A.F. Correlje
Please Note
45 records found
1
Hydrogen and derived fuels may act as long-term energy storage in climate-neutral energy systems. However, risk-averse investors will not invest in sufficient renewable electricity, back-up, electrolyzer and storage capacity if they are only remunerated for the hydrogen or electricity produced and markets for risk are missing. We develop a stochastic equilibrium model to study whether capacity markets can limit costs to consumers by restoring investments risk-neutral levels. Our results show that the efficacy of capacity markets depends on complementary instruments to ensure the availability of renewables. If risk-aversion and missing markets for risk reduce renewable build-out, capacity markets in the electricity and hydrogen sectors are needed to restore the overall capacity mix and limit costs for consumers. If complementary instruments lift investments in renewables, a capacity market in the electricity sector suffices. In this situation, an additional capacity market in the hydrogen sector triggers a bias toward hydrogen-fired backup capacity. This illustrates that an integrated systems perspective is required to design future energy markets.
Nederlands Energiebeleid in het Kielzog van Internationale Ontwikkelingen
Dertig Jaar Energiebeleid 1995-2025
Challenge accepted
Sub-national government authorities and the legitimacy of co-creative redevelopment projects in fossil-industrial regions
Regions reliant on declining fossil fuel production often grapple with upcoming deindustrialisation, economic decline, and deterioration of liveability. In attempts to address these issues proactively, local change agents, including sub-national government authorities, increasingly collaborate to develop new, more sustainable and just regional pathways. A potential yet not uncontested stepping stone towards such pathways is co-creative asset redevelopment. In this paper, we focus on the role of sub-national government authorities in co-creative redevelopment. Particularly, we zoom in on the legitimacy challenges that these authorities face and must address for co-creative redevelopment to have transformative capacity. We draw on insights from the case of GZI Next in Emmen, the Netherlands, and identify six challenges, amongst others intra-organisational conflicts of interests, accountability issues, and competing claims to the right to a just transition. We reflect on these challenges and how to overcome them and propose avenues for future research.
Guest Editorial
Special Issue on “Sustainable urban energy systems – Governance and citizen involvement”
Uit de interviews met de stakeholders zijn onzekerheden geïdentificeerd. Een samenvatting van de geïdentificeerde onzekerheden is ter verificatie aangeboden aan de geïnterviewde stakeholders. Vanuit alle geïdentificeerde onzekerheden heeft het onderzoeksteam een inschatting gemaakt welke onzekerheden van toepassing konden zijn voor een bepaalde stakeholdersgroep. Hierbij zijn de volgende stakeholdergroepen gedefinieerd: gemeente, warmtebedrijven, warmteproducent en projectontwikkelaars.
Vervolgens hebben stakeholders per enquête geverifieerd of de stakeholdersgroep bloot wordt gesteld aan de voorgelegde onzekerheden. Daarbij wordt er van uitgegaan dat als, bijvoorbeeld, één projectontwikkelaar aangaf dat zij aan een onzekerheid wordt blootgesteld, die onzekerheid van toepassing is op de gehele groep van projectontwikkelaars.
De primaire doelgroep voor dit whitepaper zijn gemeenten, maar ook voor andere stakeholders die betrokken zijn bij de ontwikkeling van een warmtenet zijn er zinvolle lessen te trekken. ...
Uit de interviews met de stakeholders zijn onzekerheden geïdentificeerd. Een samenvatting van de geïdentificeerde onzekerheden is ter verificatie aangeboden aan de geïnterviewde stakeholders. Vanuit alle geïdentificeerde onzekerheden heeft het onderzoeksteam een inschatting gemaakt welke onzekerheden van toepassing konden zijn voor een bepaalde stakeholdersgroep. Hierbij zijn de volgende stakeholdergroepen gedefinieerd: gemeente, warmtebedrijven, warmteproducent en projectontwikkelaars.
Vervolgens hebben stakeholders per enquête geverifieerd of de stakeholdersgroep bloot wordt gesteld aan de voorgelegde onzekerheden. Daarbij wordt er van uitgegaan dat als, bijvoorbeeld, één projectontwikkelaar aangaf dat zij aan een onzekerheid wordt blootgesteld, die onzekerheid van toepassing is op de gehele groep van projectontwikkelaars.
De primaire doelgroep voor dit whitepaper zijn gemeenten, maar ook voor andere stakeholders die betrokken zijn bij de ontwikkeling van een warmtenet zijn er zinvolle lessen te trekken.
Key Tensions in the Development of Regional Heat Infrastructure in The Netherlands
The Dilemmas of an Interorganizational Strategy Process
This article studies safety management in future gas systems. It is structured around the compatibility of its technological and institutional coordination. We identify how the current mode of safety management is not in harmony with increasingly complex technological and institutional arrangements, and combine safety science with institutional analysis to improve safety management. For our case study of biogas quality monitoring in the Netherlands, we offer structured recommendations for the reallocation of monitoring and enforcement mechanisms based on Safety-II. This article provides insights for users of gas systems and other infrastructures alike, and it offers safety scholars an approach to safety management that incorporates a novel focus on institutions.
African power pools and regional electricity market design
Taking stock of regional integration in energy sectors
Drawing the line
Opening up and closing down the siting of a high voltage transmission route in the Netherlands
From expectational conflicts to energy synergies
The evolution of societal value co-creation in energy hub development
Adapting to changing values
A framework for responsible decision-making in smart city development
Understanding Value Change in the Energy Transition
Exploring the Perspective of Original Institutional Economics
A New Carrier for Old Assumptions?
Imagined Publics and Their Justice Implications for Hydrogen Development in the Netherlands
Public agency and responsibility in energy governance
A Q study on diverse imagined publics in the Dutch heat transition
In Energy Social Science (ESS), the concept of imagined publics is used to describe how energy actors perceive societal groups around new energy technologies and projects. Findings indicate that imagined publics often build upon deficit assumptions; people are (unjustly) considered unknowledgeable, incapable, unwilling and irresponsible agents in governance. While insightful, deficit-based explanations insufficiently capture the broad diversity of publics imagined around energy system change. In this paper, we share the results of a Q-study, designed to systematically identify diverse imagined publics in the Dutch heat transition. We found five imaginaries: 1. “Meaningful participation in a diverse society” 2. “Strong and enthusiastic communities in the lead” 3. “NIMBYs, social contestation and the threat to decarbonisation” 4. “Collectivism & vulnerable groups at risk” 5. “Unburdening individual user-consumers in the transition”. Each imaginary builds upon a different set of epistemic, action and normative assumptions, which construct public agency and responsibility in transitions in distinctive ways. We explore how these constructions come to justify roles and obligations for publics as well of other actors in the heat transition. One of our main contributions is that we explicitly move beyond the analysis of singular imaginaries as we consider imaginaries to be interactive, holistic, and contextual. In comparison, key social, ethical, and political tensions and trade-offs in the heat transition become visible.
A Healthy Metaphor?
The North Sea Consultation and the Power of Words
Upholding safety in future energy systems
The need for systemic risk assessment