R.R.P. van Nooijen
Please Note
12 records found
1
Improving groundwater–surface water exchange representation in WALRUS
Evaluation of direction- and temperature-dependent resistance parameterization for a managed dutch lowland catchment
Two adaptations are proposed and evaluated against the baseline model. The first is a temperature- and direction-dependent groundwater resistance parameterization (cG), which is intended to represent streambed clogging asymmetry as well as seasonal variability driven by changes in water viscosity. The second is an adapted quickflow partitioning formulation (fQS), which is designed to prevent the complete suppression of land-surface quickflow during extended dry periods. Five model variants are calibrated using a multi-objective framework combining six hydraulic signatures including discharge, flow duration curve, autocorrelation, seasonal runoff coefficient, and normalized groundwater dynamics, and evaluated across a calibration period and two independent testing periods.
All model variants reproduce peak discharge with reasonable skill, but consistently underperform on low flows and summer groundwater dynamics. A structurally recurring opposite-sign error in summer groundwater behaviour, present across all variants and both testing periods, points to systematic underestimation of actual evapotranspiration or outward seepage or overestimation of the equilibrium storage deficit. The adapted fQS formulation produces a physically consistent but negligible improvement, largely absorbed by compensating changes in the quickflow reservoir constant. The direction-dependent cG formulation successfully reproduces asymmetric GW–SW exchange resistance, but introduces elevated summer discharge that worsens seasonal water balance closure. The temperature-dependent component of cG shows no identifiable calibrated influence. Additionally, the spatially uniform representation of managed surface water levels is identified as a source of uncertainty, given the heterogeneous water management across the catchment's sub-catchments.
The results indicate that improving summer unsaturated zone dynamics represents a higher priority for WALRUS development than further GW–SW exchange complexity. The multi-objective calibration framework developed here is directly transferable to comparable lowland catchment applications. ...
Two adaptations are proposed and evaluated against the baseline model. The first is a temperature- and direction-dependent groundwater resistance parameterization (cG), which is intended to represent streambed clogging asymmetry as well as seasonal variability driven by changes in water viscosity. The second is an adapted quickflow partitioning formulation (fQS), which is designed to prevent the complete suppression of land-surface quickflow during extended dry periods. Five model variants are calibrated using a multi-objective framework combining six hydraulic signatures including discharge, flow duration curve, autocorrelation, seasonal runoff coefficient, and normalized groundwater dynamics, and evaluated across a calibration period and two independent testing periods.
All model variants reproduce peak discharge with reasonable skill, but consistently underperform on low flows and summer groundwater dynamics. A structurally recurring opposite-sign error in summer groundwater behaviour, present across all variants and both testing periods, points to systematic underestimation of actual evapotranspiration or outward seepage or overestimation of the equilibrium storage deficit. The adapted fQS formulation produces a physically consistent but negligible improvement, largely absorbed by compensating changes in the quickflow reservoir constant. The direction-dependent cG formulation successfully reproduces asymmetric GW–SW exchange resistance, but introduces elevated summer discharge that worsens seasonal water balance closure. The temperature-dependent component of cG shows no identifiable calibrated influence. Additionally, the spatially uniform representation of managed surface water levels is identified as a source of uncertainty, given the heterogeneous water management across the catchment's sub-catchments.
The results indicate that improving summer unsaturated zone dynamics represents a higher priority for WALRUS development than further GW–SW exchange complexity. The multi-objective calibration framework developed here is directly transferable to comparable lowland catchment applications.
First, forecast models were developed to obtain probabilistic predictions. Three neural network architectures were investigated: a linear model, an MLP (multi-layer perceptron), and an LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) model, along with a seasonal moving average as a benchmark. These neural network models were trained per district and collectively across districts. When trained per district, the linear model performed most accurately. When trained together, the MLP model performed best, but the linear model generalized the best overall, with the MLP generalizing second-best. The LSTM model had the worst performance. In districts with less heteroscedasticity in the demand pattern, the benchmark model performed on par with the neural networks in the end of the forecasting horizon, indicating that complex models are not always necessary. A categorical variable to determine the DMA did not improve the point forecasts.
Because the MLP with solely lagged features ultimately had the best performance for point forecasts, this model was used for probabilistic extensions to estimate the 0.95 prediction interval. The MLP was extended with the aforementioned probabilistic extensions. The probabilistic models were assessed in terms of reliability with where a probability was computed that tells whether the 0.95 prediction interval is reached as well as sharpness which tells how wide the interval is. Finally the Winkler Score is used that computes a trade-off between both.
Both models that fully learn the prediction interval (QR and MDN) were more difficult to calibrate, and further research is needed to calibrate them accordingly. By training these models jointly on the 10 DMAs, the coverages did vary per DMA. This can potentially be solved by training one model per DMA or by using regularization per DMA to push the model to have a similar coverage per DMA.
The MCD model had difficulty to adapt the prediction interval over the forecasting horizon, causing the coverage to reduce. The QR and MDN models also have trade off imbalances between reliability and sharpness over the forecasting horizon on the testing set, which have more random patterns. Interestingly the Conformal Prediction algorithm maintains its coverage best over the forecasting horizon and increases the sharpness, which is due to the online updating procedure. When allowing small decreases up to 0.02 probability in coverage on the testing set, the CQR model performs best according to the Winkler Score. The MDN performs best when larger drops of coverage are allowed.
Analyzing the rolling coverage over time shows improvements are possible, especially in late spring and summer periods there is under-coverage. There is also still a difference of coverage between weekdays and weekends. This indicates there is still epistemic uncertainty left to reduce, which is the uncertainty of data and model parameters. More features are recommended to reduce this which are categorical features as well as future weather data. This is recommended to investigate for non-industrial DMAs, by assuming a perfect forecast. A larger dataset may also be beneficial to obtain better performing models. ...
First, forecast models were developed to obtain probabilistic predictions. Three neural network architectures were investigated: a linear model, an MLP (multi-layer perceptron), and an LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory) model, along with a seasonal moving average as a benchmark. These neural network models were trained per district and collectively across districts. When trained per district, the linear model performed most accurately. When trained together, the MLP model performed best, but the linear model generalized the best overall, with the MLP generalizing second-best. The LSTM model had the worst performance. In districts with less heteroscedasticity in the demand pattern, the benchmark model performed on par with the neural networks in the end of the forecasting horizon, indicating that complex models are not always necessary. A categorical variable to determine the DMA did not improve the point forecasts.
Because the MLP with solely lagged features ultimately had the best performance for point forecasts, this model was used for probabilistic extensions to estimate the 0.95 prediction interval. The MLP was extended with the aforementioned probabilistic extensions. The probabilistic models were assessed in terms of reliability with where a probability was computed that tells whether the 0.95 prediction interval is reached as well as sharpness which tells how wide the interval is. Finally the Winkler Score is used that computes a trade-off between both.
Both models that fully learn the prediction interval (QR and MDN) were more difficult to calibrate, and further research is needed to calibrate them accordingly. By training these models jointly on the 10 DMAs, the coverages did vary per DMA. This can potentially be solved by training one model per DMA or by using regularization per DMA to push the model to have a similar coverage per DMA.
The MCD model had difficulty to adapt the prediction interval over the forecasting horizon, causing the coverage to reduce. The QR and MDN models also have trade off imbalances between reliability and sharpness over the forecasting horizon on the testing set, which have more random patterns. Interestingly the Conformal Prediction algorithm maintains its coverage best over the forecasting horizon and increases the sharpness, which is due to the online updating procedure. When allowing small decreases up to 0.02 probability in coverage on the testing set, the CQR model performs best according to the Winkler Score. The MDN performs best when larger drops of coverage are allowed.
Analyzing the rolling coverage over time shows improvements are possible, especially in late spring and summer periods there is under-coverage. There is also still a difference of coverage between weekdays and weekends. This indicates there is still epistemic uncertainty left to reduce, which is the uncertainty of data and model parameters. More features are recommended to reduce this which are categorical features as well as future weather data. This is recommended to investigate for non-industrial DMAs, by assuming a perfect forecast. A larger dataset may also be beneficial to obtain better performing models.
Evaluating Constant Failure Rates in Storm Surge Barriers
A Statistical Framework Applied to Censored Component Lifetimes of the Oosterscheldekering
1. How large are water balance data errors and to what extent can they be reduced?
2. How large are water balance model errors and to what extent can they be reduced?
3. To what extent does quantifying and reducing data and model errors eliminate trade-offs in fitting multiple datasets?
The strategy is constructed based on an error estimation and water balance data fusion method and the original and the advanced version of the Water Partition and Balance model (Wapaba), then tested in the Smoky Hill River catchment. When using unprocessed data, the water balance is not closed for the basin. The discharge simulation has the fitting precision index the Box-Cox transformed root mean squared error (TRMSE) in the range of 0.70 - 1.43 for different datasets and in calibration and validation period. Indexes of discharge fitting σma$ exceed 1.66. After closing the water balance with the mean time series of all fluxes, TRMSE decreases to 0.55. Considering data uncertainties, TRMSE is further declined to 0.29 and σ drops to 0.46. After that, the model structure is also improved. When using the modified model to calibrate on only ETa and TWSA for calibration (TRMSE for discharge = 0.87), the performance is similar to that of using the original Wapaba on all fluxes (TRMSE for discharge = 0.86). The fitting precision index σ for TWSA also decreases.
The research demonstrates the effectiveness of the data fusion method in correcting satellite time series and sheds light on the potential of application of this strategy in the ungauged area through the comparison of different calibration cases. After modification, the strategy is able to reproduce the flow regime, without using in-situ data, to the same degree as all three hydrological components (discharge, actual evapotranspiration and water storage) are used for calibration.
...
1. How large are water balance data errors and to what extent can they be reduced?
2. How large are water balance model errors and to what extent can they be reduced?
3. To what extent does quantifying and reducing data and model errors eliminate trade-offs in fitting multiple datasets?
The strategy is constructed based on an error estimation and water balance data fusion method and the original and the advanced version of the Water Partition and Balance model (Wapaba), then tested in the Smoky Hill River catchment. When using unprocessed data, the water balance is not closed for the basin. The discharge simulation has the fitting precision index the Box-Cox transformed root mean squared error (TRMSE) in the range of 0.70 - 1.43 for different datasets and in calibration and validation period. Indexes of discharge fitting σma$ exceed 1.66. After closing the water balance with the mean time series of all fluxes, TRMSE decreases to 0.55. Considering data uncertainties, TRMSE is further declined to 0.29 and σ drops to 0.46. After that, the model structure is also improved. When using the modified model to calibrate on only ETa and TWSA for calibration (TRMSE for discharge = 0.87), the performance is similar to that of using the original Wapaba on all fluxes (TRMSE for discharge = 0.86). The fitting precision index σ for TWSA also decreases.
The research demonstrates the effectiveness of the data fusion method in correcting satellite time series and sheds light on the potential of application of this strategy in the ungauged area through the comparison of different calibration cases. After modification, the strategy is able to reproduce the flow regime, without using in-situ data, to the same degree as all three hydrological components (discharge, actual evapotranspiration and water storage) are used for calibration.
System. Although navigation feasibility was not thoroughly explored, “Reference”
(and consequently “Wet”) year inflows show water depths rising to or higher
than the accepted. Concluding a decisive answer to the “archeological debate” of
Sennacherib’s motivation for construction of such massive infrastructure is impossible with present data (Environment, canal, social) available. Circumstances favoring control and therefore planned rural irrigation (rather than capital-centered) for Nineveh’s hinterlands are analyzed and discussed. Lastly a few interventions seen as valuable for further modeling studies were suggest towards the members of the LoNAP team as a contribution to their upcoming field survey. ...
System. Although navigation feasibility was not thoroughly explored, “Reference”
(and consequently “Wet”) year inflows show water depths rising to or higher
than the accepted. Concluding a decisive answer to the “archeological debate” of
Sennacherib’s motivation for construction of such massive infrastructure is impossible with present data (Environment, canal, social) available. Circumstances favoring control and therefore planned rural irrigation (rather than capital-centered) for Nineveh’s hinterlands are analyzed and discussed. Lastly a few interventions seen as valuable for further modeling studies were suggest towards the members of the LoNAP team as a contribution to their upcoming field survey.
Optimizing the use of Delta21 for flood prone areas not protected by flood defenses at Dordrecht
A study on the operation strategy and reliability of a new flood protection system
The main objective of this report is to determine if the inclusion of Delta21 to the flood protection system of the Rhine-Meuse delta can provide a significant reduction of the flood risk of the flood prone areas at Dordrecht. Furthermore, it should be determined if an optimal operational scheme is possible in which the flood protection system with Delta21 can comply with all the flood requirements of the flood prone areas at Dordrecht and limitations to the Europoort barrier and Delta21 project while considering the reliability of the Delta21 project and the climate scenarios of the year 2100.
It was determined that the present flood risk at the flood prone areas at the Island of Dordrecht is equal to €110,000 per year. For the minimum, medium and maximum scenario for the year 2100 this risk increases to €390,000, €1,300,000 and €8,100,000 per year respectively. The implementation of the optimal operation of Delta21 reduces this risk with 23, 15 and 64 %. To obtain a flood risk reduction of 64 % for the maximum scenario, the closure frequency of the Europoort barrier, which may not be larger than three times per year, is equal to ten times per year. Furthermore, the flood risk as a percentage of the average annual income per household at the flood prone areas may not exceed 1 %, but for the medium onward this limit is exceeded at the historical harbor (city center). The maximum allowable probability of failure per pump of the pumping station and per siphon of the spillway of Delta21 is about 0.5 if the correlation between the components of both these systems is smaller than 0.9.
The inclusion of Delta21 in the current flood protection system with the present Europoort closure level can provide a significant reduction of the future flood risk of the flood prone areas at Dordrecht. However, it is not possible to create an optimal operational scheme for all scenarios of the year 2100 in which the flood protection system with Delta21 complies with the flood requirements of the flood prone areas and the limitations of the Europoort barrier. Finally, the reliability of the new Delta21 components is non-decisive for the flood risk assessments that have been made as long as the components are not fully dependent.
...
The main objective of this report is to determine if the inclusion of Delta21 to the flood protection system of the Rhine-Meuse delta can provide a significant reduction of the flood risk of the flood prone areas at Dordrecht. Furthermore, it should be determined if an optimal operational scheme is possible in which the flood protection system with Delta21 can comply with all the flood requirements of the flood prone areas at Dordrecht and limitations to the Europoort barrier and Delta21 project while considering the reliability of the Delta21 project and the climate scenarios of the year 2100.
It was determined that the present flood risk at the flood prone areas at the Island of Dordrecht is equal to €110,000 per year. For the minimum, medium and maximum scenario for the year 2100 this risk increases to €390,000, €1,300,000 and €8,100,000 per year respectively. The implementation of the optimal operation of Delta21 reduces this risk with 23, 15 and 64 %. To obtain a flood risk reduction of 64 % for the maximum scenario, the closure frequency of the Europoort barrier, which may not be larger than three times per year, is equal to ten times per year. Furthermore, the flood risk as a percentage of the average annual income per household at the flood prone areas may not exceed 1 %, but for the medium onward this limit is exceeded at the historical harbor (city center). The maximum allowable probability of failure per pump of the pumping station and per siphon of the spillway of Delta21 is about 0.5 if the correlation between the components of both these systems is smaller than 0.9.
The inclusion of Delta21 in the current flood protection system with the present Europoort closure level can provide a significant reduction of the future flood risk of the flood prone areas at Dordrecht. However, it is not possible to create an optimal operational scheme for all scenarios of the year 2100 in which the flood protection system with Delta21 complies with the flood requirements of the flood prone areas and the limitations of the Europoort barrier. Finally, the reliability of the new Delta21 components is non-decisive for the flood risk assessments that have been made as long as the components are not fully dependent.
The variability of the rootzone storage capacity in Austria
An exploration of its controls
The rootzone storage capacity (Sr) is a crucial part of the hydrological cycle. This storage provides water access for vegetation, in order to meet the atmospheric water demand through transpiration. The spatio-temporal variability of Sr is not well represented in current hydrological and climate models. The root zone storage capacity receives rapidly increasing interest from scientists. Recent studies developed a climate-based method to determine Sr. This method is based on the insight that ecosystems efficiently adapt their rootzone storage capacity to survive a drought with a certain return period. However, this method requires a vast amount of data. Long hydrological time-series with a rather fine temporal resolution are required. These time-series are not always available for many poorly gauged catchments. Therefore, it is important to explore what is exactly controlling this Sr, and if we can eventually predict it. This study aims to describe the spatial and temporal variability of Sr with a combination of climate and land cover variables in Austria for the study period 1982 - 2008. To anticipate on expected snowfall, a snowfall module is included and calibrated with the use of a MODIS satellite snow cover product. The most important climate and land cover variables are identified, using multiple linear regression analysis. The best performing regression models are selected with a diverse combination of variables. This is done by comparing 21 catchments across the central and eastern part of Austria. Additionally, a stationary time-series split method is used to explore how Sr is changing in time. Subsequently, another multiple linear regression analysis is performed to explore the controls of the dynamics of Sr for these catchments. According to this study, the Run-off coefficient describes Sr best in all studied regression models. A multiple linear regression model compiled out of the Run-off coefficient and the seasonality index performed best with an R2adj of 0.8. The seasonality index seems to be specific for this study since the highest fraction of precipitation and evaporation coincides in summer. Land cover seems of less importance for the estimation of Sr. However, no conclusion could be drawn for the importance of land cover types in the regression analysis considering the disputable applicability of the land cover data. Furthermore, the relations of fractional cropland cover and fractional forest cover with Sr are in contradiction with current literature. Apart from the spatial relationships, it is discovered that on average increased from the year 1992 onwards. However, no indisputable explanation is encountered (R2adj 0.55). The decreasing Run-off coefficient explains most of the increase in Sr. No conclusions could be drawn on the influence of land cover change on Sr, caused by an irregular land cover time-series. Since the catchments in this study are rather humid and have similar seasonal patterns, it would be interesting to investigate if the discovered relationships are also valid for more arid and seasonal varying catchments. Also, it would be useful to investigate the unexpected relationship between land cover and Sr further. ...
The rootzone storage capacity (Sr) is a crucial part of the hydrological cycle. This storage provides water access for vegetation, in order to meet the atmospheric water demand through transpiration. The spatio-temporal variability of Sr is not well represented in current hydrological and climate models. The root zone storage capacity receives rapidly increasing interest from scientists. Recent studies developed a climate-based method to determine Sr. This method is based on the insight that ecosystems efficiently adapt their rootzone storage capacity to survive a drought with a certain return period. However, this method requires a vast amount of data. Long hydrological time-series with a rather fine temporal resolution are required. These time-series are not always available for many poorly gauged catchments. Therefore, it is important to explore what is exactly controlling this Sr, and if we can eventually predict it. This study aims to describe the spatial and temporal variability of Sr with a combination of climate and land cover variables in Austria for the study period 1982 - 2008. To anticipate on expected snowfall, a snowfall module is included and calibrated with the use of a MODIS satellite snow cover product. The most important climate and land cover variables are identified, using multiple linear regression analysis. The best performing regression models are selected with a diverse combination of variables. This is done by comparing 21 catchments across the central and eastern part of Austria. Additionally, a stationary time-series split method is used to explore how Sr is changing in time. Subsequently, another multiple linear regression analysis is performed to explore the controls of the dynamics of Sr for these catchments. According to this study, the Run-off coefficient describes Sr best in all studied regression models. A multiple linear regression model compiled out of the Run-off coefficient and the seasonality index performed best with an R2adj of 0.8. The seasonality index seems to be specific for this study since the highest fraction of precipitation and evaporation coincides in summer. Land cover seems of less importance for the estimation of Sr. However, no conclusion could be drawn for the importance of land cover types in the regression analysis considering the disputable applicability of the land cover data. Furthermore, the relations of fractional cropland cover and fractional forest cover with Sr are in contradiction with current literature. Apart from the spatial relationships, it is discovered that on average increased from the year 1992 onwards. However, no indisputable explanation is encountered (R2adj 0.55). The decreasing Run-off coefficient explains most of the increase in Sr. No conclusions could be drawn on the influence of land cover change on Sr, caused by an irregular land cover time-series. Since the catchments in this study are rather humid and have similar seasonal patterns, it would be interesting to investigate if the discovered relationships are also valid for more arid and seasonal varying catchments. Also, it would be useful to investigate the unexpected relationship between land cover and Sr further.
The Canals Never Lie
MASSCOTE framework and modelling of operation strategies in the Gezira Irrigation Scheme
Gaussian Process Regression Models for Predicting Water Retention Curves
Application of Machine Learning Techniques for Modelling Uncertainty in Hydraulic Curves
Design of an adaptive weir
A case study of the replacement of weir Belfeld