Concrete is an ageing viscoelastic material exhibiting both elastic (instantaneous) as well as viscous (time-dependent) deformation under loading conditions (either external or internal). There is a limited number of studies focused on the time-dependent response of alkali-activated concretes (AACs) under loading/unloading conditions. Creep of AAC is a complex phenomenon, which is influenced by exposure conditions of the material, including the loading magnitude, temperature, relative humidity, thermal and drying histories; as well as chemical composition and phase assemblages (e.g., type and amount of reaction products) present in the cementitious matrix. AAC has shown very vibrable creep behaviors, due to different raw materials and processes using during their production. Creep studies on room temperature cured slag-based AAC usually show high creep; however, creep studies of different AACs, including fly ash-based and fly ash-slag-blended, indicate that elevated temperature curing could be a suitable mitigation strategy for reducing creep. This is associated with the development of a more mature microstructure in the material, due to an accelerated reaction kinetics and a consequent increase in strength and lower creep. However, applying a curing temperature above 80 °C causes thermal defects and cracks which increases the creep. For most aluminosilicate-based AACs that produced with fly ash, metakaolin and their blends with a small amount of ground granulated blast furnace slag, the recommended curing method is to use thermal curing at about 60 °C. In addition, curing time and initial loading time are also important. It must be noted that because of the complexity of raw materials properties and mix proportions, there is no universal method for all types of AACs. The existing creep prediction models for Portland cement-based concretes cannot be transferred and adopted in AACs directly due to the distinct nature of hydration products. Therefore, more studies investigated the creep at both small size and full-scale of AACs are urgently needed.

Alkali-activated materials (AAMs), as eco-friendly alternatives to Portland cement (PC), have attracted increasing attention of researchers and users in the past decades. Despite the eco-friendly nature of AAMs, doubts about these materials as an essential ingredient of concrete exist, regarding, for example, their volume stability. One possible volume change concerns autogenous shrinkage. Autogenous shrinkage is the self-created volume reduction of materials due to chemical reactions without the need for substance or heat exchange with the environment. If the autogenous shrinkage of a binder material is too large, cracking might happen, which will seriously impair the durability of concrete. The aim of this chapter is to provide a state-of-the-art review on the autogenous shrinkage of AAMs. The different characteristics and mechanisms of autogenous shrinkage of different AAMs are reported. Corresponding shrinkage-mitigating strategies are summarized. Existing models to simulate and predict the autogenous shrinkage of AAMs are reviewed. Remarks are then given on testing methods of autogenous shrinkage, which link back to the determination of the magnitude of autogenous shrinkage of AAMs. Connections between autogenous shrinkage and other deformations such as drying shrinkage, thermal deformation and creep are also discussed. Research gaps and outlook on future research in this field are given in the end.

The formation of micro-cracks due to restrained shrinkage is a significant concern for the durability and in-service implementation of alkali-activated materials (AAM). These cracks develop as a result of partial or total restrained deformations which occur when the material's properties are still evolving, and the deformation rate is high. This makes AAM especially susceptible to cracking during this critical early stage, leading to potential long-term durability issues. Therefore, it is particularly crucial to understand their restrained shrinkage behavior and early-age cracking risk. This chapter discusses two approaches for assessing the cracking sensitivity of AAM with a particular focus on the empirical method. It reviews the existing testing devices for evaluating restrained shrinkage and cracking in AAM, and compares and discusses key findings from the literature.