Introducing a comprehensive physics-based modelling framework for tandem and other PV systems
M.R. Vogt (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)
C. Ruiz Ruiz Tobon (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)
Alba Alcañiz Moya (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)
P. Procel Moya (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)
Y. Blom (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)
A. Nour El Din (TU Delft - Energy and Industry)
T. Stark (Student TU Delft)
Zhenhai Wang (Student TU Delft)
E. Garcia Goma (Student TU Delft)
J. G. Etxebarria (Student TU Delft)
H. Ziar (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)
Miroslav Zeman (TU Delft - Electrical Sustainable Energy)
R Santbergen (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)
O Isabella (TU Delft - Photovoltaic Materials and Devices)
More Info
expand_more
Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.
Abstract
We introduce a novel simulation tool capable of calculating the energy yield of a PV system based on its fundamental material properties and using self-consistent models. Thus, our simulation model can operate without measurements of a PV device. It combines wave and ray optics and a dedicated semiconductor simulation to model the optoelectronic PV device properties resulting in the IV-curve. The system surroundings are described via spectrally resolved ray tracing resulting in a cell resolved irradiance distribution, and via the fluid dynamics-based thermal model, in the individual cell temperatures. A lumped-element model is used to calculate the IV-curves of each solar cell for every hour of the year. These are combined factoring in the interconnection to obtain the PV module IV-curves, which connect to the inverter for calculating the AC energy yield. In our case study, we compare two types of 2 terminal perovskite/silicon tandem modules with STC PV module efficiencies of 27.7% and 28.6% with a reference c-Si module with STC PV module efficiency of 20.9%. In four different climates, we show that tandem PV modules operate at 1–1.9 °C lower yearly irradiance weighted average temperatures compared to c-Si. We find that the effect of current mismatch is significantly overestimated in pure optical studies, as they do not account for fill factor gains. The specific yields in kWh/kWp of the tandem PV systems are between −2.7% and +0.4% compared to the reference c-Si system in all four simulated climates. Thus, we find that the lab performance of the simulated tandem PV system translates from the laboratory to outdoors comparable to c-Si systems.