E. Minkman
Please Note
7 records found
1
Steering WWTP renewal
Cross-sector governance lessons from grid congestion
The case studies reveal that while external pressures create a clear need for action, stakeholders lack a shared understanding of the required change. The study identified four governance barriers within WWTP projects: no consensus on problem ownership, different sense of urgency, uncertainty regarding cost allocation and distributed leadership that in one case result in a situation of inertia. Comparing these findings with grid congestion, it demonstrates that similar governance bottlenecks have occurred. However, grid congestion has become more visible because it directly effects societal developments like housing, forcing a more coordinated response.
The study translates insights from grid congestion into actionable lessons for the wastewater sector. Single-loop lessons, which adjust existing routines, include formalising cooperation and escalation arrangements, ensuring continuity through boundary spanners, avoid unscalable pilots, involve municipalities earlier in the process and learn from organisations with similar experiences. Double-loop lessons, which require reframing underlying assumptions, involve formulate a clear and shared task, break the task down into sub-tasks and roles, make those who face impacts co-owners of the problem, create urgency connecting the problem directly to concrete societal impacts.
One of the main findings is that a full transition is not yet occuring in the WWTP sector. Nevertheless, the WWTP replacement task demands governance choices that go beyond optimisation. This study provides an analytical understanding of the current WWTP challenge and through cross-sector lessons practical guidance is provided to steer future WWTP renewal projects in the Netherlands. ...
The case studies reveal that while external pressures create a clear need for action, stakeholders lack a shared understanding of the required change. The study identified four governance barriers within WWTP projects: no consensus on problem ownership, different sense of urgency, uncertainty regarding cost allocation and distributed leadership that in one case result in a situation of inertia. Comparing these findings with grid congestion, it demonstrates that similar governance bottlenecks have occurred. However, grid congestion has become more visible because it directly effects societal developments like housing, forcing a more coordinated response.
The study translates insights from grid congestion into actionable lessons for the wastewater sector. Single-loop lessons, which adjust existing routines, include formalising cooperation and escalation arrangements, ensuring continuity through boundary spanners, avoid unscalable pilots, involve municipalities earlier in the process and learn from organisations with similar experiences. Double-loop lessons, which require reframing underlying assumptions, involve formulate a clear and shared task, break the task down into sub-tasks and roles, make those who face impacts co-owners of the problem, create urgency connecting the problem directly to concrete societal impacts.
One of the main findings is that a full transition is not yet occuring in the WWTP sector. Nevertheless, the WWTP replacement task demands governance choices that go beyond optimisation. This study provides an analytical understanding of the current WWTP challenge and through cross-sector lessons practical guidance is provided to steer future WWTP renewal projects in the Netherlands.
Dredging the Future
Assessing the Impact of Alternative Uses of Dredge Sediment in the Port of Rotterdam
The research investigates whether participatory logistical modelling can support better decision-making on sediment reuse. An open-source simulation model (OpenCLSim) was developed to represent dredging, transport, and processing chains for three strategies: (1) continued offshore disposal, (2) land raising via truck or pipeline, and (3) reuse in concrete after dewatering. Stakeholders from the port authority, government agencies, contractors, and researchers were engaged through interviews, surveys, and workshops to co-define evaluation criteria and weigh their relative importance. Model results were combined with a multi-criteria decision analysis to rank alternatives.
Findings show that while offshore disposal remains the most cost- and time-efficient solution, pipeline-based land raising approaches cost parity at high volumes and delivers co-benefits for flood protection and habitat creation. Concrete reuse shows strong circular economy potential but is limited by dewatering costs, logistics, and regulatory barriers.
The study concludes that sediment management should be treated as a portfolio challenge, combining conventional disposal with targeted reuse projects. Participatory modelling proved valuable for exploring trade-offs, testing “what-if” scenarios, and building consensus—providing a transferable framework for more sustainable sediment management. ...
The research investigates whether participatory logistical modelling can support better decision-making on sediment reuse. An open-source simulation model (OpenCLSim) was developed to represent dredging, transport, and processing chains for three strategies: (1) continued offshore disposal, (2) land raising via truck or pipeline, and (3) reuse in concrete after dewatering. Stakeholders from the port authority, government agencies, contractors, and researchers were engaged through interviews, surveys, and workshops to co-define evaluation criteria and weigh their relative importance. Model results were combined with a multi-criteria decision analysis to rank alternatives.
Findings show that while offshore disposal remains the most cost- and time-efficient solution, pipeline-based land raising approaches cost parity at high volumes and delivers co-benefits for flood protection and habitat creation. Concrete reuse shows strong circular economy potential but is limited by dewatering costs, logistics, and regulatory barriers.
The study concludes that sediment management should be treated as a portfolio challenge, combining conventional disposal with targeted reuse projects. Participatory modelling proved valuable for exploring trade-offs, testing “what-if” scenarios, and building consensus—providing a transferable framework for more sustainable sediment management.
Policy Responses to Hydrogen Import Challenges in the Netherlands
From Ambition to Implementation
A qualitative case study approach was employed, combining policy document analysis with 18 semi-structured stakeholder interviews from various sectors, including industry, infrastructure, research institutions, and government-affiliated organizations. The qualitative data were coded and analyzed using Atlas.ti, with categories of transition challenges based on the frameworks of Weber et al. (2012) and bolhuis (2024), which were used to structure the findings.
The analysis reveals a range of interdependent challenges, including regulatory complexity, infrastructure bottlenecks, limited financial support for ammonia cracking, and a lack of tailored safety frameworks. Nevertheless, some instruments, most notably H2Global and the RED III RFNBO mandates, are positively received by stakeholders and viewed as promising instruments to stimulate investment and demand. Their full potential, however, depends on timely implementation, increased scale, and improved alignment across national and European levels. Variation in national export contexts further shapes the character of the challenges: in the UK, regulatory divergence and uncertainty surrounding export subsidies are key constraints; in Norway, more substantial institutional alignment is offset by public concerns surrounding the use of ammonia.
Enhancing the current Dutch policy framework through an updated national import strategy, robust and clear demand articulation, infrastructure development, and targeted policy for green ammonia imports would improve investor confidence and facilitate the timely development of international hydrogen import chains.
...
A qualitative case study approach was employed, combining policy document analysis with 18 semi-structured stakeholder interviews from various sectors, including industry, infrastructure, research institutions, and government-affiliated organizations. The qualitative data were coded and analyzed using Atlas.ti, with categories of transition challenges based on the frameworks of Weber et al. (2012) and bolhuis (2024), which were used to structure the findings.
The analysis reveals a range of interdependent challenges, including regulatory complexity, infrastructure bottlenecks, limited financial support for ammonia cracking, and a lack of tailored safety frameworks. Nevertheless, some instruments, most notably H2Global and the RED III RFNBO mandates, are positively received by stakeholders and viewed as promising instruments to stimulate investment and demand. Their full potential, however, depends on timely implementation, increased scale, and improved alignment across national and European levels. Variation in national export contexts further shapes the character of the challenges: in the UK, regulatory divergence and uncertainty surrounding export subsidies are key constraints; in Norway, more substantial institutional alignment is offset by public concerns surrounding the use of ammonia.
Enhancing the current Dutch policy framework through an updated national import strategy, robust and clear demand articulation, infrastructure development, and targeted policy for green ammonia imports would improve investor confidence and facilitate the timely development of international hydrogen import chains.
Potential benefits of introducing OKRs at marine engineering contractors
Potential benefits of introducing OKRs at marine engineering contractors
No stress, let plants be your success!
A spatial suitability analysis for agricultural systems that could be promising for salinity, drought and waterlogging stress
A practical spatial approach is needed that combines SRAS knowledge with local data, helping decision-makers understand which SRAS options are feasible, where they are suitable, and what their implementation implies for key stakeholders. This was achieved by answering the question: ‘Which salt-resilient agricultural systems are potentially suitable for areas increasingly affected by salinization, drought, and waterlogging, and how can their spatial suitability be assessed and interpreted based on soil types and climate projections?’
To address this question, the case study Schouwen-Duiveland was investigated, because this region is already exposed to SDAW stressors. Both current conditions and a high 2050 climate scenario were assessed. This desk study developed a spatial suitability framework to evaluate the potential of SRAS based on four key factors: salinity levels, drought stress, waterlogging stress, and soil type.
Through a combination of literature review and geospatial analysing in QGIS, three promising SRAS approaches were identified for Schouwen-Duiveland. These include: 1.) Salt-tolerant crop rotation, which adapts conventional agricultural practices to include crops with higher salinity tolerance. 2.) Halophyte (plants that thrive on saline soils) intercropping or rotation, which can improve soil health by taking up salt from the soil while enabling cultivation of conventional crops. 3.) Agroforestry, a system based on trees or shrubs, which provides a higher tolerance to both drought and waterlogging, while also increasing biodiversity and potentially total yields.
Due to several data and knowledge gaps, assumptions had to be made, which reduce the robustness of the outcomes. Therefore, this study should be seen as an exploratory assessment rather than a set of definitive guidelines. Nevertheless, the results highlight the potential of these systems and emphasize the need for sustainable water management and location-specific guidelines, considering the local variability of stressors.
The spatial suitability maps were interpreted from both scientific and societal perspectives and are recognized as a tool to initiate social dialogue around the SRAS transition. These spatial guidelines can serve as practical tools for both policymakers and farmers.
Achieving a full transition requires increasing the readiness for change, starting with small-scale field experiments initiated by farmers, supported by policymakers who share the risks. Other key aspects include collaboration and knowledge sharing between stakeholders, which are essential for gaining further insights and improving spatial suitability assessment.
Despite its limitations, this study provides a foundation for a practical tool to assess local SRAS suitability. It contributes to informed discussions for SRAS transitions and ultimately supports the development of climate-resilient agriculture that strengthens long-term food security. ...
A practical spatial approach is needed that combines SRAS knowledge with local data, helping decision-makers understand which SRAS options are feasible, where they are suitable, and what their implementation implies for key stakeholders. This was achieved by answering the question: ‘Which salt-resilient agricultural systems are potentially suitable for areas increasingly affected by salinization, drought, and waterlogging, and how can their spatial suitability be assessed and interpreted based on soil types and climate projections?’
To address this question, the case study Schouwen-Duiveland was investigated, because this region is already exposed to SDAW stressors. Both current conditions and a high 2050 climate scenario were assessed. This desk study developed a spatial suitability framework to evaluate the potential of SRAS based on four key factors: salinity levels, drought stress, waterlogging stress, and soil type.
Through a combination of literature review and geospatial analysing in QGIS, three promising SRAS approaches were identified for Schouwen-Duiveland. These include: 1.) Salt-tolerant crop rotation, which adapts conventional agricultural practices to include crops with higher salinity tolerance. 2.) Halophyte (plants that thrive on saline soils) intercropping or rotation, which can improve soil health by taking up salt from the soil while enabling cultivation of conventional crops. 3.) Agroforestry, a system based on trees or shrubs, which provides a higher tolerance to both drought and waterlogging, while also increasing biodiversity and potentially total yields.
Due to several data and knowledge gaps, assumptions had to be made, which reduce the robustness of the outcomes. Therefore, this study should be seen as an exploratory assessment rather than a set of definitive guidelines. Nevertheless, the results highlight the potential of these systems and emphasize the need for sustainable water management and location-specific guidelines, considering the local variability of stressors.
The spatial suitability maps were interpreted from both scientific and societal perspectives and are recognized as a tool to initiate social dialogue around the SRAS transition. These spatial guidelines can serve as practical tools for both policymakers and farmers.
Achieving a full transition requires increasing the readiness for change, starting with small-scale field experiments initiated by farmers, supported by policymakers who share the risks. Other key aspects include collaboration and knowledge sharing between stakeholders, which are essential for gaining further insights and improving spatial suitability assessment.
Despite its limitations, this study provides a foundation for a practical tool to assess local SRAS suitability. It contributes to informed discussions for SRAS transitions and ultimately supports the development of climate-resilient agriculture that strengthens long-term food security.
Policy platforms as support tools for climate change mitigation and adaptation policymaking
A case study of policymakers and policy advisors’ perceptions of policy platforms as support tools and how to improve their design and use
Multiple challenges affect the effectiveness of climate change mitigation and adaptation measures, such as accountability, intergenerational justice and developing countries’ increased participation in greenhouse gas emissions. The high complexity of information surrounding models’ assumptions, results, and scenarios related to climate change also presents a challenge, especially when communicating with policymakers. In this context, support tools such as policy platforms can help bridge the science-policy gap by allowing policymakers to understand scenarios and available policy levers, enabling a better understanding of relevant concepts and models or serving as hubs for disseminating best practices and success stories. Available literature often evaluates support tools within the context of use by regular citizens, making it unclear how policymakers perceive support tools and how well they meet their needs, pointing to an important knowledge gap. This thesis explores policymakers’ and policy advisors’ perceptions of the usefulness of climate change mitigation and adaptation (CCMA) policy platforms and the characteristics of such policy platforms they prefer in order to use them as support tools. A collective case study was conducted with ten CCMA policy platforms within the context of the EU-funded Horizon 2020 programme. In addition, interviews (11) and surveys (9) with policymakers and policymakers’ advisors in the Netherlands and seven other countries within and beyond the EU were conducted.
Nine characteristics of CCMA policy platforms were identified: Transparency & Credibility of information, Ease of use, Flexibility of use, Accessibility & Portability, Education & Awareness, Communication of complex information, Data visualisation & interactivity, Actively maintained and supported, and Security & privacy. Interviews and surveys show that accessibility, relevance, applicability, and credibility were identified as the primary factors driving the perception of policymakers about the usefulness of CCMA policy platforms and four groups of characteristics were identified with decreasing levels of priority for policymakers: mandatory or must-have (formed by communication of complex information, free and open access to the tool, transparency regarding data sources and limitations, and high level of detail for spatial and temporal data); highly desirable or should-have (formed by availability of training and learning functionalities, availability of detailed documentation on concepts and models, interactive and easy-to-navigate elements, and availability of a web-based platform); ‘nice to have’ or could-have (user stories from policymakers or communities, availability of very recent data, ability to import user data/export results, and ability to modify parameters and run custom analyses), and indifferent (availability of languages beyond English and the ability to use the tool in mobile phones or tablets).
Four main recommendations are made to improve the design and use of CCMA policy platforms: Incorporating systematic reviews of existing CCMA policy platforms as part of projects developing such platforms, involving boundary organisations in the development and use of CCMA policy platforms, developing CCMA policy platforms with longer life expectancies and developing CCMA policy platforms flexible for different needs and preferences of policymakers.
With these results, new CCMA policy platforms can be developed with a better understanding of how useful policymakers perceive them and what they want from these support tools. ...
Multiple challenges affect the effectiveness of climate change mitigation and adaptation measures, such as accountability, intergenerational justice and developing countries’ increased participation in greenhouse gas emissions. The high complexity of information surrounding models’ assumptions, results, and scenarios related to climate change also presents a challenge, especially when communicating with policymakers. In this context, support tools such as policy platforms can help bridge the science-policy gap by allowing policymakers to understand scenarios and available policy levers, enabling a better understanding of relevant concepts and models or serving as hubs for disseminating best practices and success stories. Available literature often evaluates support tools within the context of use by regular citizens, making it unclear how policymakers perceive support tools and how well they meet their needs, pointing to an important knowledge gap. This thesis explores policymakers’ and policy advisors’ perceptions of the usefulness of climate change mitigation and adaptation (CCMA) policy platforms and the characteristics of such policy platforms they prefer in order to use them as support tools. A collective case study was conducted with ten CCMA policy platforms within the context of the EU-funded Horizon 2020 programme. In addition, interviews (11) and surveys (9) with policymakers and policymakers’ advisors in the Netherlands and seven other countries within and beyond the EU were conducted.
Nine characteristics of CCMA policy platforms were identified: Transparency & Credibility of information, Ease of use, Flexibility of use, Accessibility & Portability, Education & Awareness, Communication of complex information, Data visualisation & interactivity, Actively maintained and supported, and Security & privacy. Interviews and surveys show that accessibility, relevance, applicability, and credibility were identified as the primary factors driving the perception of policymakers about the usefulness of CCMA policy platforms and four groups of characteristics were identified with decreasing levels of priority for policymakers: mandatory or must-have (formed by communication of complex information, free and open access to the tool, transparency regarding data sources and limitations, and high level of detail for spatial and temporal data); highly desirable or should-have (formed by availability of training and learning functionalities, availability of detailed documentation on concepts and models, interactive and easy-to-navigate elements, and availability of a web-based platform); ‘nice to have’ or could-have (user stories from policymakers or communities, availability of very recent data, ability to import user data/export results, and ability to modify parameters and run custom analyses), and indifferent (availability of languages beyond English and the ability to use the tool in mobile phones or tablets).
Four main recommendations are made to improve the design and use of CCMA policy platforms: Incorporating systematic reviews of existing CCMA policy platforms as part of projects developing such platforms, involving boundary organisations in the development and use of CCMA policy platforms, developing CCMA policy platforms with longer life expectancies and developing CCMA policy platforms flexible for different needs and preferences of policymakers.
With these results, new CCMA policy platforms can be developed with a better understanding of how useful policymakers perceive them and what they want from these support tools.
Stimulate and Support Sustainable Behaviour
A gamification based intervention towards sustainable behaviour within project scope in a marine contracting organization