L.L.A. Vermeersen
Please Note
15 records found
1
Building upon previous work, in this thesis an improved model to simulate bistatic reflectometry measurements between MEX and TGO was created. Moreover, at Earth GNSS-R (Reflectometry) measurements have been employed for several years, and concepts from GNSS-R were studied in this thesis and have been implemented into the model.
The simulated measurements were compared with measured data and with the model of the previous work. Measurement parameters, including signal polarization, s/c pointing, and permittivity were also investigated and the findings of this thesis show the effects that these parameters have on the received signal. Finally, future measurement opportunities were also investigated.
...
Building upon previous work, in this thesis an improved model to simulate bistatic reflectometry measurements between MEX and TGO was created. Moreover, at Earth GNSS-R (Reflectometry) measurements have been employed for several years, and concepts from GNSS-R were studied in this thesis and have been implemented into the model.
The simulated measurements were compared with measured data and with the model of the previous work. Measurement parameters, including signal polarization, s/c pointing, and permittivity were also investigated and the findings of this thesis show the effects that these parameters have on the received signal. Finally, future measurement opportunities were also investigated.
This thesis assesses dual-spacecraft Bi-Static Radar (BSR) measurement feasibility at Ultra High Frequency, providing near-global coverage ideal for comparison with gamma/neutron spectrometry hydrogen maps. The Mars Express lander relay antenna transmits a continuous signal probing a few metres into the subsurface (shallow depths which cannot be mapped by conventional low-frequency radar). The ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter receives the echo, whose amplitude directly reflects permittivity variations induced by compositional changes, e.g. water (ice) deposits.
Models were created to optimize measurement planning and simulate the received power spectrum against BSR data. The current match is limited, reflecting the method’s novelty, and surface composition is yet to show a strong signature. However, after calibration, resolution increase and improving direct signal, seasonal and polarization effects modelling, reliable detections appear possible. ...
This thesis assesses dual-spacecraft Bi-Static Radar (BSR) measurement feasibility at Ultra High Frequency, providing near-global coverage ideal for comparison with gamma/neutron spectrometry hydrogen maps. The Mars Express lander relay antenna transmits a continuous signal probing a few metres into the subsurface (shallow depths which cannot be mapped by conventional low-frequency radar). The ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter receives the echo, whose amplitude directly reflects permittivity variations induced by compositional changes, e.g. water (ice) deposits.
Models were created to optimize measurement planning and simulate the received power spectrum against BSR data. The current match is limited, reflecting the method’s novelty, and surface composition is yet to show a strong signature. However, after calibration, resolution increase and improving direct signal, seasonal and polarization effects modelling, reliable detections appear possible.
Studying venus using polarimetry
With application to exoplanet characterization
Today, uplift of up to 13mma°1 is recorded around theHudson Bay area inNorthAmerica, due to the last ice sheets that have melted roughly between eighteen and six thousand years ago. Even higher uplift rates of 30 mm a°1 have been recorded in Southeast Alaska as a response to ice melt that only started 250 years ago. Part of the reason why these uplift rates differ is due to the underlying mantle viscosity. Mantle viscosity determines how fast material in the Earth’s mantle is allowed to flow. A high mantle viscosity implies a mantle in which flow is slow, and a low mantle viscosity implies a weak mantle in which flow occurs easily. The viscosity of the mantle below Hudson Bay is expected to be around the global average value of 1021 Pa s, while the mantle viscosity in Southeast Alaska is expected to be a few orders of magnitude lower. GIA research is performed to infer structural parameters such as its mantle viscosity. Moreover, with more knowledge of GIA we are able to more accurately correct measurements for the effect of GIA. The goal of this thesis is to improve the numerical model setups, contributing to these two goals…
...
Today, uplift of up to 13mma°1 is recorded around theHudson Bay area inNorthAmerica, due to the last ice sheets that have melted roughly between eighteen and six thousand years ago. Even higher uplift rates of 30 mm a°1 have been recorded in Southeast Alaska as a response to ice melt that only started 250 years ago. Part of the reason why these uplift rates differ is due to the underlying mantle viscosity. Mantle viscosity determines how fast material in the Earth’s mantle is allowed to flow. A high mantle viscosity implies a mantle in which flow is slow, and a low mantle viscosity implies a weak mantle in which flow occurs easily. The viscosity of the mantle below Hudson Bay is expected to be around the global average value of 1021 Pa s, while the mantle viscosity in Southeast Alaska is expected to be a few orders of magnitude lower. GIA research is performed to infer structural parameters such as its mantle viscosity. Moreover, with more knowledge of GIA we are able to more accurately correct measurements for the effect of GIA. The goal of this thesis is to improve the numerical model setups, contributing to these two goals…
Natural satellites ephemerides
The Galilean moons' dynamics in the JUICE-Europa Clipper era
Detection of Low Velocity Space Debris and Micrometeoroid Impacts
An Experimental Investigation
The Causes of Regional Sea-level Change
Since 1993
Global mean sea level has been rising at a rate of about 3.4 millimetres per year over the last 30 years. Regionally, however, sea level can be changing at a much higher or lower rate. That is because local processes, such as ocean dynamics and gravitational effects associated with continental ice mass changes, cause regional deviations from the global average. But what is causing sea level to change at a specific location? Is sea level changing because the oceans are warming, and thus expanding? Or because the ice from glaciers and ice sheets are melting? The attribution of sea-level change to these and other drivers can be done using a sea-level budget approach. Sea-level budget studies can be used to constrain missing or poorly known contributions and to validate climate models. While the global mean sea-level budget is considered closed within uncertainties, closing the budget on a regional to local scale is still challenging.
In this thesis, I focused on the question: Can we close the regional sea-level budget in the satellite altimetry era on a sub-basin scale consistently for the entire world? For this, we need not only high quality observations of sea-level change and each component, but also of the uncertainties within each process. Therefore, in Chapter 2 and 3, I explored the main drivers of regional sea-level change, focusing on the uncertainty characterization of each component. I then looked at which spatial scale is optimal for analysing the regional sea-level budget, and compared the sum of the drivers with the total observed change in these regions in Chapter 4. ...
Global mean sea level has been rising at a rate of about 3.4 millimetres per year over the last 30 years. Regionally, however, sea level can be changing at a much higher or lower rate. That is because local processes, such as ocean dynamics and gravitational effects associated with continental ice mass changes, cause regional deviations from the global average. But what is causing sea level to change at a specific location? Is sea level changing because the oceans are warming, and thus expanding? Or because the ice from glaciers and ice sheets are melting? The attribution of sea-level change to these and other drivers can be done using a sea-level budget approach. Sea-level budget studies can be used to constrain missing or poorly known contributions and to validate climate models. While the global mean sea-level budget is considered closed within uncertainties, closing the budget on a regional to local scale is still challenging.
In this thesis, I focused on the question: Can we close the regional sea-level budget in the satellite altimetry era on a sub-basin scale consistently for the entire world? For this, we need not only high quality observations of sea-level change and each component, but also of the uncertainties within each process. Therefore, in Chapter 2 and 3, I explored the main drivers of regional sea-level change, focusing on the uncertainty characterization of each component. I then looked at which spatial scale is optimal for analysing the regional sea-level budget, and compared the sum of the drivers with the total observed change in these regions in Chapter 4.
Straight line propagation in radio occultation measurements at Mars
A feasibility study for an alternative calculation of refractivity profiles
Toward a better Understanding of Europa Crevasses
Application of Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics to Europa
The forward gravity field modelling method that I improve upon in this dissertation is mostly used for topographic/isostatic mass reduction of gravity data. The methodology is able to transform density-models into gravitational potential fields using a spherical harmonic representation. I show that this methodology in the existing form is not suited to be used for density layers in lower crustal and upper mantle regions. The binomial series inherent to this methodology do not converge when applied to deep mass structures, and therefore it is not possible to truncate the series at a low degree to approximate the mass. This approximation is crucial for the computational efficiency of the methodology. I propose a correction that mitigates this erroneous behaviour, which enables this methodology to efficiently compute the potential field of deep situated masses. I benchmark the improved methodology with a tesseroid-based gravity-field modelling software, and I show that my software is accurate within ±4 mGal, when modelling the Moho density interface (with a range in signal of ±500 mGal. The improved methodology is used in the studies described in this thesis.
With an efficient and accurate forward modelling methodology, I am able to use global gravity field data in studies of the solid Earth. In the central part of Fennoscandia the crust is currently uplifting, because of the delayed response of the viscous mantle to melting of the regional Late Pleistocene ice sheet. This process, called glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), causes a negative anomaly in the present-day static gravity field as isostatic equilibrium has not been reached yet. Several studies have used this anomaly as a constraint on models of GIA, but the uncertainty in crustal and upper mantle structures had not been properly taken into account. In revisiting this problem, I show that the GIA gravity signal overlaps with mantle convection signals, such that a simple spherical harmonic truncation is not sufficient to separate these two phenomena. Furthermore, I find that, in contrast to the other studies, the effect of crustal anomalies on the gravity field cannot be effectively removed, because of the relative large uncertainties in the crustal density models. Therefore, I propose to correct the observed gravity field for GIA with numerical modelling results when constructing geophysical models that assume isostatic equilibrium. I show that correcting for GIA results in a significant vertical readjustment of the geometry of structural layers in the modelled crust of 5-10 percent. Correcting the gravity field for GIA prior to assuming isostatic equilibrium might be relevant in other areas with ongoing post-glacial rebound such as North America and the polar regions.
Uncertainty in lithospheric density models is still the limiting factors in solid Earth studies and needs to be improved. Lithospheric density anomalies can, among other methods, be estimated from seismic tomography, gravity studies, or joint studies using both datasets. I compare different gravity-based density models of the lithosphere to a tomographic-derived solution and characterise the sources that introduce large uncertainties in the density models of the lithosphere. To study the uncertainty between global and regional crustal models, I select a region where the crust is explored in great measure with seismic profiles, namely the British Isles and surrounding areas, where I use three crustal models to quantify the crustal uncertainty: CRUST1.0, EUCrust-07, and a high-resolution regional P-wave velocity model of the region. The crustal models contribute to the uncertainty of the density of the lithosphere with ±110 kg/m3. Furthermore, I study various P-wave velocity-to-density conversions to quantify the uncertainty introduced by these conversion methods (±10 kg/m3. All different crustal density models are forward modelled into gravity anomalies using the improved methodology of Chapter 2 and these gravity anomalies are subsequently removed from the gravity observations. The unmodelled long-wavelength signal in the gravity field representing mass anomalies in the deep mantle are removed from the observation by spherical harmonic truncation, introducing an uncertainty of ±5 kg/m3. Also, the choice of density background model (±20 kg/m3) and lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary uncertainty (±30 kg/m3) have a small but significant effect on the estimated lithosphere densities. However, the inhomogeneous spatial distribution of profiles of controlled-source seismic exploration of the crustal thickness and density distribution proves to be the largest source of uncertainty (±110 kg/m3). The gravity-based lithospheric density solutions with a variation of ±100 kg/m3 are completely different in magnitude and spatial signature to the densities (±35 kg/m3) derived from a shear wave velocity model. This demonstrates that the tomographic model has a limited resolution, which can be related to regularisation that is used in the construction of global tomographic models. To account for this spectral imbalance, I spatially filter the gravity-based density models, resulting in similarities in spatial correlation and magnitude between that of the gravity-based and the tomographic-derived density. With the filtered gravity-based density I am able to estimate lateral varying conversion values between shear wave velocity and density for the lithosphere, which shows a correlation with major tectonic regions. This correlation shows that the independent gravity-based solutions, despite being filtered, can help in identifying different compositional domains in the lithosphere.
Satellite observations also provide global data on the temporal variations of the gravity field. In the last study, I show that global gravity-change observations from the GRACE satellite mission can be used to study GIA in the Barents Sea Region. The Barents Sea is subject to ongoing postglacial uplift since the melting of the Weichselian ice sheet that covered this region. The deglaciation history is not well known because there is only data from locations close to the boundary of the former ice sheet, in Franz Joseph Land, Svalbard, and Novaya Zemlya. At these locations the magnitude of the GIA uplift is limited, reducing the signal-to-noise of the data. The GRACE mission measures the gravity-change due to GIA at the center of the Barents Sea, where the maximum uplift and ongoing gravity-change is situated. I show that the linear trend in the gravity-change derived from a decade of observations from the GRACE satellite mission can constrain the volume of the ice sheet after correcting for current ice-melt, hydrology and far-field gravitational effects. Regional ice loading models based on new geologically-inferred ice margin chronologies show a significantly better fit to the GRACE data than the global ice models ICE-5G and ICE-6G_C. The regional ice models in this study contain less ice mass during LGM in the Barents Sea than ICE-5G (5-6.3 m equivalent sea level vs. 8.5 m). Also, I show that the GRACE gravity-change is sensitive to the upper mantle viscosity underneath the Barents sea, for which I found a minimum value of 4x1020 Pas, regardless of the ice loading history. The GRACE gravity-change should be used as a constraint in any future GIA modelling of the Barents Sea, because it is the only measurement that captures the signal of maximum GIA.
The high resolution and accurate global gravity field models do give new insights in the structure and density distribution of the upper mantle. The presented studies in this dissertation demonstrate that analysing the spectral signature of gravity data is very useful. Medium-to-short-scale features, like lateral density variation in the lithosphere and GIA gravity-change in the Barents Sea can be separate from other gravity-change sources by applying spectral filters. For longer wavelength signals, such as the GIA static gravity signal in Fennoscandia, this proves to be more difficult due to the overlap in the long-wavelength region by mantle convection signals and other deep mantle signals. On the whole, the global gravity field models and their spectral signature play an important part in building a global density model of the Earth, in which lithosphere, GIA, but also mantle convection and core-mantle boundary effects need to be combined to explain the gravity field.
...
The forward gravity field modelling method that I improve upon in this dissertation is mostly used for topographic/isostatic mass reduction of gravity data. The methodology is able to transform density-models into gravitational potential fields using a spherical harmonic representation. I show that this methodology in the existing form is not suited to be used for density layers in lower crustal and upper mantle regions. The binomial series inherent to this methodology do not converge when applied to deep mass structures, and therefore it is not possible to truncate the series at a low degree to approximate the mass. This approximation is crucial for the computational efficiency of the methodology. I propose a correction that mitigates this erroneous behaviour, which enables this methodology to efficiently compute the potential field of deep situated masses. I benchmark the improved methodology with a tesseroid-based gravity-field modelling software, and I show that my software is accurate within ±4 mGal, when modelling the Moho density interface (with a range in signal of ±500 mGal. The improved methodology is used in the studies described in this thesis.
With an efficient and accurate forward modelling methodology, I am able to use global gravity field data in studies of the solid Earth. In the central part of Fennoscandia the crust is currently uplifting, because of the delayed response of the viscous mantle to melting of the regional Late Pleistocene ice sheet. This process, called glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), causes a negative anomaly in the present-day static gravity field as isostatic equilibrium has not been reached yet. Several studies have used this anomaly as a constraint on models of GIA, but the uncertainty in crustal and upper mantle structures had not been properly taken into account. In revisiting this problem, I show that the GIA gravity signal overlaps with mantle convection signals, such that a simple spherical harmonic truncation is not sufficient to separate these two phenomena. Furthermore, I find that, in contrast to the other studies, the effect of crustal anomalies on the gravity field cannot be effectively removed, because of the relative large uncertainties in the crustal density models. Therefore, I propose to correct the observed gravity field for GIA with numerical modelling results when constructing geophysical models that assume isostatic equilibrium. I show that correcting for GIA results in a significant vertical readjustment of the geometry of structural layers in the modelled crust of 5-10 percent. Correcting the gravity field for GIA prior to assuming isostatic equilibrium might be relevant in other areas with ongoing post-glacial rebound such as North America and the polar regions.
Uncertainty in lithospheric density models is still the limiting factors in solid Earth studies and needs to be improved. Lithospheric density anomalies can, among other methods, be estimated from seismic tomography, gravity studies, or joint studies using both datasets. I compare different gravity-based density models of the lithosphere to a tomographic-derived solution and characterise the sources that introduce large uncertainties in the density models of the lithosphere. To study the uncertainty between global and regional crustal models, I select a region where the crust is explored in great measure with seismic profiles, namely the British Isles and surrounding areas, where I use three crustal models to quantify the crustal uncertainty: CRUST1.0, EUCrust-07, and a high-resolution regional P-wave velocity model of the region. The crustal models contribute to the uncertainty of the density of the lithosphere with ±110 kg/m3. Furthermore, I study various P-wave velocity-to-density conversions to quantify the uncertainty introduced by these conversion methods (±10 kg/m3. All different crustal density models are forward modelled into gravity anomalies using the improved methodology of Chapter 2 and these gravity anomalies are subsequently removed from the gravity observations. The unmodelled long-wavelength signal in the gravity field representing mass anomalies in the deep mantle are removed from the observation by spherical harmonic truncation, introducing an uncertainty of ±5 kg/m3. Also, the choice of density background model (±20 kg/m3) and lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary uncertainty (±30 kg/m3) have a small but significant effect on the estimated lithosphere densities. However, the inhomogeneous spatial distribution of profiles of controlled-source seismic exploration of the crustal thickness and density distribution proves to be the largest source of uncertainty (±110 kg/m3). The gravity-based lithospheric density solutions with a variation of ±100 kg/m3 are completely different in magnitude and spatial signature to the densities (±35 kg/m3) derived from a shear wave velocity model. This demonstrates that the tomographic model has a limited resolution, which can be related to regularisation that is used in the construction of global tomographic models. To account for this spectral imbalance, I spatially filter the gravity-based density models, resulting in similarities in spatial correlation and magnitude between that of the gravity-based and the tomographic-derived density. With the filtered gravity-based density I am able to estimate lateral varying conversion values between shear wave velocity and density for the lithosphere, which shows a correlation with major tectonic regions. This correlation shows that the independent gravity-based solutions, despite being filtered, can help in identifying different compositional domains in the lithosphere.
Satellite observations also provide global data on the temporal variations of the gravity field. In the last study, I show that global gravity-change observations from the GRACE satellite mission can be used to study GIA in the Barents Sea Region. The Barents Sea is subject to ongoing postglacial uplift since the melting of the Weichselian ice sheet that covered this region. The deglaciation history is not well known because there is only data from locations close to the boundary of the former ice sheet, in Franz Joseph Land, Svalbard, and Novaya Zemlya. At these locations the magnitude of the GIA uplift is limited, reducing the signal-to-noise of the data. The GRACE mission measures the gravity-change due to GIA at the center of the Barents Sea, where the maximum uplift and ongoing gravity-change is situated. I show that the linear trend in the gravity-change derived from a decade of observations from the GRACE satellite mission can constrain the volume of the ice sheet after correcting for current ice-melt, hydrology and far-field gravitational effects. Regional ice loading models based on new geologically-inferred ice margin chronologies show a significantly better fit to the GRACE data than the global ice models ICE-5G and ICE-6G_C. The regional ice models in this study contain less ice mass during LGM in the Barents Sea than ICE-5G (5-6.3 m equivalent sea level vs. 8.5 m). Also, I show that the GRACE gravity-change is sensitive to the upper mantle viscosity underneath the Barents sea, for which I found a minimum value of 4x1020 Pas, regardless of the ice loading history. The GRACE gravity-change should be used as a constraint in any future GIA modelling of the Barents Sea, because it is the only measurement that captures the signal of maximum GIA.
The high resolution and accurate global gravity field models do give new insights in the structure and density distribution of the upper mantle. The presented studies in this dissertation demonstrate that analysing the spectral signature of gravity data is very useful. Medium-to-short-scale features, like lateral density variation in the lithosphere and GIA gravity-change in the Barents Sea can be separate from other gravity-change sources by applying spectral filters. For longer wavelength signals, such as the GIA static gravity signal in Fennoscandia, this proves to be more difficult due to the overlap in the long-wavelength region by mantle convection signals and other deep mantle signals. On the whole, the global gravity field models and their spectral signature play an important part in building a global density model of the Earth, in which lithosphere, GIA, but also mantle convection and core-mantle boundary effects need to be combined to explain the gravity field.
Although this was not always the case, it is now known that forces and deformations due to the non-rigid characteristics of the Earth constantly perturb the motion of the planet to various degrees. The fact that our planet, and all realistic bodies for that matter,is not wholly solid, that it has oceans, an atmosphere and a visco-elastic crust, mantle and core, means that the actual position of the rotational axis and rotation rate of the Earth vary from the idealized rigid body motion on virtually every time scale. The Earth constantly reshapes itself to cope with the ever changing loads and other geo-dynamic forces that act upon it. This deformation in turn leads to shifts in the position of the rotation axis with respect to the Earth’s surface, or polar motion, and to a change in rotation rate, also known as a change in length-of-day. This reshaping of a body due to geo-dynamic forces is dependent on the rheology of that body, since material properties such as rigidity and viscosity determine how a body deforms and flows under certain stresses. Although their regularities in the rotation of the Earth complicate astronomical research, for the geophysicist they are a gift. The rotational perturbations must have sources and thus provide information on the internal structure of the Earth and the geophysical processes acting on and within it. The main objective of this thesis is to examine the influences of some of the parameters that determine the polar motion of a terrestrial body, without adhering to the constraints put on them by the application to the Earth. For instance, the influence of the absolute size of a body as defined by its radius has never been examined since the radius of the Earth is known very accurately. This leads to more general and more widely applicable results as the driving parameters are examined in wide ranges.
To this end, a linearized formulation of the polar motion was used in conjunction with the Normal Mode technique, which uses the Laplace domain to calculate the elastic equivalence of the visco-elastic problem in the time domain. ...
Although this was not always the case, it is now known that forces and deformations due to the non-rigid characteristics of the Earth constantly perturb the motion of the planet to various degrees. The fact that our planet, and all realistic bodies for that matter,is not wholly solid, that it has oceans, an atmosphere and a visco-elastic crust, mantle and core, means that the actual position of the rotational axis and rotation rate of the Earth vary from the idealized rigid body motion on virtually every time scale. The Earth constantly reshapes itself to cope with the ever changing loads and other geo-dynamic forces that act upon it. This deformation in turn leads to shifts in the position of the rotation axis with respect to the Earth’s surface, or polar motion, and to a change in rotation rate, also known as a change in length-of-day. This reshaping of a body due to geo-dynamic forces is dependent on the rheology of that body, since material properties such as rigidity and viscosity determine how a body deforms and flows under certain stresses. Although their regularities in the rotation of the Earth complicate astronomical research, for the geophysicist they are a gift. The rotational perturbations must have sources and thus provide information on the internal structure of the Earth and the geophysical processes acting on and within it. The main objective of this thesis is to examine the influences of some of the parameters that determine the polar motion of a terrestrial body, without adhering to the constraints put on them by the application to the Earth. For instance, the influence of the absolute size of a body as defined by its radius has never been examined since the radius of the Earth is known very accurately. This leads to more general and more widely applicable results as the driving parameters are examined in wide ranges.
To this end, a linearized formulation of the polar motion was used in conjunction with the Normal Mode technique, which uses the Laplace domain to calculate the elastic equivalence of the visco-elastic problem in the time domain.