S.G.J. Heijman
Please Note
26 records found
1
During the column experiments the NOM loading was higher for the microporous carbon in contrast with the isotherm experiments, despite equal performance of the SSF in both columns. The adsorption of pesticides (EBCT 11.2 min) showed similar correlations as during the isotherm experiments, with 20 - 35 % higher breakthrough observed for GAC-N. Compensated for carbon density, the overall loading (μg/gGAC) was on average 45 % higher for GAC-N ( 𝜌=250𝑘𝑔/𝑚3 ) than GAC-E( 𝜌=500𝑘𝑔/𝑚3), contradicting the isotherm experiments. Due to problems with gas accumulation between the GAC in combination with wall effects the empty bed contact time (EBCT) was negatively impacted, resulting in a mass transfer zone (MTZ) that was too short for the compounds to reach equilibrium over the columns. If GAC-N has higher adsorption kinetics than GAC- E it could explain the overall higher pesticide loading. The reduction in EBCT resulted in immediate breakthrough from week 1 onwards, with breakthrough curves showing linear patterns. As a result, it was not possible to accurately predict the sorption capacity of the columns or translate lab-scale performance to pilot data. Modelling with fixed bed adsorption software using homogenous surface mass diffusion (HSMD) and linear driving force (LDF) models was attempted but did not yield usable data for all pesticides.
The IOCS isotherms (C0 = 50 mg PO43-/L) showed Freundlich type adsorption of phosphate (𝑘𝑓 = 5.39 & 𝑛=2.04), with additional high removal of calcium (37%), magnesium (27%) and potassium (10%), though these did not show Freundlich or Langmuir type adsorption. Phosphate removal was successfully modelled with HSDM models which predicted breakthrough at 700 - 2000 bed volumes (BV) depending on the diffusion coefficients. The column experiments showed significantly faster initial breakthrough at 400 BV despite maintaining 55 min EBCT. The column maintained a significantly higher sorption capacity after initial breakthrough for longer than predicted, losing only 50% capacity over the course 2500 BV. During the column studies high removal of calcium was observed and it was theorized that phosphate formed calcium precipitation complexes at pH of 8. The removal of magnesium and potassium was absent during column studies. At the conclusion of the experiments, the IOCS had sorbed 12.8 mg PO43 /gIOCS after 2573 BV with roughly 50% residual sorption capacity remaining.
As a result of pre-loading during production, the IOCS leached NOM during the isotherm experiments. Subsequent column experiments did not show NOM (UV254) desorption but rather showed NOM removal at higher rates than the SSF (10% vs 5%) which resulted in additional higher removal of NOM in the following GAC-E layer vs a column without the IOCS layer, exhibiting synergies between the layers.
The IOCS layer was successful in the removal of Imidacloprid from the influent, which started after 1100 BV or 6 weeks and is suspected to occur through biodegradation, peaking at 70 % removal at conclusion of the experiments. The SSF layer following the IOCS was presumably inoculated with the biomass and additionally removed 70 % of the Imidacloprid from the IOCS effluent. The combined IOCS-SSF removed 90 % of the Imidacloprid influent (μg/L), which has not been seen in these filters at such short EBCT to date for any compound. The SSF-GAC columns that did not contain IOCS did not show Imidacloprid removal, indicating that the biomass can only form on selective substrate. It is unclear at this point whether removal is contained to Imidacloprid or if additional compounds are susceptible for removal in IOCS layers. The combined influence of lower NOM and lower total pesticide loading on the GAC-E layer resulted in a 8 – 10 % increase in total pesticide adsorption vs the column that did not contain an IOCS layer, with 5 – 10 % lower breakthrough for all compounds. Chloridazon and Tebuconazole where likewise removed after 1100 BV or 6 weeks through suspected biodegradation in both the IOCS and SSF layers, peaking at 25 % and 40 % removal respectively. Though the biodegradation of these compounds has been proven in literature, it has not been observed in column studies at such high concentrations & removal rates at these low EBCT. It is hypothesized that the abundance of nutrients allowed for rapid bio growth and subsequent pesticide degradation.
The results of this study indicate that the augmentation of SSF-GAC sandwich filters with IOCS columns aid in the removal of phosphate, NOM and Imidacloprid, thereby extending the filters bed life and improving overall performance. While the removal of other pesticides remains to be investigated, the findings of this thesis underpin the use case of IOCS as a top up layer for SSF-GAC sandwich filters used to treat agricultural waters. ...
During the column experiments the NOM loading was higher for the microporous carbon in contrast with the isotherm experiments, despite equal performance of the SSF in both columns. The adsorption of pesticides (EBCT 11.2 min) showed similar correlations as during the isotherm experiments, with 20 - 35 % higher breakthrough observed for GAC-N. Compensated for carbon density, the overall loading (μg/gGAC) was on average 45 % higher for GAC-N ( 𝜌=250𝑘𝑔/𝑚3 ) than GAC-E( 𝜌=500𝑘𝑔/𝑚3), contradicting the isotherm experiments. Due to problems with gas accumulation between the GAC in combination with wall effects the empty bed contact time (EBCT) was negatively impacted, resulting in a mass transfer zone (MTZ) that was too short for the compounds to reach equilibrium over the columns. If GAC-N has higher adsorption kinetics than GAC- E it could explain the overall higher pesticide loading. The reduction in EBCT resulted in immediate breakthrough from week 1 onwards, with breakthrough curves showing linear patterns. As a result, it was not possible to accurately predict the sorption capacity of the columns or translate lab-scale performance to pilot data. Modelling with fixed bed adsorption software using homogenous surface mass diffusion (HSMD) and linear driving force (LDF) models was attempted but did not yield usable data for all pesticides.
The IOCS isotherms (C0 = 50 mg PO43-/L) showed Freundlich type adsorption of phosphate (𝑘𝑓 = 5.39 & 𝑛=2.04), with additional high removal of calcium (37%), magnesium (27%) and potassium (10%), though these did not show Freundlich or Langmuir type adsorption. Phosphate removal was successfully modelled with HSDM models which predicted breakthrough at 700 - 2000 bed volumes (BV) depending on the diffusion coefficients. The column experiments showed significantly faster initial breakthrough at 400 BV despite maintaining 55 min EBCT. The column maintained a significantly higher sorption capacity after initial breakthrough for longer than predicted, losing only 50% capacity over the course 2500 BV. During the column studies high removal of calcium was observed and it was theorized that phosphate formed calcium precipitation complexes at pH of 8. The removal of magnesium and potassium was absent during column studies. At the conclusion of the experiments, the IOCS had sorbed 12.8 mg PO43 /gIOCS after 2573 BV with roughly 50% residual sorption capacity remaining.
As a result of pre-loading during production, the IOCS leached NOM during the isotherm experiments. Subsequent column experiments did not show NOM (UV254) desorption but rather showed NOM removal at higher rates than the SSF (10% vs 5%) which resulted in additional higher removal of NOM in the following GAC-E layer vs a column without the IOCS layer, exhibiting synergies between the layers.
The IOCS layer was successful in the removal of Imidacloprid from the influent, which started after 1100 BV or 6 weeks and is suspected to occur through biodegradation, peaking at 70 % removal at conclusion of the experiments. The SSF layer following the IOCS was presumably inoculated with the biomass and additionally removed 70 % of the Imidacloprid from the IOCS effluent. The combined IOCS-SSF removed 90 % of the Imidacloprid influent (μg/L), which has not been seen in these filters at such short EBCT to date for any compound. The SSF-GAC columns that did not contain IOCS did not show Imidacloprid removal, indicating that the biomass can only form on selective substrate. It is unclear at this point whether removal is contained to Imidacloprid or if additional compounds are susceptible for removal in IOCS layers. The combined influence of lower NOM and lower total pesticide loading on the GAC-E layer resulted in a 8 – 10 % increase in total pesticide adsorption vs the column that did not contain an IOCS layer, with 5 – 10 % lower breakthrough for all compounds. Chloridazon and Tebuconazole where likewise removed after 1100 BV or 6 weeks through suspected biodegradation in both the IOCS and SSF layers, peaking at 25 % and 40 % removal respectively. Though the biodegradation of these compounds has been proven in literature, it has not been observed in column studies at such high concentrations & removal rates at these low EBCT. It is hypothesized that the abundance of nutrients allowed for rapid bio growth and subsequent pesticide degradation.
The results of this study indicate that the augmentation of SSF-GAC sandwich filters with IOCS columns aid in the removal of phosphate, NOM and Imidacloprid, thereby extending the filters bed life and improving overall performance. While the removal of other pesticides remains to be investigated, the findings of this thesis underpin the use case of IOCS as a top up layer for SSF-GAC sandwich filters used to treat agricultural waters.
not affect rate of adsorption by zeolite, but enhances ammonium removal. Experimental results indicate that zeolite can be bio-regenerated effectively, and rate of conversion is faster than rate of desorption of adsorbed ammonium. The system of zeolite and biofilm has some buffer capacity, but cannot compensate for the bicarbonate anions needed for H+ released. A BioWin model
was designed to simulate the survival of biomass during extended periods of low concentration, and the results indicated that conversion capacity of the system reduces after 7 days of DWF concentrations. But the biomass can sustain longer periods of DWF concentrations, but it takes some time and exposure to higher substrate concentrations to revive it's capacity. In conclusion this study
confirms the potential in this technology and confirms effective bio-regeneration capabilities. The results from this research can built upon to answer questions regarding knowledge gaps with reactor operation and design. This paves the way for future studies to make it an industrially viable technology. ...
not affect rate of adsorption by zeolite, but enhances ammonium removal. Experimental results indicate that zeolite can be bio-regenerated effectively, and rate of conversion is faster than rate of desorption of adsorbed ammonium. The system of zeolite and biofilm has some buffer capacity, but cannot compensate for the bicarbonate anions needed for H+ released. A BioWin model
was designed to simulate the survival of biomass during extended periods of low concentration, and the results indicated that conversion capacity of the system reduces after 7 days of DWF concentrations. But the biomass can sustain longer periods of DWF concentrations, but it takes some time and exposure to higher substrate concentrations to revive it's capacity. In conclusion this study
confirms the potential in this technology and confirms effective bio-regeneration capabilities. The results from this research can built upon to answer questions regarding knowledge gaps with reactor operation and design. This paves the way for future studies to make it an industrially viable technology.
Concentrating PFAS waste streams
Generated during drinking water treatment
Foam fractionation removes PFAS from the waste stream by injecting air bubbles. Two laboratory setups were made for the injection mechanism of the air bubbles. First, by passing pressurized air through an air stone, and second, by adding pressurized water (i.e. white water) to the waste stream. The adsorbents were tested in the laboratory by conducting equilibrium batch experiments with different adsorbent dosages. The laboratory experiments were performed on both drinking water waste streams. The performance of concentrating the anion exchange brine solution with nanofiltration membranes was evaluated with the use of IMS Design models. ...
Foam fractionation removes PFAS from the waste stream by injecting air bubbles. Two laboratory setups were made for the injection mechanism of the air bubbles. First, by passing pressurized air through an air stone, and second, by adding pressurized water (i.e. white water) to the waste stream. The adsorbents were tested in the laboratory by conducting equilibrium batch experiments with different adsorbent dosages. The laboratory experiments were performed on both drinking water waste streams. The performance of concentrating the anion exchange brine solution with nanofiltration membranes was evaluated with the use of IMS Design models.
Purifying IJssellake water
Operation and performance analysis of direct hollow fiber nanofiltration on raw IJssellake water
Limited to no fouling impact was observed on the membrane performance when feeding the pilot with raw IJssellake water. The membrane performance parameters (mass transfer coefficient (MTC), trans membrane pressure (TMP) and normalized pressure drop (NPD)) were stable over time. In addition, limited to no fouling impact was observed on the membrane when feeding the pilot with WPJ pre-treated water. However, membrane performance (i.e. MTC) was better for raw IJssellake water (1 year old membrane) compared to WPJ pre-treated water (virgin membrane). This implies that the active outer layer of the membrane has undergone a change in properties leading to these higher MTC values.
An increase in recovery, flux and crossflow velocity resulted in a decrease in ion retention. However, a decrease in ion retention with elevated crossflow velocity is unusual. Higher crossflow velocities should actually lead to an increase in ion retention due to reduced ion build-up next to the membrane surface (i.e. lower concentration polarization effect). However, the lower ion retention can be attributed to the elevated MTC during experiments. The removal of natural organic matter (NOM) was consistently above 90% and was not influenced by a change in operational condition. Ion retention was higher for WPJ pre-treated water (virgin membrane) compared to raw IJssellake water (1 year old membrane). This can be attributed to the increase in MTC of 1.5 LMH/bar in raw IJssellake water (compared to WPJ pre-treated water) potentially caused by a change in the properties of the active outer layer.
For determining the OMP retention of the dNF40 membrane, a spiked solution containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and pharmaceutical compounds was analyzed. The PFAS compounds of the spiked solution were retained very well (above 80%). As expected, the retention increased with increasing MW. The adsorption percentage of PFAS was between 40%-90%. The pharmaceutical retention was around 30%, although all pharmaceuticals analyzed had a MW below the MWCO of the membrane.
A 5-stage full-scale dNF40 plant was designed based on a permeate flow of 15 M m3/year, a total hardness concentration in the permeate stream below 1.4 mmol/L and a recovery percentage of 85%. Based on the 5-stage full-scale dNF40 plant an economical analysis was performed and compared to the full-scale UF-RO in Heemskerk. The total cost (OPEX and CAPEX) were cheapest for the full-scale dNF40 plant fed with raw IJssellake water (12 ct/m3), followed by the dNF40 plant fed with WPJ pre-treated water (32 ct/m3) and most expensive for the UF-RO plant (35 ct/m3). The major factors in the OPEX was the membrane replacement cost for the dNF40 plant and the energy and chemical cost for the UF-RO plant. ...
Limited to no fouling impact was observed on the membrane performance when feeding the pilot with raw IJssellake water. The membrane performance parameters (mass transfer coefficient (MTC), trans membrane pressure (TMP) and normalized pressure drop (NPD)) were stable over time. In addition, limited to no fouling impact was observed on the membrane when feeding the pilot with WPJ pre-treated water. However, membrane performance (i.e. MTC) was better for raw IJssellake water (1 year old membrane) compared to WPJ pre-treated water (virgin membrane). This implies that the active outer layer of the membrane has undergone a change in properties leading to these higher MTC values.
An increase in recovery, flux and crossflow velocity resulted in a decrease in ion retention. However, a decrease in ion retention with elevated crossflow velocity is unusual. Higher crossflow velocities should actually lead to an increase in ion retention due to reduced ion build-up next to the membrane surface (i.e. lower concentration polarization effect). However, the lower ion retention can be attributed to the elevated MTC during experiments. The removal of natural organic matter (NOM) was consistently above 90% and was not influenced by a change in operational condition. Ion retention was higher for WPJ pre-treated water (virgin membrane) compared to raw IJssellake water (1 year old membrane). This can be attributed to the increase in MTC of 1.5 LMH/bar in raw IJssellake water (compared to WPJ pre-treated water) potentially caused by a change in the properties of the active outer layer.
For determining the OMP retention of the dNF40 membrane, a spiked solution containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and pharmaceutical compounds was analyzed. The PFAS compounds of the spiked solution were retained very well (above 80%). As expected, the retention increased with increasing MW. The adsorption percentage of PFAS was between 40%-90%. The pharmaceutical retention was around 30%, although all pharmaceuticals analyzed had a MW below the MWCO of the membrane.
A 5-stage full-scale dNF40 plant was designed based on a permeate flow of 15 M m3/year, a total hardness concentration in the permeate stream below 1.4 mmol/L and a recovery percentage of 85%. Based on the 5-stage full-scale dNF40 plant an economical analysis was performed and compared to the full-scale UF-RO in Heemskerk. The total cost (OPEX and CAPEX) were cheapest for the full-scale dNF40 plant fed with raw IJssellake water (12 ct/m3), followed by the dNF40 plant fed with WPJ pre-treated water (32 ct/m3) and most expensive for the UF-RO plant (35 ct/m3). The major factors in the OPEX was the membrane replacement cost for the dNF40 plant and the energy and chemical cost for the UF-RO plant.
Iron Removal in Low Salinity Water
A case study of brackish water reverse osmosis permeate
The objective of this study was to investigate the regeneration performance of dried OMP-loaded granular zeolites through gaseous ozonation process, and the regeneration feasibility in long-term adsorption-regeneration processes. Three types of zeolites (MOR, MFI and BEA) were applied for target OMP (benzotriazole, methyl-benzotriazole, carbamazepine, diclofenac hydrochlorothiazide, sulfamethoxazole, metoprolol, sotalol, trimethoprim, propranolol, and clarithromycin) removal. A sequential process coupling zeolite adsorption and oxidation by gaseous ozone was established in batch mode. To assess the ozone effect on OMP degradation and zeolite itself, ozone bubbling tests and adsorption isotherm experiments were executed as pre-experiments. The relative adsorption capacity obtained through regeneration was used to demonstrate regeneration performance. Operating conditions, adsorption duration and regeneration duration were determined and applied. Ultimately the regeneration performance in long-term adsorption-regeneration processes was investigated.
Experimental results showed that all target OMPs were not resistant to ozonation in the water phase. Gaseous ozone was showed no influence on the adsorption capacities of zeolite granules. 120 hours and 500 mgL-1 zeolite granules were applied in OMP-loading adsorption experiments. Zeolites always showed high adsorption capacities of metoprolol, trimethoprim and sotalol, which regeneration effect was not evidenced. 60 minutes of ozonation was effective and sufficient for regenerating low and medium adsorption OMPs, except for carbamazepine. The regeneration of carbamazepine probably required a longer regeneration duration. In four cycles of adsorption-regeneration experiments, regeneration of sulfamethoxazole could be achieved after four rounds of ozonation. Regarding carbamazepine, diclofenac, benzotriazole, and methyl-benzotriazole, the regeneration performance were significantly reduced after the first cycle of regeneration. The ozonation duration is supposed to be extended above 60 min in long-term regeneration experiments. Intermediates were potentially responsible for the reduction of regeneration performance in ozonation and adsorption processes. Particularly, the effect of intermediates accumulation might be the main factor that hampered the regeneration performance of low and medium adsorption OMPs in long-term operation. ...
The objective of this study was to investigate the regeneration performance of dried OMP-loaded granular zeolites through gaseous ozonation process, and the regeneration feasibility in long-term adsorption-regeneration processes. Three types of zeolites (MOR, MFI and BEA) were applied for target OMP (benzotriazole, methyl-benzotriazole, carbamazepine, diclofenac hydrochlorothiazide, sulfamethoxazole, metoprolol, sotalol, trimethoprim, propranolol, and clarithromycin) removal. A sequential process coupling zeolite adsorption and oxidation by gaseous ozone was established in batch mode. To assess the ozone effect on OMP degradation and zeolite itself, ozone bubbling tests and adsorption isotherm experiments were executed as pre-experiments. The relative adsorption capacity obtained through regeneration was used to demonstrate regeneration performance. Operating conditions, adsorption duration and regeneration duration were determined and applied. Ultimately the regeneration performance in long-term adsorption-regeneration processes was investigated.
Experimental results showed that all target OMPs were not resistant to ozonation in the water phase. Gaseous ozone was showed no influence on the adsorption capacities of zeolite granules. 120 hours and 500 mgL-1 zeolite granules were applied in OMP-loading adsorption experiments. Zeolites always showed high adsorption capacities of metoprolol, trimethoprim and sotalol, which regeneration effect was not evidenced. 60 minutes of ozonation was effective and sufficient for regenerating low and medium adsorption OMPs, except for carbamazepine. The regeneration of carbamazepine probably required a longer regeneration duration. In four cycles of adsorption-regeneration experiments, regeneration of sulfamethoxazole could be achieved after four rounds of ozonation. Regarding carbamazepine, diclofenac, benzotriazole, and methyl-benzotriazole, the regeneration performance were significantly reduced after the first cycle of regeneration. The ozonation duration is supposed to be extended above 60 min in long-term regeneration experiments. Intermediates were potentially responsible for the reduction of regeneration performance in ozonation and adsorption processes. Particularly, the effect of intermediates accumulation might be the main factor that hampered the regeneration performance of low and medium adsorption OMPs in long-term operation.
In collaboration with the Water Lab at the faculty of Civil Engineering in Delft and Royal Haskoning (DHV), it was possible to perform some experiments to understand the flocculation properties of EPS in the dissolved air flotation technologies. More specifically, the effects of the EPS were studied with two experiments: a jar test and a flotation column experiment. The sludge used for the experiment was collected from Harnashpolder facility after being digested for at least 25 days. With the jar test experiments, it was examined the effects of sludge settleability (5 gTSS/L): increasing EPS doses (200-1200 mgEPS/L), increment by 20% the original SVI value, on average. Furthermore, it was performed a small scale flotation experiment with two Alka seltzer pills. After a certain EPS dose (400 mgEPS/L), TSS in the formed foam resulted 1.78 times more concentrated. Finally, it was also analysed the particle size distribution (PSD) variation, but the measurements were characterized by a high standard deviation which reduced the reliability of the results. The scope of these first experiments was the individuation of a certain EPS dose to apply in the flotation column experiment simulating the DAF performance (800 mgEPS/L). The EPS addition did not improve the quality of the effluent (65%), and was slightly inferior to the blank series (69%). However, the obtained foam was almost 1.75 times more concentrated when compared to the blank solution. Towards the end of the experiment, a better removal efficiency was notated within the EPS series and it was correlated to the foam concentration (R2= 0.989). Despite the errors, PSD of the EPS series were characterized by a higher frequency of small particles, between 1-10 μm. In the discussion chapter two explanations are proposed considering the effect of zeta potential variations after the EPS addition. In conclusion, the use of EPS to enhance the solid-liquid separation of the sludge was not successful. However, further research with different doses of EPS and different types of sludge should be studied to assess the potential use of EPS to improve the efficiency of a DAF system. ...
In collaboration with the Water Lab at the faculty of Civil Engineering in Delft and Royal Haskoning (DHV), it was possible to perform some experiments to understand the flocculation properties of EPS in the dissolved air flotation technologies. More specifically, the effects of the EPS were studied with two experiments: a jar test and a flotation column experiment. The sludge used for the experiment was collected from Harnashpolder facility after being digested for at least 25 days. With the jar test experiments, it was examined the effects of sludge settleability (5 gTSS/L): increasing EPS doses (200-1200 mgEPS/L), increment by 20% the original SVI value, on average. Furthermore, it was performed a small scale flotation experiment with two Alka seltzer pills. After a certain EPS dose (400 mgEPS/L), TSS in the formed foam resulted 1.78 times more concentrated. Finally, it was also analysed the particle size distribution (PSD) variation, but the measurements were characterized by a high standard deviation which reduced the reliability of the results. The scope of these first experiments was the individuation of a certain EPS dose to apply in the flotation column experiment simulating the DAF performance (800 mgEPS/L). The EPS addition did not improve the quality of the effluent (65%), and was slightly inferior to the blank series (69%). However, the obtained foam was almost 1.75 times more concentrated when compared to the blank solution. Towards the end of the experiment, a better removal efficiency was notated within the EPS series and it was correlated to the foam concentration (R2= 0.989). Despite the errors, PSD of the EPS series were characterized by a higher frequency of small particles, between 1-10 μm. In the discussion chapter two explanations are proposed considering the effect of zeta potential variations after the EPS addition. In conclusion, the use of EPS to enhance the solid-liquid separation of the sludge was not successful. However, further research with different doses of EPS and different types of sludge should be studied to assess the potential use of EPS to improve the efficiency of a DAF system.
Ceramic nanofiltration (NF) emerges to be an interesting alternative for water treatment. Compared to polymeric membranes, this type of membrane offers great mechanical robustness and can be operated under extreme conditions, and tolerates high-pressure backwash, chemical cleaning, and high-temperature sterilization, which leads to longer periods of reliable performance. Moreover, ceramic NF membranes are potentially capable to separate multivalent ions from monovalent ions. Hence, this method could be applicable to treat IEX brine. Alternatively, chemical precipitation using barium and calcium is widely used to remove sulphate from water which is more straight forward than membrane filtration. The precipitates can be mechanically separated from the supernatant for further treatment or use.
Combination of chemical precipitation and ceramic NF membrane (later called as integrated sulphate removal) was investigated to remove sulphate from IEX brine. Along with that, investigation using synthetic brines consisting of Na2SO4 and NaCl for a binary salt solution and only Na2SO4 for a single salt solution was also conducted to build the understanding in treating the IEX brine. Barium salt was proved to efficiently remove sulphate due to its very low solubility. However, calcium salt was not as effective as barium salt. The treatment was followed by NF using a ceramic membrane with MWCO of 900 Da. In the end, the integrated approach was able to remove 86% of the sulphate and 85% of NOM from IEX brine. Furthermore, the precipitation stage was also modelled in PhreeqC by using Pitzer database.
Barium salt (BaCl2.2H2O) was preferred in this research for precipitating the sulphate. However, due to its toxicity, alternative precipitation was desired. Ettringite (calcium sulfoaluminate) precipitation was considered since the involving salts were not toxic. The efficacy of this method was predicted through modelling in PhreeqC to give some insight to alternatively removing sulphate from IEX brine. Eventually, a comparison using cost estimation and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) were performed to obtain some considerations to implement the treatment alternative in a full-scale application.
...
Ceramic nanofiltration (NF) emerges to be an interesting alternative for water treatment. Compared to polymeric membranes, this type of membrane offers great mechanical robustness and can be operated under extreme conditions, and tolerates high-pressure backwash, chemical cleaning, and high-temperature sterilization, which leads to longer periods of reliable performance. Moreover, ceramic NF membranes are potentially capable to separate multivalent ions from monovalent ions. Hence, this method could be applicable to treat IEX brine. Alternatively, chemical precipitation using barium and calcium is widely used to remove sulphate from water which is more straight forward than membrane filtration. The precipitates can be mechanically separated from the supernatant for further treatment or use.
Combination of chemical precipitation and ceramic NF membrane (later called as integrated sulphate removal) was investigated to remove sulphate from IEX brine. Along with that, investigation using synthetic brines consisting of Na2SO4 and NaCl for a binary salt solution and only Na2SO4 for a single salt solution was also conducted to build the understanding in treating the IEX brine. Barium salt was proved to efficiently remove sulphate due to its very low solubility. However, calcium salt was not as effective as barium salt. The treatment was followed by NF using a ceramic membrane with MWCO of 900 Da. In the end, the integrated approach was able to remove 86% of the sulphate and 85% of NOM from IEX brine. Furthermore, the precipitation stage was also modelled in PhreeqC by using Pitzer database.
Barium salt (BaCl2.2H2O) was preferred in this research for precipitating the sulphate. However, due to its toxicity, alternative precipitation was desired. Ettringite (calcium sulfoaluminate) precipitation was considered since the involving salts were not toxic. The efficacy of this method was predicted through modelling in PhreeqC to give some insight to alternatively removing sulphate from IEX brine. Eventually, a comparison using cost estimation and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) were performed to obtain some considerations to implement the treatment alternative in a full-scale application.
Microbial Desalination
An exploratory research to assess the potential of desalination by microbial methods
research line. Based on the results of all research lines, it was concluded that microbial desalination is be a promising new technology for desalination, which should be further developed. ...
research line. Based on the results of all research lines, it was concluded that microbial desalination is be a promising new technology for desalination, which should be further developed.
A critical review of Adsorption Desalination
The road to sustainable desalination or whisful thinking
The world is consuming a large amount of energy. Unfortunately, this is not done efficiently. It is estimated that 72% of worldwide energy consumption is lost after conversion. Waste heat is an unwanted product as a result of this inefficient conversion. It is estimated that 63% of this waste heat has a temperature of 100 degrees Celcius or lower. A temperature that is not even sufficient to boil an egg, but it is energy nonetheless. If this energy could be harvested, the water gap could be closed by desalination without increasing the carbon footprint. However, how to do this? A solution could be found in Japan and your dry cleaner. In the seventies, when the oil crisis was at its peak, Japan had a problem. It has a high need for air conditioning which has a high need for energy. A device was created that could use waste heat to create cooling with silica gel. The general public knows silica gel as moist eaters that are included in your dry cleaning. By placing silica gel in a closed environment, liquid water could be evaporated. Evaporation needs energy, and this could create cooling. In early 2000, some folks in Singapore realised that this technology could also be used to desalinate. Adsorption Desalination was born. Adsorption desalination (also known as AD) is a boiling point elevation and vapour pressure lowering desalination technique. Silica gel has a high affinity to adsorb water vapour. Since this is done in a closed environment, the pressure is lowered till boiling. When an energy source is placed inside the liquid, an equilibrium can be found without lowering the pressure further. Once the silica gel is saturated, it is heated till a certain temperature that it starts to desorb the vapour again. This vapour is collected and condensed into a clean product. The mass transport takes place by a pressure difference. Since the evaporation takes place in vacuum conditions, it is around room temperature. Therefore it can have a low sensitivity for erosion. Since it is an evaporation technique, it also has a low sensitivity for fouling. On paper, it can be a desalination technology with low operational costs compared to others. In reality, a couple of barriers have to be conquered. One of the barriers is the characteristics of the core element of this technology, the silica gel. The reason that silica gel can adsorb water vapour so well is due to two main elements. First, it is an incompletely dehydrated polymeric structure of colloidal silica acids. Therefore it can create hydrogen bonds, polar bonds and weak electron bonds with other molecules. Water is a bipolar molecule, and therefore silica gel can adsorb water exceptionally well. It can create hydron bonds efficiently, and due to the bipolar nature of water, multiplayer on top of each other can be formed. The second element is the high specific surface of silica gel. It has many pores, and therefore a specific surface equal to human lungs can be formed. In the end, the best qualities can adsorb until 40% of their body weight.
These two elements determine the maximum amount of vapour silica gel can adsorb. However, two parameters determine if silica gel can adsorb. These two parameters are the temperature and vapour pressure. If the temperature is high, the vapour pressure has also to be high to ensure adsorption and the other way around. The same account for the opposite effect. Therefore energy transfer is vital for smooth operation. Unfortunately, the thermal conductivity of silica gel is extremely low. Besides energy transfer to change the temperature of silica gel to go from adsorping to desorbing and reverse, much energy has to be transported during the adsorption and desorption phase. During adsorption, water vapour transforms from a gas phase to a semi-solid phase. In this phase, the energy level is lower. Since energy cannot be destroyed, this energy has to be removed. The same applies to the opposite. If the heat exchanger is not well designed, the adsorption and desorption phase are prolonged, and the daily water production diminished. Even if the whole set-up is well designed, there is still one element of silica gel that can also diminish the water production of the set-up: the degradation of silica gel. Multiple mechanisms can degrade silica gel, but the two most important are fragmentation and pore pollutions by metal ions. Fragmentation (the breaking up into smaller parts) occurs by the high thermal stress the silica gel endures and the pollutions by the feed. A part of the sorption ability is destroyed or temporarily inhibited. The use of acid water can remove the pollution, so maintenance on the silica gel is necessary. Replacing the silica gel by other sorbents like zeolite is possible. Unfortunately, it has a lower adsorption capacity which leads to a less compact device and is, therefore, more expensive. Another unfortunate fact is that zeolite desorbs at a higher temperature. When using zeolite, adsorption desalination can no longer use waste heat of low quality to desalinate. The last problem with using silica gel, but also other sorbents, are the instabilities with the sorption characteristics in vacuum conditions. The sorption characters depend as said before on the temperature and the vapour pressure. Inside vacuum conditions, a disturbance of the vapour pressure can negatively influence the sorption characteristics and can lead to desorption at the wrong moment. Since it is done in a closed environment, it can lead to condensation which lowers the vapour pressure further. A complete breakdown of performance can be the result. Disturbances can happen through air leakage, which is are a common problem in industries. There are some solutions, but in the end, the permanent one is a high-quality vacuum system and intensive maintenance. Even with these barriers, adsorption desalination is still an attractive technology due to its relationship with its own energy consumption pattern. The energy consumption is high but stable and barely sensitive to change in conditions like feed salinity and recovery. Its energy consumption stays around the 40 $kWh/m^3$ in most cases. Only a small part, around 1.38 $kWh/m^3$ or even less has to be mechanical energy. All others can come from waste heat. If the other operating costs are kept low, it is an exciting technology to use, especially for brine treatment since waste heat is an inexpensive energy source. Some researcher claim it is a free energy source, but that statement cannot be valid. To use waste heat, infrastructure is necessary to collect it and transport it. It is not the same as putting a plug in the wall. There is probably enough waste heat in the world to close the water gap. As an example, the Netherlands is the second biggest producers of waste heat in Europe and creates enough to produce probably more 850 $km^3$ potable water. Unfortunately, there are some uncertainties. Waste heat is only classified in three rough categories, low, medium or high. Low is everything below 100 degrees Celcius. It could be that most energy is trapped in waste heat with a temperature of 30 degrees. More validation is necessary since the future of adsorption desalination is intertwined with waste heat. Without waste heat, it cannot be an inexpensive desalination technique. Since it is still an experimental technology, not a lot of data is available to create a solid picture of the costs involved with adsorption desalination. Only two studies exist today, and both estimate that the cost for seawater desalination using adsorption desalination is between 50% and 70 % of the cost while using reverse osmosis. Only one study gives insight into the different sectors of cost. What is notable is that the other costs, replacement cost for parts and chemical cost for adsorption desalination are kept at zero. A strange conclusion since silica gel can degrade and replacement can be necessary, chemicals are necessary for the heating and cooling water AD uses. No conclusion can be made about the final costs of AD, but it the conclusion of these studies seems unlikely. For seawater desalination, the costs are probably in the same range as reverse osmosis. Furthermore, there is a strong case that AD can remove biological pollutants since it is an evaporation technique where temperatures are reached until 80 degrees Celcius. There are a few remarks and only solid empirical data can prove these claims. The original intent of this research was to research these claims. Unfortunately, the set-up was not functioning properly due to practical problems like air leakages. Even with this result, much knowledge was gained, and a few remarks and conclusions can be made. To conclude, adsorption desalination is a newly emerging technology with many interesting aspects. It can provide an alternative for standard desalination techniques while being sustainable. There are a few barriers to overcome, but it deserves attention. Further developments should be stimulated since the water should be close in an environmentally friendly matter. Adsorption desalination is a sustainable solution that should always be considered. ...
The world is consuming a large amount of energy. Unfortunately, this is not done efficiently. It is estimated that 72% of worldwide energy consumption is lost after conversion. Waste heat is an unwanted product as a result of this inefficient conversion. It is estimated that 63% of this waste heat has a temperature of 100 degrees Celcius or lower. A temperature that is not even sufficient to boil an egg, but it is energy nonetheless. If this energy could be harvested, the water gap could be closed by desalination without increasing the carbon footprint. However, how to do this? A solution could be found in Japan and your dry cleaner. In the seventies, when the oil crisis was at its peak, Japan had a problem. It has a high need for air conditioning which has a high need for energy. A device was created that could use waste heat to create cooling with silica gel. The general public knows silica gel as moist eaters that are included in your dry cleaning. By placing silica gel in a closed environment, liquid water could be evaporated. Evaporation needs energy, and this could create cooling. In early 2000, some folks in Singapore realised that this technology could also be used to desalinate. Adsorption Desalination was born. Adsorption desalination (also known as AD) is a boiling point elevation and vapour pressure lowering desalination technique. Silica gel has a high affinity to adsorb water vapour. Since this is done in a closed environment, the pressure is lowered till boiling. When an energy source is placed inside the liquid, an equilibrium can be found without lowering the pressure further. Once the silica gel is saturated, it is heated till a certain temperature that it starts to desorb the vapour again. This vapour is collected and condensed into a clean product. The mass transport takes place by a pressure difference. Since the evaporation takes place in vacuum conditions, it is around room temperature. Therefore it can have a low sensitivity for erosion. Since it is an evaporation technique, it also has a low sensitivity for fouling. On paper, it can be a desalination technology with low operational costs compared to others. In reality, a couple of barriers have to be conquered. One of the barriers is the characteristics of the core element of this technology, the silica gel. The reason that silica gel can adsorb water vapour so well is due to two main elements. First, it is an incompletely dehydrated polymeric structure of colloidal silica acids. Therefore it can create hydrogen bonds, polar bonds and weak electron bonds with other molecules. Water is a bipolar molecule, and therefore silica gel can adsorb water exceptionally well. It can create hydron bonds efficiently, and due to the bipolar nature of water, multiplayer on top of each other can be formed. The second element is the high specific surface of silica gel. It has many pores, and therefore a specific surface equal to human lungs can be formed. In the end, the best qualities can adsorb until 40% of their body weight.
These two elements determine the maximum amount of vapour silica gel can adsorb. However, two parameters determine if silica gel can adsorb. These two parameters are the temperature and vapour pressure. If the temperature is high, the vapour pressure has also to be high to ensure adsorption and the other way around. The same account for the opposite effect. Therefore energy transfer is vital for smooth operation. Unfortunately, the thermal conductivity of silica gel is extremely low. Besides energy transfer to change the temperature of silica gel to go from adsorping to desorbing and reverse, much energy has to be transported during the adsorption and desorption phase. During adsorption, water vapour transforms from a gas phase to a semi-solid phase. In this phase, the energy level is lower. Since energy cannot be destroyed, this energy has to be removed. The same applies to the opposite. If the heat exchanger is not well designed, the adsorption and desorption phase are prolonged, and the daily water production diminished. Even if the whole set-up is well designed, there is still one element of silica gel that can also diminish the water production of the set-up: the degradation of silica gel. Multiple mechanisms can degrade silica gel, but the two most important are fragmentation and pore pollutions by metal ions. Fragmentation (the breaking up into smaller parts) occurs by the high thermal stress the silica gel endures and the pollutions by the feed. A part of the sorption ability is destroyed or temporarily inhibited. The use of acid water can remove the pollution, so maintenance on the silica gel is necessary. Replacing the silica gel by other sorbents like zeolite is possible. Unfortunately, it has a lower adsorption capacity which leads to a less compact device and is, therefore, more expensive. Another unfortunate fact is that zeolite desorbs at a higher temperature. When using zeolite, adsorption desalination can no longer use waste heat of low quality to desalinate. The last problem with using silica gel, but also other sorbents, are the instabilities with the sorption characteristics in vacuum conditions. The sorption characters depend as said before on the temperature and the vapour pressure. Inside vacuum conditions, a disturbance of the vapour pressure can negatively influence the sorption characteristics and can lead to desorption at the wrong moment. Since it is done in a closed environment, it can lead to condensation which lowers the vapour pressure further. A complete breakdown of performance can be the result. Disturbances can happen through air leakage, which is are a common problem in industries. There are some solutions, but in the end, the permanent one is a high-quality vacuum system and intensive maintenance. Even with these barriers, adsorption desalination is still an attractive technology due to its relationship with its own energy consumption pattern. The energy consumption is high but stable and barely sensitive to change in conditions like feed salinity and recovery. Its energy consumption stays around the 40 $kWh/m^3$ in most cases. Only a small part, around 1.38 $kWh/m^3$ or even less has to be mechanical energy. All others can come from waste heat. If the other operating costs are kept low, it is an exciting technology to use, especially for brine treatment since waste heat is an inexpensive energy source. Some researcher claim it is a free energy source, but that statement cannot be valid. To use waste heat, infrastructure is necessary to collect it and transport it. It is not the same as putting a plug in the wall. There is probably enough waste heat in the world to close the water gap. As an example, the Netherlands is the second biggest producers of waste heat in Europe and creates enough to produce probably more 850 $km^3$ potable water. Unfortunately, there are some uncertainties. Waste heat is only classified in three rough categories, low, medium or high. Low is everything below 100 degrees Celcius. It could be that most energy is trapped in waste heat with a temperature of 30 degrees. More validation is necessary since the future of adsorption desalination is intertwined with waste heat. Without waste heat, it cannot be an inexpensive desalination technique. Since it is still an experimental technology, not a lot of data is available to create a solid picture of the costs involved with adsorption desalination. Only two studies exist today, and both estimate that the cost for seawater desalination using adsorption desalination is between 50% and 70 % of the cost while using reverse osmosis. Only one study gives insight into the different sectors of cost. What is notable is that the other costs, replacement cost for parts and chemical cost for adsorption desalination are kept at zero. A strange conclusion since silica gel can degrade and replacement can be necessary, chemicals are necessary for the heating and cooling water AD uses. No conclusion can be made about the final costs of AD, but it the conclusion of these studies seems unlikely. For seawater desalination, the costs are probably in the same range as reverse osmosis. Furthermore, there is a strong case that AD can remove biological pollutants since it is an evaporation technique where temperatures are reached until 80 degrees Celcius. There are a few remarks and only solid empirical data can prove these claims. The original intent of this research was to research these claims. Unfortunately, the set-up was not functioning properly due to practical problems like air leakages. Even with this result, much knowledge was gained, and a few remarks and conclusions can be made. To conclude, adsorption desalination is a newly emerging technology with many interesting aspects. It can provide an alternative for standard desalination techniques while being sustainable. There are a few barriers to overcome, but it deserves attention. Further developments should be stimulated since the water should be close in an environmentally friendly matter. Adsorption desalination is a sustainable solution that should always be considered.
Adsorption of organic micro pollutants with high silica zeolite in secondary wastewater effluent
Competition between OMP and NOM