In the quest of large-scale quantum computers, multi-core distributed architectures are considered a compelling alternative to be explored. A crucial aspect in such approach is the stringent demand on communication among cores when qubits need to interact, which conditions the scalability potential of these architectures. In this work, we address the question of how the cost of the communication among cores impacts on the viability of the quantum multi-core approach. Methodologically, we consider a design space in which architectural variables (number of cores, number of qubits per core), application variables for several quantum benchmarks (number of qubits, number of gates, percentage of two-qubit gates) and inter-core communication latency are swept along with the definition of a figure of merit. This approach yields both a qualitative understanding of trends in the design space and companion dimensioning guidelines for the architecture, including optimal points, as well as quantitative answers to the question of beyond which communication performance levels the multi-core architecture pays off. Our results allow to determine the thresholds for inter-core communication latency in order for multi-core architectures to outperform single-core quantum processors. @en

The grand challenge of scaling up quantum computers requires a full-stack architectural standpoint. In this position paper, we will present the vision of a new generation of scalable quantum computing architectures featuring distributed quantum cores (Qcores) interconnected via quantum-coherent qubit state transfer links and orchestrated via an integrated wireless interconnect.@en

Quantum many-core processors are envisioned as the ultimate solution for the scalability of quantum computers. Based upon Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) chips interconnected in a sort of quantum intranet, they enable large algorithms to be executed on current and close future technology. In order to optimize such architectures, it is crucial to develop tools that allow specific design space explorations. To this aim, in this paper we present a technique to perform a spatio-temporal characterization of quantum circuits running in multi-chip quantum computers. Specifically, we focus on the analysis of the qubit traffic resulting from operations that involve qubits residing in different cores, and hence quantum communication across chips, while also giving importance to the amount of intra-core operations that occur in between those communications. Using specific multi-core performance metrics and a complete set of benchmarks, our analysis showcases the opportunities that the proposed approach may provide to guide the design of multi-core quantum computers and their interconnects. @en

Current monolithic quantum computer architectures have limited scalability. One promising approach for scaling them up is to use a modular or multi-core architecture, in which different quantum processors (cores) are connected via quantum and classical links. This new architectural design poses new challenges such as the expensive inter-core communication. To reduce these movements when executing a quantum algorithm, an efficient mapping technique is required. In this paper, a detailed critical discussion of the quantum circuit mapping problem for multi-core quantum computing architectures is provided. In addition, we further explore the performance of a mapping method, which is formulated as a partitioning over time graph problem, by performing an architectural scalability analysis.@en

Quantum algorithms can be expressed as quantum circuits when the circuit model of computation is adopted. Such a circuit description is usually hardware-agnostic, that is, it does not consider the limitations that the quantum hardware might have. In order to make quantum algorithms executable on quantum devices they need to comply to their constraints, which mainly affect the parallelism of quantum operations and the possible interactions between the qubits. The process of adapting a quantum circuit to meet the quantum chip restrictions is known as mapping. The resulting circuit usually has a higher number of gates and depth, decreasing the algorithm's reliability. Different mapping solutions have been already proposed. Most of them are meant for a specific quantum processor and differ in methodology, approach and features. In addition, they are usually only compared in terms of added gates, circuit depth and compilation time. No thorough comparative analysis of the different mapping solutions performance and features has been performed so far.In this paper, we propose to apply structured design space exploration (DSE) methodologies to the mapping procedures. This will allow not only to have a more in depth and structured analysis of their performance but also to identify what features are key and worth to implement. By using DSE we will be able to: i) determine in what regimes some mapping solutions outperform others; ii) derive optimal mapping strategies for specific quantum algorithms and quantum processors; and iii) perform an scalability analysis. In addition, DSE techniques cannot only be applied to the mapping layer that is key for bridging quantum applications to quantum devices, but also to the full-stack quantum computing system allowing for its crosslayer co-design.@en

Despite its tremendous potential, it is still unclear how quantum computing will scale to satisfy the requirements of its most powerful applications. Among other issues, there are hard limits to the number of qubits that can be integrated into a single chip. Multicore architectures are a firm candidate for unlocking the scalability of quantum processors. Nonetheless, the vulnerability and complexity of quantum communications make this a challenging approach. A comprehensive design should imply consolidating the communications stack in the quantum computer architecture. In this article, we explain how this vision, by entangling communications and computation in the core of the design, may help to solve the open challenges. We also summarize the first results of our application of structured design methodologies backing this vision. With our work, we hope to contribute with design guidelines that may help unleash the potential of quantum computing.@en

Being a very promising technology, with impressive advances in the recent years, it is still unclear how quantum computing will scale to satisfy the requirements of its most powerful applications. Although continued progress in the fabrication and control of qubits is required, quantum computing scalability will depend as well on a comprehensive architectural design considering a distributed multi-core approach as an alternative to the traditional monolithic version, hence including a communications perspective. However, this goes beyond introducing mere interconnects. Rather, it implies consolidating the full communications stack in the quantum computer structure. In this paper, we propose a double full-stack architecture encompassing quantum computation and quantum communications, which we use to address the monolithic versus distributed question with a structured design methodology. For that, we revisit the different quantum computing layers to capture and model their essence by highlighting the open design variables and performance metrics. Using behavioral models and actual measurements from existing quantum computers, the results of simulations suggest that multicore architectures may effectively unleash the full quantum computer potential.@en

In the midst of the NISQ era of quantum computers, the challenges are gravitating to encompass both architecting and full-stack engineering aspects, which are inherently algorithm-driven, so that there starts to be a convergence of bottom-up and top down design approaches, what we coin as the Quantum Architecting (QuArch) era. In face of many-fold diverse design proposals, in this paper it is postulated and proposed to apply the so-called Design Space Exploration (DSE) to the full vertical stack of quantum systems as an instrumental methodology to address such design diversity challenge. This structured design means, based upon composing a multidimensional input design space together with compressing the set of output performance metrics into an optimization-oriented overall figure of merit, provides a framework and method for optimization, for performance comparison. It yields as well a way to discriminate among alternative techniques at all layers and across layers, eventually as a structured and comprehensive design-oriented formal framework to address the quantum system design and evaluation complexity. The paper concludes by illustrating instances of this methodology in optimizing and comparing mapping techniques to address the resource-constrained current NISQ quantum chips, and to carry out a quantitative gap analysis of scalability trends aiming manycore distributed quantum architectures. @en

Design, simulation, analysis and verification methodologies are crucial for developing electronic circuits and systems at large. Whereas long-standing EDA software is used in the semiconductor technology, there is no counterpart for quantum computing systems yet. Although the quantum computing community started utilizing and adapting some of the already existing EDA tools, for instance, to design quantum processors and control electronics for driving the qubits, or even to solve some quantum computing design tasks, they do not fully use the expertise gained over the last decades in the field of design automation. Current intermediate-scale quantum computers have been designed in an 'adhoc' manner with heterogeneous methods and tools. As we are entering the large-scale era, it is timely and key to further adopt EDA methodologies and software for quantum computing. In this paper, we provide an overview on how full-stack quantum computing systems are being implemented nowadays and discuss which the main challenges are for transitioning from this current scenario to a comprehensive framework encompassing full automated system-wide architecting, design, simulation, verification, and test.@en