M.D.M. Pérez-Fortes
Please Note
6 records found
1
Electrons to High-Value Chemicals
A techno-economic analysis of commercial bio-oil gasification and electrolytic hydrogen into light olefins in the Netherlands
The TOPSIS analysis identifies the commercial bio-oil produced at the Aracruz plant in Brazil as the most suitable feedstock, with a relative closeness coefficient of 0.828. The conceptual plant gasifies 100 000 t/yr of this bio-oil under autothermal conditions; the syngas stoichiometric number is then adjusted with electrolytic hydrogen from a twelve-stack, 58 MW alkaline water electrolyser to synthesise 94 181 t/yr of grade-AA methanol, which is converted via the DMTO-III process to 20 387 t/yr of polymer-grade ethylene and 14 581 t/yr of polymer-grade propylene. The plant adopts two process features not yet found in commercial practice: the use of electrolytic hydrogen as a stripping agent to remove dissolved CO₂ from the raw methanol, and membrane separators for the C₂ and C₃ olefin–paraffin separations as an alternative to the incumbent cryogenic separation. Heat integration lowers the annual utility cost from almost €6 million to −€0.78 million.
The principal performance indicators are: a light-olefin mass yield of 35% relative to the bio-oil feed; a carbon conversion of 81%; a conversion of 35% of the hydrogen input into light olefins; and energy and exergy efficiencies of 47.1% and 49%, respectively. The plant requires €474.6 million in total capital investment and €125.7 million in annual operating cost, while its annual revenue covers only 44% of the annual cost, corresponding to an annual loss of €70.3 million. This loss has two distinct origins—upstream, the high cost of bio-oil and electricity; and downstream, the low revenue from ethylene and propylene sales.
Adopting an IRR of 10% as the threshold for financial feasibility, a sensitivity analysis shows that reducing the bio-oil and electricity prices simultaneously to zero—i.e. virtually free bio-oil and electricity—yields an IRR of only 7.59%, which renders the plant financially unattractive. On the product side, the ethylene and propylene prices would need to rise by 250% and 500%, respectively, to reach financial feasibility, implying a reliance on the price premium for non-fossil-derived products. Finally, equipping the plant with hydrogen storage to limit its exposure to high electricity prices, and optimising accordingly, sets the electrolyser and storage capacities to 62.6 MW and 3393 kg; this configuration nonetheless lowers the annual electricity cost by only 7%, insufficient to render the plant financially viable. ...
The TOPSIS analysis identifies the commercial bio-oil produced at the Aracruz plant in Brazil as the most suitable feedstock, with a relative closeness coefficient of 0.828. The conceptual plant gasifies 100 000 t/yr of this bio-oil under autothermal conditions; the syngas stoichiometric number is then adjusted with electrolytic hydrogen from a twelve-stack, 58 MW alkaline water electrolyser to synthesise 94 181 t/yr of grade-AA methanol, which is converted via the DMTO-III process to 20 387 t/yr of polymer-grade ethylene and 14 581 t/yr of polymer-grade propylene. The plant adopts two process features not yet found in commercial practice: the use of electrolytic hydrogen as a stripping agent to remove dissolved CO₂ from the raw methanol, and membrane separators for the C₂ and C₃ olefin–paraffin separations as an alternative to the incumbent cryogenic separation. Heat integration lowers the annual utility cost from almost €6 million to −€0.78 million.
The principal performance indicators are: a light-olefin mass yield of 35% relative to the bio-oil feed; a carbon conversion of 81%; a conversion of 35% of the hydrogen input into light olefins; and energy and exergy efficiencies of 47.1% and 49%, respectively. The plant requires €474.6 million in total capital investment and €125.7 million in annual operating cost, while its annual revenue covers only 44% of the annual cost, corresponding to an annual loss of €70.3 million. This loss has two distinct origins—upstream, the high cost of bio-oil and electricity; and downstream, the low revenue from ethylene and propylene sales.
Adopting an IRR of 10% as the threshold for financial feasibility, a sensitivity analysis shows that reducing the bio-oil and electricity prices simultaneously to zero—i.e. virtually free bio-oil and electricity—yields an IRR of only 7.59%, which renders the plant financially unattractive. On the product side, the ethylene and propylene prices would need to rise by 250% and 500%, respectively, to reach financial feasibility, implying a reliance on the price premium for non-fossil-derived products. Finally, equipping the plant with hydrogen storage to limit its exposure to high electricity prices, and optimising accordingly, sets the electrolyser and storage capacities to 62.6 MW and 3393 kg; this configuration nonetheless lowers the annual electricity cost by only 7%, insufficient to render the plant financially viable.
A PyrOil-GEM Process for Bio-LNG Production
Techno-Economic Process Analysis combining Bio-Oil Gasification, Intermittent Electrolysis of Sea Water, and Sorption-Enhanced Methanation
This thesis designs and analyzes a process for making Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) from Dutch domestic biomass resources, modeled in Aspen Plus process simulation software. Specifically, the process design combines gasification of biomass pyrolysis oil, desalination and electrolysis of sea water, and Sorption-Enhanced Methanation, as well as cryogenic liquefaction to produce bio-LNG, a renewable liquid fuel. This bio-LNG may then be used to generate electricity, to fuel heavy road traffic, or whatever application might be found for it.
Based on a 6 kg/s intake of wood pyrolysis oil, nearly 12 t/h LNG can be produced, in addition to useful side products such as sea salt and drinking water. Economic evaluation yields a project NPV of nearly €4 billion, and an IRR of 36.7%. Furthermore, the LCOM of this process is lower than several biomass-to-X processes, at €190/MWh. ...
This thesis designs and analyzes a process for making Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) from Dutch domestic biomass resources, modeled in Aspen Plus process simulation software. Specifically, the process design combines gasification of biomass pyrolysis oil, desalination and electrolysis of sea water, and Sorption-Enhanced Methanation, as well as cryogenic liquefaction to produce bio-LNG, a renewable liquid fuel. This bio-LNG may then be used to generate electricity, to fuel heavy road traffic, or whatever application might be found for it.
Based on a 6 kg/s intake of wood pyrolysis oil, nearly 12 t/h LNG can be produced, in addition to useful side products such as sea salt and drinking water. Economic evaluation yields a project NPV of nearly €4 billion, and an IRR of 36.7%. Furthermore, the LCOM of this process is lower than several biomass-to-X processes, at €190/MWh.
Distilling the Perspectives On Blue Hydrogen
A Social Cost Benefit Analysis of Using Blue Hydrogen for Decarbonising High Temperature Heat Demand within Refineries in the Port of Rotterdam
Blue hydrogen is seen as a promising solution for decarbonising high temperature heat within refineries. However, existing studies have primarily focused on the technical and commercial feasibility from a corporate perspective, lacking a comprehensive, holistic view. This is relevant since the government is obliged to reach the decarbonisation targets. This research aimed to determine the cost and benefits of using blue hydrogen for the decarbonisation of high temperature heat within PoR refineries from the public and corporate perspective, in alignment with Dutch/EU net zero targets in 2050.
The main research question which was answered is: What are the costs and benefits of using blue hydrogen for the decarbonisation of high temperature heat generation within refineries in the Port of Rotterdam considering the Dutch/EU net zero targets in 2050, from the perspective of the corporate versus the public?
A Social Cost Benefit Analysis (SCBA) under EU guidelines was conducted, comparing a business as usual (BAU) reference case, which is not reaching the climate targets, with a blue hydrogen intervention scenario. The intervention scenario resulted in an overall CO2 reduction of 44.4 Mt between 2024 and 2050, needed to reach EU and Dutch decarbonisation targets.
After identifying all effects resulting from the intervention scenario, the cost and benefits of both perspectives could be assessed. This study finds significant differences in valuation between the corporate and public perspective. The corporate Net Present Value (NPV) is 172MEUR, while the public NPV Is 8,834 MEUR. This underscores that societal and environmental benefits are not captured in corporate metrics. This is primarily due to the undervalued Corporate CO2 EU ETS price compared to the Social Cost of Carbon. Addressing this gap may require policy measures such as increasing the EU ETS or the local Dutch CO2 Levy. Further research should assess mechanisms to align CO2 pricing with true external costs.
...
Blue hydrogen is seen as a promising solution for decarbonising high temperature heat within refineries. However, existing studies have primarily focused on the technical and commercial feasibility from a corporate perspective, lacking a comprehensive, holistic view. This is relevant since the government is obliged to reach the decarbonisation targets. This research aimed to determine the cost and benefits of using blue hydrogen for the decarbonisation of high temperature heat within PoR refineries from the public and corporate perspective, in alignment with Dutch/EU net zero targets in 2050.
The main research question which was answered is: What are the costs and benefits of using blue hydrogen for the decarbonisation of high temperature heat generation within refineries in the Port of Rotterdam considering the Dutch/EU net zero targets in 2050, from the perspective of the corporate versus the public?
A Social Cost Benefit Analysis (SCBA) under EU guidelines was conducted, comparing a business as usual (BAU) reference case, which is not reaching the climate targets, with a blue hydrogen intervention scenario. The intervention scenario resulted in an overall CO2 reduction of 44.4 Mt between 2024 and 2050, needed to reach EU and Dutch decarbonisation targets.
After identifying all effects resulting from the intervention scenario, the cost and benefits of both perspectives could be assessed. This study finds significant differences in valuation between the corporate and public perspective. The corporate Net Present Value (NPV) is 172MEUR, while the public NPV Is 8,834 MEUR. This underscores that societal and environmental benefits are not captured in corporate metrics. This is primarily due to the undervalued Corporate CO2 EU ETS price compared to the Social Cost of Carbon. Addressing this gap may require policy measures such as increasing the EU ETS or the local Dutch CO2 Levy. Further research should assess mechanisms to align CO2 pricing with true external costs.
Electrochemical reductionofCO2 (CO2 E) tominimise environmentalimpact
With a focus on CO2-eq emissions
...
Despite its role as a major coal producer, Indonesia has set ambitious targets, aiming to achieve net-zero emissions by 2060, including a 29% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030. A pivotal step towards these goals is exploring alternative energy sources, with a particular focus on the New and Renewable Energy (NRE) sector.
Traditionally used for cooking, biomass energy has expanded within Indonesia's NRE sector, with sustainable biofuel and biogas gaining prominence. Indonesia possesses a substantial biomass potential, estimated at 32.6 gigawatts (GW), offering a sustainable avenue for biomass residue utilization. One promising avenue is co-firing biomass alongside coal in existing Coal-Fired Power Plants (CFPPs). However, initial pilot projects have encountered challenges, with co-firing percentages remaining below 20%, and coal retaining dominance in the energy mix.
This report addresses a critical knowledge gap hindering the progress of biomass co-firing in Indonesia. Its primary objective is to assess the techno-economic potential of retrofitting existing CFPPs in Indonesia for biomass co-firing. The assessment encompasses identifying abundant and suitable biomass residues for co-firing, exploring retrofit scenarios based on technical considerations, conducting an economic feasibility analysis of CFPP retrofitting, and proposing policy recommendations for Indonesia's Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources.
The study reveals that agricultural by-products account for 70% of available biomass, followed by forestry residues (17%) and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) (13%). Notable contributors among agricultural residues include rice and palm oil residues, each exhibiting substantial potentials. Forestry residues, such as solid and sawdust residues from pulpwood and sawn wood, also hold promise.
The technical potential for co-firing is estimated at 450 terawatt-hours (TWh), equivalent to the estimated electricity demand in 2030. To achieve practical implementation, proposed CFPP retrofit scenarios consider co-firing percentages, addressing pre-treatment of biomass, boiler efficiency, and equipment modifications.
Using the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) methodology, the economic assessment yields a range of outcomes, from 2.2 to 10 cents per kilowatt-hour ($c/kWh), based on distinct case studies. The report highlights the economic feasibility of biomass co-firing in Indonesia, even when compared to sub-critical/ultra sub-critical coal plants.
To support biomass co-firing, the report recommends policies such as a significant carbon tax, redirecting coal subsidies, and promoting biomass utilization to support biomass co-firing. Improving the supply chain by identifying biomass sources near coal mines and enhancing transportation infrastructure is also essential for ensuring a stable biomass supply. Despite some limitations in data sources and modeling, the study employs dynamic approaches to present result ranges and diverse scenarios, enhancing the validity of its findings.
In summary, the strategic implementation of recommended measures has the potential to significantly contribute to Indonesia's transition towards sustainable biomass co-firing practices in its energy sector, aligning with its emissions reduction and net-zero goals. ...
Despite its role as a major coal producer, Indonesia has set ambitious targets, aiming to achieve net-zero emissions by 2060, including a 29% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030. A pivotal step towards these goals is exploring alternative energy sources, with a particular focus on the New and Renewable Energy (NRE) sector.
Traditionally used for cooking, biomass energy has expanded within Indonesia's NRE sector, with sustainable biofuel and biogas gaining prominence. Indonesia possesses a substantial biomass potential, estimated at 32.6 gigawatts (GW), offering a sustainable avenue for biomass residue utilization. One promising avenue is co-firing biomass alongside coal in existing Coal-Fired Power Plants (CFPPs). However, initial pilot projects have encountered challenges, with co-firing percentages remaining below 20%, and coal retaining dominance in the energy mix.
This report addresses a critical knowledge gap hindering the progress of biomass co-firing in Indonesia. Its primary objective is to assess the techno-economic potential of retrofitting existing CFPPs in Indonesia for biomass co-firing. The assessment encompasses identifying abundant and suitable biomass residues for co-firing, exploring retrofit scenarios based on technical considerations, conducting an economic feasibility analysis of CFPP retrofitting, and proposing policy recommendations for Indonesia's Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources.
The study reveals that agricultural by-products account for 70% of available biomass, followed by forestry residues (17%) and Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) (13%). Notable contributors among agricultural residues include rice and palm oil residues, each exhibiting substantial potentials. Forestry residues, such as solid and sawdust residues from pulpwood and sawn wood, also hold promise.
The technical potential for co-firing is estimated at 450 terawatt-hours (TWh), equivalent to the estimated electricity demand in 2030. To achieve practical implementation, proposed CFPP retrofit scenarios consider co-firing percentages, addressing pre-treatment of biomass, boiler efficiency, and equipment modifications.
Using the Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) methodology, the economic assessment yields a range of outcomes, from 2.2 to 10 cents per kilowatt-hour ($c/kWh), based on distinct case studies. The report highlights the economic feasibility of biomass co-firing in Indonesia, even when compared to sub-critical/ultra sub-critical coal plants.
To support biomass co-firing, the report recommends policies such as a significant carbon tax, redirecting coal subsidies, and promoting biomass utilization to support biomass co-firing. Improving the supply chain by identifying biomass sources near coal mines and enhancing transportation infrastructure is also essential for ensuring a stable biomass supply. Despite some limitations in data sources and modeling, the study employs dynamic approaches to present result ranges and diverse scenarios, enhancing the validity of its findings.
In summary, the strategic implementation of recommended measures has the potential to significantly contribute to Indonesia's transition towards sustainable biomass co-firing practices in its energy sector, aligning with its emissions reduction and net-zero goals.