validate the MCDM model. VGS were found to offer a range of supporting, regulating, provisioning and cultural ecosystem services. The performance of VGS in delivering these services was mainly determined by the plants, substrate and support system. In general, living walls have a higher performance than green façades, among which modular living walls perform best. However, context-specific valuation was considered key. Evaluating VGS on the interaction effects between the main system components and the ecosystem services is an effective approach for developing a MCDM model that enhances decision-making and creates support base for implementation. A context-specific impact assessment can be achieved by weighing the relevance of the ecosystem services. Further research that compares the impact of distinct types of VGS is needed to further develop and validate the model, specifically with regard to grey water treatment, education, and wellbeing.
Computational decision support for crowd management applications
A case study on operational in-event pedestrian crowd management
Summer in the city: Sun, Swimming - and Sleepless Nights?
Understanding nuisance problems in relation to citizen reporting on nuisance experiences and interventions in the context of urban summer recreation in green-blue open spaces in Amsterdam-east
Forecasting Crowd Movements in Real-Time
A database-driven approach for real-time prediction of crowd movement during mass events
The influence of the visible views on cyclists' route choices
A geospatial approach for the measurement of the determinants in the urban environment based on 3D isovists and cyclists’ GPS trajectories in Amsterdam