M. Triggianese
Please Note
45 records found
1
Building Narratives
Instances from the Architecture Dialogue
Structured around three major projects by KAAN Architecten – the redevelopment of SPOT, the Amsterdam Courthouse and the Schiphol Terminal competition – the book investigates how architecture operates within increasingly complex political, economic and institutional realities. Processes of representation, integration and public communication become central to the act of designing itself.
Combining essays, project analysis and visual documentation, ‘Building Narratives’ reflects on architecture’s shifting role in a context shaped by neoliberal transformation, financial uncertainty and digital culture. The publication proposes architectural design not only as a spatial practice, but as a medium capable of structuring dialogue between stakeholders, institutions and the public realm. ...
Structured around three major projects by KAAN Architecten – the redevelopment of SPOT, the Amsterdam Courthouse and the Schiphol Terminal competition – the book investigates how architecture operates within increasingly complex political, economic and institutional realities. Processes of representation, integration and public communication become central to the act of designing itself.
Combining essays, project analysis and visual documentation, ‘Building Narratives’ reflects on architecture’s shifting role in a context shaped by neoliberal transformation, financial uncertainty and digital culture. The publication proposes architectural design not only as a spatial practice, but as a medium capable of structuring dialogue between stakeholders, institutions and the public realm.
Co-creation with carbon data
Reframing the designer’s role in the decarbonization of the built environment
Thick mapping mobility
A design-driven research for the architecture of interchanges
Evaluate user satisfaction for urban design of railway station areas
An assessment framework using agent-based simulation
Railway station areas can play a crucial role in promoting sustainable development if integrated with cities and be fluctuation-responsive through effective urban design. However, during the design stage, assessing the station areas' performance, of which user satisfaction is indicative, is challenging due to methodological limitations. Agent-based simulation (ABS) is promising as it can link spatial features with agents' behavior features. This research questions to what extent ABS can help assess the urban design of station areas.
Methods
This paper adopts the user pyramid as the theoretical framework, which outlines five types of user needs: safety, speed, ease, comfort, and experience. The paper selects indicators linking satisfaction and spatial features at the district and building levels. These indicators are measured in the simulation of the station system using digital tools, including MassMotion and Python scripts. The theory, indicators, and tools, in combination, serve as an assessment framework. Rotterdam Central Station is used as a case to demonstrate how the framework works.
Results
The framework is capable of assessing design alternatives by identifying changes in user satisfaction. It can be applied on the district level (at a scale of 250 m) with substantial details to inform design decision-making, and it is useful during the design stage when only limited data is available. This paper strengthens the scientific knowledge of railway station areas through the multidisciplinary literature review that translates user needs for urban design use, and it advances the digital means to visualize user satisfaction affected by design. ...
Railway station areas can play a crucial role in promoting sustainable development if integrated with cities and be fluctuation-responsive through effective urban design. However, during the design stage, assessing the station areas' performance, of which user satisfaction is indicative, is challenging due to methodological limitations. Agent-based simulation (ABS) is promising as it can link spatial features with agents' behavior features. This research questions to what extent ABS can help assess the urban design of station areas.
Methods
This paper adopts the user pyramid as the theoretical framework, which outlines five types of user needs: safety, speed, ease, comfort, and experience. The paper selects indicators linking satisfaction and spatial features at the district and building levels. These indicators are measured in the simulation of the station system using digital tools, including MassMotion and Python scripts. The theory, indicators, and tools, in combination, serve as an assessment framework. Rotterdam Central Station is used as a case to demonstrate how the framework works.
Results
The framework is capable of assessing design alternatives by identifying changes in user satisfaction. It can be applied on the district level (at a scale of 250 m) with substantial details to inform design decision-making, and it is useful during the design stage when only limited data is available. This paper strengthens the scientific knowledge of railway station areas through the multidisciplinary literature review that translates user needs for urban design use, and it advances the digital means to visualize user satisfaction affected by design.
Space, Time, and Affordance
Experimenting with computational methods to visualize human-building interaction
Greener, denser station areas?
Geodesign and Green Transit Oriented Development in Los Angeles
Mobility Futures
Four scenarios for the Dutch mobility system in 2050
Carbon Design Bottlenecks
An empirical taxonomy of the challenges integrating carbon data in the Architecture practice
Carbon Design Bottlenecks
An Empirical Taxonomy Of The Challenges Integrating Carbon Data In The Architecture Practice