C. van Daalen
Please Note
23 records found
1
Policy Analysis of Multi-Actor Systems
Second edition
The impacts of biosecurity measures on Campylobacter contamination in broiler houses and slaughterhouses in the Netherlands
A simulation modelling approach
On the meaning and operationalization of antifragility
Comment on the paper by Groβler
PrESTO
A peer review and peer assessment system with incentives for high quality learning
The PrESTO system is a peer review and peer assessment tool that allows large numbers of students to practice open-ended assignments, while keeping the workload of the teaching staff manageable. PrESTO was originally developed for a quantitative modeling course, but is applicable to any course with open-ended assignments that can be divided into successive steps. The software organizes the peer review and peer assessment workflow, and guides the students through the activities required in each step: review, give feedback on and assess the work of an anonymous predecessor, and then improve and extend it with a next step.
Perspectives on policy analysis
A framework for understanding and design
Residential energy efficiency improvements often have a smaller effect than expected. Although there is agreement on the existence of this effect, called the rebound effect, there is no agreement on the size of the effect. The objective of this study was to investigate the potential of using serious games to assess this effect. We used a game in which participants play home owners who manage their households in terms of energy consumption. Results of experiments with 50 players showed signs of the rebound effect when players with a low efficiency house reduced their energy consumption more than players with a high efficiency house. In addition, some issues related to previous studies were addressed, such as the possibility to perform an ex-ante assessment and to conduct the study in a controlled environment. Calculations of the size of the rebound effect depended on the approach used to determine the expected effect and showed differences between appliances.
Incorporating stakeholder perspectives into model-based scenarios
Exploring the futures of the Dutch gas sector
Several model-based, analytical approaches have been developed recently to deal with the deep uncertainty present in situations for which futures studies are conducted. These approaches focus on covering a wide variety of scenarios and searching for robust strategies. However, they generally do not take the multiplicity of stakeholder perspectives into account in analytic terms, which could bring in diverse opinions and views, not only on possible futures but also on values and interests. In this study, we present an approach to incorporate stakeholder perspectives into model-based scenarios for exploring the future dynamics of the Dutch gas sector. The results demonstrate that the scenario space can be demarcated according to the perspectives. This allows for a systematic comparison of the perspectives and provides a basis for identification of robust strategies. Also, the analysis shows that incompatible elements between the model and perspectives, or within perspectives can be identified. This provides insights about the problem complexity and potential barriers to the futures envisioned by the perspectives. Future research can strengthen this approach by involving stakeholders in modelling and in the model-based representation of the perspective narratives to enhance learning and credibility, and can extend the analysis to identify (socially) robust policies.
Voorwaardelijke toegangssystemen
De toegangspoort tot nieuwe diensten?
Brachial plexus lesions
Validating the expert system PLEXUS
PLEXUS is an expert system which has been designed to advise physicians on the complex subject of brachial plexus injuries. Patient history information and results of neurological, neurophysiological and neuroradiological examinations are entered into the computer by the physician. Computer output consists of the localization of the injury, indication of the severity of the injury, and a treatment plan. PLEXUS was validated in cooperation with four international experts and was tested clinically in four hospitals. The independent validation showed that PLEXUS has a good performance. Features which must be improved include the extension of the functionality of the system to facilitate a more direct communication, and enhancement of the system's ability to assist in data gathering and entry. This study highlights the importance of thorough validation for the development of these kinds of systems.
Field evaluation of knowledge based systems
The medical system PLEXUS