E. Abraham
Please Note
27 records found
1
This research presents a six-step generic assessment framework that can be used to evaluate different decentralized WEN systems. The first step was formed to give the opportunity in setting up the research scope. It has the possibility to either select one neighborhood as a study case of multiple depending on the research objectives. After that comes a modular step where it is possible to include different innovative technologies that are relevant for a more decentralized WEN system. The water- and energy balance can be modeled in the third step, providing insight into the (re)use of water- and energy sources on different temporal scales. Subsequently, the generic assessment framework contains 13 evaluation indicators that are divided into four themes: (1) water system, (2) value for people, (3) energy system, and (4) general characteristics. The last step includes stakeholder perspectives to prioritize and weigh the indicators.
A modern Dutch neighborhood with a high building density (City Nieuwegein) was used as a case study to demonstrate the generic assessment framework. Four scenarios were designed (reference, improved centralized, hybrid, and almost decentralized) to assess the impact of a neighborhood with more decentralized WEN systems. The case study results showed that more decentralization strategies improved most indicator scores. Using different decentralized WEN systems increases the collection and storage of local water- and energy resources. It was found that neighborhoods with more decentralization strategies have a higher complexity (e.g., monitoring and spatial limitations) in implementation. Moreover, the investment- and maintenance costs can be up to 51% higher compared to a neighborhood with minimal decentralized WEN systems. However, the outcomes of the six stakeholder perspectives, showed that the scenario with the highest level of decentralization was, in all cases, preferred.
The results of the case study showed that the generic assessment framework can be used to evaluate different decentralized WEN systems. The 13 evaluation indicators followed the circular economy principle as this favors future-proof concepts. Besides, the generic assessment framework included stakeholder perspectives so that it can facilitate the decision-making process of stakeholders. This framework can be further improved by including multi-objective optimization resulting in more scenarios that can be simulated. At last, more research is required for qualitative indicators that improves evaluating the different scenarios. ...
This research presents a six-step generic assessment framework that can be used to evaluate different decentralized WEN systems. The first step was formed to give the opportunity in setting up the research scope. It has the possibility to either select one neighborhood as a study case of multiple depending on the research objectives. After that comes a modular step where it is possible to include different innovative technologies that are relevant for a more decentralized WEN system. The water- and energy balance can be modeled in the third step, providing insight into the (re)use of water- and energy sources on different temporal scales. Subsequently, the generic assessment framework contains 13 evaluation indicators that are divided into four themes: (1) water system, (2) value for people, (3) energy system, and (4) general characteristics. The last step includes stakeholder perspectives to prioritize and weigh the indicators.
A modern Dutch neighborhood with a high building density (City Nieuwegein) was used as a case study to demonstrate the generic assessment framework. Four scenarios were designed (reference, improved centralized, hybrid, and almost decentralized) to assess the impact of a neighborhood with more decentralized WEN systems. The case study results showed that more decentralization strategies improved most indicator scores. Using different decentralized WEN systems increases the collection and storage of local water- and energy resources. It was found that neighborhoods with more decentralization strategies have a higher complexity (e.g., monitoring and spatial limitations) in implementation. Moreover, the investment- and maintenance costs can be up to 51% higher compared to a neighborhood with minimal decentralized WEN systems. However, the outcomes of the six stakeholder perspectives, showed that the scenario with the highest level of decentralization was, in all cases, preferred.
The results of the case study showed that the generic assessment framework can be used to evaluate different decentralized WEN systems. The 13 evaluation indicators followed the circular economy principle as this favors future-proof concepts. Besides, the generic assessment framework included stakeholder perspectives so that it can facilitate the decision-making process of stakeholders. This framework can be further improved by including multi-objective optimization resulting in more scenarios that can be simulated. At last, more research is required for qualitative indicators that improves evaluating the different scenarios.
A future-proof water system for Campbelltown and the Greater Sydney area
Evaluating the potentials and implications of decentral wastewater treatment in suburban developments
The results are evaluated with the same criteria, which reveals the feasibility, pros and cons of each scenario while confirming the possibility of implementing decentralised wastewater treatment in this area although it does not bring out the same performance for all the scenarios. Further research can be carried out to simulate the long-term performance of the schemes and to test the performance with different technical components of DEWATS for the locations. ...
The results are evaluated with the same criteria, which reveals the feasibility, pros and cons of each scenario while confirming the possibility of implementing decentralised wastewater treatment in this area although it does not bring out the same performance for all the scenarios. Further research can be carried out to simulate the long-term performance of the schemes and to test the performance with different technical components of DEWATS for the locations.
The LEPP to 2050 is made possible by normalising the selected markets. As a result, the conditions unprecedented in Dutch data are covered in the normalised and combined data set. Generally, under scenarios with high proportions of hydrogen power in the energy portfolio, the cWGAN-GP model projects that DAM price series would have slightly lower mean and daily standard deviation than the 2019 level. Whereas much lower mean and daily standard deviation are projected when natural gas is still the fuel of the most frequent final generating technology. To explore the possible application of the projector model, the German DAM prices series in 2019 have been projected and evaluated, and the projections under Dutch 2050 energy scenarios have been used in calculating the generic profit potential of energy storage.
Five findings can be summarised from the main results. Firstly, from a literature survey and importance analyses, seven features are shown relevant to the DAM price in the combined data set, namely month of the year, day of the week, total hourly load forecast, national daily mean temperature, fuel cost of the most frequent final generating technology, hourly renewable power generation forecast and total installed renewable power capacity. Secondly, it has been found that two of the four proposed market state normalisation solutions, the Renewable Scarcity Factor (RSF) and the Renewable-Load Ratio (RLR) help the cWGAN-GP model strike a balance between price value distribution and hourly inter-dependencies. Thirdly, in this LEPP study, the cWGAN-GP model performs better than the Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder (CVAE) and multivariate Gaussian distribution (mGaus) models. Compared with the two alternatives, the cWGAN-GP model produces samples in better quality while remaining sensitive to temporal conditions. Fourthly, projections by the cWGAN-GP model are more realistic than those made by the Energy Transition Model (ETM), with price values varying continuously in smooth boundaries. Finally, the fuel cost of the most frequent final generating technology is found critical to LEPP. The annual mean and daily standard deviation of the DAM price series are expected to rise significantly when natural gas is mostly replaced by hydrogen power in the national energy portfolio. ...
The LEPP to 2050 is made possible by normalising the selected markets. As a result, the conditions unprecedented in Dutch data are covered in the normalised and combined data set. Generally, under scenarios with high proportions of hydrogen power in the energy portfolio, the cWGAN-GP model projects that DAM price series would have slightly lower mean and daily standard deviation than the 2019 level. Whereas much lower mean and daily standard deviation are projected when natural gas is still the fuel of the most frequent final generating technology. To explore the possible application of the projector model, the German DAM prices series in 2019 have been projected and evaluated, and the projections under Dutch 2050 energy scenarios have been used in calculating the generic profit potential of energy storage.
Five findings can be summarised from the main results. Firstly, from a literature survey and importance analyses, seven features are shown relevant to the DAM price in the combined data set, namely month of the year, day of the week, total hourly load forecast, national daily mean temperature, fuel cost of the most frequent final generating technology, hourly renewable power generation forecast and total installed renewable power capacity. Secondly, it has been found that two of the four proposed market state normalisation solutions, the Renewable Scarcity Factor (RSF) and the Renewable-Load Ratio (RLR) help the cWGAN-GP model strike a balance between price value distribution and hourly inter-dependencies. Thirdly, in this LEPP study, the cWGAN-GP model performs better than the Conditional Variational Auto-Encoder (CVAE) and multivariate Gaussian distribution (mGaus) models. Compared with the two alternatives, the cWGAN-GP model produces samples in better quality while remaining sensitive to temporal conditions. Fourthly, projections by the cWGAN-GP model are more realistic than those made by the Energy Transition Model (ETM), with price values varying continuously in smooth boundaries. Finally, the fuel cost of the most frequent final generating technology is found critical to LEPP. The annual mean and daily standard deviation of the DAM price series are expected to rise significantly when natural gas is mostly replaced by hydrogen power in the national energy portfolio.
Groundwater Monitoring Feasibility Study for Kumasi, Ghana
Using value sensitive design methods to synergize diverse stakeholder perspectives to develop groundwater management and monitoring strategies
The first research question aims to identify key stakeholders and their role in groundwater management. The results identifed over 40 stakeholder groups in the Kumasi water sector. However, the most well-known groups are Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL) and the Water Resources Commission (WRC). In addition to these government organizations, technical experts, specifically affiliated with Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), were cited as necessary to involve in the development of a groundwater monitoring technology.
The second research question seeks to identify practical considerations for groundwater monitoring. Here, there was a general negative view of groundwater management with challenges including limited regulation, lack of awareness for groundwater issues, and limited collaboration among groundwater stakeholders. To address these challenges, the most cited design requirement mentioned during the interviews was the need for mass education on water related concerns. Lastly, there were significant concerns among many of the interviewees about borehole drilling and the importance of informal communication between drillers and neighbors to ensure safe and sustainable access to groundwater.
The third research question uses value sensitive design protocols to create value profiles for each of the stakeholder groups. The values incorporated in this study are economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, safety, social equity, participation, reliability, and trust. Respondents were asked, through a token allocation activity, to indicate what values are important for groundwater monitoring. Although the value profiles between stakeholder groups were not statistically different, the anecdotal evidence from interviews suggests that participation is connected to other values. This indicates that participation contributes to achieving other values in the implementation of a groundwater monitoring program.
The last research question sought to identify communication tools to incorporate considerations derived from the research questions, case studies, Ghanaian water policy, and a theoretical framework based on participatory design. This resulted in the recommendation of three parallel strategies: a) multi-stakeholder involvement, b) technology development and c) a water education campaign. The programs are designed to operate in a cyclic manner based on a social learning model specific to water management. This will enable a groundwater monitoring technology to be developed (b) alongside a water education campaign (c) in the community where water will be monitored. Implementation of a multistakeholder advisory board to coordinate these efforts and facilitate collaboration will ensure a participatory process. The next steps are to disseminate findings to key stakeholders in the Ghana water sector and continuously adapt the action plans as new information is identified. ...
The first research question aims to identify key stakeholders and their role in groundwater management. The results identifed over 40 stakeholder groups in the Kumasi water sector. However, the most well-known groups are Ghana Water Company Limited (GWCL) and the Water Resources Commission (WRC). In addition to these government organizations, technical experts, specifically affiliated with Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), were cited as necessary to involve in the development of a groundwater monitoring technology.
The second research question seeks to identify practical considerations for groundwater monitoring. Here, there was a general negative view of groundwater management with challenges including limited regulation, lack of awareness for groundwater issues, and limited collaboration among groundwater stakeholders. To address these challenges, the most cited design requirement mentioned during the interviews was the need for mass education on water related concerns. Lastly, there were significant concerns among many of the interviewees about borehole drilling and the importance of informal communication between drillers and neighbors to ensure safe and sustainable access to groundwater.
The third research question uses value sensitive design protocols to create value profiles for each of the stakeholder groups. The values incorporated in this study are economic efficiency, environmental sustainability, safety, social equity, participation, reliability, and trust. Respondents were asked, through a token allocation activity, to indicate what values are important for groundwater monitoring. Although the value profiles between stakeholder groups were not statistically different, the anecdotal evidence from interviews suggests that participation is connected to other values. This indicates that participation contributes to achieving other values in the implementation of a groundwater monitoring program.
The last research question sought to identify communication tools to incorporate considerations derived from the research questions, case studies, Ghanaian water policy, and a theoretical framework based on participatory design. This resulted in the recommendation of three parallel strategies: a) multi-stakeholder involvement, b) technology development and c) a water education campaign. The programs are designed to operate in a cyclic manner based on a social learning model specific to water management. This will enable a groundwater monitoring technology to be developed (b) alongside a water education campaign (c) in the community where water will be monitored. Implementation of a multistakeholder advisory board to coordinate these efforts and facilitate collaboration will ensure a participatory process. The next steps are to disseminate findings to key stakeholders in the Ghana water sector and continuously adapt the action plans as new information is identified.
Reinforcement learning for water system control
Cost optimization at IJmuiden pumping station
This research investigates the IJmuiden pumping station, which drains water from the Noordzeekanaal-Amsterdam-Rijnkanaal system into The North Sea. The primary focus of the control of this system is ensuring safe water levels as it runs through areas of high economic value. The flexibility of the range of safe water levels allows costs to be minimized by selecting favourable moments to consume electricity. This simultaneously contributes to the stability of the electrical grid. This research explores the potential for a Reinforcement Learning controller for such an optimization problem, as there are some drawbacks to the Model Predictive Control methods that are currently widely used. The research objective is formulated as follows:
To optimize the control of the IJmuiden pumping station using Reinforcement Learning while complying with local water level restrictions and compare it to the state-of-the-art Model Predictive Control methods in terms of constraint violation, energy costs, and computational speed.
The Reinforcement Learning controller will use a deep Q-learning algorithm that chooses the most cost efficient control in IJmuiden while respecting the water level restrictions. To do so, the model makes decisions based on electricity prices and details about the state of the water system for the current time step as well as a forecast of 48 hours ahead. This data is provided as an input to the model.
The inputs of the model consist of historical data, meaning that the associated uncertainties are not included. The water system that the model can interact with is represented by a linear reservoir model. Therefore, the water system is influenced dynamically by the actions taken by the model. The possible actions are determined by the state of the water system.
The trained model was tested on 2 years of unseen data (data that was not used during training). Using the same test data, control plans were generated using Model Predictive Control. The Reinforcement Learning model was very successful in ensuring safe water levels. However, this did result in approximately 50\% higher energy costs. The use of the gate was close to optimal but the pumping was not clearly correlated with favourable prices and power consumption. The trained model was robust, with consistently accurate results with regards to respecting the water level constraints.
The most significant difference with the Model Predictive Control was the computation time. The Reinforcement Learning model was able to create a control plan approximately 300 times faster. This opens doors for further development of the model and increased complexity. A more accurate model of the water system can be used to take into account temporal and spatial effects and individually representing the six pumps in IJmuiden.
There are still many steps before such a model can be used for operational control, but the method has potential for such an application. Many aspects of the model can be improved as well as making adjustments to increase the usability for control operators. ...
This research investigates the IJmuiden pumping station, which drains water from the Noordzeekanaal-Amsterdam-Rijnkanaal system into The North Sea. The primary focus of the control of this system is ensuring safe water levels as it runs through areas of high economic value. The flexibility of the range of safe water levels allows costs to be minimized by selecting favourable moments to consume electricity. This simultaneously contributes to the stability of the electrical grid. This research explores the potential for a Reinforcement Learning controller for such an optimization problem, as there are some drawbacks to the Model Predictive Control methods that are currently widely used. The research objective is formulated as follows:
To optimize the control of the IJmuiden pumping station using Reinforcement Learning while complying with local water level restrictions and compare it to the state-of-the-art Model Predictive Control methods in terms of constraint violation, energy costs, and computational speed.
The Reinforcement Learning controller will use a deep Q-learning algorithm that chooses the most cost efficient control in IJmuiden while respecting the water level restrictions. To do so, the model makes decisions based on electricity prices and details about the state of the water system for the current time step as well as a forecast of 48 hours ahead. This data is provided as an input to the model.
The inputs of the model consist of historical data, meaning that the associated uncertainties are not included. The water system that the model can interact with is represented by a linear reservoir model. Therefore, the water system is influenced dynamically by the actions taken by the model. The possible actions are determined by the state of the water system.
The trained model was tested on 2 years of unseen data (data that was not used during training). Using the same test data, control plans were generated using Model Predictive Control. The Reinforcement Learning model was very successful in ensuring safe water levels. However, this did result in approximately 50\% higher energy costs. The use of the gate was close to optimal but the pumping was not clearly correlated with favourable prices and power consumption. The trained model was robust, with consistently accurate results with regards to respecting the water level constraints.
The most significant difference with the Model Predictive Control was the computation time. The Reinforcement Learning model was able to create a control plan approximately 300 times faster. This opens doors for further development of the model and increased complexity. A more accurate model of the water system can be used to take into account temporal and spatial effects and individually representing the six pumps in IJmuiden.
There are still many steps before such a model can be used for operational control, but the method has potential for such an application. Many aspects of the model can be improved as well as making adjustments to increase the usability for control operators.
Sensitivity Assessment of Sentinel-1 SAR Closure Phase to Vegetation and Soil Moisture Dynamics
A Case Study for Regions in Southern France
This thesis provides relatively comprehensive and overall ideas to research drinking water temperature. The objective of this thesis consists of three parts: i) Determining impact factors on water temperature; ii) Simulating water temperature in the distribution system; iii) Choosing measures to control water temperature. Firstly, data measurement and analytical methods were applied to determine impact factors on water temperature, and the influence level of each impact factor had been identified. Subsequently, implementing these impact factors to calibrate the water temperature simulation model to verify the model’s feasibility. Finally, the performance on reducing water temperature of three measures, porous asphalt, pervious interlocking concrete pavement, and grass cover, were compared to determine the most effective measure from the standpoint of pipe cover. The results show as following: i) Four impact factors are summarized as surface cover material, district heating pipe, shade effect and groundwater level based on the collected data; ii) It is feasible to simulate the water temperature in the water distribution system. For the model of city Almere, around 88% of simulation values had a difference smaller than 1℃ compared with measurement data; iii) Grass cover has a better performance than the porous asphalt and pervious interlocking cement pavement. Additionally, this thesis discusses limitations during the measurement and simulation process and more relative interventions to reduce water temperature.
In summary, this thesis further summarizes the various impact factors that affect the drinking water temperature and the measure to control drinking water temperature has launched from the point of pipe cover compared with previous references. These results provide guiding advice on the engineering projects of constructing and renovating drinking water distribution systems considering water temperature. ...
This thesis provides relatively comprehensive and overall ideas to research drinking water temperature. The objective of this thesis consists of three parts: i) Determining impact factors on water temperature; ii) Simulating water temperature in the distribution system; iii) Choosing measures to control water temperature. Firstly, data measurement and analytical methods were applied to determine impact factors on water temperature, and the influence level of each impact factor had been identified. Subsequently, implementing these impact factors to calibrate the water temperature simulation model to verify the model’s feasibility. Finally, the performance on reducing water temperature of three measures, porous asphalt, pervious interlocking concrete pavement, and grass cover, were compared to determine the most effective measure from the standpoint of pipe cover. The results show as following: i) Four impact factors are summarized as surface cover material, district heating pipe, shade effect and groundwater level based on the collected data; ii) It is feasible to simulate the water temperature in the water distribution system. For the model of city Almere, around 88% of simulation values had a difference smaller than 1℃ compared with measurement data; iii) Grass cover has a better performance than the porous asphalt and pervious interlocking cement pavement. Additionally, this thesis discusses limitations during the measurement and simulation process and more relative interventions to reduce water temperature.
In summary, this thesis further summarizes the various impact factors that affect the drinking water temperature and the measure to control drinking water temperature has launched from the point of pipe cover compared with previous references. These results provide guiding advice on the engineering projects of constructing and renovating drinking water distribution systems considering water temperature.
Diagnostics of the Theoretical Underpinning of the Socio-hydrological Model in "Water Effciency in Sustainable Cotton-based Production Systems" Project in Maharashtra, India
Evaluation of model performance and the quantication of errors using Monte Carlo sampling, GLUE, linear regressions, linear PCA, and kernel PCA
After the initial calibration, the model scores are NS: -0.343 to -0.996, log of NS: -0.655 to -1.91, MAE: 447.1 to 553.2 kg/ha, and r-squared: 0.003 to 0.008. Because of the poor performance of the model, the uncertainty intervals from GLUE are not enough to capture the total errors of the model. However, after adjustment using the structural error model, the model scores become NS: 0.83, log of NS: 0.56, MAE: 149 kg/ha, and r-squared: 0.859. The adjusted yield calculation has a residual error as Gaussian distribution with standard deviation of 150 kg/ha. The qualitative analysis identified several factors that contribute to the errors viz. farmers' capital, irrigation behavior, and crop production process such as canopy cover growth. Lastly, there is no major instability found through the bootstrap analysis. The physical model is not performing well, especially when it is calculating yield for individual farmers over a large study area. However, the structural error model can adjust the yield prediction so that it is close to the observed yields. This indicates the poor performance is likely to be caused by the prevalence of structural errors in the model instead of the uncertainties regarding parameters, input, or observation values. Therefore, it is recommended for future research to address this first. This can be done by further study and incorporation of more crop production processes, soil water simulation, and exploratory interviews to identify patterns and more factors that can influence the errors. ...
After the initial calibration, the model scores are NS: -0.343 to -0.996, log of NS: -0.655 to -1.91, MAE: 447.1 to 553.2 kg/ha, and r-squared: 0.003 to 0.008. Because of the poor performance of the model, the uncertainty intervals from GLUE are not enough to capture the total errors of the model. However, after adjustment using the structural error model, the model scores become NS: 0.83, log of NS: 0.56, MAE: 149 kg/ha, and r-squared: 0.859. The adjusted yield calculation has a residual error as Gaussian distribution with standard deviation of 150 kg/ha. The qualitative analysis identified several factors that contribute to the errors viz. farmers' capital, irrigation behavior, and crop production process such as canopy cover growth. Lastly, there is no major instability found through the bootstrap analysis. The physical model is not performing well, especially when it is calculating yield for individual farmers over a large study area. However, the structural error model can adjust the yield prediction so that it is close to the observed yields. This indicates the poor performance is likely to be caused by the prevalence of structural errors in the model instead of the uncertainties regarding parameters, input, or observation values. Therefore, it is recommended for future research to address this first. This can be done by further study and incorporation of more crop production processes, soil water simulation, and exploratory interviews to identify patterns and more factors that can influence the errors.
Estimating hydraulic aquifer parameters from tide-induced groundwater fluctuations
A case study in Schouwen-Duiveland
A new approach in optimal sensor placement for smart hydraulic monitoring in intermittent water supply (IWS) systems
A technical and financial analysis of the use of flow and pressure meters to detect hidden leaks in large cities in sub-Saharan Africa
Optimal Rehabilitation of Urban Drainage Systems
Application of single-objective optimisation for the implementation of Green-Blue-Grey Infrastructures in changing climate
Rehabilitation of UDS can be done in several ways, including implementing Green-Blue-Grey Infrastructures (G-B-G measures). The combination of G-B-G measures can increase the resiliency of the UDS to withstand higher intensity rainfall by reducing both the peak flow and enlarging the capacity of the UDS system. Therefore, this thesis aims to develop a method to find the optimal way to rehabilitate an existing UDS to reduce the risk of flooding under the climate change rainfall scenarios.
The method developed coupled a hydrodynamic model, Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), and Genetic Algorithm (GA) to find the optimal solution to rehabilitate UDS. The effect of climate change was incorporated by simulating the solutions using composite design storms that represent the increase in hourly and daily rainfall extremes for 2030, 2050, and 2085. The objective function of this optimisation problem becomes the minimisation of the total cost to implement the measures for the rehabilitation of UDS, under the constraint that no flooding can happen on the system when tested against the climate change rainfall scenarios. Therefore, the decision variables of this optimisation are the size and location for each implemented measure, while the penalty cost is associated with the cost of each m3 of flooding.
Based on the analysis of the case study, the most appropriate Green-Blue measures to be implemented is Rain Barrels, Infiltration Trenches, and Pervious Pavements. Meanwhile, for grey measures, it is best to consider pipe and pump replacements and increasing the CSOs’ weirs. The optimisation was done using the developed formal method and manual trial-and-error. The results of the formal optimisation have been confirmed to outperform the result from manual optimisation using the traditional trial-and-error method. The optimal solutions proved that a combination of both grey and G-B measures produced the lowest cost to reduce flooding. Although the solutions can be adapted over time from 2030 until 2085, the results show that adaptive solutions might not be needed when the solution for 2085 is better implemented from the year 2030. Overall, it can be projected that in the future, the combination of G-B-G measures can produce an economically optimal solution to be implemented in order to achieve zero floodings in the case study location. ...
Rehabilitation of UDS can be done in several ways, including implementing Green-Blue-Grey Infrastructures (G-B-G measures). The combination of G-B-G measures can increase the resiliency of the UDS to withstand higher intensity rainfall by reducing both the peak flow and enlarging the capacity of the UDS system. Therefore, this thesis aims to develop a method to find the optimal way to rehabilitate an existing UDS to reduce the risk of flooding under the climate change rainfall scenarios.
The method developed coupled a hydrodynamic model, Storm Water Management Model (SWMM), and Genetic Algorithm (GA) to find the optimal solution to rehabilitate UDS. The effect of climate change was incorporated by simulating the solutions using composite design storms that represent the increase in hourly and daily rainfall extremes for 2030, 2050, and 2085. The objective function of this optimisation problem becomes the minimisation of the total cost to implement the measures for the rehabilitation of UDS, under the constraint that no flooding can happen on the system when tested against the climate change rainfall scenarios. Therefore, the decision variables of this optimisation are the size and location for each implemented measure, while the penalty cost is associated with the cost of each m3 of flooding.
Based on the analysis of the case study, the most appropriate Green-Blue measures to be implemented is Rain Barrels, Infiltration Trenches, and Pervious Pavements. Meanwhile, for grey measures, it is best to consider pipe and pump replacements and increasing the CSOs’ weirs. The optimisation was done using the developed formal method and manual trial-and-error. The results of the formal optimisation have been confirmed to outperform the result from manual optimisation using the traditional trial-and-error method. The optimal solutions proved that a combination of both grey and G-B measures produced the lowest cost to reduce flooding. Although the solutions can be adapted over time from 2030 until 2085, the results show that adaptive solutions might not be needed when the solution for 2085 is better implemented from the year 2030. Overall, it can be projected that in the future, the combination of G-B-G measures can produce an economically optimal solution to be implemented in order to achieve zero floodings in the case study location.
In this report the performance of a linear and nonlinear recharge model, inside the TFN model, are tested against synthetic time series of the groundwater table. These time series for the groundwater table are created with the unsaturated/saturated zone model HYDRUS-1D. With HYDRUS-1D, thirty-five synthetic time series are created for five different soil types and seven different unsaturated zone thicknesses (up to 5 m). The three most commonly used response functions, exponential, gamma and four-parameters are also tested for these thirty-five time series.
The results show that TFN models using the nonlinear recharge model are almost always better in estimating the groundwater table time series than the linear recharge model. This is confirmed in both the calibration and validation period. The common disadvantage of the linear recharge model, undershooting the groundwater table in (dry) summers, is not observed for the nonlinear recharge model. This can improve the forecasting abilities of TFN models during droughts.
Additionally, the nonlinear recharge model gives a more realistic representation of the fluxes in the root zone. This is confirmed goodness-of-fit parameters when comparing of the recharge flux and evaporation reduction calculated by HYDRUS-1D and the nonlinear recharge model. Especially when using the exponential response function, the recharge flux can be estimated quite well by the nonlinear recharge model. However, the nonlinear recharge model is currently not able to estimate groundwater uptake (upwards recharge) while it is observed in the HYDRUS-1D simulations.
The linear model does perform decently for shallow groundwater tables down to a depth of 150 cm since that is where large groundwater fluctuations and more days with groundwater uptake (upward recharge) are observed. The use of the gamma and four-parameter response functions significantly improves the performance of the linear recharge model. This can be explained by the compensation of these response functions for dispersion and retardation in the root zone. Nevertheless, when performing groundwater table time series analysis on synthetic time series created with HYDRUS-1D, the nonlinear recharge model is preferred to simulate the groundwater table. ...
In this report the performance of a linear and nonlinear recharge model, inside the TFN model, are tested against synthetic time series of the groundwater table. These time series for the groundwater table are created with the unsaturated/saturated zone model HYDRUS-1D. With HYDRUS-1D, thirty-five synthetic time series are created for five different soil types and seven different unsaturated zone thicknesses (up to 5 m). The three most commonly used response functions, exponential, gamma and four-parameters are also tested for these thirty-five time series.
The results show that TFN models using the nonlinear recharge model are almost always better in estimating the groundwater table time series than the linear recharge model. This is confirmed in both the calibration and validation period. The common disadvantage of the linear recharge model, undershooting the groundwater table in (dry) summers, is not observed for the nonlinear recharge model. This can improve the forecasting abilities of TFN models during droughts.
Additionally, the nonlinear recharge model gives a more realistic representation of the fluxes in the root zone. This is confirmed goodness-of-fit parameters when comparing of the recharge flux and evaporation reduction calculated by HYDRUS-1D and the nonlinear recharge model. Especially when using the exponential response function, the recharge flux can be estimated quite well by the nonlinear recharge model. However, the nonlinear recharge model is currently not able to estimate groundwater uptake (upwards recharge) while it is observed in the HYDRUS-1D simulations.
The linear model does perform decently for shallow groundwater tables down to a depth of 150 cm since that is where large groundwater fluctuations and more days with groundwater uptake (upward recharge) are observed. The use of the gamma and four-parameter response functions significantly improves the performance of the linear recharge model. This can be explained by the compensation of these response functions for dispersion and retardation in the root zone. Nevertheless, when performing groundwater table time series analysis on synthetic time series created with HYDRUS-1D, the nonlinear recharge model is preferred to simulate the groundwater table.
Point and interval forecasting of short-term electricity price with machine learning
A theoretical and practical evaluation of benchmark accuracies for the Dutch intraday market