J.S.J. Koolwijk
Please Note
19 records found
1
Decision-making in participatory urban development
An exploration of transparent decision-making about values and conflicts
This study examines how the weighing process of citizens’ values can be made more transparent in order to better safeguard these values within VR-supported participatory urban development. A qualitative case study was conducted in a Dutch municipality involving a road infrastructure and housing development project. Data were collected through a literature review, semi-structured interviews with residents and experts, and exploratory VR sessions.
The findings show that the weighing of values is shaped by the interaction between a project arena, institutional and political arena. Within these arenas, citizen values are continuously balanced against broader considerations such as policy objectives, political priorities, feasibility constraints, risk management, and project ambitions. Rather than representing a neutral translation of participation outcomes into spatial interventions, decision-making emerges as a dynamic process in which values are negotiated, prioritised, and sometimes transformed. This process gives rise to procedural value conflicts concerning transparency, fairness, trust, and influence. While citizens often express concerns about substantive issues such as traffic safety, accessibility, and liveability, dissatisfaction is frequently rooted in perceptions of limited influence over decision-making and uncertainty about how trade-offs are made.
In response to these tensions, experts adopt different strategies ranging from deliberative dialogue to more strategic and technocratic approaches. While these strategies are often intended to manage complexity and maintain project progress, they can simultaneously reinforce procedural tensions and contribute to perceptions of exclusion. The study concludes that VR can contribute to transparency by making trade-offs, constraints, and alternative scenarios more visible. However, VR should not be regarded as a neutral tool. Because decisions about what is visualised and what remains invisible are themselves shaped by institutional and political considerations, VR can also function as a strategic instrument that influences how decisions are perceived and legitimised. Transparency therefore requires making not only design outcomes visible, but also the decision-making processes through which they are produced.
...
This study examines how the weighing process of citizens’ values can be made more transparent in order to better safeguard these values within VR-supported participatory urban development. A qualitative case study was conducted in a Dutch municipality involving a road infrastructure and housing development project. Data were collected through a literature review, semi-structured interviews with residents and experts, and exploratory VR sessions.
The findings show that the weighing of values is shaped by the interaction between a project arena, institutional and political arena. Within these arenas, citizen values are continuously balanced against broader considerations such as policy objectives, political priorities, feasibility constraints, risk management, and project ambitions. Rather than representing a neutral translation of participation outcomes into spatial interventions, decision-making emerges as a dynamic process in which values are negotiated, prioritised, and sometimes transformed. This process gives rise to procedural value conflicts concerning transparency, fairness, trust, and influence. While citizens often express concerns about substantive issues such as traffic safety, accessibility, and liveability, dissatisfaction is frequently rooted in perceptions of limited influence over decision-making and uncertainty about how trade-offs are made.
In response to these tensions, experts adopt different strategies ranging from deliberative dialogue to more strategic and technocratic approaches. While these strategies are often intended to manage complexity and maintain project progress, they can simultaneously reinforce procedural tensions and contribute to perceptions of exclusion. The study concludes that VR can contribute to transparency by making trade-offs, constraints, and alternative scenarios more visible. However, VR should not be regarded as a neutral tool. Because decisions about what is visualised and what remains invisible are themselves shaped by institutional and political considerations, VR can also function as a strategic instrument that influences how decisions are perceived and legitimised. Transparency therefore requires making not only design outcomes visible, but also the decision-making processes through which they are produced.
Starting right: Project start-ups as instruments for collaboration in complex projects
A legal and practical approach to achieving actor goals in complex construction projects
The findings demonstrate that PSUs are evolving from informal kick-off workshops into semi-formal collaborative governance instruments. Their effectiveness depends less on singular interventions and more on continuous reinforcements, organizational commitments, balanced actor participation, and adaptation throughout the project lifecycle. The study further identifies three interconnected PSU goal categories: relational & interpersonal goals, interorganizational alignment goals, and project control-related goals, refining the traditional hard-soft project management distinction.
This thesis contributes to project management and collaboration literature by reconceptualizing PSUs as governance mechanisms and by emphasizing the temporal and actor-level dependence of collaboration effectiveness. In addition, the study provides practical guidance and implications for the DPS framework, project owners, managers, facilitators, and legal professionals seeking to enhance the start-up process and to strengthen teamwork processes in complex construction projects. ...
The findings demonstrate that PSUs are evolving from informal kick-off workshops into semi-formal collaborative governance instruments. Their effectiveness depends less on singular interventions and more on continuous reinforcements, organizational commitments, balanced actor participation, and adaptation throughout the project lifecycle. The study further identifies three interconnected PSU goal categories: relational & interpersonal goals, interorganizational alignment goals, and project control-related goals, refining the traditional hard-soft project management distinction.
This thesis contributes to project management and collaboration literature by reconceptualizing PSUs as governance mechanisms and by emphasizing the temporal and actor-level dependence of collaboration effectiveness. In addition, the study provides practical guidance and implications for the DPS framework, project owners, managers, facilitators, and legal professionals seeking to enhance the start-up process and to strengthen teamwork processes in complex construction projects.
In two projects two different perspectives were identified. Whilst in the third project, three perspectives emerged. In the two projects with two perspectives, the perspectives were split between on one hand participants that found more complexity from the experienced lack of trust and other relational sources, and on the other hand participants that found complexity stemming from project content. The perspectives in the third project were more nuanced. With one finding political influence and higher management more complex, one finding the number of subprojects and influence from external stakeholders complex, and a third finding technical and project environment elements more complex. Within this third project, the complexity from lack of trust was ranked lower. The project manager from that project expressed that they had put a lot of effort into creating and keeping trust throughout the project. It seems that putting high effort into elements that are ranked high in one or more of the perspectives could lower the perceived complexity of that element. But if this actually is the case, and if this can lead to better project results or collaboration needs to be researched further.
When looking at all projects at the same time, complexity experienced from the lack of trust was also prevalent in two of the three perspectives that emerged.
The research confirms that multiple, distinct perspectives exist within project teams, each reflecting a different understanding of which elements are most complex. These perspectives do not systematically align with project roles nor organisational boundaries. In one project, the perspective aligned more with IPM role, in one project results were similar between role and company, and in one project perspectives aligned more with organisation.
Identifying perspectives on project complexity through (for example) the Q-methodology, can be used to increase collaboration by enabling project professionals to understand each other better. This allows for perspective-taking, enhancing group performance through fostering cooperation and coordination.
Through the different perspectives on project complexity, different complexity elements emerge as adding the most complexity to the project. These emerging elements should be investigated within a team, by directing more attention to them. For example, by focussing on them more during risk analysis sessions. If everyone had thought the same about the complexity, these elements might not emerge and be overlooked. Thus, having different perspectives should be embraced.
The complexity of a project, and the perception thereof are not static, therefore identifying perspectives should be repeated. Over time the perspective of a person could drift away from what others think that person has as a perspective. By systematically repeating the exercise throughout a project lifecycle, (for example) before each project follow-up, helps project professionals to keep understanding each other, keeping perspective-taking possible. Whilst simultaneously identifying new emerging complexity elements that warrant investigation and attention. ...
In two projects two different perspectives were identified. Whilst in the third project, three perspectives emerged. In the two projects with two perspectives, the perspectives were split between on one hand participants that found more complexity from the experienced lack of trust and other relational sources, and on the other hand participants that found complexity stemming from project content. The perspectives in the third project were more nuanced. With one finding political influence and higher management more complex, one finding the number of subprojects and influence from external stakeholders complex, and a third finding technical and project environment elements more complex. Within this third project, the complexity from lack of trust was ranked lower. The project manager from that project expressed that they had put a lot of effort into creating and keeping trust throughout the project. It seems that putting high effort into elements that are ranked high in one or more of the perspectives could lower the perceived complexity of that element. But if this actually is the case, and if this can lead to better project results or collaboration needs to be researched further.
When looking at all projects at the same time, complexity experienced from the lack of trust was also prevalent in two of the three perspectives that emerged.
The research confirms that multiple, distinct perspectives exist within project teams, each reflecting a different understanding of which elements are most complex. These perspectives do not systematically align with project roles nor organisational boundaries. In one project, the perspective aligned more with IPM role, in one project results were similar between role and company, and in one project perspectives aligned more with organisation.
Identifying perspectives on project complexity through (for example) the Q-methodology, can be used to increase collaboration by enabling project professionals to understand each other better. This allows for perspective-taking, enhancing group performance through fostering cooperation and coordination.
Through the different perspectives on project complexity, different complexity elements emerge as adding the most complexity to the project. These emerging elements should be investigated within a team, by directing more attention to them. For example, by focussing on them more during risk analysis sessions. If everyone had thought the same about the complexity, these elements might not emerge and be overlooked. Thus, having different perspectives should be embraced.
The complexity of a project, and the perception thereof are not static, therefore identifying perspectives should be repeated. Over time the perspective of a person could drift away from what others think that person has as a perspective. By systematically repeating the exercise throughout a project lifecycle, (for example) before each project follow-up, helps project professionals to keep understanding each other, keeping perspective-taking possible. Whilst simultaneously identifying new emerging complexity elements that warrant investigation and attention.
From Trigger to Action
Research on risk causes and response measures in Dutch public construction projects
This thesis examines how risk causes are related to response measures in Dutch public construction projects, using pre-construction risk registers as the empirical dataset. The study combines a focused literature review, thematic analysis of the risk registers, and an expert meeting with three project control managers.
The findings show that the literature provides a useful starting point for structuring recurring risk causes, but that additional refinement is needed to reflect practice. The thematic analysis resulted in practice-based categorizations for risk causes, risk events, and response measures, and showed that causes and measures are related through recurring links. Rather than pointing to fixed response rules, these recurring links suggest three broader cause–measure pattern types, namely focused cause–measure patterns, dispersed cause–measure patterns, and broad linking patterns.
Overall, the thesis shows that broad recurring cause–measure patterns can be identified in risk registers through structured analysis, and that clearer categorization and recording practices can strengthen the value of the risk registers for comparison, learning, and improvement in public construction projects.
...
This thesis examines how risk causes are related to response measures in Dutch public construction projects, using pre-construction risk registers as the empirical dataset. The study combines a focused literature review, thematic analysis of the risk registers, and an expert meeting with three project control managers.
The findings show that the literature provides a useful starting point for structuring recurring risk causes, but that additional refinement is needed to reflect practice. The thematic analysis resulted in practice-based categorizations for risk causes, risk events, and response measures, and showed that causes and measures are related through recurring links. Rather than pointing to fixed response rules, these recurring links suggest three broader cause–measure pattern types, namely focused cause–measure patterns, dispersed cause–measure patterns, and broad linking patterns.
Overall, the thesis shows that broad recurring cause–measure patterns can be identified in risk registers through structured analysis, and that clearer categorization and recording practices can strengthen the value of the risk registers for comparison, learning, and improvement in public construction projects.
Designing the Wild Within
A living School in Concrete cracks
Central in this project is the office building Blakeburg, designed in 1977 by Jan Hoogstad, which is being redeveloped into a Montessori school, housing for the elderly and public space. The building transforms from a closed, monofunctional volume to an open and changeable biotope in which learning, living and ecology reinforce each other.
The architectural interventions, such as opening up the façade, integrating a landscape staircase, and deploying natural ventilation through existing towers, emerged from a research process. Through literature review, case study visits, participation workshops with children, and the creation of a comic book, seven design principles were formulated: community, reciprocal relationship, natural elements, sustainability, flexibility, participation and scalability.
In this project, nature is not added as aesthetic greenery but is the foundation of the whole design. It is a plea for architecture as a living organism, in which the boundaries between city and nature, old and new, young and old, slowly blur, and space is created for a changing future. ...
Central in this project is the office building Blakeburg, designed in 1977 by Jan Hoogstad, which is being redeveloped into a Montessori school, housing for the elderly and public space. The building transforms from a closed, monofunctional volume to an open and changeable biotope in which learning, living and ecology reinforce each other.
The architectural interventions, such as opening up the façade, integrating a landscape staircase, and deploying natural ventilation through existing towers, emerged from a research process. Through literature review, case study visits, participation workshops with children, and the creation of a comic book, seven design principles were formulated: community, reciprocal relationship, natural elements, sustainability, flexibility, participation and scalability.
In this project, nature is not added as aesthetic greenery but is the foundation of the whole design. It is a plea for architecture as a living organism, in which the boundaries between city and nature, old and new, young and old, slowly blur, and space is created for a changing future.
This study adopted the mixed methods approach, with a comparative case study as the research strategy. Data was collected through a context analysis, participatory observations, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires. Qualitative data was analyzed by coding and annotating audio transcripts. Quantitative data was analyzed by calculating the baseline scores and team effectiveness scores. Subsequently, qualitative and quantitative data were integrated.
The study showed that that every task-focused and person-focused leadership behavior was exhibited, individually or in various combinations. This indicated that there is no one-size-fits-all leadership behavior. Moreover, the findings revealed the presence of situational leadership indicating the ability of individuals to adapt their leadership behaviors by prioritizing, steering and meeting the needs of the team. The second main finding suggested that high exhibition of leadership behaviors, especially person-focused behaviors during milestones, was associated with higher team effectiveness. Milestones were unveiled as critical moments that had a substantial impact on the exhibition of shared leadership behaviors and team effectiveness. An unexpected finding suggested that team composition -more than the project-delivery method- moderates the relationship between shared leadership and team effectiveness. Furthermore, the findings suggested that the project phase and responsibilities of individuals play a significant role in the involvement and presence during meetings. Hence, the study should be extended to fully observe and comprehend the influences of the project-delivery method on team composition. Therefore, two hypotheses are formulated that deserve further research, specifically suggesting that: 1) team composition moderates the relationship between shared leadership and team effectiveness in Project-Based Cross-Functional Design Teams; and 2) team composition in Project-Based Cross-Functional Design Teams are project phase-dependent.
In conclusion, this study provided valuable insights into the importance of shared leadership on team effectiveness in engineering design teams in the Dutch construction sector and has shown how various task-focused and person-focused leadership behaviors manifest in practice and how they can shape team effectiveness through time. The findings strengthen the idea that person-focused behaviors are equally important, if not, more important than task-focused behaviors in enhancing team effectiveness in Project-Based Cross-Functional Design Teams. Emphasizing person-focused behaviors should be beneficial to increasing overall performance, satisfaction and quality effectiveness. All team members can contribute to addressing this challenge, which promotes cohesion, satisfaction and improved team work. ...
This study adopted the mixed methods approach, with a comparative case study as the research strategy. Data was collected through a context analysis, participatory observations, semi-structured interviews, and questionnaires. Qualitative data was analyzed by coding and annotating audio transcripts. Quantitative data was analyzed by calculating the baseline scores and team effectiveness scores. Subsequently, qualitative and quantitative data were integrated.
The study showed that that every task-focused and person-focused leadership behavior was exhibited, individually or in various combinations. This indicated that there is no one-size-fits-all leadership behavior. Moreover, the findings revealed the presence of situational leadership indicating the ability of individuals to adapt their leadership behaviors by prioritizing, steering and meeting the needs of the team. The second main finding suggested that high exhibition of leadership behaviors, especially person-focused behaviors during milestones, was associated with higher team effectiveness. Milestones were unveiled as critical moments that had a substantial impact on the exhibition of shared leadership behaviors and team effectiveness. An unexpected finding suggested that team composition -more than the project-delivery method- moderates the relationship between shared leadership and team effectiveness. Furthermore, the findings suggested that the project phase and responsibilities of individuals play a significant role in the involvement and presence during meetings. Hence, the study should be extended to fully observe and comprehend the influences of the project-delivery method on team composition. Therefore, two hypotheses are formulated that deserve further research, specifically suggesting that: 1) team composition moderates the relationship between shared leadership and team effectiveness in Project-Based Cross-Functional Design Teams; and 2) team composition in Project-Based Cross-Functional Design Teams are project phase-dependent.
In conclusion, this study provided valuable insights into the importance of shared leadership on team effectiveness in engineering design teams in the Dutch construction sector and has shown how various task-focused and person-focused leadership behaviors manifest in practice and how they can shape team effectiveness through time. The findings strengthen the idea that person-focused behaviors are equally important, if not, more important than task-focused behaviors in enhancing team effectiveness in Project-Based Cross-Functional Design Teams. Emphasizing person-focused behaviors should be beneficial to increasing overall performance, satisfaction and quality effectiveness. All team members can contribute to addressing this challenge, which promotes cohesion, satisfaction and improved team work.
“How to adapt Earned Value Management to various levels of projects based on the project complexity?”
To answer this question, the study will first outline significant aspects within EVM and assess the maturity level of organizations implementing EVM. Van Oord is chosen as the study location to gather data on their EVM application. The study then delves into potential adaptations of EVM and its effective application across diverse project types.
The research yields several significant outcomes. Firstly, the core EVM aspects are grouped under Earned Value Analysis, encompassing Planned Value (scope, budget, schedule), Actual Cost, and Earned Value. Project variance analysis, forecast calculations, and corrective action analysis are also recognized as critical components of EVM. The next step is understanding the organization maturity level, where this study reveals that EVM partially implemented in the organization and only in selected projects, following the threshold of EVM Maturity Level standards.
The next step involves the formulation of frameworks. The ABCD EVM Framework is developed based on the modified EVM 10-step model, focusing on elements such as Earned Value Analysis and the ANSI/EIA-748 standard as modified EVM components. One impactful aspect, as per the ANSI/EIA-748 Standard, involves determining the Work Breakdown Structure level, influencing the level of detail in schedule planning, budgeting, and progress tracking. Additionally, other variations include frequency of variance calculation and project forecast estimation. Various other aspects such as changes, responsibilities, reporting, and organizational decisions outlined in the discussion chapter are also differ on each project levels.
Moreover, the EVM framework is generated through TOE complexity analysis. Out of the 47 TOE Elements, 29 elements are being identified as influencing elements for the implementation of Earned Value Management. By adhering to the scalability factor from the ANSI/EIA-748 Standard and considering interview outcomes, several suggestions are formulated for Earned Value Management activities. The objective is to anticipate the high-scoring TOE elements for each project. The EVM aspects influencing this framework mainly concern the Project Measurement Baseline Plan, Budget and Schedule Authorization, the level of detail in the Work Breakdown Structure, and the recording of allocation and management reports.
Conclusively, variation in the adaptability of Earned Value Management are shown in the resulted frameworks for variety of project levels, as well as becoming tools to improve the organization maturity level. For practical application, this study recommends organization to implement EVM using the ABCD project classification or similar project sizing measurement approach while integrating insights from the TOE EVM Framework. This holistic strategy can enhance project monitoring and control across various complexity levels, contributing to the successful and effective outcomes of projects in the construction industry. ...
“How to adapt Earned Value Management to various levels of projects based on the project complexity?”
To answer this question, the study will first outline significant aspects within EVM and assess the maturity level of organizations implementing EVM. Van Oord is chosen as the study location to gather data on their EVM application. The study then delves into potential adaptations of EVM and its effective application across diverse project types.
The research yields several significant outcomes. Firstly, the core EVM aspects are grouped under Earned Value Analysis, encompassing Planned Value (scope, budget, schedule), Actual Cost, and Earned Value. Project variance analysis, forecast calculations, and corrective action analysis are also recognized as critical components of EVM. The next step is understanding the organization maturity level, where this study reveals that EVM partially implemented in the organization and only in selected projects, following the threshold of EVM Maturity Level standards.
The next step involves the formulation of frameworks. The ABCD EVM Framework is developed based on the modified EVM 10-step model, focusing on elements such as Earned Value Analysis and the ANSI/EIA-748 standard as modified EVM components. One impactful aspect, as per the ANSI/EIA-748 Standard, involves determining the Work Breakdown Structure level, influencing the level of detail in schedule planning, budgeting, and progress tracking. Additionally, other variations include frequency of variance calculation and project forecast estimation. Various other aspects such as changes, responsibilities, reporting, and organizational decisions outlined in the discussion chapter are also differ on each project levels.
Moreover, the EVM framework is generated through TOE complexity analysis. Out of the 47 TOE Elements, 29 elements are being identified as influencing elements for the implementation of Earned Value Management. By adhering to the scalability factor from the ANSI/EIA-748 Standard and considering interview outcomes, several suggestions are formulated for Earned Value Management activities. The objective is to anticipate the high-scoring TOE elements for each project. The EVM aspects influencing this framework mainly concern the Project Measurement Baseline Plan, Budget and Schedule Authorization, the level of detail in the Work Breakdown Structure, and the recording of allocation and management reports.
Conclusively, variation in the adaptability of Earned Value Management are shown in the resulted frameworks for variety of project levels, as well as becoming tools to improve the organization maturity level. For practical application, this study recommends organization to implement EVM using the ABCD project classification or similar project sizing measurement approach while integrating insights from the TOE EVM Framework. This holistic strategy can enhance project monitoring and control across various complexity levels, contributing to the successful and effective outcomes of projects in the construction industry.
The goal of this study is to provide new insights for actors in the housing construction chain, the government and science. To gain these new insights, the following research question has been formulated: How can the collaboration between actors in the Dutch housing construction industry be improved in the pursuit of sustainable supply chain management? This research was conducted through an in-depth case study research, based on literature research and semi-structured interviews with representatives from the most influential actor types in the Dutch housing construction supply chain. The housing construction supply chain contains a wide variety of actors with key players herein being main contractors, property developers and so-called first tier subcontractors
During the analysis of the interview results, an extensive amount of barriers and drivers were uncovered that actors encounter during the implementation of SSCM in the Dutch housing construction industry. For both barriers and drivers, it was found that subcontractors and property developers focus on the market and networking category, indicating they look more at the supply chain compared to main contractors. For main contractors, it seems they focus more on regulations, institutional barriers and drivers from within their own organization.
Based on the identified barriers and drivers, the following practical recommendations can accelerate the transition to SSCM in the Dutch housing construction industry. First, share knowledge with all actors in the supply chain. Second, develop a sustainable corporate culture that is reinforced both top-down and bottom-up in the organization. Third, some investments in sustainable operations are too high for a single actor to realize. Therefore, it is recommended that supply chain actors find effective ways to share financial burdens with each other in housing projects. Fourth and last, governmental institutions draft long term visions for the environment and subsequently translate this into policy.
The research findings can be used to inform and motivate main contractors, subcontractors, property developers and governments about practical implications and the use of policy instruments to achieve a sustainable supply chain in the Dutch housing construction industry. The combination of more intrinsic motivation from all actors in the housing construction chain can pave the way for creating a sustainable way of constructing houses.
...
The goal of this study is to provide new insights for actors in the housing construction chain, the government and science. To gain these new insights, the following research question has been formulated: How can the collaboration between actors in the Dutch housing construction industry be improved in the pursuit of sustainable supply chain management? This research was conducted through an in-depth case study research, based on literature research and semi-structured interviews with representatives from the most influential actor types in the Dutch housing construction supply chain. The housing construction supply chain contains a wide variety of actors with key players herein being main contractors, property developers and so-called first tier subcontractors
During the analysis of the interview results, an extensive amount of barriers and drivers were uncovered that actors encounter during the implementation of SSCM in the Dutch housing construction industry. For both barriers and drivers, it was found that subcontractors and property developers focus on the market and networking category, indicating they look more at the supply chain compared to main contractors. For main contractors, it seems they focus more on regulations, institutional barriers and drivers from within their own organization.
Based on the identified barriers and drivers, the following practical recommendations can accelerate the transition to SSCM in the Dutch housing construction industry. First, share knowledge with all actors in the supply chain. Second, develop a sustainable corporate culture that is reinforced both top-down and bottom-up in the organization. Third, some investments in sustainable operations are too high for a single actor to realize. Therefore, it is recommended that supply chain actors find effective ways to share financial burdens with each other in housing projects. Fourth and last, governmental institutions draft long term visions for the environment and subsequently translate this into policy.
The research findings can be used to inform and motivate main contractors, subcontractors, property developers and governments about practical implications and the use of policy instruments to achieve a sustainable supply chain in the Dutch housing construction industry. The combination of more intrinsic motivation from all actors in the housing construction chain can pave the way for creating a sustainable way of constructing houses.
Towards a better understanding of mediation in the construction sector: a grounded theory approach
Explorative and qualitative research on contributing factors to mediation processes in Dutch construction projects
Projects in the construction sector are known for their high complexity. Due to this complexity, disputes in construction are close to inevitable. While these disputes can lead to major project delays and financial costs, they demand for a resolution. Juridical resolution methods like litigation and arbitration have found to be unfavourable in terms of time, money and business relationship costs. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods like mediation are viewed to score better on these points.
Problem
Unfortunately, still a big amount of escalated disputes in the construction sector are resolved by traditional juridical methods, where the parties fight each other to win. This results in major expenses, time investments and relational damage.
Purpose
This research aims to gain a better understanding of mediation processes in the construction industry. This could lead to less use of juridical procedures and maybe less escalated disputes in general. This could save disputing parties in the construction sector money, time and business relational damage.
Method
A grounded theory approach has been used in this research, because no research has yet been conducted on factors that influence the mediation process, nor on the course of its process in practice. Four case studies have been carried out in a qualitative fashion, conducting in-depth interviews with the involved disputing parties and the mediator(s). The resulting transcripts have been analysed on contributing factors, allocating quotations to closed and open coding. Furthermore, the cases have been analysed on their course of the mediation process.
Findings
A substantial amount of influencing factors have been found to be influencing the mediation process in practice: a few from academic literature and the majority from the case studies, consisting of internal moderators, external moderators, mediator’s interventions and the action of bartering. Therefrom, conclusions have been drawn which have been discussed with a validation panel to value them and add a level of depth. Furthermore, an enhanced framework of the mediation process has been constructed where these factors have been added to. Since this research has a limited scope and is based on the grounded theory approach, a substantial amount of limitations and recommendations for future research have been given. ...
Projects in the construction sector are known for their high complexity. Due to this complexity, disputes in construction are close to inevitable. While these disputes can lead to major project delays and financial costs, they demand for a resolution. Juridical resolution methods like litigation and arbitration have found to be unfavourable in terms of time, money and business relationship costs. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) methods like mediation are viewed to score better on these points.
Problem
Unfortunately, still a big amount of escalated disputes in the construction sector are resolved by traditional juridical methods, where the parties fight each other to win. This results in major expenses, time investments and relational damage.
Purpose
This research aims to gain a better understanding of mediation processes in the construction industry. This could lead to less use of juridical procedures and maybe less escalated disputes in general. This could save disputing parties in the construction sector money, time and business relational damage.
Method
A grounded theory approach has been used in this research, because no research has yet been conducted on factors that influence the mediation process, nor on the course of its process in practice. Four case studies have been carried out in a qualitative fashion, conducting in-depth interviews with the involved disputing parties and the mediator(s). The resulting transcripts have been analysed on contributing factors, allocating quotations to closed and open coding. Furthermore, the cases have been analysed on their course of the mediation process.
Findings
A substantial amount of influencing factors have been found to be influencing the mediation process in practice: a few from academic literature and the majority from the case studies, consisting of internal moderators, external moderators, mediator’s interventions and the action of bartering. Therefrom, conclusions have been drawn which have been discussed with a validation panel to value them and add a level of depth. Furthermore, an enhanced framework of the mediation process has been constructed where these factors have been added to. Since this research has a limited scope and is based on the grounded theory approach, a substantial amount of limitations and recommendations for future research have been given.
End-user involvement in hospital building design
A Case Study On Information Management And Design Process: Erasmus MC Rotterdam new building project
The main research question is: In hospital building projects, how does the project organization translate the end-user information into design? By performing a single case study, data was collected through context analysis, document analysis, and in-depth interviews about end-user involvement, information flow, and decision-making process in Erasmus MC Rotterdam new building project. Ten interviews were conducted with different members of the project organization including project managers and leaders, design experts, and also external advisors. The research analysis illustrates a participative design and decision-making process and the three main findings of this research:(1)End-users from different groups were involved in the design and decision-making process and the level of involvement was different in each stage. There is mainly a consultative form of user involvement that evolved into a co-design form in the technical phase of design. User representatives and designers were members of technical design teams: TOTs in this phase looking for design solutions together. (2) Two groups had key roles during the process: User Coordinators and the Building Expertise group. User Coordinators ensure the gathering of user information and engagement of end-users during the design, and they are the information exchange link between the end-users and the design team. The Building Expertise group in this project had an intermediator role acting in different boundaries of the organization. (3) Design decisions are based on continuous consultation with end-user representatives which are linked to the project organization at all levels. There was a transparent and informed decision-making process. Review matrices were decision-making support tools used by different groups including different end- end-user groups and help different groups exchange information in different boundaries. Research findings and the analysis gives a better understanding of information management, end-user, and stakeholder management in healthcare building design and planning and give insights on project management and how to organize the information exchange and the team interactions and use different methods and tools during the briefing and design process in complex building design projects like hospitals. ...
The main research question is: In hospital building projects, how does the project organization translate the end-user information into design? By performing a single case study, data was collected through context analysis, document analysis, and in-depth interviews about end-user involvement, information flow, and decision-making process in Erasmus MC Rotterdam new building project. Ten interviews were conducted with different members of the project organization including project managers and leaders, design experts, and also external advisors. The research analysis illustrates a participative design and decision-making process and the three main findings of this research:(1)End-users from different groups were involved in the design and decision-making process and the level of involvement was different in each stage. There is mainly a consultative form of user involvement that evolved into a co-design form in the technical phase of design. User representatives and designers were members of technical design teams: TOTs in this phase looking for design solutions together. (2) Two groups had key roles during the process: User Coordinators and the Building Expertise group. User Coordinators ensure the gathering of user information and engagement of end-users during the design, and they are the information exchange link between the end-users and the design team. The Building Expertise group in this project had an intermediator role acting in different boundaries of the organization. (3) Design decisions are based on continuous consultation with end-user representatives which are linked to the project organization at all levels. There was a transparent and informed decision-making process. Review matrices were decision-making support tools used by different groups including different end- end-user groups and help different groups exchange information in different boundaries. Research findings and the analysis gives a better understanding of information management, end-user, and stakeholder management in healthcare building design and planning and give insights on project management and how to organize the information exchange and the team interactions and use different methods and tools during the briefing and design process in complex building design projects like hospitals.
Key factors in team collaboration
A qualitative study to determine the team effectiveness of an inter-organisational, international project based integrated design team
Future proof neighborhood shopping centres in an aging population
A quantitative case study research on shopping preferences of elderly people in a Dutch aging neighborhood.
The Emergence of Shared Leadership in Project-based Integrated Design Teams
A case study on the way interpersonal skills can influence team functioning
Research question: Considering interpersonal skills, how can process managers influence team functioning in project-based integrated design teams which apply shared leadership?
Methodology: The here described comparative case study uses an interpretive qualitative approach. Data was collected from two case studies, through context analysis, participant observations and interviews on behaviour, team interaction and communication.
Findings: This research highlighted the complexity of hospital design project organisations. The case studies address three managers: process manager, design manager and project controller – who each have their own responsibilities and focus. The emphasis of this research is with the process manager, who adapts to what the project team needs in that situation and can apply interpersonal skills by reflecting and ask questions (Why? What? When? Where? How?) to stimulate creative and critical thinking and engage project team members to interact with each other (trigger shared leadership). These skills can be applied to obtain organisational purposes, such as financial goals and to manage information which can contribute to project progress. Stagnation of project progress occurs when topics or problems are attempted to be solved at the wrong organisational level, thus “at the wrong table” (in Dutch: “het probleem wordt op de verkeerde tafel gelegd”). The different strategic levels influence each other, which in turn may alter the communication, and functioning within the team, as well as the project outcome. Furthermore, this research indicated that BIM is often seen as a goal in its own right, thus as a 3D Revit model, rather than a means to support shared understanding or shared mental model, and thus act as a boundary object. Findings indicated the need for a BIM to be dealt with as an information management system. Therefore, the outcomes of the study and it is recommended to involve a BIM coordinator to enact the use of BIM as a boundary object amongst project team members.
Practical implications: This research emphasizes on the importance of interpersonal skills and the importance of information sharing to team functioning. This can provide insight for project team composition, recruitment and training, and tendering processes. ...
Research question: Considering interpersonal skills, how can process managers influence team functioning in project-based integrated design teams which apply shared leadership?
Methodology: The here described comparative case study uses an interpretive qualitative approach. Data was collected from two case studies, through context analysis, participant observations and interviews on behaviour, team interaction and communication.
Findings: This research highlighted the complexity of hospital design project organisations. The case studies address three managers: process manager, design manager and project controller – who each have their own responsibilities and focus. The emphasis of this research is with the process manager, who adapts to what the project team needs in that situation and can apply interpersonal skills by reflecting and ask questions (Why? What? When? Where? How?) to stimulate creative and critical thinking and engage project team members to interact with each other (trigger shared leadership). These skills can be applied to obtain organisational purposes, such as financial goals and to manage information which can contribute to project progress. Stagnation of project progress occurs when topics or problems are attempted to be solved at the wrong organisational level, thus “at the wrong table” (in Dutch: “het probleem wordt op de verkeerde tafel gelegd”). The different strategic levels influence each other, which in turn may alter the communication, and functioning within the team, as well as the project outcome. Furthermore, this research indicated that BIM is often seen as a goal in its own right, thus as a 3D Revit model, rather than a means to support shared understanding or shared mental model, and thus act as a boundary object. Findings indicated the need for a BIM to be dealt with as an information management system. Therefore, the outcomes of the study and it is recommended to involve a BIM coordinator to enact the use of BIM as a boundary object amongst project team members.
Practical implications: This research emphasizes on the importance of interpersonal skills and the importance of information sharing to team functioning. This can provide insight for project team composition, recruitment and training, and tendering processes.
BIM as a communication and collaboration tool for the design and operation phase of hospital buildings
A case study research into validating and verifying the design and BIM model by the project team and client & end-users
BIM can be used for integrated communication and collaboration between different stakeholders, from the same as well as from different project phases. For a good collaboration with BIM, clear objectives should be communicated between stakeholders. With BIM, project team actors can work together in a shared environment, existing of a 3D model and other tools. The project stakeholders can be architects, engineers, (sub)contractors, but also new roles that emerge due to BIM, such as BIM managers and BIM designers. Existing roles of project actors, such as architects, can also change because e.g. different technical BIM related skills are required. BIM can be used for information management between these different roles of the design team and the client and its end-users.
Considering the project lifecycle, the design and operation phase are critical because in the design phase the usability for the use phase is defined, and the use phase is the longest phase of building projects. BIM can be used for communication between the different actors that work in the design and use phase. Also, end-users can be included in the communication about design and operation of buildings, to make a building better fit to the end-use. When communicating about the design and its specifications, the design and corresponding BIM model should be validated and verified.
Although a lot of benefits are given in literature, the findings of empirical research show that these benefits are often not met in practice: interviewed stakeholders stated that the benefits are not always working out as proposed by BIM programme makers, and the connection between design and use with BIM is often not implemented well enough, e.g. due to different information needs of different actors.
The process of communication in the project, as well of the way stakeholders validate and verify the design, are influenced by the project context, including language, culture, background and interests of different stakeholders. Further, incidents during the process can influence the extent that the BIM documents such as protocols and execution plans, as agreed upon in the start of the project, are followed during the project. Critical points towards a successful project are: 1. To use BIM as a means, instead of a goal in itself: the reasons why BIM is used should be well defined upfront, and good agreements should be made about it.; 2. BIM is not only a way to resolve design errors, but also to involve different stakeholders, including the client. The interests and competences of different actors should be defined upfront; 3. If the client does not have extensive knowledge of BIM, or does not know exactly why and how to use BIM, it is also up to the design team to help the client sort this out. 4. BIM and digital communication should not replace real life communication, as it stays important to meet face to face.
...
BIM can be used for integrated communication and collaboration between different stakeholders, from the same as well as from different project phases. For a good collaboration with BIM, clear objectives should be communicated between stakeholders. With BIM, project team actors can work together in a shared environment, existing of a 3D model and other tools. The project stakeholders can be architects, engineers, (sub)contractors, but also new roles that emerge due to BIM, such as BIM managers and BIM designers. Existing roles of project actors, such as architects, can also change because e.g. different technical BIM related skills are required. BIM can be used for information management between these different roles of the design team and the client and its end-users.
Considering the project lifecycle, the design and operation phase are critical because in the design phase the usability for the use phase is defined, and the use phase is the longest phase of building projects. BIM can be used for communication between the different actors that work in the design and use phase. Also, end-users can be included in the communication about design and operation of buildings, to make a building better fit to the end-use. When communicating about the design and its specifications, the design and corresponding BIM model should be validated and verified.
Although a lot of benefits are given in literature, the findings of empirical research show that these benefits are often not met in practice: interviewed stakeholders stated that the benefits are not always working out as proposed by BIM programme makers, and the connection between design and use with BIM is often not implemented well enough, e.g. due to different information needs of different actors.
The process of communication in the project, as well of the way stakeholders validate and verify the design, are influenced by the project context, including language, culture, background and interests of different stakeholders. Further, incidents during the process can influence the extent that the BIM documents such as protocols and execution plans, as agreed upon in the start of the project, are followed during the project. Critical points towards a successful project are: 1. To use BIM as a means, instead of a goal in itself: the reasons why BIM is used should be well defined upfront, and good agreements should be made about it.; 2. BIM is not only a way to resolve design errors, but also to involve different stakeholders, including the client. The interests and competences of different actors should be defined upfront; 3. If the client does not have extensive knowledge of BIM, or does not know exactly why and how to use BIM, it is also up to the design team to help the client sort this out. 4. BIM and digital communication should not replace real life communication, as it stays important to meet face to face.
Duurzaamheidsachterstand in zwakke woonwijken
De vergeten eigenaar-bewoners in de Vogelaarwijken
Risk sharing in supply chain partnerships: An SME perspective
A study of the behaviour of risk sharing in partnerships in a construction supply chain
distribution of risk is a consequence of current practices affecting commercially and financially weaker parties, such as SMEs. ...
distribution of risk is a consequence of current practices affecting commercially and financially weaker parties, such as SMEs.
Increasing Team Collaboration by Implementing Shared Leadership
A case study of the soft side of project management
Research question: What are the main tasks that need to be addressed in project teams with Shared Leadership and is the way a task was performed dependent on certain leadership styles?
Methodology: The concept is explored by using a comparative case study design. Two case studies were executed to collect data. First, the team members and the project manager were interviewed by using a semi-structured interview at the beginning of the research. Second, an observational study is done by observing the design team meetings to identify which members are contributing to shared leadership and could there be tasks and roles recognized on the basis of their behaviour and communication flow. Third, the team members and the project managers were asked to fill in a questionnaire, which are used to understand the interpersonal side of team collaboration.
Findings: Shared leadership can be measured by making observations and applying communication labels as developed during the research. There is not a relationship to be recognized between the formal role of a person and the shown behaviour. Furthermore, Shared leadership is dynamic as it is not linked to specific leadership styles. Furthermore, a new definition of shared leadership appeared from this study: Shared leadership consists of multiple dynamic leadership behaviours to maximize team effectiveness.
Limitations of the research: Qualitative research is always subject to bias due to the interpretation of the qualitative information. Subsequently, the modest number of samples that is investigated in this research are not intended to adequately represent the behaviour and communication flow. To date, this is among the first observational studies to result in an inductive result.
Practical implications: This research raises awareness on the concept of shared leadership and how this is outlined in corresponding tasks. This research recommends to train the project managers in a way where there is an increased focus on the people-oriented approach. Furthermore, reflections on the collaboration process should be built in the standard project checks every month.
Scientific relevance: This research tries to make an addition to the current literature about shared leadership. By introducing specific communicative qualities and link these to tasks performed in teams with shared leadership.
Originality/value: Limited literature is available on the practical implication of shared leadership; this research increases the insight of this concept.
...
Research question: What are the main tasks that need to be addressed in project teams with Shared Leadership and is the way a task was performed dependent on certain leadership styles?
Methodology: The concept is explored by using a comparative case study design. Two case studies were executed to collect data. First, the team members and the project manager were interviewed by using a semi-structured interview at the beginning of the research. Second, an observational study is done by observing the design team meetings to identify which members are contributing to shared leadership and could there be tasks and roles recognized on the basis of their behaviour and communication flow. Third, the team members and the project managers were asked to fill in a questionnaire, which are used to understand the interpersonal side of team collaboration.
Findings: Shared leadership can be measured by making observations and applying communication labels as developed during the research. There is not a relationship to be recognized between the formal role of a person and the shown behaviour. Furthermore, Shared leadership is dynamic as it is not linked to specific leadership styles. Furthermore, a new definition of shared leadership appeared from this study: Shared leadership consists of multiple dynamic leadership behaviours to maximize team effectiveness.
Limitations of the research: Qualitative research is always subject to bias due to the interpretation of the qualitative information. Subsequently, the modest number of samples that is investigated in this research are not intended to adequately represent the behaviour and communication flow. To date, this is among the first observational studies to result in an inductive result.
Practical implications: This research raises awareness on the concept of shared leadership and how this is outlined in corresponding tasks. This research recommends to train the project managers in a way where there is an increased focus on the people-oriented approach. Furthermore, reflections on the collaboration process should be built in the standard project checks every month.
Scientific relevance: This research tries to make an addition to the current literature about shared leadership. By introducing specific communicative qualities and link these to tasks performed in teams with shared leadership.
Originality/value: Limited literature is available on the practical implication of shared leadership; this research increases the insight of this concept.