This paper presents the design and control of 12 kW medium voltage Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) prototype, providing a general overview on both the component and system levels. A top level functional overview of the sub-module (SM) converter design including features like semiconductor temperature monitoring and protections for over-voltage, overcurrent, and over-temperature to enhance reliability. The paper also offers a comprehensive system overview, utilizing OPALRT as a high-level controller. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design, a 12-kW, three-phase MMC prototype was constructed, consisting of four full-bridge (FB) SMs in each converter arm. The paper explains communication management and the integration of analog and digital signals between the physical system and the user interface controller. Finally, the system's output under various operating conditions is analyzed and presented.

Modular Multilevel Converters (MMCs) offer significant advantages in the medium to high-voltage settings. The modular architecture of MMCs allows for redundant submodules (SMs) to improve overall reliability. These redundant SMs can be deployed using various redundancy strategies, such as Load-Sharing Active Redundancy Strategy (LS-ARS), Fixed-Level Active Redundancy Strategy (FL-ARS), and Standby Redundancy Strategy (SRS). The primary contribution of this paper is the introduction of guidelines for applying Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) and a comprehensive methodology for its application across various redundancy strategies. This enables precise planning of preventive maintenance and estimation of the number of faulty SMs with a specific lifespan in the MMC. More importantly, MCS is applied to estimate the reliability of the MMC applying Mission Profile for SRS and LS-ARS where analytical solutions are unavailable. An analysis of uncertainty and the applicability of MCS is also presented to demonstrate the advantages of MCS over analytical methods. The computational time required for applying MCS across different redundancy strategies and arm levels is also assessed.

Modular multilevel converters (MMCs) are widely used in various applications due to their scalability, efficiency, and fault-tolerant capabilities. This article proposes a fault-tolerant methodology tailored for full-bridge (FB) submodules (SMs) in MMCs to enhance system reliability under open-circuit faults (OCFs) in insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs). The method adopts a hybrid approach, using control logic adjustments to reconfigure faulty SMs into half-bridge (HB) configuration for T2/T3 faults while employing redundant SMs for T1/T4 faults. Accurate fault detection and localization are achieved through established methods, such as state observers and voltage comparisons. It is shown using MCS that the proposed method can improve the 17 kV 10 MVA converter reliability by almost 25% over solely redundancy-based solution for given lifetime requirements. Finally, using a lab-scale FB MMC prototype, it is experimentally shown that the proposed reconfiguration technique can successfully localize the fault and revert to normal operating requirements by shifting from FB to HB SM configuration in approximately 20 ms of fault initiation.

Modular multilevel converters are favorable for efficiently operating high-power usages. The required number of components significantly increases when higher modularity is introduced for the given voltage level, thus reducing the system's reliability. This article suggests a mixed redundancy strategy (MRS) that combines the operational concepts using active and spare redundant submodules. It is shown that more than 50% higher B10 lifetime (the point in time when the system has a 90% probability of survival) is achievable as compared to reliability improvement using fixed-level active redundancy strategy, load-sharing active redundancy strategy, and standby redundancy strategy with the same number of redundant submodules. The tradeoff between operational efficiency and investment cost is explored to define the boundary for selecting the MRS over other redundancy strategies with varying dc-link voltages and average converter loading, considering a ten-year payback period and equivalent B10 lifetime. The change in viability boundary for the MRS is established with increasing B10 lifetime and its sensitivity to power electronic component costs and assumed failure rate. The effect of power capacity with a higher switch current rating is evaluated. Also, the Monte Carlo simulation methodology is proposed to evaluate the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed MRS scheme. Finally, the insights of this study are applied to existing literature.

The role of power electronics in advancing electrification and sustainability is pivotal. The Modular Multilevel Converter (MMC) is a leading candidate for connecting offshore wind farms to the power grid. However, one of the primary concerns with MMC is its reliability, primarily due to the high number of components, with semiconductors and capacitors being the main sources of failures. This study examines how the modularity and redundancy of the MMC affect its reliability and, consequently, its impact on power system adequacy. Our findings reveal a substantial influence of MMC's modularity and redundancy on power system adequacy. A high level of modularity with no redundancy leads to the worst-case scenario. On the other hand, lower modularity combined with higher redundancy results in the best scenario for power system adequacy. However, it's important to note that lower modularity and higher redundancy come with increased capital costs of MMC, representing a trade-off between reliability and affordability that we explore in this paper.

Power electronics converters are essential for power generation, transmission, and distribution. The modular multilevel converter (MMC) is highly valued for its versatility, high efficiency, and robust control capabilities. Since MMC is composed of many components, its reliability is crucial for maintaining the availability of electrical power systems. The reliability of the MMC can be evaluated using different methods, such as the military handbook (MIL) and the Mission Profile (MP) methods. By comparing the reliability estimation of the MMC using the MIL and MP methods, this study offers insights into the effectiveness of these approaches. Also, it shows the significant difference in final results between the two applied methods. These findings contribute to the understanding and improvement of the reliability assessment of power electronics converters. Also, the impact of redundancy is scrutinized to make the comparison more thorough.

Modular Multilevel Converters (MMCs) find increasing applications in medium to high-voltage systems. In such systems, reliability-oriented selection of power electronic switches becomes essential because higher modularity implies an increased number of components. The trade-off between the impact of higher modularity on converter reliability is quantitatively established, corresponding to redundancy costs for the given lifetime requirements. Therefore, this paper proposes a method for an optimal choice among available market switch voltage rating for the MMC. It is shown that the sub-modules (SMs) based on 1.7 kV switches are the most suitable (instead of 1.2 kV and 3.3 kV switches) for two case studies adapting data from the medium voltage grid in The Netherlands. Moreover, the insights from these case studies are generalized to DC link voltage in the range of 10-220 kV and average loading of 1-100%. The sensitivity analysis is performed for the different failure rates (FRs), required lifetime, components cost, and energy price. Sensitivity analysis is also performed to identify the impact of FIDES and Military Handbook (MIL-HDBK) methods. The impact of converter power capacity is studied under the variable current rating. Finally, a generalized form of the proposed method is presented and applied in the published works.

Power electronics converters are crucial for power generation, transmission, and distribution. The modular multilevel converter (MMC) is highly valued for its ability to handle high power levels, versatility in reconfiguration, high efficiency through small-capacity submodules (SMs), and robust control capabilities. A failure of a power electronics converter could result in disruptions in the flow of electrical power, which could have severe consequences for people and equipment relying on it. Thus, the reliability of power electronics converters is critical to maintaining the reliability of the electrical power system. Two well-known methodologies, the military handbook (MIL) and the more recent FIDES, can be used to evaluate the MMC's reliability. Both methods consider various factors to estimate the component's failure rate, resulting in different reliability parameters. In this paper, the reliability of the MMC is estimated using both methods, and the results are compared for standby and active redundancy strategies. Lastly, a generalized cost form that considers operational cost, capital cost, redundancy strategies, reliability methods (MIL and FIDES), and the MMC's annual average loading is presented.