M.P. Hagenzieker
Please Note
18 records found
1
Towards safe use of general controls in cars
A real-world driving study assessing internal HMI task frequencies and influencing factors
Our AI-co-created website, utilizing Generative AI as an assistant, aims to disseminate proven road safety strategies, such as “Sustainable Safety” and the “Urban Street Design Guide,” which have been successfully implemented in the Netherlands and various U.S. cities. The prototype seeks to bridge language and knowledge gaps, empowering citizens worldwide with accessible road safety insights.
Employing the Prototype Method, this study underwent three development iterations, integrating feedback from diverse citizen groups through workshops and surveys. The final product, prototype 3, presented in a semi-manual, semi-AI format, demonstrates that AI can significantly enhance civic participation and public affairs.
Based on the Human-Centered AI (HCAI) framework, we introduce an advanced "Citizen-AI" model, incorporating the ARIE evaluation model—Avoid, Reduce, Insist, Encourage—to ensure ethical AI deployment. Together with the 3E framework: Education, Empowerment, and Engagement, the ARIE model offers a comprehensive self-assessment tool for developers, guiding the creation of AI systems that prioritize human welfare. This study envisions a future where citizens are equipped to use AI as an active tool for participation, bridging the gap between technology and public engagement.
...
Our AI-co-created website, utilizing Generative AI as an assistant, aims to disseminate proven road safety strategies, such as “Sustainable Safety” and the “Urban Street Design Guide,” which have been successfully implemented in the Netherlands and various U.S. cities. The prototype seeks to bridge language and knowledge gaps, empowering citizens worldwide with accessible road safety insights.
Employing the Prototype Method, this study underwent three development iterations, integrating feedback from diverse citizen groups through workshops and surveys. The final product, prototype 3, presented in a semi-manual, semi-AI format, demonstrates that AI can significantly enhance civic participation and public affairs.
Based on the Human-Centered AI (HCAI) framework, we introduce an advanced "Citizen-AI" model, incorporating the ARIE evaluation model—Avoid, Reduce, Insist, Encourage—to ensure ethical AI deployment. Together with the 3E framework: Education, Empowerment, and Engagement, the ARIE model offers a comprehensive self-assessment tool for developers, guiding the creation of AI systems that prioritize human welfare. This study envisions a future where citizens are equipped to use AI as an active tool for participation, bridging the gap between technology and public engagement.
Cycling in the Age of Automation
Enhancing Cyclist Interaction with Automated Vehicles through Human-Machine Interfaces
The main contributions of this dissertation include a thorough investigation of cyclists' expectations for future interactions with automated vehicles, highlighting the need for reliable detection by automated vehicles and placing the responsibility for safety on vehicle developers rather than cyclists. The research offers objective data and self-reported insights into cyclist-automated vehicle interactions and evaluates cyclists' ability to visually detect the presence or absence of a driver. Additionally, it introduces 20 scenarios of cyclist-automated vehicle interaction, serving as a resource for safety assessments and HMI research. A comprehensive literature review of existing HMIs for cyclists was conducted, identifying 92 concepts involving vehicles, bicycles, cyclists, and infrastructure.
The dissertation concludes with design recommendations for cyclist-centric HMIs, proposing an omnidirectional on-vehicle external HMI (eHMI) to communicate detection and automated driving mode. This dissertation provides valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and automated vehicle developers, aiming for the safer, more inclusive, and sustainable urban traffic environments of tomorrow. ...
The main contributions of this dissertation include a thorough investigation of cyclists' expectations for future interactions with automated vehicles, highlighting the need for reliable detection by automated vehicles and placing the responsibility for safety on vehicle developers rather than cyclists. The research offers objective data and self-reported insights into cyclist-automated vehicle interactions and evaluates cyclists' ability to visually detect the presence or absence of a driver. Additionally, it introduces 20 scenarios of cyclist-automated vehicle interaction, serving as a resource for safety assessments and HMI research. A comprehensive literature review of existing HMIs for cyclists was conducted, identifying 92 concepts involving vehicles, bicycles, cyclists, and infrastructure.
The dissertation concludes with design recommendations for cyclist-centric HMIs, proposing an omnidirectional on-vehicle external HMI (eHMI) to communicate detection and automated driving mode. This dissertation provides valuable insights for researchers, policymakers, and automated vehicle developers, aiming for the safer, more inclusive, and sustainable urban traffic environments of tomorrow.
Drivers’ Behaviour on Freeway Curve Approach
Different Angles, Different Perspectives
...
Analysis of travel planner use, route choice behaviour and passenger predicitions on the Dutch railway
A case of the Nederlandse Spoorwegen
Should I Stop or Should I Cross?
Interactions between vulnerable road users and automated vehicles
The influence of take-over requests on driver workload: The role of personality
A driving simulation self-experiment
The authors argue that the long-term improvement in safety does not only happen through individual and societal (i.e., within society) learning, but also through a third dimension which is the learning process across nations (i.e., in between societies). In this paper we attempt to capture this phenomenon in two ways using data for the EU Member States.
We first analyze countries’ progress in safety improvement in relation to their motorization level. Then we use panel regression to investigate whether the Human Development Index (HDI) as a measure of knowledge is a better predictor of safety instead of exposure measures (like car ownership level). The results show that for many countries lagging behind both in motorization and safety it took less time to converge in terms of safety than in motorization level. We also found that the HDI is overall a better predictor. While a few countries are already getting close to the saturation point in their motorization, an alternative knowledge-based predictor is needed for these countries to better describe trends in mortality rate. ...
The authors argue that the long-term improvement in safety does not only happen through individual and societal (i.e., within society) learning, but also through a third dimension which is the learning process across nations (i.e., in between societies). In this paper we attempt to capture this phenomenon in two ways using data for the EU Member States.
We first analyze countries’ progress in safety improvement in relation to their motorization level. Then we use panel regression to investigate whether the Human Development Index (HDI) as a measure of knowledge is a better predictor of safety instead of exposure measures (like car ownership level). The results show that for many countries lagging behind both in motorization and safety it took less time to converge in terms of safety than in motorization level. We also found that the HDI is overall a better predictor. While a few countries are already getting close to the saturation point in their motorization, an alternative knowledge-based predictor is needed for these countries to better describe trends in mortality rate.
Traffic Safety around Major Forks
A driving simulator study that compares different configurations with the use of surrogate safety measures
First, the system of interaction needs to be known. Using the methodology of Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM), the determinants and behaviour of the system is identified. FCM is a fairly new method in the field of transport planning, but showed potential for this specific research in which scientific data is limited. The original approach to develop a FCM model is adapted. Therefore, the time it took to develop a conceptual FCM model during a workshop could have been limited and disadvantages of one strategy is balanced or mitigated with the advantages of other stragegies. This research is therefore also assessing if FCM can be a useful method in the field of transport planning.
The FCM model that describes that system of interaction is developed via a literature study and subsequent workshop. This resulted in a model of 21 determinants with 72 connections or relationships. Computations showed that the most important (key) determinants were the following concepts: Safe crossing behaviour, VRU friendly road design, AV friendly road design, Intelligent infrastructure and Identification and recognition. These key determinants, who each describe an idea of something formed by mentally combining all its characteristics or particulars, are considered most important in the system of interaction and should therefore be first be researched in pilots.
The results of the workshop and computations provide a first glance at the system and results. Interviews provided extensive state-of-the-art knowledge on the key determinants. The findings from the interviews are translated into an advice for the City of Amsterdam te develop and execute pilots. These pilots should be able to answer the most important and relevant research questions on the safe mutual interaction between automated vehicles and vulnerable road users in the urban environment.
FCM is found to be useful in the field of transport planning for specific case in which scientific research is limited, with a lack of quantitative data, but available qualitative data from professionals and where human behaviour plays an important role. For the still developing technology of automated driving systems, the method can be useful for as long as quantitative data is not available. As soon as such data is available, other methods are found to be more useful. ...
First, the system of interaction needs to be known. Using the methodology of Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping (FCM), the determinants and behaviour of the system is identified. FCM is a fairly new method in the field of transport planning, but showed potential for this specific research in which scientific data is limited. The original approach to develop a FCM model is adapted. Therefore, the time it took to develop a conceptual FCM model during a workshop could have been limited and disadvantages of one strategy is balanced or mitigated with the advantages of other stragegies. This research is therefore also assessing if FCM can be a useful method in the field of transport planning.
The FCM model that describes that system of interaction is developed via a literature study and subsequent workshop. This resulted in a model of 21 determinants with 72 connections or relationships. Computations showed that the most important (key) determinants were the following concepts: Safe crossing behaviour, VRU friendly road design, AV friendly road design, Intelligent infrastructure and Identification and recognition. These key determinants, who each describe an idea of something formed by mentally combining all its characteristics or particulars, are considered most important in the system of interaction and should therefore be first be researched in pilots.
The results of the workshop and computations provide a first glance at the system and results. Interviews provided extensive state-of-the-art knowledge on the key determinants. The findings from the interviews are translated into an advice for the City of Amsterdam te develop and execute pilots. These pilots should be able to answer the most important and relevant research questions on the safe mutual interaction between automated vehicles and vulnerable road users in the urban environment.
FCM is found to be useful in the field of transport planning for specific case in which scientific research is limited, with a lack of quantitative data, but available qualitative data from professionals and where human behaviour plays an important role. For the still developing technology of automated driving systems, the method can be useful for as long as quantitative data is not available. As soon as such data is available, other methods are found to be more useful.
The contribution of infrastructure characteristics to bicycle crashes without motor vehicles
A quantitative approach using a case-control design