Safety, security, and the unintended implications of cutting the academic ties with the fossil fuel industry

Journal Article (2025)
Author(s)

Oscar Oviedo-Trespalacios (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Britte Bouchaut (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Karolien van Nunen (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Amir Pooyan Afghari (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Ming Yang (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Rioshar Yarveisy (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Eleonora Papadimitriou (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Perla J. Marang-van de Mheen (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Pieter van Gelder (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Genserik Reniers (TU Delft - Safety and Security Science)

Research Group
Safety and Security Science
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101264
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2025
Language
English
Research Group
Safety and Security Science
Bibliographical Note
Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository as part of the Taverne amendment. More information about this copyright law amendment can be found at https://www.openaccess.nl. Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public.
Volume number
56
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

In recent years, the relationship between academia and the fossil fuel industry has become a focal point of intense debate. This concern arises from the fear that corporate funding might skew research activities. A significant development in this area is the adoption of policies by a Dutch university, and discussions in several others, prohibiting research funded by the fossil fuel industry. These policies aim to safeguard academic freedom and integrity. Despite this, there has been little discussion on the myriad challenges, implications, and possible unintended consequences, particularly in the realm of safety-and-security research. As such, this manuscript delves into the complex transition towards a fossil-fuel-free society, examining it through the lenses of safety science and sociotechnical systems. It emphasizes the vital importance of collective responsibility in ensuring systemic safety and security as we navigate towards achieving the sustainable development goals. This journey requires a delicate balance between the objectives of safety and sustainability, along with a deep understanding of the security implications of decreasing our dependence on the fossil fuel industry. The strategy of distancing academic research from fossil fuel industries, commonly seen as a positive step, also demands a nuanced consideration of its broader impacts, including the setting of precedents for addressing other existential and systemic risks. Instead, we argue for the establishment of robust governance structures rooted in restorative justice principles. Such frameworks can facilitate productive dialogue with underrepresented groups, motivate the fossil fuel industry towards sustainable practices, and safeguard the integrity of scholarly research. This approach not only addresses immediate concerns related to fossil fuels but also lays the groundwork for a more inclusive and equitable model of climate risk research, essential for tackling the multifaceted challenges of our era.

Files

License info not available
warning

File under embargo until 14-04-2026