The security of Automated Vehicles (AVs) is an important emerging area of research in traffic safety. Methods have been published and evaluated in experimental vehicles to secure safe AV control in the presence of attacks, but human motion comfort is rarely investigated in such studies. In this paper, we present an innovative optimal-coupling-observer-based framework that rejects the impact of bounded sensor attacks in a network of connected and automated vehicles from safety and comfort point of view. We demonstrate its performance in car following with cooperative adaptive cruise control for platoons with redundant distance and velocity sensors. The error dynamics are formulated as a Linear Time Variant (LTV) system, resulting in complex stability conditions that are investigated using a Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) approach guaranteeing global asymptotic stability. We prove the capability of the framework to secure occupants’ safety and comfort in the presence of bounded attacks. In the onset of attack, the framework rapidly detects attacked sensors and switches to the most reliable observer eliminating attacked sensors, even with modest attack magnitudes. Without our proposed method, severe (but bounded) attacks result in collisions and major discomfort. With our method, attacks had negligible effects on motion comfort evaluated using ISO-2631 Ride Comfort and Motion Sickness indexes. The results pave the path to bring comfort to the forefront of AVs security.

Accurately measuring comfort and perceived safety in automated vehicles (AVs) is critical for understanding user experience, accommodating various needs, and eventually contributing to the public acceptance of AVs. However, methodological practices vary largely across the field. To address this gap, we organised a workshop at AutomotiveUI 2025, where three expert talks covered subjective measurements, objective and physiological measures, and AI-driven models, followed by two structured group discussion sessions on current practices and future methodologies. This work-in-progress synthesises key insights from both the expert talks and community discussions. Critical themes include, for example, the need for context-specific, deliberate selection of subjective measures; the promise and practical limitations of physiological signals; the ground truth challenge that complicates subjective-objective combination; and the emerging role of artificial intelligence (AI) for real-time inference and multimodal combination. We offer these insights to provide the community with a common methodological landscape and to promote more robust practices.

Prolonged exposure to whole-body vibration (WBV) is a key contributor to motion discomfort in vehicles, including motion sickness and ride comfort. This issue becomes more compelling in automated vehicles, where occupants are expected to frequently engage in non-driving-related activities and will expect high comfort levels. Hence, enhancing seat design to mitigate WBV is essential for improving ride comfort across vehicle types. Therefore, this study, which primarily addresses vertical accelerations, optimized an existing seat suspension (K-Seat) and subjectively assessed discomfort using 24 participants (13 males and 11 females) exposed to a 29-minute driving session. The experiment was conducted with a conventional Toyota Yaris seat in a driving simulator, where a K-Seat model was used to emulate the effect of the seat suspension. Thus we evaluated the K-Seat, which has shown great promise for attenuating low-frequency vibrations; however, it had never been tested on human participants. The results show an overall reduction of 50% in reported motion sickness using the motion illness symptoms classification scale (MISC). Subjective discomfort was also alleviated for head and upper back. In addition, perceived discomfort was analyzed based on gender, illustrating a greater effectiveness of the K-Seat in enhancing lower neck comfort for females than for males.

Biomechanical human body models are now essential in the field of vehicle crash safety, where both crash dummy models and real human body models are widely validated and embedded in commercial simulation tools. Such models are available in a wide range of body sizes to assess injuries to car occupants and vulnerable road users. Postural stabilization is mimicked using spring-damper models and basic controllers. However, to study dynamic seat comfort, including vibration transmission and motion sickness, more advanced models are needed capturing postural stabilization through coordinated muscular control integrating visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive motion cues. This paper addresses the latest development in such human models for comfort prediction. It highlights the latest validation results in vibration and motion sickness in automated driving.

This paper presents an analysis of lane changing manoeuvres under real traffic conditions, focusing on how drivers adapt their behaviour across different driving regimes. Using naturalistic driving data collected on a high-capacity road in Madrid (Spain), the research explores the role of traffic context in decision-making focusing on gap acceptance, vehicle dynamics, safety metrics and motivational factors.To analyse these dynamics, drivers were exposed to six controlled traffic configurations designed to reproduce representative real-world highway scenarios with different surrounding vehicle distributions, inter-vehicle distances, and relative speeds. Driver behaviour was analysed across three distinct manoeuvre phases, corresponding to car-following, anticipation, and lane change execution.The results show that traffic density and the surrounding environment significantly shape driver strategies. Higher traffic complexity leads to longer anticipation phases, greater dispersion in timing, and reduced safety margins. While Time-to-Collision (TTC) offers general insights into risk, gap-based metrics proved more stable and informative for predicting the actual execution of the manoeuvre.This study contributes to the understanding of context-dependent lane-change behaviour using controlled naturalistic driving scenarios. The findings support the development of predictive models and the design of advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) and automated vehicles, enabling safer and more adaptive lane-change algorithms that better account for driver intent and traffic dynamics.

In automated vehicles, beeps are widely used as alarms and feedback. However, as automation advances, there is a need to explore subtler, contextually sound-based notifications for non-urgent situations. While auditory interfaces for take-over requests have been studied, limited attention has been given to using soundscapes for such alerts. This paper designed and evaluated soundscapes using existing driving-related sounds–amplified road noise and/or dimmed background music–for scheduled take-over situations. A driving simulator study showed that these soundscapes enhanced reaction time, situation awareness, and acceptance without causing annoyance. Particularly, the combined condition (music dimming and road noise amplifying) supported higher driver awareness and responsiveness. These findings suggest that soundscapes can offer safer, more intuitive take-over alerts by embedding information into familiar audio cues. This study contributes to developing soundscapes as novel alert mechanisms that integrate seamlessly with the driving environment to enhance both safety and user experience in automated vehicles.

As vehicles transition between driving automation levels, drivers need to be continually aware of the automation mode and the resulting driver responsibilities. This study investigates the impact of visual user interfaces (UIs) on drivers’ mode awareness in SAE Level 2 automated vehicles. It focuses on their understanding of speed and distance control, steering control, and the hands-on steering wheel requirement presented through UIs. Forty-five UIs were generated, presenting the activation of Lane Keeping Assist (LKA) and Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) and the hands-on steering wheel requirement. Through an online questionnaire with 1080 respondents with experience of SAE Level 2, the study evaluated how these visual UIs influenced users’ understanding of control responsibilities, information usability, and trust in automated vehicles. The results show a limited role of UI in shaping users’ understanding of control. ACC UIs and LKA UIs had no significant effects, and apparently, the understanding of speed and distance control and steering control was independent of the ACC UI and LKA UI. A large variance in responses regarding the understanding of steering control and speed and distance control indicates confusion caused by mode ambiguity, suggesting that drivers do not well understand how the speed and distance control and steering control task is shared between the driver and the automation. However, the hands-on steering wheel UIs significantly improved the understanding of the hands-on steering wheel requirement. The hands-on steering wheel UI combining the hands on the wheel icon and the text “Keep hands on steering wheel” yielded 94.4% correct understanding and outperformed the UI with hands but without text (87.8% correct) or no UI (82.5% correct). In addition, the variation of visual UI did not affect trust. This study contributes to the understanding and design of visual UIs for effective communication of driver responsibilities in automated vehicles.

Transportation and mobility are experiencing a significant transformation the recent years, which is evident in road (vehicles and bicycles) and rail vehicles. This transformation includes the introduction of automated vehicles (AVs), the increase of active transportation modes (e.g. cycling and walking) and the extended use of trains for commuting to work or travelling. However, despite this great transition, there are significant challenges that can hamper the wide use of these transport means, with comfort being one of them. In this paper, we explore physical comfort in these transport modes, examining ride comfort and motion sickness definitions and assessment, environmental influences, occupant postures, human body dynamics, and postural control strategies for adapting to motion. We conclude that while established comfort guidelines exist for conventional vehicles, substantial gaps persist in understanding and evaluating comfort in emerging modes like bicycles and automated vehicles with varied seating. Further research into modelling human body dynamics and the central nervous system's role in postural control, especially for cyclists and non-conventional postures, is essential for designing future transportation systems that prioritise comfort and health.

We present a vehicle system capable of navigating safely and efficiently around Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs), such as pedestrians and cyclists. The system comprises key modules for environment perception, localization and mapping, motion planning, and control, integrated into a prototype vehicle. A key innovation is a motion planner based on Topology-driven Model Predictive Control (T-MPC). The guidance layer generates multiple trajectories in parallel, each representing a distinct strategy for obstacle avoidance or non-passing. The underlying trajectory optimization constrains the joint probability of collision with VRUs under generic uncertainties. To address extraordinary situations ('edge cases') that go beyond the autonomous capabilities - such as construction zones or encounters with emergency responders - the system includes an option for remote human operation, supported by visual and haptic guidance. In simulation, our motion planner outperforms three baseline approaches in terms of safety and efficiency. We also demonstrate the full system in prototype vehicle tests on a closed track, both in autonomous and remotely operated modes.

This paper presents a novel approach integrating motion replanning, path tracking and vehicle stability for collision avoidance using nonlinear Model Predictive Contouring Control. Employing torque vectoring capabilities, the proposed controller is able to stabilise the vehicle in evasive manoeuvres at the limit of handling. A nonlinear double-track vehicle model, together with an extended Fiala tyre model, is used to capture the nonlinear coupled longitudinal and lateral dynamics. The optimised control inputs are the steering angle and the four longitudinal wheel forces to minimise the tracking error in safe situations and maximise the vehicle-to-obstacle distance in emergency manoeuvres. These optimised longitudinal forces generate an additional direct yaw moment, enhancing the vehicle’s lateral agility and aiding in obstacle avoidance and stability maintenance. The longitudinal tyre forces are constrained using the tyre friction cycle. The proposed controller has been tested on rapid prototyping hardware to prove real-time capability. In a high-fidelity simulation environment validated with experimental data, our proposed approach successfully avoids obstacles and maintains vehicle stability. It outperforms two baseline controllers: one without torque vectoring and another one without collision avoidance prioritisation. Furthermore, we demonstrate the robustness of the proposed approach to vehicle parameter variations, road friction, perception, and localisation errors. The influence of each variation is statistically assessed to evaluate its impact on the performance, providing guidelines for future controller design.

A plausible explanation about the acquisition and realization of beliefs by the central nervous system (CNS) when issuing control actions to counteract external perturbations, is to employ mechanisms aiming to minimize sensory conflict and muscle effort while maintaining biomechanical stability. However, existing head–neck postural control models fail to explicitly integrate this plausible CNS objective within their stabilization mechanisms. This study proposes a novel Model Predictive Control (MPC)-based framework to replicate CNS postural stabilization by incorporating the minimization of sensory conflict as a primary control objective through the MPC cost function. The MPC is integrated in a simplified biomechanical head–neck structure, using a prediction model and sensory feedback to optimize control actions over a finite time horizon within biomechanical constraints. Two human experiments measuring head motion with unpredictable seat and trunk perturbations were used to evaluate and validate different configurations of sensory feedback pathways. During anterior–posterior translational trunk perturbations, the results illustrated that the configuration with vestibular feedback improved head position prediction while muscle effort and partial somatosensory feedback alone, achieved superior results in head pitch prediction. Meanwhile, muscle effort and partial somatosensory feedback were sufficient to stabilize the head during trunk rotational (pitch) perturbations. Finally, a multi-scenario optimization demonstrated that a single set of MPC weights could generalize stabilization across both perturbation types. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of MPC in replicating CNS-inspired postural adjustments, indicating that controlling a simplified biomechanical head–neck model provides a computationally efficient and accurate alternative to complex multi-segment approaches.

The ability to engage in other activities during the ride is considered by consumers as one of the key reasons for the adoption of automated vehicles. However, engagement in non-driving activities will provoke occupants’ motion sickness, deteriorating their overall comfort and thereby risking acceptance of automated driving. Therefore, it is critical to extend our understanding of motion sickness and unravel the modulating factors that affect it through experiments with participants. Currently, most experiments are conducted on public roads (realistic but not reproducible) or test tracks (feasible with prototype automated vehicles). This research study develops a method to design an optimal path and speed reference to accurately replicate on-road motion sickness exposure on a small test track. The method uses model predictive control to replicate the longitudinal and lateral accelerations collected from on-road drives on a test track of 70 m by 175 m. A within-subject experiment (47 participants) was conducted comparing the occupants’ motion sickness occurrence in test-track and on-road conditions, with the conditions being cross-randomized. The results illustrate that the subjective (reported) motion sickness is well reproduced with an insignificant reduction on the track. Meanwhile, there is an overall correspondence of individual sickness levels between on-road and test-track. This paves the path for the employment of our method for a simpler, safer and more replicable assessment of motion sickness.

As automated vehicles require human drivers to resume control in critical situations, predicting driver takeover behaviour could be beneficial for safe transitions of control. While previous research has explored predicting takeover behaviour in relation to driver state and traits, little work has examined the predictive value of manual driving style. We hypothesised that drivers’ behaviour during manual driving is predictive of their takeover behaviour when resuming control from an automated vehicle. We assessed 38 drivers with varying experience in a high-fidelity driving simulator. After completing manual driving sessions to assess their driving style, participants performed an automated driving task, typically on a subsequent date. Measures of driving style from manual driving sessions, including headway and lane change speed, were found to be predictive of takeover behaviour. The level of driving experience was associated with the behavioural measures, but correlations between measures of manual driving style and takeover behaviour remained after controlling for driver experience. Our findings demonstrate that how drivers reclaim control from their automated vehicle is not an isolated phenomenon but is associated with manual driving behaviour and driving experience. Strategies to improve takeover safety and comfort could be based on driving style measures, for example by the automated vehicle adapting its behaviour to match a driver's driving style.

Trust and perceived safety are pivotal in the acceptance of automated vehicles and can be enhanced by providing users with automation information on the (safe) operation of the vehicle. This study aims to identify how user interfaces (UI) can enhance drivers' trust and acceptance and reduce perceived risk in partially automated vehicles. Four interfaces were designed with different levels of complexity. These levels were achieved by combining automation information (surrounding information vs surrounding and manoeuvre information) and modality (visual vs visual and auditory). These interfaces were evaluated in a driving simulator in which a partially automated vehicle reacted to an event of a merging and braking vehicle in its front. The criticality of the events was manipulated by the factors merging gap (in meters) and deceleration (m/s²) of the vehicle in front. The reaction of the automation was either to brake or to change lanes. The results show that an optimal combination of automation information and modality enhances drivers' trust and acceptance. More specifically, the most advanced UI, which provided surrounding and manoeuvre information via the visual and auditory modalities, was associated with the highest trust and acceptance ranking and the lowest perceived risk. Manoeuvre information delivered through the auditory modality was particularly effective in enhancing trust and acceptance. The benefits of the UIs were consistent over events. However, in the most critical events, drivers did not feel entirely safe and did not trust the automation completely. This study suggests that the design of UIs for partially automated vehicles shall include automation information via visual and auditory modalities.