Erratum

High-Mobility Hydrogenated Fluorine-Doped Indium Oxide Film for Passivating Contacts c-Si Solar Cells (ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces (2019) 11:49 (45586−45595) DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b14709)

Journal Article (2021)
Author(s)

Can Han (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Luana Mazzarella (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Yifeng Zhao (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Guangtao Yang (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Paul Procel (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Martijn Tijssen (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Ana Montes

Olindo Isabella (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

Miro Zeman (TU Delft - Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science)

undefined More Authors (External organisation)

Research Group
Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
DOI related publication
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c02993 Final published version
More Info
expand_more
Publication Year
2021
Language
English
Related content
Research Group
Photovoltaic Materials and Devices
Journal title
ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces
Issue number
10
Volume number
13
Pages (from-to)
12636
Downloads counter
162
Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Abstract

The authors inadvertently misreported the order of magnitude of the TCO deposition pressure, for which all “10−3 Pa” should be intended as “Pa”. The authors regret for the mistake. These errors do not affect the conclusions of the work. The following errors needs to be corrected in the article. Page 45587. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION, 2.1. “2.50 × 10−3 Pa” and “2.20 × 10−3 Pa” should be “2.50 Pa” and “2.20 Pa”, respectively. Page 45588. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION, 3.1. All the “... × 10−5 Pa” should be “... × 10−2 Pa”. The physical unit of the “10−5 Pa” in the x-axis of Figure 2 should also be “10−2 Pa”. The correct Figure 2 appears below: (Figure presented).

Files

License info not available