R. Happee
Please Note
55 records found
1
This study investigated whether pre- and in-exposure postural sway and head–trunk stabilization characteristics are associated with VIMS severity during VR exposure. Twenty-five participants completed standing and seated head-sway measurements under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, followed by a head–trunk stabilization test with yaw perturbation on a rotational seat and two VIMS-inducing VR exposures. VIMS severity was continuously recorded using the Misery Scale (MISC), supplemented by Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) scores, while vection incidence was continuously reported during exposure. Head motion was characterized using time- and frequency-domain features, and head–trunk stabilization was quantified using frequency-dependent gain, phase, and coherence measures.
Pre-exposure head sway showed stronger associations with VIMS-related outcomes than head motion measured during exposure. In particular, the difference between eyes-open and eyes-closed sway in the seated condition (sit, EO-EC) exhibited the strongest overall associations, with the peak medial–lateral angular velocity showing a significant negative correlation with SSQ-nausea subscores in one of the VR exposures after correction for multiple comparisons (ρ=-0.721, pbonf=0.01, mbonf=288). Furthermore, the median sway frequencies calculated under the same condition (sit, EO-EC) were found to be highly positively correlated with all SSQ sub- and total scores (Nausea: ρ=0.605; Oculomotor: ρ=0.531; Disorientation: ρ=0.628; Total Score: ρ=0.626). These findings support the relevance of postural control mechanisms to individual MS severity proposed by the Postural Instability Theory in a seated VIMS context. They extend previous work by demonstrating that pre-exposure seated sway, rather than only exposure-induced postural motion, may contain information about individual VIMS susceptibility.
Selected stabilization features in the head–trunk stabilization test showed associations with inverse end time, but no consistent relationships with MISC or vection incidence were observed. Overall, the findings indicate that pre-exposure seated head sway, particularly its visual dependency, may serve as a useful objective marker of individual VIMS susceptibility, while task-dependent head–neck dynamics should be considered when interpreting cervical motion responses in immersive VR environments. ...
This study investigated whether pre- and in-exposure postural sway and head–trunk stabilization characteristics are associated with VIMS severity during VR exposure. Twenty-five participants completed standing and seated head-sway measurements under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions, followed by a head–trunk stabilization test with yaw perturbation on a rotational seat and two VIMS-inducing VR exposures. VIMS severity was continuously recorded using the Misery Scale (MISC), supplemented by Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) scores, while vection incidence was continuously reported during exposure. Head motion was characterized using time- and frequency-domain features, and head–trunk stabilization was quantified using frequency-dependent gain, phase, and coherence measures.
Pre-exposure head sway showed stronger associations with VIMS-related outcomes than head motion measured during exposure. In particular, the difference between eyes-open and eyes-closed sway in the seated condition (sit, EO-EC) exhibited the strongest overall associations, with the peak medial–lateral angular velocity showing a significant negative correlation with SSQ-nausea subscores in one of the VR exposures after correction for multiple comparisons (ρ=-0.721, pbonf=0.01, mbonf=288). Furthermore, the median sway frequencies calculated under the same condition (sit, EO-EC) were found to be highly positively correlated with all SSQ sub- and total scores (Nausea: ρ=0.605; Oculomotor: ρ=0.531; Disorientation: ρ=0.628; Total Score: ρ=0.626). These findings support the relevance of postural control mechanisms to individual MS severity proposed by the Postural Instability Theory in a seated VIMS context. They extend previous work by demonstrating that pre-exposure seated sway, rather than only exposure-induced postural motion, may contain information about individual VIMS susceptibility.
Selected stabilization features in the head–trunk stabilization test showed associations with inverse end time, but no consistent relationships with MISC or vection incidence were observed. Overall, the findings indicate that pre-exposure seated head sway, particularly its visual dependency, may serve as a useful objective marker of individual VIMS susceptibility, while task-dependent head–neck dynamics should be considered when interpreting cervical motion responses in immersive VR environments.
Seeing Future Sickness
Vision-Based Head Pose Estimation for Motion Sickness Assessment in Automated Vehicles
A machine-learning-ready RGB-D dataset was created using a custom 6-DoF motion simulator, with an Azure Kinect depth camera and motion capture system providing synchronised measurements and ground-truth poses. An anatomically grounded head coordinate system based on the vestibular organs was introduced to align the measurements with human motion perception. The dataset comprises 42 trials from 17 participants and 323,424 frames, covering different driving speeds, glasses conditions, and instructed head movements.
Five machine learning architectures were evaluated using 5-fold participant-level cross-validation. A post-processing pipeline combining coordinate calibration and non-causal low-pass filtering reduced tracking errors by approximately 2.5–4 times across all models. The best-performing model achieved mean MSDV-weighted coherence values of 0.890 for orientation and 0.941 for position within the primary MS frequency range (0.05–1 Hz). These results demonstrate the feasibility of depth-camera-based head-motion measurement for mathematical MS prediction and non-intrusive passenger comfort monitoring in future AVs. ...
A machine-learning-ready RGB-D dataset was created using a custom 6-DoF motion simulator, with an Azure Kinect depth camera and motion capture system providing synchronised measurements and ground-truth poses. An anatomically grounded head coordinate system based on the vestibular organs was introduced to align the measurements with human motion perception. The dataset comprises 42 trials from 17 participants and 323,424 frames, covering different driving speeds, glasses conditions, and instructed head movements.
Five machine learning architectures were evaluated using 5-fold participant-level cross-validation. A post-processing pipeline combining coordinate calibration and non-causal low-pass filtering reduced tracking errors by approximately 2.5–4 times across all models. The best-performing model achieved mean MSDV-weighted coherence values of 0.890 for orientation and 0.941 for position within the primary MS frequency range (0.05–1 Hz). These results demonstrate the feasibility of depth-camera-based head-motion measurement for mathematical MS prediction and non-intrusive passenger comfort monitoring in future AVs.
As automated vehicles position drivers as passive passengers and simulators become increasingly immersive, motion sickness has emerged as a critical barrier to user acceptance. Traditional models rely on group averages and focus on extreme outcomes, failing to capture the subtle, individual discomforts like nausea and dizziness that ruin the passenger experience.
This book presents a framework for predicting and mitigating motion sickness at the individual lev el by moving b eyond a one-size-fits-all approach. The research introduces a personalized modeling method that adapts to specific user sensitivities using two key parameters and proposes critical updates to sensory conflict models to better align visual perception with reality. These culminate in a novel control algorithm for simulators that reduces motion sickness by over 50% without sacrificing realism. This work aims to bridge the gap between biological variability and mechanical design to create a more comfortable experience. ...
As automated vehicles position drivers as passive passengers and simulators become increasingly immersive, motion sickness has emerged as a critical barrier to user acceptance. Traditional models rely on group averages and focus on extreme outcomes, failing to capture the subtle, individual discomforts like nausea and dizziness that ruin the passenger experience.
This book presents a framework for predicting and mitigating motion sickness at the individual lev el by moving b eyond a one-size-fits-all approach. The research introduces a personalized modeling method that adapts to specific user sensitivities using two key parameters and proposes critical updates to sensory conflict models to better align visual perception with reality. These culminate in a novel control algorithm for simulators that reduces motion sickness by over 50% without sacrificing realism. This work aims to bridge the gap between biological variability and mechanical design to create a more comfortable experience.
disc health, but existing devices are often expensive, uncomfortable, or require supervised use in a clinic.
This thesis describes the design, development, and evaluation of a novel traction device for the treatment of LBP, which is affordable, user-friendly, and suitable for unsupervised usage in physiotherapy practices or at home. A patient study of an early seated prototype (Prototype 2) with 20 patients revealed limitations in fixation and comfort: four patients could not be tested due to slipping through the belt fixation, and six of the remaining patients were unable to complete the 10-minute treatment. On average, patients reported only a slight reduction in pain (∆V AS of 0.47 ± 2.60), and a significant negative correlation was found between treatment-related discomfort and pain reduction (r = −0.57, p = 0.022).
Furthermore, market research at YES!Delft indicated that Prototype 2 would be too costly for the intended users. To optimize therapy, a literature review was conducted to determine how the therapist controlled parameters, specifically force, body position, and duration, to assess their potential influence on the treatment effect. The review suggested that traction is most effective at forces of < 20% body weight (increasing up to 40% if necessary), in prone or supine 90/90 positions, and with intermittent traction cycles lasting 10-20 minutes. Additional factors influencing outcomes included patient age, duration of symptoms, presence of sciatica, and timing of follow-up.
Based on these findings, a third prototype was developed and evaluated in a patient study comprising six treatments over a six-week period. The control group (n = 4) received manual traction in combination with mobilization and detonizing (which is standard physiotherapy treatment) and in the study group (n = 6) manual traction was replaced with treatment by Prototype 3. Both groups reported reductions in pain (VAS) and disability (ODI), with statistically significant improvement observed only in the study group (p = 0.0216). No significant differences between groups were detected, though effect sizes indicated individual improvement. These results demonstrate the viability of a patient-operated traction device and suggest therapeutic potential comparable to that of current physiotherapy treatments and reported literature. While further research with larger study groups and refined design parameters is needed, the device shows promise as a cost-effective solution for use in physiotherapy practices or home settings. ...
disc health, but existing devices are often expensive, uncomfortable, or require supervised use in a clinic.
This thesis describes the design, development, and evaluation of a novel traction device for the treatment of LBP, which is affordable, user-friendly, and suitable for unsupervised usage in physiotherapy practices or at home. A patient study of an early seated prototype (Prototype 2) with 20 patients revealed limitations in fixation and comfort: four patients could not be tested due to slipping through the belt fixation, and six of the remaining patients were unable to complete the 10-minute treatment. On average, patients reported only a slight reduction in pain (∆V AS of 0.47 ± 2.60), and a significant negative correlation was found between treatment-related discomfort and pain reduction (r = −0.57, p = 0.022).
Furthermore, market research at YES!Delft indicated that Prototype 2 would be too costly for the intended users. To optimize therapy, a literature review was conducted to determine how the therapist controlled parameters, specifically force, body position, and duration, to assess their potential influence on the treatment effect. The review suggested that traction is most effective at forces of < 20% body weight (increasing up to 40% if necessary), in prone or supine 90/90 positions, and with intermittent traction cycles lasting 10-20 minutes. Additional factors influencing outcomes included patient age, duration of symptoms, presence of sciatica, and timing of follow-up.
Based on these findings, a third prototype was developed and evaluated in a patient study comprising six treatments over a six-week period. The control group (n = 4) received manual traction in combination with mobilization and detonizing (which is standard physiotherapy treatment) and in the study group (n = 6) manual traction was replaced with treatment by Prototype 3. Both groups reported reductions in pain (VAS) and disability (ODI), with statistically significant improvement observed only in the study group (p = 0.0216). No significant differences between groups were detected, though effect sizes indicated individual improvement. These results demonstrate the viability of a patient-operated traction device and suggest therapeutic potential comparable to that of current physiotherapy treatments and reported literature. While further research with larger study groups and refined design parameters is needed, the device shows promise as a cost-effective solution for use in physiotherapy practices or home settings.
Towards Sickness-free Automated Driving
Control Algorithms for Motion Sickness Mitigation in Automated Vehicles and Enhanced Immersion in Driving Simulators
Control of Evasive Manoeuvres for Automated Driving
Solving the Edge Cases
Bayesian Neurodynamic Modeling
Decoding Neuron Pathways in Vertical Motion Sickness
Comfort Assessment in Automated Vehicles
Using Facial Emotion Recognition to assess Trust and Perceived Safety
In this thesis, an experiment was designed and conducted using a driving simulator to allow participants to experience a ride in an automated vehicle. The aim was to elicit varying levels of comfort by altering the driving style and introducing the presence of a pedestrian, while simultaneously collecting a comprehensive dataset to analyse these comfort levels. This dataset includes continuous subjective comfort ratings given by the participant, vehicle dynamics from the real-world drive on which the simulation was based, webcam footage monitoring the person’s facial expression, Galvanic Skin Response, heart rate (variability), and eye-tracking from 32 participants. Such comprehensive datasets are rare in the literature and provide valuable opportunities for future research to compare different signals and explore their interrelations. From the subjective comfort ratings, it was found that the driving style was a bigger factor than the presence of a pedestrian. Even though the pedestrian did cause a decrease in comfort, the difference between the two driving styles was found to be significantly bigger. For facial expression recognition, a state-of-the-art model was successfully implemented. With minimal lighting conditions, the face could always be detected, and expressions were successfully classified with corresponding emotion labels from the universal set of emotions. Out of the 32 participants, 24 were included in the analyses. Most of these participants (15/24) did not show any detectable reaction in their facial expressions to the critical event. Amongst the 9 participants who did, 8 of them showed a Happy expression, and only 4 showed a Surprise expression. Fear was never dominant. This result shows that, in the current experiment, Facial Expression Recognition is not a reliable method for discomfort detection in Automated Vehicles. Additionally, a neural network was implemented to predict a person’s subjective comfort based on vehicle dynamics and their Galvanic Skin Response (GSR). The model was validated using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV), where one participant was excluded from the training set and their data was used for testing. The results were promising, as the self-reported comfort and the model-predicted comfort showed a positive correlation across all participants. These findings demonstrate the potential for objective comfort assessment in automated vehicles, reducing the biases inherent in subjective evaluations and paving the way for further research in this field. ...
In this thesis, an experiment was designed and conducted using a driving simulator to allow participants to experience a ride in an automated vehicle. The aim was to elicit varying levels of comfort by altering the driving style and introducing the presence of a pedestrian, while simultaneously collecting a comprehensive dataset to analyse these comfort levels. This dataset includes continuous subjective comfort ratings given by the participant, vehicle dynamics from the real-world drive on which the simulation was based, webcam footage monitoring the person’s facial expression, Galvanic Skin Response, heart rate (variability), and eye-tracking from 32 participants. Such comprehensive datasets are rare in the literature and provide valuable opportunities for future research to compare different signals and explore their interrelations. From the subjective comfort ratings, it was found that the driving style was a bigger factor than the presence of a pedestrian. Even though the pedestrian did cause a decrease in comfort, the difference between the two driving styles was found to be significantly bigger. For facial expression recognition, a state-of-the-art model was successfully implemented. With minimal lighting conditions, the face could always be detected, and expressions were successfully classified with corresponding emotion labels from the universal set of emotions. Out of the 32 participants, 24 were included in the analyses. Most of these participants (15/24) did not show any detectable reaction in their facial expressions to the critical event. Amongst the 9 participants who did, 8 of them showed a Happy expression, and only 4 showed a Surprise expression. Fear was never dominant. This result shows that, in the current experiment, Facial Expression Recognition is not a reliable method for discomfort detection in Automated Vehicles. Additionally, a neural network was implemented to predict a person’s subjective comfort based on vehicle dynamics and their Galvanic Skin Response (GSR). The model was validated using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV), where one participant was excluded from the training set and their data was used for testing. The results were promising, as the self-reported comfort and the model-predicted comfort showed a positive correlation across all participants. These findings demonstrate the potential for objective comfort assessment in automated vehicles, reducing the biases inherent in subjective evaluations and paving the way for further research in this field.
Driver's perceived risk in relation to automated vehicle behaviour
Evaluation and mitigation of perceived risk through simulator studies, computational models, and user interface design
The initial phase of this dissertation focused on how drivers' perceived risk and trust when using AVs evolve in close encounters with other road users. We developed regression-based perceived risk and trust models based on a simulator study with 25 participants involving merging and hard braking scenarios on motorways. The proposed models reveal that perceived risk is dynamically influenced by driving conditions and sensitive to individual factors such as driving experience and gender with experienced and male drivers generally perceiving lower risk. Notably, a decrease in trust after high-risk encounters was observed, indicating a close relationship between perceived risk and trust in AVs. Additionally, physiological responses were observed as potential indicators of perceived risk in critical driving scenarios.
To develop a tool for gaining insights on perceived risk, we put forward a novel computational model called potential collision avoidance difficulty (PCAD) model. Drawing inspiration from Fuller's Risk Allostasis Theory and the looming phenomenon, PCAD evaluates the difficulty of avoiding potential collisions by calculating minimal control effort through braking or/and steering needed to navigate safely. By integrating visual looming, factors in the uncertain behaviour of surrounding vehicles, control inaccuracies of the subject vehicle, and potential collision severity, PCAD provided an accurate population-level fitting of perceived risk in our own dataset on highway merging and a published dataset on obstacle avoidance. The findings highlight the need to account for both the longitudinal and lateral dimensions of driving condition, and uncertain behaviours of surrounding vehicles when interpreting perceived risk.
Further exploration of perceived risk was achieved through the creation of a large-scale dataset of perceived risk using an online survey. This new dataset provided time-continuous perceived risk in dynamic driving conditions. A total of 105 events was created including merging, hard braking and lane changes on motorways, while systematically varying multiple control parameters (such as relative speed and distance) to achieve different levels of event criticalities. Deep neural networks (DNNs) were then trained on this dataset to fit perceived risk, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to identify the key contributors to perceived risk in the continuous time domain. Aligned with the PCAD model developed previously, the results highlighted the importance of the relative motion information, particularly the distance to other road users and the uncertainty of surrounding vehicle behaviour in shaping perceived risk. This approach not only discerns the dynamics of perceived risk by systematically analysing interactions with other road users but also provides a guide for future modelling of perceived risk. The development of this extensive dataset fills the gap by providing the lacking continuous perceived risk data, thereby supporting further research on perceived risk.
The last contribution of this dissertation was on enhancing perceived safety and trust through optimised design of UIs. A simulator experiment demonstrated that multimodal UIs incorporating both visual and auditory modalities enhanced perceived safety and trust the most. Manoeuvre information delivered through the auditory modality was particularly effective in enhancing trust and acceptance. The findings indicate the benefits of the UIs in enhancing perceived safety and trust but also showed the limitations of using UIs alone during highly critical events. This part of the work suggests that the design of UIs for partially automated vehicles shall include automation information via visual and auditory modalities to enhance perceived safety and trust.
This dissertation makes several contributions to the field of perceived risk research in AVs. First, it provides foundational insights into perceived risk, demonstrating the significant influences of driving conditions, manoeuvre uncertainties and individual personal characteristics. The computational perceived risk models demonstrate strong predictive power in perceived risk and offer a deep understanding of how perceived risk is shaped in dynamic driving conditions. Additionally, the rich dataset obtained in this dissertation, which includes event-based discrete data and time-continuous data on perceived risk, serves as a new and open resource for future perceived risk research. Lastly, the practical evaluation of the design of UI provided actionable recommendations in enhancing trust and perceived safety, particularly through manoeuvre information delivered using auditory modality. These contributions advance the understanding, modelling, and practical application of perceived risk in automated driving environments, supporting the broader acceptance and integration of AVs.
The dissertation presents various opportunities for the advancement of AV technology and its integration with human factors. Building on the comprehensive datasets, computational models and insights gained in this dissertation, future studies should focus on further refining computational models to capture perceived risk in general scenarios. Expanding data collection efforts to include on-road tests, and more diverse participants will also enhance the generalisability of the findings. Additionally, the design of adaptive UIs that fit individual preferences remains a promising direction for future research. ...
The initial phase of this dissertation focused on how drivers' perceived risk and trust when using AVs evolve in close encounters with other road users. We developed regression-based perceived risk and trust models based on a simulator study with 25 participants involving merging and hard braking scenarios on motorways. The proposed models reveal that perceived risk is dynamically influenced by driving conditions and sensitive to individual factors such as driving experience and gender with experienced and male drivers generally perceiving lower risk. Notably, a decrease in trust after high-risk encounters was observed, indicating a close relationship between perceived risk and trust in AVs. Additionally, physiological responses were observed as potential indicators of perceived risk in critical driving scenarios.
To develop a tool for gaining insights on perceived risk, we put forward a novel computational model called potential collision avoidance difficulty (PCAD) model. Drawing inspiration from Fuller's Risk Allostasis Theory and the looming phenomenon, PCAD evaluates the difficulty of avoiding potential collisions by calculating minimal control effort through braking or/and steering needed to navigate safely. By integrating visual looming, factors in the uncertain behaviour of surrounding vehicles, control inaccuracies of the subject vehicle, and potential collision severity, PCAD provided an accurate population-level fitting of perceived risk in our own dataset on highway merging and a published dataset on obstacle avoidance. The findings highlight the need to account for both the longitudinal and lateral dimensions of driving condition, and uncertain behaviours of surrounding vehicles when interpreting perceived risk.
Further exploration of perceived risk was achieved through the creation of a large-scale dataset of perceived risk using an online survey. This new dataset provided time-continuous perceived risk in dynamic driving conditions. A total of 105 events was created including merging, hard braking and lane changes on motorways, while systematically varying multiple control parameters (such as relative speed and distance) to achieve different levels of event criticalities. Deep neural networks (DNNs) were then trained on this dataset to fit perceived risk, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to identify the key contributors to perceived risk in the continuous time domain. Aligned with the PCAD model developed previously, the results highlighted the importance of the relative motion information, particularly the distance to other road users and the uncertainty of surrounding vehicle behaviour in shaping perceived risk. This approach not only discerns the dynamics of perceived risk by systematically analysing interactions with other road users but also provides a guide for future modelling of perceived risk. The development of this extensive dataset fills the gap by providing the lacking continuous perceived risk data, thereby supporting further research on perceived risk.
The last contribution of this dissertation was on enhancing perceived safety and trust through optimised design of UIs. A simulator experiment demonstrated that multimodal UIs incorporating both visual and auditory modalities enhanced perceived safety and trust the most. Manoeuvre information delivered through the auditory modality was particularly effective in enhancing trust and acceptance. The findings indicate the benefits of the UIs in enhancing perceived safety and trust but also showed the limitations of using UIs alone during highly critical events. This part of the work suggests that the design of UIs for partially automated vehicles shall include automation information via visual and auditory modalities to enhance perceived safety and trust.
This dissertation makes several contributions to the field of perceived risk research in AVs. First, it provides foundational insights into perceived risk, demonstrating the significant influences of driving conditions, manoeuvre uncertainties and individual personal characteristics. The computational perceived risk models demonstrate strong predictive power in perceived risk and offer a deep understanding of how perceived risk is shaped in dynamic driving conditions. Additionally, the rich dataset obtained in this dissertation, which includes event-based discrete data and time-continuous data on perceived risk, serves as a new and open resource for future perceived risk research. Lastly, the practical evaluation of the design of UI provided actionable recommendations in enhancing trust and perceived safety, particularly through manoeuvre information delivered using auditory modality. These contributions advance the understanding, modelling, and practical application of perceived risk in automated driving environments, supporting the broader acceptance and integration of AVs.
The dissertation presents various opportunities for the advancement of AV technology and its integration with human factors. Building on the comprehensive datasets, computational models and insights gained in this dissertation, future studies should focus on further refining computational models to capture perceived risk in general scenarios. Expanding data collection efforts to include on-road tests, and more diverse participants will also enhance the generalisability of the findings. Additionally, the design of adaptive UIs that fit individual preferences remains a promising direction for future research.
This study aims to investigate the effect of prosthesis design on the gait pattern through musculoskeletal modelling and predictive simulations. Two prosthesis designs are modelled for these purposes, after which several variations on these models are made. It is hypothesised that the prosthesis that assists in push-off through ankle plantarflexion, should result in a gait pattern that is closer to a healthy one. It should also decrease the CoT. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate the use of modelling and simulations in the customisation of prostheses.
OpenSim was used to create a total of eight models based on a model with 9 degrees of freedom and 18 muscles: a healthy person, a conventional prosthesis model, two scaled versions of the conventional prosthesis model, the walkMECH prosthesis and three variations on the walkMECH. SCONE was used to find an optimal gait pattern for each of the models through the CMA-ES method. CoT-, gait-, degrees of freedom- and reaction force objectives were minimised. The results were evaluated by comparing the CoT, joint angles, ground reaction forces and muscle activation of each model.
The CoT for the healthy model was found to be higher than reported before, based on both experimental and simulation studies. As a result, we have little confidence in the CoT estimation of our models. This is further exacerbated by the finding of a lower CoT for the conventional prosthesis than for the healthy model, in contrast to earlier reports. The results for most other measures were irregular, making it difficult to draw conclusions from them. It is expected that the predictive optimisations did not reach a global minimum, and that the results are therefore not accurate. Future research should aim to solve this problem. It should also be attempted to find the cause of the difference in CoT between our simulations and those of others.
No conclusions could be drawn from the results. Nonetheless, there is a clear potential for the use of musculoskeletal modelling and predictive simulation in the investigation of the effects of prosthesis design on gait. ...
This study aims to investigate the effect of prosthesis design on the gait pattern through musculoskeletal modelling and predictive simulations. Two prosthesis designs are modelled for these purposes, after which several variations on these models are made. It is hypothesised that the prosthesis that assists in push-off through ankle plantarflexion, should result in a gait pattern that is closer to a healthy one. It should also decrease the CoT. Furthermore, we aim to evaluate the use of modelling and simulations in the customisation of prostheses.
OpenSim was used to create a total of eight models based on a model with 9 degrees of freedom and 18 muscles: a healthy person, a conventional prosthesis model, two scaled versions of the conventional prosthesis model, the walkMECH prosthesis and three variations on the walkMECH. SCONE was used to find an optimal gait pattern for each of the models through the CMA-ES method. CoT-, gait-, degrees of freedom- and reaction force objectives were minimised. The results were evaluated by comparing the CoT, joint angles, ground reaction forces and muscle activation of each model.
The CoT for the healthy model was found to be higher than reported before, based on both experimental and simulation studies. As a result, we have little confidence in the CoT estimation of our models. This is further exacerbated by the finding of a lower CoT for the conventional prosthesis than for the healthy model, in contrast to earlier reports. The results for most other measures were irregular, making it difficult to draw conclusions from them. It is expected that the predictive optimisations did not reach a global minimum, and that the results are therefore not accurate. Future research should aim to solve this problem. It should also be attempted to find the cause of the difference in CoT between our simulations and those of others.
No conclusions could be drawn from the results. Nonetheless, there is a clear potential for the use of musculoskeletal modelling and predictive simulation in the investigation of the effects of prosthesis design on gait.
This study investigated the amplitude dynamics of motion sickness. This was done by perturbing 17 participants along the fore-aft direction with acceleration amplitudes of 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 ms^-2 in four separate sessions. In the experiment, both subjective sickness scores and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) was recorded. Using the subjective sickness scores, we explored variations of the Oman model of nausea that could capture the time-amplitude dynamics that were observed. Along with this, a neural network prediction model was proposed to predict motion sickness levels using GSR as a predictor, which could then be used as an objective measurement of motion sickness. Lastly, to better understand the MISC as a measure of motion sickness, we determined the functional mapping between subjective discomfort and the MISC scale.
Our findings show a monotonous increase in the rate of motion sickness development, but this increase is not linear, with a sudden change in slope after 1.5 ms^-2. This nonlinear increase was captured best by applying a power law to the input conflict vector instead of at the output as proposed in the original Oman model (Oman, 1990) Further, it is found that GSR can indeed be used as a predictor for motion sickness with an accuracy of 77% in the training, 66% in the validation and 62% in the holdout set. Finally, it is found that the subject discomfort has a power-law relation with MISC with a mean exponent of 1.28.
The developed prediction model as well as the variation of the Oman model can be used in other experiments to control the level of sickness to the desired trajectory. The developed models can enable adaptive control algorithms for path and motion planning to mitigate motion sickness. This is will in turn lead to a significant improvement in the experience in commuting with an automated vehicle. ...
This study investigated the amplitude dynamics of motion sickness. This was done by perturbing 17 participants along the fore-aft direction with acceleration amplitudes of 1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 ms^-2 in four separate sessions. In the experiment, both subjective sickness scores and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) was recorded. Using the subjective sickness scores, we explored variations of the Oman model of nausea that could capture the time-amplitude dynamics that were observed. Along with this, a neural network prediction model was proposed to predict motion sickness levels using GSR as a predictor, which could then be used as an objective measurement of motion sickness. Lastly, to better understand the MISC as a measure of motion sickness, we determined the functional mapping between subjective discomfort and the MISC scale.
Our findings show a monotonous increase in the rate of motion sickness development, but this increase is not linear, with a sudden change in slope after 1.5 ms^-2. This nonlinear increase was captured best by applying a power law to the input conflict vector instead of at the output as proposed in the original Oman model (Oman, 1990) Further, it is found that GSR can indeed be used as a predictor for motion sickness with an accuracy of 77% in the training, 66% in the validation and 62% in the holdout set. Finally, it is found that the subject discomfort has a power-law relation with MISC with a mean exponent of 1.28.
The developed prediction model as well as the variation of the Oman model can be used in other experiments to control the level of sickness to the desired trajectory. The developed models can enable adaptive control algorithms for path and motion planning to mitigate motion sickness. This is will in turn lead to a significant improvement in the experience in commuting with an automated vehicle.
our motion variable. We exposed participants to 4 conditions, employing a within-subject experiment design, manipulating our independent variables motion and motivation. We collected motion sickness data via the motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire, misery scale and motion
sickness assessment questionnaire; motivation data via the situational motivation scale; workload data via the NASA TLX workload scale and task performance data via the total score obtained, the total time spent on the task and the average time spent per question. We found that our motion profile caused motion sickness in participants, with some evidence for habituation. We also found some evidence for training effects present in our data. Performance decrements, associated workload and motivation scores across the 4 conditions were statistically similar and we could not conclusively prove our hypotheses. Further analysis showed that amotivation scores almost showed significant effect on task performance which does match anecdotal evidence. MSAQ scores also negatively affected how much time people could spend on a cognitive task. We found that workload scores of participants increased significantly with increase in motion sickness which could give
us an insight on performing cognitive tasks under sickness. Overall, our experiment design could not show the trends that we had hypothesized, and we obtained partial results via our secondary analysis. Our findings indicate that further attention is to be given to the motivation variable to make it more robust. Further, a much large sample size is needed to better test our hypotheses, with perhaps, a mixed subject design for our study. Our study also showed an unexpected interaction of lateral and londitudinal motion profiles, causing significantly higher levels of sickness than what was predicted using existing models, which warrants further research into the same. ...
our motion variable. We exposed participants to 4 conditions, employing a within-subject experiment design, manipulating our independent variables motion and motivation. We collected motion sickness data via the motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire, misery scale and motion
sickness assessment questionnaire; motivation data via the situational motivation scale; workload data via the NASA TLX workload scale and task performance data via the total score obtained, the total time spent on the task and the average time spent per question. We found that our motion profile caused motion sickness in participants, with some evidence for habituation. We also found some evidence for training effects present in our data. Performance decrements, associated workload and motivation scores across the 4 conditions were statistically similar and we could not conclusively prove our hypotheses. Further analysis showed that amotivation scores almost showed significant effect on task performance which does match anecdotal evidence. MSAQ scores also negatively affected how much time people could spend on a cognitive task. We found that workload scores of participants increased significantly with increase in motion sickness which could give
us an insight on performing cognitive tasks under sickness. Overall, our experiment design could not show the trends that we had hypothesized, and we obtained partial results via our secondary analysis. Our findings indicate that further attention is to be given to the motivation variable to make it more robust. Further, a much large sample size is needed to better test our hypotheses, with perhaps, a mixed subject design for our study. Our study also showed an unexpected interaction of lateral and londitudinal motion profiles, causing significantly higher levels of sickness than what was predicted using existing models, which warrants further research into the same.