M. Overend
Please Note
77 records found
1
Corrigendum to ‘Resilience readiness levels for buildings
Establishing multi-hazard resilience metrics and rating systems’(International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, (2025), 128, C, (105746), (S2212420925005709), 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105746)
Optical distortions in architectural glass
Review of categorization, evaluation and measurement methods
There is an increasing demand for cast glass for load-bearing applications in the built environment. This material often contains bulk flaws; more so when for example waste cullet is used. A substantial obstacle to a wider application of such glass components is the lack of reliable methods for evaluating the effect of these bulk flaws on the mechanical performance of the material. Current standardized strength testing methods for glass focus on surface and edge characterization of thin, homogeneous elements.
Objective
This paper identifies existing destructive methods with potential for measuring the tensile strength of glass and other brittle materials; and assesses to what level they give information about the bulk strength in the presence of bulk flaws.
Methods
A literature review is conducted on existing destructive testing methods in use for brittle solids from various research domains and end applications. Existing methods are summarized, and their applicability for volumetric glass is critically assessed and discussed.
Results
The selected methods are classified, based on stress state, stress distribution and stressed volume, accuracy, consistency and verifiability, complexity and precision required for the test specimens, and the availability of the required test equipment. Subsequently, the various advantages and limitations of the tests are summarized.
Conclusion
Several recommendations are made. The direct uniaxial tensile test is recommended for testing bulk flaws under a uniaxial tensile stress state, while the ultrasonic tensile test is discussed as a promising alternative. For biaxial testing the sphere compression test is proposed. Further physical experiments are recommended to assess their reliability and practicality. ...
There is an increasing demand for cast glass for load-bearing applications in the built environment. This material often contains bulk flaws; more so when for example waste cullet is used. A substantial obstacle to a wider application of such glass components is the lack of reliable methods for evaluating the effect of these bulk flaws on the mechanical performance of the material. Current standardized strength testing methods for glass focus on surface and edge characterization of thin, homogeneous elements.
Objective
This paper identifies existing destructive methods with potential for measuring the tensile strength of glass and other brittle materials; and assesses to what level they give information about the bulk strength in the presence of bulk flaws.
Methods
A literature review is conducted on existing destructive testing methods in use for brittle solids from various research domains and end applications. Existing methods are summarized, and their applicability for volumetric glass is critically assessed and discussed.
Results
The selected methods are classified, based on stress state, stress distribution and stressed volume, accuracy, consistency and verifiability, complexity and precision required for the test specimens, and the availability of the required test equipment. Subsequently, the various advantages and limitations of the tests are summarized.
Conclusion
Several recommendations are made. The direct uniaxial tensile test is recommended for testing bulk flaws under a uniaxial tensile stress state, while the ultrasonic tensile test is discussed as a promising alternative. For biaxial testing the sphere compression test is proposed. Further physical experiments are recommended to assess their reliability and practicality.
...
Integrating heat and seismic risk
A multi-objective decision-making approach for facade retrofit design
Predicting building operational energy under material degradation and climate uncertainty
A sensitivity analysis
Resilience Readiness Levels for buildings
Establishing multi-hazard resilience metrics and rating systems
Reclamation potential in the built environment
A digitised assessment of two contemporary façade systems
Towards Environmentally Sustainable Bio-Based Load-Bearing Components in Buildings
The Feasibility, Early-Stage Development and Testing of Five Possible Building Components to Meet Specific Performance Requirements
Bulk fillers from food waste for polymeric bio-composites
The influence of filler type, particle size and volume ratio on furan-matrix composites
Thermal Resilience to Extreme Heat
Preliminary Study on Thermal Fragility Curves
Composite glass sandwich panels, consisting of glass face sheets bonded to linear stiffeners (spines) in the core region, can provide significant benefits in material efficiency, reduced thickness, and greater overall transparency. However, current analytical models of their mechanical performance fail to account for the non-uniform longitudinal stress distribution caused by shear-lag effects in wide structural panels. This study redresses this by means of experimental research on composite glazing panels with different loading and geometrical configurations. Six 4-point bending experiments were performed on 34 mm thick, 1000 mm long, and 700 mm wide composite glazing panels, made from soda-lime silica glass face sheets bonded to glass fibre-reinforced polymer core spines. Two types of adhesives were tested: a relatively low stiffness silicone-based adhesive, and a relatively high stiffness epoxy-based adhesive. The shear-lag effects are quantified in terms of effective width ratios (EWR). The study showed that the epoxy-bonded panels provided a significant degree of composite action (DCA = 0.85) whereas the composite action in the silicone-bonded panels was negligible. Furthermore, it was found that applying the EWR values from this study in a recently published analytical model yields predictions of maximum strains at mid-span that deviate by no more than 16 % from the experimental results.
Triggering bulk flaws in glass
Uniaxial tensile testing of glass using theta-specimens