C. Borst
Please Note
47 records found
1
Flying V Robust Controller Design
Design of a C* Longitudinal Flight Controller using H infinity - Loop Shaping Techniques
as landing. Furthermore, despite an increase in workload ratings during non-nominal obstacle events, mission understanding was not compromised. This indicates a successful conversion of physical effort into effective cognitive support. Consequently, the implementation supports timely decision-making, ensuring early planning and optimizing mission efficiency. Future research recommends evaluating a cockpit-integrated system to further validate these findings under a realistic operational context. ...
as landing. Furthermore, despite an increase in workload ratings during non-nominal obstacle events, mission understanding was not compromised. This indicates a successful conversion of physical effort into effective cognitive support. Consequently, the implementation supports timely decision-making, ensuring early planning and optimizing mission efficiency. Future research recommends evaluating a cockpit-integrated system to further validate these findings under a realistic operational context.
The work in this thesis explored how an ecologically-inspired design of a collaborative ATC-UTM interface for tower controllers could assist them in supervising UTM decisions on UAS and achieve a safe and expeditious flow of air traffic within the control zone. The concept relies on the segregation of ATC and UTM areas of responsibility to avoid the issue of having multiple agents (human tower controller vs. automated UTM) manage different traffic in the same airspace. However, dynamic changes in crewed and uncrewed airspace demands may occur, making it necessary to provide flexible airspace management mechanisms. By using tools that automated UTM systems can interpret (geofences and UASspecific commands) human controllers can temporarily turn static airspace segregation into active separation management of individual vehicles to maintain safety...
...
The work in this thesis explored how an ecologically-inspired design of a collaborative ATC-UTM interface for tower controllers could assist them in supervising UTM decisions on UAS and achieve a safe and expeditious flow of air traffic within the control zone. The concept relies on the segregation of ATC and UTM areas of responsibility to avoid the issue of having multiple agents (human tower controller vs. automated UTM) manage different traffic in the same airspace. However, dynamic changes in crewed and uncrewed airspace demands may occur, making it necessary to provide flexible airspace management mechanisms. By using tools that automated UTM systems can interpret (geofences and UASspecific commands) human controllers can temporarily turn static airspace segregation into active separation management of individual vehicles to maintain safety...
Towards Automated and Sustainable Airport Surface Movement Operations
Designing Models, Methods, and Tools for Next-generation Concepts of Operations
Against this backdrop, regulators, researchers, and practitioners increasingly view AI-enabled decision-support and automation as key enablers for future improvements. Yet, the literature lacks a modelling framework that simultaneously captures the interrelated operational processes, heterogeneous actors, and fidelity requirements necessary to evaluate next-generation concepts for airport surface movement operations (ASM Ops) in a realistic and systematic manner. Many existing models remain limited to isolated subsystems, single concepts, or strong simplifying assumptions, which restrict their ability to compare alternative future approaches at a detailed level. To address this gap, the objective of this thesis is to design models, methods, and tools to investigate next-generation concepts of operations (ConOps) for automated and sustainable ASM Ops.
The thesis is structured around eight research questions (RQs) and proceeds in three phases. The development phase (Chapters 2 to 5) first derives modelling requirements from the operational structure of ASM Ops and from the goal to represent surface movements at high fidelity while remaining computationally tractable (RQ 1). ASM Ops encompasses a hierarchy of tasks, ranging from strategic planning (long-term and high-level decisions) to scheduling (tactical allocation of resources), routing (tactical planning of movements), guidance (operational planning of movements), and finally movement execution (controlling aircraft and ground vehicles). This hierarchical decomposition, combined with the need for coordinated oversight to maintain the strict safety standards in aviation, motivates a hierarchical–distributed modelling approach.
To provide the required modularity, adaptability, and expressiveness in both fast-time and real-time simulations, this thesis adopts the multi-agent systems (MAS) paradigm. A generalised MAS architecture is proposed, comprising environmental objects and four agent categories aligned with the hierarchy of ASM Ops tasks (RQ 2). The architecture supports different allocations of responsibilities and different coordination mechanisms, enabling the instantiation of tailored model instances for specific ConOps while retaining a reusable simulation environment and component structure.
To support trajectory-based automation studies at airport scale (RQ 3), the thesis then outlines the Multi-Agent Motion Planning on Airport Surfaces (AS-MAMP) algorithm as the decision-logic for centralised path planning in a fully-automated operational setting, i.e. on EASA’s AI Level 3. AS-MAMP is a two-level solver that builds on Priority-Based Search (PBS) and its variants for high-level conflict resolution. Because existing low-level planners were insufficient to compute realistic 4D ground trajectories under operational constraints, the thesis introduces the novel Safe Interval Motion Planning (SIMP) algorithm. SIMP plans continuous-time trajectories in accordance with the operational processes in ASM Ops (e.g. pushback and engine-start, tug coupling/decoupling, and holding), motions based on finite acceleration, and conflict avoidance in continuous space and time.
The resulting planning approach is evaluated through structured benchmarking on a synthetic airport layout, where the high-level coordination component is compared against PBS variants and SIMP is benchmarked against SIPP and kinodynamic A*. The evaluation is complemented by experiments on the real-world layout of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol to assess scalability and operational relevance under realistic airport complexity. Taken together, these results establish the MAS architecture and AS-MAMP planning capability as an enabling foundation for subsequent operational analyses, while also identifying limitations and implementation challenges that arise when moving towards real-world deployment.
The validation phase (Chapters 6 to 8) applies the developed MAS framework in operational studies and subsequently strengthens its realism. Two far-term analyses investigate fully-automated ASM Ops under multi-engine taxiing (RQ 4) and under engine-off taxiing (RQ 5), examining system-level implications under dense traffic assumptions. Building on feedback from ATCOs and other operational experts gathered throughout the thesis, historical aircraft ground tracks are then analysed to improve the calibration of key movement parameters (RQ 6) so that the model is able to more accurately reproduce the historical operations. The MAS model is further extended to represent aircraft towing movements and to assess their impact on regular traffic (RQ 7). Based on these modifications, multiple operational model variations are compared to clarify the sensitivity of results to modelling assumptions and to discuss implications for next-generation surface operations.
Fully-automated operations pose significant implementation challenges in real-world settings, so human involvement remains required for the foreseeable future. Therefore, as a final exploration phase, Chapter 9 provides an outlook towards EASA’s AI Level 2 concepts by examining how human–automation interaction mechanisms can be embedded into the MAS model to enable operator involvement (RQ 8). These demonstrations focus on technical feasibility – illustrating how interfaces and information exchange could be embedded into the MAS model – rather than validated evidence from human-in-the-loop experiments. Chapter 10 concludes by synthesising the findings across all research questions, reflecting on limitations and implications for future ASM Ops, and outlining directions for continued development and socio-technical validation. ...
Against this backdrop, regulators, researchers, and practitioners increasingly view AI-enabled decision-support and automation as key enablers for future improvements. Yet, the literature lacks a modelling framework that simultaneously captures the interrelated operational processes, heterogeneous actors, and fidelity requirements necessary to evaluate next-generation concepts for airport surface movement operations (ASM Ops) in a realistic and systematic manner. Many existing models remain limited to isolated subsystems, single concepts, or strong simplifying assumptions, which restrict their ability to compare alternative future approaches at a detailed level. To address this gap, the objective of this thesis is to design models, methods, and tools to investigate next-generation concepts of operations (ConOps) for automated and sustainable ASM Ops.
The thesis is structured around eight research questions (RQs) and proceeds in three phases. The development phase (Chapters 2 to 5) first derives modelling requirements from the operational structure of ASM Ops and from the goal to represent surface movements at high fidelity while remaining computationally tractable (RQ 1). ASM Ops encompasses a hierarchy of tasks, ranging from strategic planning (long-term and high-level decisions) to scheduling (tactical allocation of resources), routing (tactical planning of movements), guidance (operational planning of movements), and finally movement execution (controlling aircraft and ground vehicles). This hierarchical decomposition, combined with the need for coordinated oversight to maintain the strict safety standards in aviation, motivates a hierarchical–distributed modelling approach.
To provide the required modularity, adaptability, and expressiveness in both fast-time and real-time simulations, this thesis adopts the multi-agent systems (MAS) paradigm. A generalised MAS architecture is proposed, comprising environmental objects and four agent categories aligned with the hierarchy of ASM Ops tasks (RQ 2). The architecture supports different allocations of responsibilities and different coordination mechanisms, enabling the instantiation of tailored model instances for specific ConOps while retaining a reusable simulation environment and component structure.
To support trajectory-based automation studies at airport scale (RQ 3), the thesis then outlines the Multi-Agent Motion Planning on Airport Surfaces (AS-MAMP) algorithm as the decision-logic for centralised path planning in a fully-automated operational setting, i.e. on EASA’s AI Level 3. AS-MAMP is a two-level solver that builds on Priority-Based Search (PBS) and its variants for high-level conflict resolution. Because existing low-level planners were insufficient to compute realistic 4D ground trajectories under operational constraints, the thesis introduces the novel Safe Interval Motion Planning (SIMP) algorithm. SIMP plans continuous-time trajectories in accordance with the operational processes in ASM Ops (e.g. pushback and engine-start, tug coupling/decoupling, and holding), motions based on finite acceleration, and conflict avoidance in continuous space and time.
The resulting planning approach is evaluated through structured benchmarking on a synthetic airport layout, where the high-level coordination component is compared against PBS variants and SIMP is benchmarked against SIPP and kinodynamic A*. The evaluation is complemented by experiments on the real-world layout of Amsterdam Airport Schiphol to assess scalability and operational relevance under realistic airport complexity. Taken together, these results establish the MAS architecture and AS-MAMP planning capability as an enabling foundation for subsequent operational analyses, while also identifying limitations and implementation challenges that arise when moving towards real-world deployment.
The validation phase (Chapters 6 to 8) applies the developed MAS framework in operational studies and subsequently strengthens its realism. Two far-term analyses investigate fully-automated ASM Ops under multi-engine taxiing (RQ 4) and under engine-off taxiing (RQ 5), examining system-level implications under dense traffic assumptions. Building on feedback from ATCOs and other operational experts gathered throughout the thesis, historical aircraft ground tracks are then analysed to improve the calibration of key movement parameters (RQ 6) so that the model is able to more accurately reproduce the historical operations. The MAS model is further extended to represent aircraft towing movements and to assess their impact on regular traffic (RQ 7). Based on these modifications, multiple operational model variations are compared to clarify the sensitivity of results to modelling assumptions and to discuss implications for next-generation surface operations.
Fully-automated operations pose significant implementation challenges in real-world settings, so human involvement remains required for the foreseeable future. Therefore, as a final exploration phase, Chapter 9 provides an outlook towards EASA’s AI Level 2 concepts by examining how human–automation interaction mechanisms can be embedded into the MAS model to enable operator involvement (RQ 8). These demonstrations focus on technical feasibility – illustrating how interfaces and information exchange could be embedded into the MAS model – rather than validated evidence from human-in-the-loop experiments. Chapter 10 concludes by synthesising the findings across all research questions, reflecting on limitations and implications for future ASM Ops, and outlining directions for continued development and socio-technical validation.
RCO presents an opportunity to critically reassess automation on the flight deck by redefining the role of the pilot. Many researchers agree that the pilot remains the ultimate decision-maker and is responsible for ensuring the safety and success of the flight operation. The pilot’s role will encompass flight planning, communication, and surveillance, while system management tasks are considered suitable candidates for automation. However, automating system management may lead to diminished system state awareness, potentially compromising flight plan management performance. Consequently, additional support is needed to keep the pilot actively engaged with flight plan management tasks.
In addition to addressing the potential adverse effects of automating system tasks, the current support for flight plan management requires already a significant improvement. A key challenge in handling non-normals lies in assessing and integrating disturbances into the flight plan. Pilots must gather, combine, and analyze environmental and system information. This information is often fragmented across multiple sources and requires decryption to become actionable. This process heavily relies on the pilot’s initiative and experience, increasing the risk of unconsidered impacts.
This study examined the impact of elevating the Level of Automation (LOA) for system and flight plan management functions. A proposed concept elevated the LOA of the system management support, specifically the action execution stage from a stepby- step action support to a system that autonomously performs a sequence of actions after human activation. In flight plan management, the information acquisition and analysis stages were highly automated, with the goal of reducing workload while enhancing decision-making performance…
...
RCO presents an opportunity to critically reassess automation on the flight deck by redefining the role of the pilot. Many researchers agree that the pilot remains the ultimate decision-maker and is responsible for ensuring the safety and success of the flight operation. The pilot’s role will encompass flight planning, communication, and surveillance, while system management tasks are considered suitable candidates for automation. However, automating system management may lead to diminished system state awareness, potentially compromising flight plan management performance. Consequently, additional support is needed to keep the pilot actively engaged with flight plan management tasks.
In addition to addressing the potential adverse effects of automating system tasks, the current support for flight plan management requires already a significant improvement. A key challenge in handling non-normals lies in assessing and integrating disturbances into the flight plan. Pilots must gather, combine, and analyze environmental and system information. This information is often fragmented across multiple sources and requires decryption to become actionable. This process heavily relies on the pilot’s initiative and experience, increasing the risk of unconsidered impacts.
This study examined the impact of elevating the Level of Automation (LOA) for system and flight plan management functions. A proposed concept elevated the LOA of the system management support, specifically the action execution stage from a stepby- step action support to a system that autonomously performs a sequence of actions after human activation. In flight plan management, the information acquisition and analysis stages were highly automated, with the goal of reducing workload while enhancing decision-making performance…
As automation becomes more advanced and complex, it also becomes increasingly difficult for humans to supervise, thereby hindering their trust and acceptance. Previous research suggests that some form of “seeing-into” transparency may be required to address this issue and support effective human supervision of automated systems. In this dissertation, “seeing-into” transparency is categorised into operational transparency and engineering transparency. Operational transparency offers (real-time) insights into the automation’s states, actions, goals, and environmental impact, helping operational users maintain situation awareness and respond effectively to changing conditions. Engineering transparency, in contrast, discloses the inner workings of automation, enabling users to develop a deeper understanding of automation behaviour. This research adopts a bottom-up approach, beginning with engineering transparency and progressing towards operational transparency.
This dissertation focuses on achieving transparent path planning in UTM routing. To this end, a visual approach was first proposed to reveal the internal processes of path-planning algorithms, with a focus on graph- and sampling-based ones, as shown in Chapter 2. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach, a novel web-based pathfinding visualiser was developed that incorporates various classic and advanced path-planning algorithms, such as A*, Theta*, Anya, Polyanya, Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT), RRT*, Informed RRT* and Batch Informed Tree (BIT*). To evaluate the impact of the proposed approach on algorithm runtime, extensive benchmark tests were performed on public datasets. Results show that extracting all search trees during the search process may significantly slow down the original algorithms. For large-scale, real-time operations, it is recommended to record only necessary data during the search and perform search tree extraction afterwards for visualisation.
To further investigate the effectiveness of algorithmic transparency, a user study was conducted to evaluate its impact on human understanding, as presented in Chapter 3. Considering that directly presenting the search process may overwhelm users, particularly in operational contexts, the path-planning transparency was structured into six distinct levels. Results indicate that as the transparency level increases, so does human understanding. However, the relationship between transparency and understanding is not a linear one. When the algorithm behaves contrary to human expectations and increased transparency fails to provide a clear explanation, users may become even more confused than without the additional transparency. For non-expert users unfamiliar with the algorithm, full transparency is often critical for meaningful understanding. The user study suggests that sampling-based algorithms may be easier to comprehend than graph-based algorithms. While the randomness inherent in sampling-based algorithms makes their behaviour difficult to predict, their overall rationale and underlying principles are meaningful and intuitive to humans.
As the ultimate goal of this dissertation is to achieve transparent path planning for UTM, the focus was then shifted from path-planning algorithms to UTM routing, broadening the concept of algorithmic transparency from purely engineering concerns to encompass operational dimensions, as shown in Chapter 4. A unified transparency taxonomy was developed, integrating diverse aspects of algorithmic transparency. Based on the proposed taxonomy, twenty transparency elements and their corresponding visual prototypes were devised for UTM routing. A survey study was then conducted to investigate the needs and preferences of Air Traffic Controllers (ATCos) and drone experts regarding these elements and prototypes. Results show that operational transparency is deemed more useful than engineering transparency in nominal UTM scenarios, whereas engineering transparency becomes more valuable when UTM routing fails. In the survey, operators were also asked to group the transparency elements, and their groupings aligned with the proposed transparency taxonomy.
The survey study captures only the initial opinions of operators, shaped by their prior knowledge and experience. To gain more insights, a human-in-the-loop experiment was performed to further examine the actual usage of various transparency elements in dynamic scenarios, where time pressure is a key concern, as shown in Chapter 5. Results show that information regarding the Closest Point of Approach (CPA) between drones and crewed aircraft is the most useful element for supporting tactical UTM supervision. When UTM routing fails, operators typically seek more information, such as constraint changes and details about the algorithm’s inner workings, to understand the failure and to gather clues that inform their intervention strategies. Similar to the user study presented in Chapter 3, the experiment in Chapter 5 also suggests that in UTM contexts, sampling-based algorithms might be more suitable for supervision than graph-based algorithms. This is likely because the search tree visualisation of sampling-based algorithms could more clearly convey the algorithms’ exploration efforts, offering useful cues for human intervention, such as indicating regions that are likely to be conflict-free.
In conclusion, this research achieves algorithmic transparency in path planning and demonstrates its application within UTM contexts. It contributes further empirical evidence to the growing body of research underscoring the importance and benefits of algorithmic transparency. The findings suggest that algorithmic transparency can enhance human understanding, but its utility in operational settings may be limited by situations, time pressure, and workload. As operators develop trust or expertise, their need for transparency may diminish. Overall, transparency is essential to facilitating trustworthy automation, especially when it is not yet fully reliable. ...
As automation becomes more advanced and complex, it also becomes increasingly difficult for humans to supervise, thereby hindering their trust and acceptance. Previous research suggests that some form of “seeing-into” transparency may be required to address this issue and support effective human supervision of automated systems. In this dissertation, “seeing-into” transparency is categorised into operational transparency and engineering transparency. Operational transparency offers (real-time) insights into the automation’s states, actions, goals, and environmental impact, helping operational users maintain situation awareness and respond effectively to changing conditions. Engineering transparency, in contrast, discloses the inner workings of automation, enabling users to develop a deeper understanding of automation behaviour. This research adopts a bottom-up approach, beginning with engineering transparency and progressing towards operational transparency.
This dissertation focuses on achieving transparent path planning in UTM routing. To this end, a visual approach was first proposed to reveal the internal processes of path-planning algorithms, with a focus on graph- and sampling-based ones, as shown in Chapter 2. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach, a novel web-based pathfinding visualiser was developed that incorporates various classic and advanced path-planning algorithms, such as A*, Theta*, Anya, Polyanya, Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT), RRT*, Informed RRT* and Batch Informed Tree (BIT*). To evaluate the impact of the proposed approach on algorithm runtime, extensive benchmark tests were performed on public datasets. Results show that extracting all search trees during the search process may significantly slow down the original algorithms. For large-scale, real-time operations, it is recommended to record only necessary data during the search and perform search tree extraction afterwards for visualisation.
To further investigate the effectiveness of algorithmic transparency, a user study was conducted to evaluate its impact on human understanding, as presented in Chapter 3. Considering that directly presenting the search process may overwhelm users, particularly in operational contexts, the path-planning transparency was structured into six distinct levels. Results indicate that as the transparency level increases, so does human understanding. However, the relationship between transparency and understanding is not a linear one. When the algorithm behaves contrary to human expectations and increased transparency fails to provide a clear explanation, users may become even more confused than without the additional transparency. For non-expert users unfamiliar with the algorithm, full transparency is often critical for meaningful understanding. The user study suggests that sampling-based algorithms may be easier to comprehend than graph-based algorithms. While the randomness inherent in sampling-based algorithms makes their behaviour difficult to predict, their overall rationale and underlying principles are meaningful and intuitive to humans.
As the ultimate goal of this dissertation is to achieve transparent path planning for UTM, the focus was then shifted from path-planning algorithms to UTM routing, broadening the concept of algorithmic transparency from purely engineering concerns to encompass operational dimensions, as shown in Chapter 4. A unified transparency taxonomy was developed, integrating diverse aspects of algorithmic transparency. Based on the proposed taxonomy, twenty transparency elements and their corresponding visual prototypes were devised for UTM routing. A survey study was then conducted to investigate the needs and preferences of Air Traffic Controllers (ATCos) and drone experts regarding these elements and prototypes. Results show that operational transparency is deemed more useful than engineering transparency in nominal UTM scenarios, whereas engineering transparency becomes more valuable when UTM routing fails. In the survey, operators were also asked to group the transparency elements, and their groupings aligned with the proposed transparency taxonomy.
The survey study captures only the initial opinions of operators, shaped by their prior knowledge and experience. To gain more insights, a human-in-the-loop experiment was performed to further examine the actual usage of various transparency elements in dynamic scenarios, where time pressure is a key concern, as shown in Chapter 5. Results show that information regarding the Closest Point of Approach (CPA) between drones and crewed aircraft is the most useful element for supporting tactical UTM supervision. When UTM routing fails, operators typically seek more information, such as constraint changes and details about the algorithm’s inner workings, to understand the failure and to gather clues that inform their intervention strategies. Similar to the user study presented in Chapter 3, the experiment in Chapter 5 also suggests that in UTM contexts, sampling-based algorithms might be more suitable for supervision than graph-based algorithms. This is likely because the search tree visualisation of sampling-based algorithms could more clearly convey the algorithms’ exploration efforts, offering useful cues for human intervention, such as indicating regions that are likely to be conflict-free.
In conclusion, this research achieves algorithmic transparency in path planning and demonstrates its application within UTM contexts. It contributes further empirical evidence to the growing body of research underscoring the importance and benefits of algorithmic transparency. The findings suggest that algorithmic transparency can enhance human understanding, but its utility in operational settings may be limited by situations, time pressure, and workload. As operators develop trust or expertise, their need for transparency may diminish. Overall, transparency is essential to facilitating trustworthy automation, especially when it is not yet fully reliable.
On this shift towards greater reliance on automation, two main strategies can be identified that each have a distinct impact on the system's operators (i.e., ATCOs). Chapter 2 details how these differ between a traditional function-based strategy, where all flights are controlled at a gradually increasing LOA, and a constraint-based strategy, where a subset of flights is operated at a higher LOA than other flights. The former strategy brings many human-automation issues that have been widely demonstrated through empirical research, such as 'out-of-the-loop' situation awareness, transient workload peaks, skill erosion, boredom and reduced job satisfaction. The latter strategy has the advantage of avoiding mixed authority over individual flights by creating a more parallel system than the function-based serial system. The resulting human-autonomy team (HAT) accelerates the introduction of higher LOA in operational environments, fostering innovation.
The HAT perspective has only recently appeared on the radar of the ATC community, and practical examples of its potential and implications are scarce. An interesting example is found at Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre (MUAC), an air navigation service provider (ANSP) responsible for air traffic above 24,500 ft over Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and part of Germany. MUAC is currently employing a constraint-based strategy in the development of a future shared airspace where ATC services for low-complexity routine flights are fully automated while complex flights stay with the ATCO. A key challenge for such an ATC system is to determine which flights should be allocated to either the human ATCO or the automation.
This research set out to broaden the knowledge about constraint-based automation in ATC and the desired allocation of flights in particular. Each chapter addresses a subquestion, often through empirical research with professional MUAC ATCOs. The research had three phases, starting with a first exploration, followed by an impact analysis of flight allocation on ATCO workflows and the role of flight complexity in this. The thesis concludes with a validation exercise consolidating all insights from the preceding chapters.
To test several preconditions and general ATCO acceptance of this novel concept, Chapter 3 begins with an exploratory simulator experiment. The participating ATCOs had full control over which flights they would delegate to the automation. Although pre-defined suggestions were presented, the ATCOs mostly ignored these. This experiment demonstrated the potential for allocating selected flights to either human or automation in a single airspace, but also stressed the importance of using a clever algorithm to determine this allocation. Geographic sector-based allocation, with automation handling all traffic in one sector and the ATCO all traffic in another sector, was rejected by the majority of participating ATCOs. They preferred an interaction-based allocation, hinting at the need to establish a complexity-score for each single flight.
Diving deeper into the impact that flight allocation might have on the workflow of an ATCO, Chapter 4 focuses on the core ATCO tasks: conflict detection and resolution (CD&R). Following a literature study and on-the-job ATCO observations, cognition flowcharts were constructed for these two tasks. Through an experiment with simplified static traffic scenarios, in which ATCOs had to detect and resolve conflicts, the most cognitively demanding types of traffic situations were searched for, as a means to quantify the various cognitive paths that can be traversed in the flowcharts. This turned out to be challenging, as ATCOs, like other experts, make frequent use of shortcuts and parallel processing. The constructed flowcharts can, however, serve as a starting point for the design of more human-like CD&R algorithms, such as used in this thesis' experiments. Automation that performs tasks in similar fashion as an ATCO might increase operator acceptance. This chapter's results stressed the importance of understanding flight-centric complexity before the impact of flight allocation on workflows can be determined.
To increase this understanding, the experiment in Chapter 5 used actual traffic snapshots overlaid with a single flight of interest for which the ATCOs had to indicate their perceived complexity. This individual flight complexity was a unique approach, compared to existing literature that mainly considers sector-wide complexity. Despite individual differences, flights on either end of the complexity scale were reliably identified. These results indicate that a flight allocation scheme may not need to be fine-tuned towards individual ATCO preferences. In general, a flight's complexity appears to be mostly driven by (potential) spatiotemporal interactions with other flights.
Consolidating the insights from preceding chapters, Chapter 6 discusses the most realistic and extensive experiment of this thesis. It replicates the experiment from Chapter 3 while addressing many of that experiment's shortcomings. Lessons learned in the preceding chapters led to several improvements, such as an increase in automation capabilities and communication, and more informed allocation schemes than the pragmatic schemes from the first experiment. In a direct comparison between two distinct allocation schemes, it was found that an interaction-based scheme is subjectively preferred by ATCOs and shows small efficiency benefits over a simpler flow-based allocation. In addition, it was concluded that automation should be sufficiently equipped to issue the same instructions as ATCOs, and should have the same notion of constraints from letters of agreement, to create a common ground and reduce mixed conflicts.
In conclusion, this thesis has brought forward the knowledge about flight allocation in an airspace that is shared between a human ATCO and a computer system. It can serve as a starting point for future research and development of highly automated ATC systems. Fully autonomous ATC will not become a reality in the short-term, but results show promising effects and a general feasibility of higher LOA applied to a constrained environment (i.e., a subset of flights). Researchers and ANSPs are encouraged to step beyond purely function-based visions on automation allocation and embrace a constraint-based automation strategy. This thesis has shown that a combination of these two strategies may lead to desired human-automation teamwork. ...
On this shift towards greater reliance on automation, two main strategies can be identified that each have a distinct impact on the system's operators (i.e., ATCOs). Chapter 2 details how these differ between a traditional function-based strategy, where all flights are controlled at a gradually increasing LOA, and a constraint-based strategy, where a subset of flights is operated at a higher LOA than other flights. The former strategy brings many human-automation issues that have been widely demonstrated through empirical research, such as 'out-of-the-loop' situation awareness, transient workload peaks, skill erosion, boredom and reduced job satisfaction. The latter strategy has the advantage of avoiding mixed authority over individual flights by creating a more parallel system than the function-based serial system. The resulting human-autonomy team (HAT) accelerates the introduction of higher LOA in operational environments, fostering innovation.
The HAT perspective has only recently appeared on the radar of the ATC community, and practical examples of its potential and implications are scarce. An interesting example is found at Maastricht Upper Area Control Centre (MUAC), an air navigation service provider (ANSP) responsible for air traffic above 24,500 ft over Belgium, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and part of Germany. MUAC is currently employing a constraint-based strategy in the development of a future shared airspace where ATC services for low-complexity routine flights are fully automated while complex flights stay with the ATCO. A key challenge for such an ATC system is to determine which flights should be allocated to either the human ATCO or the automation.
This research set out to broaden the knowledge about constraint-based automation in ATC and the desired allocation of flights in particular. Each chapter addresses a subquestion, often through empirical research with professional MUAC ATCOs. The research had three phases, starting with a first exploration, followed by an impact analysis of flight allocation on ATCO workflows and the role of flight complexity in this. The thesis concludes with a validation exercise consolidating all insights from the preceding chapters.
To test several preconditions and general ATCO acceptance of this novel concept, Chapter 3 begins with an exploratory simulator experiment. The participating ATCOs had full control over which flights they would delegate to the automation. Although pre-defined suggestions were presented, the ATCOs mostly ignored these. This experiment demonstrated the potential for allocating selected flights to either human or automation in a single airspace, but also stressed the importance of using a clever algorithm to determine this allocation. Geographic sector-based allocation, with automation handling all traffic in one sector and the ATCO all traffic in another sector, was rejected by the majority of participating ATCOs. They preferred an interaction-based allocation, hinting at the need to establish a complexity-score for each single flight.
Diving deeper into the impact that flight allocation might have on the workflow of an ATCO, Chapter 4 focuses on the core ATCO tasks: conflict detection and resolution (CD&R). Following a literature study and on-the-job ATCO observations, cognition flowcharts were constructed for these two tasks. Through an experiment with simplified static traffic scenarios, in which ATCOs had to detect and resolve conflicts, the most cognitively demanding types of traffic situations were searched for, as a means to quantify the various cognitive paths that can be traversed in the flowcharts. This turned out to be challenging, as ATCOs, like other experts, make frequent use of shortcuts and parallel processing. The constructed flowcharts can, however, serve as a starting point for the design of more human-like CD&R algorithms, such as used in this thesis' experiments. Automation that performs tasks in similar fashion as an ATCO might increase operator acceptance. This chapter's results stressed the importance of understanding flight-centric complexity before the impact of flight allocation on workflows can be determined.
To increase this understanding, the experiment in Chapter 5 used actual traffic snapshots overlaid with a single flight of interest for which the ATCOs had to indicate their perceived complexity. This individual flight complexity was a unique approach, compared to existing literature that mainly considers sector-wide complexity. Despite individual differences, flights on either end of the complexity scale were reliably identified. These results indicate that a flight allocation scheme may not need to be fine-tuned towards individual ATCO preferences. In general, a flight's complexity appears to be mostly driven by (potential) spatiotemporal interactions with other flights.
Consolidating the insights from preceding chapters, Chapter 6 discusses the most realistic and extensive experiment of this thesis. It replicates the experiment from Chapter 3 while addressing many of that experiment's shortcomings. Lessons learned in the preceding chapters led to several improvements, such as an increase in automation capabilities and communication, and more informed allocation schemes than the pragmatic schemes from the first experiment. In a direct comparison between two distinct allocation schemes, it was found that an interaction-based scheme is subjectively preferred by ATCOs and shows small efficiency benefits over a simpler flow-based allocation. In addition, it was concluded that automation should be sufficiently equipped to issue the same instructions as ATCOs, and should have the same notion of constraints from letters of agreement, to create a common ground and reduce mixed conflicts.
In conclusion, this thesis has brought forward the knowledge about flight allocation in an airspace that is shared between a human ATCO and a computer system. It can serve as a starting point for future research and development of highly automated ATC systems. Fully autonomous ATC will not become a reality in the short-term, but results show promising effects and a general feasibility of higher LOA applied to a constrained environment (i.e., a subset of flights). Researchers and ANSPs are encouraged to step beyond purely function-based visions on automation allocation and embrace a constraint-based automation strategy. This thesis has shown that a combination of these two strategies may lead to desired human-automation teamwork.
Interface design for sustainable aviation
Functional Visualizations of a Hydrogen-Electric Aircraft Propulsion System for Supporting Pilot Decision-Making
Supporting Trajectory Based Operations in Aerodrome Control
Supporting the Timing of the Take-off Clearance
Decision Support Tool for Time-Based Separation under Fixed Approach Trajectories in Approach Control
Increasing the Efficiency of Approach Control